Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 10:17:15 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 'make depend' or 'make' bug on recent --current Message-ID: <fa35409b-b738-51a2-7f01-d4b4983f9112@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <eac49ec8-4909-cbbf-6413-cd371b365e3e@FreeBSD.org> References: <092f5e98-dae8-dbc9-2a6e-7068b972278f@freebsd.org> <311f3a82-b702-d375-170f-82ae39236ab0@FreeBSD.org> <bec48601-f6b4-6b8a-dc0d-fad47416723b@freebsd.org> <7f325ac2-f722-c491-fca0-2e582773e780@FreeBSD.org> <b5e60be6-f491-9518-a7a9-e1fce34f3590@freebsd.org> <eac49ec8-4909-cbbf-6413-cd371b365e3e@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01.06.2016 23:04, Bryan Drewery wrote: > No. The build and how dependencies are generated and handled is still > fundamentally the same. Open the .depend.* files and see. It is only > simple dependencies for the target built. There's nothing new about its > content. If foo.c includes stdlib.h then it includes sys/_types.h which > includes sys/cdefs.h, etc. This graph is in the old (mkdep) and new > .depend* content. This is easily provable by just comparing mkdep > output to the new versions. > > Without specific evidence of a bug I cannot help. Thanx for pointing me to MD *div sources, I overlook them. About 'make depend', I don't notice anything suspicious during simple tests and don't have time or energy to look deeper in that area. Probably several clang libs rebuilds during the single day while none usually expected cause my overreaction.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fa35409b-b738-51a2-7f01-d4b4983f9112>