From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 18 21:46:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27E816A400; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:46:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk) Received: from virtual.micronet.sk (smtp.micronet.sk [84.16.32.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BE943D46; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:46:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0123910E5DA; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:47:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from virtual.micronet.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (virtual.micronet.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 60925-03; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:47:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from danger.mcrn.sk (danger.mcrn.sk [84.16.37.254]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9DF10E5D0; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:47:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:44:09 +0200 From: Daniel Gerzo X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.62.14) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1142977415.20060418234409@rulez.sk> To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: <44455CCF.7060106@FreeBSD.org> References: <200604181900.k3IJ0rUC075126@freefall.freebsd.org> <44455CCF.7060106@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at virtual.micronet.sk Cc: Maxim Konovalov , freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re[2]: docs/67893: [patch] boot(8)'s -m description is insufficient. X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Gerzo List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:46:46 -0000 Hello Doug, Tuesday, April 18, 2006, 11:40:31 PM, you wrote: > My understanding is that when something is committed to HEAD, the state of > the PR should be changed to patched, and then closed when the fix is MFC'ed, > is that no longer the case, or is my understanding wrong? I would say, that it's still the way you wrote, but I noticed that not all commiters follow this rule :/ (FYI i'm not commiter, so I might be wrong, although I recall reading that somewhere, possibly on /internal/ pages.) > Doug -- Sincerely yours, Daniel Gerzo