From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 16 11:23:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EAF16A400; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:23:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (repoman.freebsd.org [69.147.83.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FEC013C471; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:23:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by repoman.freebsd.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l1GBNZSw076511; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:23:35 GMT (envelope-from rwatson@repoman.freebsd.org) Received: (from rwatson@localhost) by repoman.freebsd.org (8.13.6/8.13.4/Submit) id l1GBNZSD076510; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:23:35 GMT (envelope-from rwatson) Message-Id: <200702161123.l1GBNZSD076510@repoman.freebsd.org> From: Robert Watson Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:23:34 +0000 (UTC) To: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch: HEAD Cc: Subject: cvs commit: www/en/projects/ideas index.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:23:35 -0000 rwatson 2007-02-16 11:23:34 UTC FreeBSD doc repository Modified files: en/projects/ideas index.sgml Log: Update ZFS "todo" to say it's being done. Perhaps there is more than people can help pjd with here, but they need to contact him first. We need to decide if this item should still be on the TODO list. Note that jb's work on dtrace is a significant work-in-progress so to contact him. Does this need to be a todo item? Note that the "use floating point in kernel rah rah rah" item requires experimental validation -- the task isn't to hack code, but to decide if the hacked code was a good idea. Does this need to be a todo item? Note that the DFBSD process checkpointing facility is both experimental and incomplete. Another "Don't just port this" sort of thing. Do we want this to be a todo item? In the Linuxulator update task, note that Roman is doing this. Do we need this todo item anymore? Add fine-grained locking to syscons task. Some of the items in this idea are silly. Note that the PXE HTTP idea requires someone to implement TCP in pxeboot, add networking experience on the requirements list. Add gnn to the TCP/IP regression suite idea, as he's working on such a thing. Make it clear in the distributed audit daemon task that portable C coding is required. Revision Changes Path 1.82 +28 -18 www/en/projects/ideas/index.sgml