From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jul 21 23:27:46 1996 Return-Path: owner-bugs Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id XAA19522 for bugs-outgoing; Sun, 21 Jul 1996 23:27:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA19516 for ; Sun, 21 Jul 1996 23:27:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by who.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) with ESMTP id XAA00516 for ; Sun, 21 Jul 1996 23:27:40 -0700 Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with ESMTP id IAA18561; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 08:20:42 +0200 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id IAA22582; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 08:20:40 +0200 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.7.5/8.6.9) id HAA03774; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 07:58:51 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199607220558.HAA03774@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: bin/1411: vi dumps core when using 'set list' To: marcs@valis.worldgate.com Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 07:58:51 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: <199607212340.QAA03387@freefall.freebsd.org> from Marc Slemko at "Jul 21, 96 04:40:01 pm" X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL17 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Marc Slemko wrote: > After further investigation, this problem appears to be the result of > using -m486 in the CFLAGS while compiling vi. If I compile without -m486, > it works fine. That's strange. Jordan already mentioned that 2.1.5 was not compiled with -m486, and i can add one more to this: everything i compile (including the tests to reproduce the behaviour of your PR) _has_ the -m486. So the question is now: you seem to be the only one who can investigate this (since nobody else can reproduce it), are you interested in tracking it further (e.g. core dump analysis), or do you give up in which case we can do nothing but close the PR unresolved? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)