Date: Sun, 11 May 1997 13:46:32 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: hasty@rah.star-gate.com (Amancio Hasty), moore@WOLFENET.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: g++ shared library segfaults Message-ID: <E0wQeZl-00032w-00@rover.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 09 May 1997 17:46:24 PDT." <199705100046.RAA01368@phaeton.artisoft.com> References: <199705100046.RAA01368@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199705100046.RAA01368@phaeton.artisoft.com> Terry Lambert writes: : For what it's worth, MSCVC++ and Borland C++ and Oregon C++ all have : this same "compiler bug". Are you *sure* about the determination of : scope? I am *POSITIVE* about it. It was definitely in the Oct 95 draft standard, which I've sense recycled. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0wQeZl-00032w-00>