From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 23 09:23:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C277AF8 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:23:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2AF77B6 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t0N9Mfc9093941 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:22:50 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t0N9Mfc9093941 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1422004970; bh=U3X6y4yBfJjK3meR40F5w3bBbQoPRg571/ENAXkUBiY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Fri,=2023=20Jan=202015=2009:22:30=20+0000|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20freebsd-questi ons@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20how=20to=20get=20broken=20pkg=20b uild=20server=20fixed?|References:=20<54c205a1.nzckSmGXXPRQHMva%pe rryh@pluto.rain.com>|In-Reply-To:=20<54c205a1.nzckSmGXXPRQHMva%per ryh@pluto.rain.com>; b=Ilbw31pwwqATaqaPQuEFdqrLDcWSrUH4qnCizGQ+yxodlNbpS1yy2sLzFJTkYDZHJ dJbTVMBRjmXEoh61PhF8Mv95QAKb2jmkOPyrhJYQxbVFpqwwnucaSXjPfuZtgHrzGE QL2z6ZSdqM32cCwu8CMoxfECd1s8FVh0Z03w4Bac= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Message-ID: <54C212D6.6030005@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:22:30 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to get broken pkg build server fixed? References: <54c205a1.nzckSmGXXPRQHMva%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <54c205a1.nzckSmGXXPRQHMva%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vF4gKejcxj7TONltQwfgXEporbK9TFNKp" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:23:00 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --vF4gKejcxj7TONltQwfgXEporbK9TFNKp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/23/15 08:26, Perry Hutchison wrote: > No answer from ports@ and the problem persists; maybe someone > here knows. >=20 > A week ago I got an email complaining of a package build failure > in a port I maintain, with the first reported error being: >=20 > !!! Jail is newer than host. (Jail: 1100052, Host: 1100050) !!! > !!! This is not supported. !!! > !!! Host kernel must be same or newer than jail. !!! > !!! Expect build failures. !!! This is something that portmgr and the build server admins will already be aware of. While it looks alarming, in this case, it is in fact completely harmless. > That obviously is not something I can fix -- it needs to be dealt > with by whomever administers the FreeBSD package build server. >=20 > This week I got two such messages, for the same port as last week, > one from the amd64 build and the other from the i386 build. > It seems the situation is getting worse rather than better. >=20 > Who do I need to notify, to get these servers fixed? You're focusing on the wrong problem. The 'Jail newer than host' thing would affect *every* package build on the cluster for FreeBSD HEAD. Since all port maintainers are not receiving build-failure nastygrams continually, ergo it's some other problem you need to attend to. Keep reading further down the email: usually the breakage you are responsible for looking at will occur near the end. Cheers, Matthew --vF4gKejcxj7TONltQwfgXEporbK9TFNKp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUwhLgXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnrS8P/2hAtoE/0J12EfDCTMK/pHHX 1ZbX8H1Tnvn4l1re16dvAc7KMKqmOX9FEs/4sNq6DwUfRqMtng6nXDPvttvU9hbH FnYkU4tOxitGcRk7bqDf/vMl6MEWo5eWcjbV+MOD5/u2RgUvY/Itc2zLz08Of6fy x2UbzLtIjZhQG29x4gP0D1CKZOePJo/B3hztN8oKQkkbL556GbD1ISWl0kyeo8Dw XP6HR9kHNOOI++fkYgftYGrRxZjbrV484SE+qEw+8V619W5cOTJizmOvU903JSdY xWo/EMApBWgR25k4O4LqWFKVNopfuXONBBd1S9AJuAjQg1gh2ftS9VOGmucZ9jEY FTK5ODApONBSA1WEsA78NKqQIpbU72TZnJVB1D0noLMMUHfEqsCoyaQjAODevIGU kG1qtPQ++wcOCP92zchfAtrTeRLg9LSHNIfjOqVQvTnQm20OL9FuDJH/8thaemE8 ksu8FpStHlb+zAtCGyLwlI+bYKcZ2gH0yF9dX1OvmdnzSGCcnFTaolZ+2uhcOYek 85PaS2ZSBQsZKW3yI1gPMhqG8GIa9NvKu+JRIILYOUvtATJcaWuf2ZVMoAtoqbLB LUn0HAKNS8Fev/ppoRXZz3dAbdQZKK3STkcIlIkZFRzTFlTnFcS89yRTSZEebfGK h/94arOpf37xhtlfXlUp =4OLn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vF4gKejcxj7TONltQwfgXEporbK9TFNKp--