From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Jul 18 17:56:18 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA27153
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 17:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from panda.hilink.com.au (panda.hilink.com.au [203.8.15.25])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA27148;
          Fri, 18 Jul 1997 17:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from danny@localhost)
	by panda.hilink.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA03249;
	Sat, 19 Jul 1997 10:55:57 +1000 (EST)
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 1997 10:55:56 +1000 (EST)
From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au>
To: Dan Busarow <dan@dpcsys.com>
cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: upgrading to a safe BIND?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.UW2.3.95.970718165829.569G-100000@cedb>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970719105424.869H-100000@panda.hilink.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



On Fri, 18 Jul 1997, Dan Busarow wrote:

> On Fri, 18 Jul 1997, Brandon Gillespie wrote:
> > Why don't we ship FreeBSD with bind-8?  From what I've read, it seems like
> > the better of the two..
> 
> The new named.conf syntax.

If I get a chance this w/e, I'll build 811 and release it as a package.  
That would be the best way to transition (and to get everyone to upgrade 
faster).  If someone beats me to it, I won't complain, though.

Danny