Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      04 Apr 2000 17:59:43 +0200
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, chris@calldei.com, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Proposal: Union mount of fdesc on top of /dev
Message-ID:  <xzpzor9rh5c.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: Poul-Henning Kamp's message of "Tue, 04 Apr 2000 17:56:51 +0200"
References:  <27929.954863811@critter.freebsd.dk>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> writes:
> In message <xzp8zytsvyj.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
> > Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> writes:
> > > The other downside is that, unlike devfs contents, they'll get
> > > just as stale just as fast as /dev gets out of date with the
> > > currently running kernel and/or MAKEDEV.
> > You expect the major/minor numbers for std{in,out,err} to change in
> > the foreseeable future?
> Uhm, why would they change ?  They are just aliases for /dev/fd/[0-2]
> after all...

My point precisely. I got the impression that Terry was afraid they
might get stale.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpzor9rh5c.fsf>