From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 7 18:55:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 729) id 102F616A524; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:55:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.0 06/18/2004 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Joel Dahl In-Reply-To: Message from Joel Dahl of "Fri, 07 Jul 2006 16:16:39 +0200." <1152281799.687.8.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20060707185523.102F616A524@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:55:23 +0000 (UTC) From: jkoshy@FreeBSD.ORG (Joseph Koshy) Cc: Joseph Koshy , doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/news press.xml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 18:55:23 -0000 > Is this really FreeBSD news? The article you committed a link to > doesn't mention FreeBSD at all. PC-BSD may be running FreeBSD under the > hood, but I'm not sure that this belongs in the news section on the > front page @ FreeBSD.org. The mention is in the 'In the Press' page though, not in the 'news' section. > I'm not saying that it's wrong to add it, but can we please have some > sort of discussion about this? Where do we draw the line? Is news > about DesktopBSD, FreeSBIE, FreeNAS, DragonFlyBSD etc allowed if we > allow news about PC-BSD? DesktopBSD, FreeSBIE, Frenzy & PC-BSD are still FreeBSD and mention of them in the press would be IMHO ok for inclusion in our 'FreeBSD in the Media' link collection. I've also linked to good 'generic BSD' press articles in the past from our 'Press' page. Advocacy has fuzzy boundaries... I wish we had a better way of sharing advocacy & marketing efforts with our derivative projects. Regards, Koshy