From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 1 22:02:27 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36DC16A418 for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2007 22:02:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 085D913C46A for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2007 22:02:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 23164 invoked by uid 399); 1 Sep 2007 22:02:25 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 1 Sep 2007 22:02:25 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 15:02:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Marcelo Araujo In-Reply-To: <200709012059.l81KxbHq080280@repoman.freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <200709012059.l81KxbHq080280@repoman.freebsd.org> X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 0xD5B2F0FB Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Cc: stas@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/astro/gpsd Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 22:02:27 -0000 On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > araujo 2007-09-01 20:59:37 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > astro/gpsd Makefile > Log: > - Fix wrong PORTREVISION number in previous commit. > > Approved by: stas (mentor) > > Revision Changes Path > 1.8 +1 -1 ports/astro/gpsd/Makefile > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/astro/gpsd/Makefile.diff?&r1=1.7&r2=1.8&f=h Skipping a number (going from 1 to 3) doesn't hurt anything. Going backwards (from 3 to 2) is bad for a lot of reasons, not the least of which is automated tools that depend on monotonically increasing version numbers. If the time between the two commits is small enough this probably won't hurt anything, but please remember this for next time. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection