Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:06:51 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, Walery Kokarev <w65l76@gmail.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Traffic quota features in IPFW Message-ID: <42DB550B.9070603@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20050717233648.A10929@xorpc.icir.org> References: <001c01c58a17$5dbe4a40$0100000a@R3B> <200507161740.38234.max@love2party.net> <20050716095353.B86993@xorpc.icir.org> <f9e6f2c605071723341270a2df@mail.gmail.com> <20050717233648.A10929@xorpc.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 06:34:56AM +0000, Walery Kokarev wrote: > >>And why can't one use divert(4) interface? It looks quite suitable for >>that particular task. > > > no _that_ would really be a performance killer! > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" unless you divert to a netgraph socket within the kernel :-) (or use the new ipfw netgraph diversion facility)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42DB550B.9070603>