From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 22:43:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5610516A4BF for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 22:43:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etustar.ze.tu-muenchen.de (etustar.ze.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.39.96]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D86E43FE1 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 22:43:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from estartu@etustar.ze.tu-muenchen.de) Received: from etustar.ze.tu-muenchen.de (estartu@localhost.ze.tu-muenchen.de [127.0.0.1])h845hu5i002804; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 07:43:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from estartu@etustar.ze.tu-muenchen.de) Received: (from estartu@localhost) by etustar.ze.tu-muenchen.de (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h845ht37002803; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 07:43:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from estartu) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 07:43:55 +0200 From: Gerhard Schmidt To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20030904054355.GA2747@augusta.de> References: <000001c371a2$31df1510$8b01a8c0@notebook> <20030903131933.GA50096@rot13.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030903131933.GA50096@rot13.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: thomas may Subject: Re: looking for a port for asterisk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 05:43:59 -0000 --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 06:19:33AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:32:55AM +0200, thomas may wrote: > > great pbx with acd functions, www.asteriskpbx.com >=20 > Just so you know, ports aren't usually added by request. The usual > submission procedure is: >=20 > * Read the Porter's Handbook on the website > * Create the port yourself > * Submit it via send-pr I did this mid of July for a Port. But there is still no response=20 to it. There are New Port from mid April that are still not included in the Ports Tree.=20 I Think some of the new ports are outdated by now.=20 Why should someone go through the trouble off creating a Port=20 when in takes Month to be included in the Tree.=20 Bye Estartu ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gerhard Schmidt | Nick : estartu IRC : Estartu | PGP Public Key Fischbachweg 3 | Privat: estartu@augusta.de | auf Anfrage/ D-86856 Hiltenfingen | Dienst: schmidt@ze.tu-muenchen.de | on request --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use MessageID: c/h4Oh4+P9gofqHHcufEw/vicp2gOG7c iQCVAwUBP1bRDgzx22nOTJQRAQFglwP9Ekhw0ff2gfkl3aU/+R9VVx7gyZ+cPnFP eLGg4PPU/guu32oLqpFJvuEbI2YSDT1jUNaKsG02KtWrWAxpz+ovLWciLQvIOso8 Ll1e9S+dxGvnnwasc+Gh8+knqHmKvxXqh/k+Okrl4C/HYEfF92ujGOTKGp77abhc pI5FYxunh1c= =S0G2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY--