From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 4 13:24:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129D416A494 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2006 13:24:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from futhwo@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415EC43D49 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2006 13:24:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from futhwo@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n15so502066nfc for ; Wed, 04 Oct 2006 06:24:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:content-type:to:from:subject:date:x-mailer; b=tSsihiVpL9/JvfYSk9Aiax9a6QHPoARolIQOOFlv7h/lvGFSoTdVi4/bJFaqf0dUj2tv4PTJRS5xlTlovHL9erBRmDg8KEP4jyUUT1pF5+WAY2Wd28JRAfV1AKtgXubDzlLoryHcnL8C93kOlsPaUvrmDnBUggzmlk7pZC5/B1A= Received: by 10.49.8.15 with SMTP id l15mr2329643nfi; Wed, 04 Oct 2006 06:24:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?85.239.177.182? ( [85.239.177.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p72sm1167634nfc.2006.10.04.06.24.30; Wed, 04 Oct 2006 06:24:30 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <7B0D645C-4EA3-4249-B7EB-5833F23824EF@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: FreeBSD Questions From: futhwo Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 15:24:22 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: Subject: Updating jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 13:24:33 -0000 Hi We have an infrastructure composed by a few physical servers that contains some full jails (up to 10 jails per server). I am wondering what's the better and fastest way to bring the jails up-to-date when a new patchlevel or minor version is released and installed on the host system. This method would better be unattended, but it's not a requirement. Hi Ivan