Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 6 Jul 2014 01:13:29 -0700
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Stefan Parvu <sparvu@systemdatarecorder.org>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Roger Pau Monn? <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject:   Re: Strange IO performance with UFS
Message-ID:  <CAJ-VmokaFaPfEGMjMHkQhhavjtyqmcNWE1uMmgpm7xFtqD7gzg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140706071735.GZ93733@kib.kiev.ua>
References:  <53B691EA.3070108@citrix.com> <53B69C73.7090806@citrix.com> <20140705001938.54a3873dd698080d93d840e2@systemdatarecorder.org> <53B7C616.1000702@citrix.com> <20140705095831.GO93733@kib.kiev.ua> <53B7D4DF.40301@citrix.com> <20140705112448.GQ93733@kib.kiev.ua> <53B8253F.5060403@citrix.com> <20140705195816.GV93733@kib.kiev.ua> <CAJ-VmonRzEPoRYJd=HLk3F4p1cxUmJ5mFurYWoMFF5rFkH42Cw@mail.gmail.com> <20140706071735.GZ93733@kib.kiev.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6 July 2014 00:17, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 05:34:48PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Hm, wait a sec. So if the IO size is a multiple of the underlying FS
>> block size, it should be okay?
> It was already suggested in the thread, and confirmed later.
> Did you read the mails ?

I did, I must've missed it. SOrry!


-a



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmokaFaPfEGMjMHkQhhavjtyqmcNWE1uMmgpm7xFtqD7gzg>