Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Oct 2001 20:49:06 -0700
From:      Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
To:        Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Cc:        arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 64 bit times revisited.. 
Message-ID:  <200110280349.f9S3n6v22087@mass.dis.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 27 Oct 2001 17:36:53 PDT." <200110280036.f9S0arb89926@apollo.backplane.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>     So far it's been amazingly painless.  I really don't think this is going
>     to be as big a deal as some people think (or even as big a deal as I
>     thought it would be, I'm already half way there!).  The next step for
>     me is to write the syscall roll functions and test a 64 bit time_t
>     kernel with a 32 bit time_t userland.

Please write a library routine that detects and compensates for:


	int	t;

	time(&t);

Until you can do this, sorry, no.

-- 
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals and unfortunately opponents also.  But not because people want
to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
people to take different points of view.  [Dr. Fritz Todt]
           V I C T O R Y   N O T   V E N G E A N C E



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200110280349.f9S3n6v22087>