Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:49:02 +0300 From: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org> To: Jean-Baptiste Quenot <jbq@caraldi.com> Cc: freebsd-ports <ports@freebsd.org>, Kris Kennaway <kris@FREEBSD.ORG>, Sam Lawrance <lawrance@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: www/resin3 patch Message-ID: <20060403064902.GA77780@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> In-Reply-To: <20060402143328.GA27433@watt.intra.caraldi.com> References: <20060331155131.GA78328@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <20060402143328.GA27433@watt.intra.caraldi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=cp-1251
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 04:33:28PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote:
>=20
> Instead of linking with "cc" instead of "ld", why not add a
> =AB=A0FreeBSD SPECIFIC OPTION=A0=BB called "-pthread" to "ld", like what
> has been done to "cc"?
>=20
Because linking with cc is a fix that we have a patch for and therefore
can be committed right on the moment.
Do you have a patch that adds -pthread to ld? Do you know how trivial or
difficult would be to create such a patch?
As I see it you object against linking with cc instead of ld, but you do
not have any other solution (except from linking *everything* with
pthread).
I suggest that in a short term we link with cc instead of ld, and in a
long term someone (you?) create a patch for a -pthread ld option.
Do you agree?
--=20
Vasil Dimov
gro.DSBeerF@dv
Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence.
-- Edsger W. Dijkstra
--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFEMMVeFw6SP/bBpCARAvuSAKCnWmTi8oPv8dQSStlRdGVlAAP3MQCeJsdf
w62vCLKiPsuMcuMzn1CWLKc=
=Nebn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060403064902.GA77780>