Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:29:31 -0700 From: Jim Harris <jim.harris@gmail.com> To: Maikel Verheijen <Maikel.Verheijen@redwood.com> Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: nvd disk on nvme controller not detected at boot-time Message-ID: <CAJP=Hc9UGNDy2iJ9xWvkf%2BT0uW-%2B-k-jQEhOf-StYHzpdk0zcA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <D065F5AF.901D%Maikel.Verheijen@redwood.com> References: <D062AFA3.206A0%maikel.verheijen@redwood.com> <CAJP=Hc_0ujTGZ%2BN_=CJfJUxLiKF38uWADHqL9FR1xb5sYqLqpA@mail.gmail.com> <D065F5AF.901D%Maikel.Verheijen@redwood.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Maikel Verheijen < Maikel.Verheijen@redwood.com> wrote: > Hi Jim, > <snip> > I'm currently running FreeBSD 10.0 with updates from freebsd-update. > Would FreeBSD 10.1-RC be safe for a production environment or would it be > better to wait until the real release? The machine is not used for > production yet, but we do want to go live with it in the near future. I > currently use a =E2=80=9Cworkaround=E2=80=9D, I=E2=80=99m not loading ZFS= at boot time but use a > custom RC script to load the nvd module, test if the nvd0 disk is there, > then load the ZFS module. That seems to work for now, but having it work > =E2=80=9Cout of the box=E2=80=9D would be better, and a lot less prone to= manual mistakes > made by me :) > > I cannot recommend whether 10.1-RC would be safe for a production environment, but you could certainly use 10.1-RC to at least confirm it fixes the issues described. You could also apply these two patches to your 10.0 kernel tree and rebuild just nvme.ko. Best regards, -Jim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJP=Hc9UGNDy2iJ9xWvkf%2BT0uW-%2B-k-jQEhOf-StYHzpdk0zcA>