Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Apr 2003 18:08:04 +0200
From:      Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: .la files again
Message-ID:  <200304241808.04312.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <20030424144359.GH65428@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>
References:  <20030424144359.GH65428@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Boundary-02=_kvAq+furtosTo8+
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thursday 24 April 2003 16:43, Stijn Hoop wrote:

> - is it OK to submit a port that installs .la files, even if not really
>   needed?

Yes. The decision is yours, really.

> - if not, can anyone point out a method that forcably removes these .la
>   files from the installation list? USE_LIBTOOL=3Dyes doesn't seem to
>   work on this port.

Remove them in post-install and from pkg-plist.

=2D-=20
Regards,
	Michael Nottebrock

--Boundary-02=_kvAq+furtosTo8+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQA+qAvkXhc68WspdLARAsP1AKCbi5n1l/JeLBat//YJ4MX5krNBOgCfYGVD
K1Q2llReualAA7ub4FTqPVg=
=qApg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_kvAq+furtosTo8+--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200304241808.04312.michaelnottebrock>