Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 16:16:42 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.ORG>, Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca>, David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "Forking" FreeBSD: CVS vs. P4 Message-ID: <3C758DEA.1DE260BE@mindspring.com> References: <20020218114326.A98974@dragon.nuxi.com> <200202181951.g1IJpip33604@apollo.backplane.com> <20020218153807.E96115@locore.ca> <20020221111915.N65817@wantadilla.lemis.com> <200202210146.g1L1kqg91511@apollo.backplane.com> <3C746FC1.897E759C@mindspring.com> <200202210435.g1L4Z0H92642@apollo.backplane.com> <3C74B9EA.9692E27E@mindspring.com> <20020221144620.B68344@espresso.q9media.com> <3C755D6C.BE8F1776@mindspring.com> <20020221185935.C68344@espresso.q9media.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Barcroft wrote: > [Discussion related to the root of the thread, rather than my message, > removed.] > > I see you are not interested in doing this. > > -CURRENT READERS TAKE NOTE: > No longer can Terry blame CVS, P4, Gnats, our two seperate branches of > development, FreeBSD developers, or the color of the sky; Terry can be > attributed to be the sole reason why these outside projects have never > been integrated into FreeBSD. Apparently, you weren't paying attention to the "too dangerous" part of the discussion, which would, by definition, keep my examples from getting committed. FWIW: I specifically chose my examples so that 3 out of the 4 of them were complex enough that they would hit the review wall. Also FWIW: Just because I came up with the examples does not mean they are my code. They are code that was current at the time the project was made aware of the patches, and the only thing missing from your 5 step process was the review and commit. Check the list archives for them, if you don't believe me. I'm amazed that I now suddenly own the integration of all forward looking projects into FreeBSD where the only steps necessary for their integration are "4) review, 5) commit". If that's the case, I hereby approve, after having reviewed it, John Baldwin's proc-locking patch. As my "mentor", I'm sure you'll commit it, now, right? If anyone else wants their code that's in P4, and not CVS, reviewed and committed to CVS, speak up, because Mike Barcroft is here to help you. PS: Grow up: you can't dismiss all my examples by waving an "it's Terry's problem" wand at them. There's a real process problem here that needs addressing. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C758DEA.1DE260BE>