Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:32:50 +0100 From: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@FreeBSD.org> To: "Jonathan T. Sage" <sagejona@theatre.msu.edu> Cc: Josef El-Rayes <josef@daemon.li> Subject: Re: Status reports - why not regularly? Message-ID: <20040113183250.GB48706@voodoo.oberon.net> In-Reply-To: <400438CB.8030702@theatre.msu.edu> References: <20040113093903.GA84055@mimoza.pantel.net> <400409F4.3090205@freebsd.org> <400428DC.2060108@theatre.msu.edu> <20040113181911.GB432@jenny.daemon.li> <20040113182201.GA48706@voodoo.oberon.net> <400438CB.8030702@theatre.msu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 01:28:27PM -0500, Jonathan T. Sage wrote: > Exactally, and as Mark pointed out, I think that keeping in changes to=20 > the ports infrastructure (bsd.ports.mk) would be an excellent idea. Yes, I think portmgr@ should mail to ports@ and explain the most important updates to bsd.*.mk -Kirill --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFABDnSQC1G6a60JuURAvYdAJ9PR5e2p7wJupOtjSW1aK2KiqBdYgCeNnr8 s1PtCtLIJtogTjqp6fbE8a8= =3ykf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040113183250.GB48706>