From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 21:18:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D731065696 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 21:18:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f68.google.com (mail-ww0-f68.google.com [74.125.82.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 517B38FC15 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 21:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwj40 with SMTP id 40so5648360wwj.7 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 13:18:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.143.194 with SMTP id w2mr13729664wbu.44.1294261797597; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 13:09:57 -0800 (PST) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.227.143.1 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 13:09:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110105194653.00005aa7@unknown> References: <86k4is872b.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20101230001817.00007082@unknown> <867hes8612.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <4D1C4C6A.704@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20110105194653.00005aa7@unknown> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 16:09:57 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: y-ZMAJ-ika1fkxPSBOhnVDY03jc Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: Any recommendations for FreeBSD VPS hosting? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 21:18:31 -0000 Hi all, FYI (and ours ;-) ) the company I work with is __planning__ on expanding our server usage at M5 hosting (which BTW provide outstanding support and have really great infrastructure). Anyway, in our new servers we are going to be migrating existing customers to Jails, and we will probably have some capacity left, so we were thinking of providing FBSD Jail services as such, but didn't know for a fact there was a demand for such a service. Apparently there is! Are there any particular requirements that people here should think we would be offering? I mean are there any specific configurations/options that people wish for? SLA requirements, etc.? If we actually do expand our servers I will let you know, but in the mean time it would be helpful to understand the potential client wishes. Thanks, Alex On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 09:10:02 +0000 > Matthew Seaman wrote: