Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:47:39 -0500 From: "R. Scott Evans" <freebsd-ports@rsle.net> To: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> Cc: timur@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tdb Message-ID: <54B9248B.9080104@rsle.net> In-Reply-To: <09128b642757896623c9f03b0be63d6f@thebighonker.lerctr.org> References: <54B92146.3060901@rsle.net> <09128b642757896623c9f03b0be63d6f@thebighonker.lerctr.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/16/15 09:39, Larry Rosenman wrote: > On 2015-01-16 08:33, R. Scott Evans wrote: >> Admittedly I've only got a math minor, but isn't 1.3.4 > 1.2.13? ;-) >> >> # pkg version -IvL= >> tdb-1.2.13,1 > succeeds index (index has 1.3.4) >> >> -scott > the ,1 is the PORTEPOCH which apparently was changed because of a > version number regression. Well, I mention it because while I use "pkg version -IvL=", I know the FreeBSD Handbook section on updating ports instructs one to use 'pkg version -l "<"' which will cause this ports change to go unseen. Likewise, "portmaster -a" on my box didn't catch this and I had to specifically update/downgrade the port. -scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54B9248B.9080104>