From owner-freebsd-current Wed Dec 8 16:45:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2115152DA; Wed, 8 Dec 1999 16:45:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA42192; Wed, 8 Dec 1999 16:45:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) From: Steve Kargl Message-Id: <199912090045.QAA42192@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Subject: Re: Reaping error(1) In-Reply-To: <19991208144320.A11395@dragon.nuxi.com> from "David O'Brien" at "Dec 8, 1999 02:43:20 pm" To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 16:45:16 -0800 (PST) Cc: kris@hub.freebsd.org (Kris Kennaway), current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 12:10:26PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > It should be noted that both fsplit and fpr apply to legacy > > Fortran 77 code (and older). Neither utility can deal with > > Fortran 90 or Fortran 95. > > But that [Fortran 77] is all our fortran compiler supports. :) > Yeah, I know ;-) On the other hand, some people in comp.lang.fortran are discussing whether g95 is feasible. Don't worry David, you won't have to import g95 for several years. ;-0 -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message