Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1998 10:41:02 -0500 From: Benjamin Greenwald <beng@lcs.mit.edu> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP : laptop power-down change Message-ID: <199812121541.KAA02595@miris.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 11 Dec 1998 10:39:19 MST." <199812111739.KAA03402@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Might I suggest that if you are so desperate for the old semantics: alias halt='/sbin/halt -p' -Ben > In message <199812110803.AAA00533@dingo.cdrom.com> Mike Smith writes: > : > : Why the change? The current behavior seems right to me. > : Yes. There is a perfectly good set of run-time options which allow you > : to determine at any time whether you want to power-off or halt; having > : a kernel option override this would be stupid. > > But the i386 code doesn't *HAVE* a rom monitor to drop back into... > We just go into a loop that says press any key to reboot. Not exactly > useful. The apm code is i386 specific, by definition. > > There are many places where we have kernel options that override > stuff, I fail to see how this is different. At the very least I'd > like to make it a sysctl so I can set it in my boot scripts. > > Warner > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812121541.KAA02595>