Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 3 Nov 2012 12:25:12 -0500
From:      ajtiM <lumiwa@gmail.com>
To:        Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: before new version
Message-ID:  <201211031225.12632.lumiwa@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20121103181835.bb93d5d4.freebsd@edvax.de>
References:  <201211031123.12664.lumiwa@gmail.com> <20121103181835.bb93d5d4.freebsd@edvax.de>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Saturday 03 November 2012 12:18:35 Polytropon wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 11:23:12 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > Could someone explain, please why ports should be frozen before a new
> > version of FreeBSD came out?
> 
> The idea is to make sure that RELEASE can be shipped with
> installation media (CD, DVD) for offline use which requires
> ports mostly to be tested and working in some specific state,
> and then the packages (those you can access on the installation
> media) are generated from them. It's handy for systems that
> do not have Internet access to install software off-line.
> 
> > It happened all the time and after update (if you update or not) there
> > are so many ports for updating. In case for very long waiting for
> > version 9.1 will be thousands of them.
> 
> That could probably be. Most users who have Internet access
> and run servers (and also home systems) will tend to update
> the OS beyond RELEASE and also do so with the ports collection,
> or alternatively also use pkg_add -r from the Latest/ directory
> instead of RELEASE (which _always_ contains the ports generated
> from the frozen ports tree).

Thank you very much.

BTW: packages are almost all the time outdated.

Mitja
--------
http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201211031225.12632.lumiwa>