Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:41:07 -0500 (EST) From: "Alexander N. Kabaev" <ak03@gte.com> To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Proposal on shared libs version values. Message-ID: <XFMail.20010213114107.ak03@gte.com> In-Reply-To: <20010212175819.A9537@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I know this will sound silly, but if numbers in shared libraries file names mean nothing to the loader, why can't we just go back to using lib.so.<major>.<minor> naming convention for libc? Jumping between versions (5xx -> 5) just does not seem right. ---------------------------------- E-Mail: Alexander N. Kabaev <ak03@gte.com> Date: 13-Feb-2001 Time: 11:37:05 ---------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20010213114107.ak03>