From owner-freebsd-arch Sat Oct 27 20:36:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2E837B405 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 20:36:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f9S3n6v22087; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 20:49:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200110280349.f9S3n6v22087@mass.dis.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Matthew Dillon Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 27 Oct 2001 17:36:53 PDT." <200110280036.f9S0arb89926@apollo.backplane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 20:49:06 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > So far it's been amazingly painless. I really don't think this is going > to be as big a deal as some people think (or even as big a deal as I > thought it would be, I'm already half way there!). The next step for > me is to write the syscall roll functions and test a 64 bit time_t > kernel with a 32 bit time_t userland. Please write a library routine that detects and compensates for: int t; time(&t); Until you can do this, sorry, no. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message