Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Aug 2011 21:28:08 -0500
From:      Brandon Gooch <jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com>
To:        Fabian Keil <freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, Michael Butler <imb@protected-networks.net>, amistry@am-productions.biz
Subject:   Re: fusefs-kmod on recent -current
Message-ID:  <CALBk6yJBqLwYnjxyxfT9qzCs=NDEnDjJrq4Z8T%2Bh4zfMNKL7wA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110807211700.20043883@fabiankeil.de>
References:  <4E3EE2CB.6050704@protected-networks.net> <20110807211700.20043883@fabiankeil.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Fabian Keil
<freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de> wrote:
> Michael Butler <imb@protected-networks.net> wrote:
>
>> Seems that the change to the mount flags in recent -current has broken
>> the compilation of sysutils/fusefs-kmod :-(
>>
>> It now needs something like the attached to compile,
>
> The attachment didn't make it. Anyway, there's already a PR about it:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/159322
>
> Fabian
>

There are several patches actually:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=&severity=&priority=&class=&state=&sort=none&text=fusefs-kmod&responsible=&multitext=&originator=&release=

An appropriate one should be chosen that contains a check for the
FreeBSD version.

Getting the appropriate one committed seems to be the issue. Has
anyone heard from this amistry@am-productions.biz? Can we get a manual
override here?

Main point of this simple-to-fix issue is that as 9.0-RELEASE
approaches, having a broken fusefs-kmod is just bad news for a lot of
users -- and it looks bad for FreeBSD too.

-Brandon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALBk6yJBqLwYnjxyxfT9qzCs=NDEnDjJrq4Z8T%2Bh4zfMNKL7wA>