From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Apr 4 03:50:48 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA03171 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 03:50:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from dg-rtp.dg.com (dg-rtp.rtp.dg.com [128.222.1.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id DAA03162 for ; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 03:50:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by dg-rtp.dg.com (5.4R3.10/dg-rtp-v02) id AA25194; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 06:50:12 -0500 Received: from ponds by dg-rtp.dg.com.rtp.dg.com; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 06:50 EST Received: from lakes.water.net (lakes [10.0.0.3]) by ponds.water.net (8.8.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA25907; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 06:11:58 -0500 (EST) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.water.net (8.8.3/8.6.9) id GAA10676; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 06:17:51 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 1997 06:17:51 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <199704041117.GAA10676@lakes.water.net> To: ponds!camelot.de!knarf, ponds!lakes.water.net!rivers Subject: Re: kern/2923: panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: f6e21000 Cc: ponds!freebsd.org!freebsd-hackers Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Hello, > > Thomas David Rivers wrote: > > > I believe it to be a timing problem in the kernel. A heavy load just > > gives you a greater opportunity (as a percentage of time) to trip over > > the problem. Again; this also happens on my extremely lightly loaded > > (i.e. only a shell) system I put together just to reproduce this problem. > > I have the same problem here on a medium loaded newsserver (6 GB > newsspool). I get "panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: > f6718000" with different values for addr. I updated from 2.1.5 to > 2.2.1 about 48 hours before I've seen this problem the first time. > > I really have no idea what to do now. The machine always reboots > some minutes after the crash. Running fsck on 10 GB disks all the > time is no fun... :/ Well - this doesn't sound like exactly the same problem - although I can easily imagine it's just a frustrating. > > If you have any idea how I can make the uptime 6 hrs or higher, please > tell me! Since I'm guessing this is a different problem; if you'll provide the kgdb traceback and an nm of your kernel (are you running a 2.2.1 GENERIC kernel?) and details of your system - it's quite possible your problem isn't as thorny as mine and can be much more readily repaired. > > Thank you, > Knarf > -- > Frank Bartels |UUCP/ZModem/Fax: +49 89 8948040| "Captain, why not just > knarf@camelot.de | http://www.camelot.de/~knarf/ | give the Borg Windows?" > - Dave Rivers -