Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:06:05 +0000
From:      Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com>
To:        jhb@freebsd.org
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: panic: vm_fault: fault on nofualt entry, addr: 81423000
Message-ID:  <E1JFzLh-0002NT-G9@dilbert.ticketswitch.com>
In-Reply-To: <200801181325.45016.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The patch would be the same, it tried to fix an issue where if the table is
> longer than the space we are borrowing to map things we could end up with 
> problems.  I.e. the changes weren't in the RSDT/XSDT path at all, but in the 
> common code used to map tables.  If you are using RSDT, then 
> RsdtPhysicalAddress is what you care about rather than XsdtPhysicalAddress.

Ah, O.K., yes, looking at the patch thats obvious, sorry. I also
just found a bug in my printf code - I wasnt printing the vlaue of
of RsdtPhysicalAddress in the second part of the 'if' at all. Will
fix that and re-test on monday.

cheers,

-pete.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1JFzLh-0002NT-G9>