From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun May 3 16:03:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA16685 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Sun, 3 May 1998 16:03:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA16565 for ; Sun, 3 May 1998 16:02:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) id QAA22899; Sun, 3 May 1998 16:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 3 May 1998 16:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199805032300.QAA22899@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG From: Nate Williams Subject: Re: kern/6495: Need pci_unmap_mem and pci_unmap_port routines Reply-To: Nate Williams Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/6495; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nate Williams To: gibbs@narnia.plutotech.com Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/6495: Need pci_unmap_mem and pci_unmap_port routines Date: Sun, 3 May 1998 16:55:59 -0600 > >Number: 6495 > >Description: > > The pci_map_* routines are only reflexive when it comes to > interrupt registration. Actually, this isn't the case. The interrupt 'unregistration' is certainly not reflexive. :( Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message