From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jul 23 6:30:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD3237B407 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 06:30:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f6NDU2i41852; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 06:30:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 06:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200107231330.f6NDU2i41852@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Maxim Konovalov Subject: Re: bin/29164: [PATCH] lack of 'Do not fragment' flag in ping(8) Reply-To: Maxim Konovalov Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/29164; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Maxim Konovalov To: Dima Dorfman Cc: Subject: Re: bin/29164: [PATCH] lack of 'Do not fragment' flag in ping(8) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:26:58 +0400 (MSD) On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Dima Dorfman wrote: > maxim@macomnet.ru writes: > > >Fix: > > > > Stolen from OpenBSD. > > > > Index: ping.c > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sbin/ping/ping.c,v > > retrieving revision 1.59 > > diff -u -r1.59 ping.c > > --- ping.c 2001/07/07 19:09:21 1.59 > > +++ ping.c 2001/07/20 10:47:35 > ... > > How about sending this to -audit? ping is security-sensitive software > (being setuid), so I think a review is in order. I am agree with you, will do. Thanks. - -maxim -- Maxim Konovalov, MAcomnet, Internet-Intranet Dept., system engineer phone: +7 (095) 796-9079, mailto: maxim@macomnet.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message