From owner-freebsd-git@freebsd.org Fri Sep 25 17:11:06 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-git@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B163FD267 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:11:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi1-f178.google.com (mail-oi1-f178.google.com [209.85.167.178]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BydjP45nSz4Fjy; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:11:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi1-f178.google.com with SMTP id m7so3533178oie.0; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 10:11:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5msiLjiPTsAokVzDdsLRZnKCahS9etdC4wzPMu5Z1dE=; b=lPFKA73c7vflfNxD9PH4ejYXGyILJ+odBB0DntvoYzPjjXELoSJyZ18nlIyCzczJ9S /4D34LF2H0/KiLhETcWqNL4nBlG4/YzNwR6Uiz+C5rIzB51pAyF5+AKdMOCifriQG6Uc RT6GZMvokLW3qTTPM+RJTR1niGul1LeOjd3BXOQJ81tJxWsDNxFvIlOrZNkraj9TL2R3 aG06iM0o5uqA6C3pohVe6eTJOIUbqu0ytN9Uo6VjeXX9YAoyVmsemLUdeMBuQpZcZFnp KPzqnKSL6guHPuIe6TZGQADPi1EyCpT7DMR6SXLlF+uvH3ERbRLJR7zIr00MUOLoFBhe 0qdw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533BFoo2fHFO1hvp6c3BDU3MQxY4jnVZgzzw3QyR1aVh7tm8FNc7 SVxNN7bamF1n0oZvnhODUPoSwoPgIusV0HzqMKFF4FsJV2g= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxd0FtquXqtcbESLvsDuiR1Efy+Er+tVSdH4/AO0g4Y7j3TUYVnVZWfKi0vOau2xBjKmyHB2hT6ZZXcXX6JsmU= X-Received: by 2002:aca:c442:: with SMTP id u63mr193544oif.150.1601053863822; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 10:11:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <202009231254.08NCsbvl097012@repo.freebsd.org> <17915865-DF2F-473D-AB52-4C69D7DB706F@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Ulrich_Sp=C3=B6rlein?= Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 19:10:46 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r366074 - in head/.github: . workflows To: Ed Maste Cc: Alexander Richardson , Jessica Clarke , freebsd-git X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BydjP45nSz4Fjy X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of uspoerlein@gmail.com designates 209.85.167.178 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=uspoerlein@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.26 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.988]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.94)[-0.941]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.34)[-0.335]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.167.178:from]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[uqs@freebsd.org,uspoerlein@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.167.178:from]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[uqs@freebsd.org,uspoerlein@gmail.com]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-git] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-git@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of git use in the FreeBSD project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:11:06 -0000 On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 2:17 PM Ed Maste wrote: > On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 03:33, Ulrich Sp=C3=B6rlein wrot= e: > > > > I created the exact same workflow via the github UI (creating a brand > new commit on master) and then force-pushed over it, that seems to have > gotten it unstuck). > > I suppose this means the same thing will need to be done if there's > ever a change to the workflow file? > Not sure, we could try ... someone on the interwebs got their actions unstuck like so, that's where I got the idea from. We should try committing a 2nd workflow in a separate file and see how it goes ...