Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:32:07 -0800
From:      Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
To:        Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>, Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>, current@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Oracle & linprocfs (was: Re: linux kernel-land)
Message-ID:  <20050107003207.GA86261@ns1.xcllnt.net>
In-Reply-To: <20050106230331.GB49329@submonkey.net>
References:  <41C38A7C.3070809@icyb.net.ua> <20041218174400.4b9af118@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <41DA9B7A.3000909@icyb.net.ua> <20050104153811.75258cba@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <41DACE3E.3070904@icyb.net.ua> <20050105121110.43e3209a@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20050105112422.GZ49329@submonkey.net> <20050105142127.GH49329@submonkey.net> <20050106230331.GB49329@submonkey.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 11:03:31PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote:
> 
> There doesn't seem to be a significant regression for Oracle on 4.x.
> I've spent 4 hours on this this evening and the installer *still*
> doesn't work properly on 4.x, with or without an "equivalent" patch to
> linprocfs_misc.c.  This isn't new with the linux8 patch, and it's widely
> believed that RELENG_5 or greater is a basic requirement for Oracle to
> work under linux emulation (for 9i at least - I don't have earlier
> versions to hand - marcel wrote the handbook section on this and may be
> able to test Oracle 8.x).

Alas. I don't have any 4.x machines since 5.3 came out and I left my
knapsack of Oracle stuff and knowledge in the Netherlands when I moved
to the US 5 years ago. I don't know and I can't find out :-)

-- 
 Marcel Moolenaar	  USPA: A-39004		 marcel@xcllnt.net



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050107003207.GA86261>