From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 03:28:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 864B916A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 03:28:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from zim.0x7e.net (zim.0x7e.net [203.38.184.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D91343D09 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 03:28:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from listone@deathbeforedecaf.net) Received: from goo.0x7e.net ([203.38.184.164] helo=goo) by zim.0x7e.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1ATg2m-0000dG-00; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 21:58:44 +1030 Message-ID: <006301c3be47$9c0c40b0$a4b826cb@goo> From: "Rob" To: "Gregory Edigarov" References: <20031209093254.GA366@profi.kharkov.ua> <004d01c3be3a$ebecc850$a4b826cb@goo> <20031209101749.GA529@profi.kharkov.ua> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 21:58:46 +1030 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: ipfw keep-state (ASAP anwser need) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 11:28:49 -0000 Have you perhaps deleted your rules? Check with ipfw list and make sure they are all there. Use /var/log/security to find which rule is denying the packets. If it's the default rule 65535, then your allow rules are somehow incorrect. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gregory Edigarov" Subject: Re: ipfw keep-state (ASAP anwser need) > On Tue, 09 Dec 2003, Rob wrote: > > > ipfw add 4100 allow udp from me to any 53 keep-state > > ipfw add 4200 allow udp from any to me 53 keep-state > It doesn't work. > > > What does /var/log/security show? > > it shows that all udp traffic to 53 port of any computer was denied. > > > It worked exactly like I've show for a very long time, but a week > ago something has broken. What is the other possibilities? > > -- > With best regards, > Gregory Edigarov > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > profi.kharkov.ua Systems Administrator > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- >