From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 16 00:53:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84499106564A for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 00:53:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17AB48FC0C for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 00:53:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so1638175wwi.31 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 17:53:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.134.232 with SMTP id s82mr1922374wei.71.1318726436986; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 17:53:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.47] (paris.c-mal.com. [88.170.200.60]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fo7sm22616692wbb.20.2011.10.15.17.53.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 15 Oct 2011 17:53:55 -0700 (PDT) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8J2) Message-Id: <83F2C712-C50A-4CE8-AF50-7F0F5FADF3F8@my.gd> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8J2) From: Damien Fleuriot Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 02:53:49 +0200 To: Waitman Gobble Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: boost issue freebsd 8.2 (32 bit) - infinite loop of boost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 00:53:58 -0000 On 15 Oct 2011, at 19:38, Waitman Gobble wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I identified the problem - the build script insists on fetching boost from= > heanet.dl.sourceforge.net -- for some reason this hangs indefinitely from m= y > connection. ie, wget > http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/project/boost/boost/1.45.0/boost_1_45_0.t= ar.bz2resolves > and connects but never transfers any data. (from my IP however if i > try it from another network it works..). >=20 > Manually fetching from > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/boost/boost/1.45.0/boost_1_45_0.t= ar.bz2 > and putting in /usr/ports/distfiles solves the problem... I'm not sure > why > heanet host doesn't like my IP (or something else?) >=20 >=20 >=20 > Anyway, I noticed I made some typos in my previous email, "34" should have= > been "45". (boost_1_45_0 not boost_1_34_0). late night. lol. >=20 >=20 > Waitman >=20 Are you using a proxy ? Can you try with another IP from the same netblock as you ? Can you successfully telnet to their IP on port 80 and "HEAD / HTTP/1.0" ?= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 16 01:33:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA57D106566B for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 01:33:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rloefgren@forethought.net) Received: from mzpi3.forethought.net (mzpi3.forethought.net [216.241.36.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94FE8FC08 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 01:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 216-241-45-95.static.forethought.net ([216.241.45.95] helo=auden.jmla.com) by mz1.forethought.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RFEGj-00084O-GM for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:07:57 -0600 Message-ID: <4E9A205C.2080508@forethought.net> Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:07:56 -0600 From: Reed Loefgren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110821 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4E99C29D.7010005@rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: <4E99C29D.7010005@rawbw.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Do you find chrome on FreeBSD buggy? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 01:33:48 -0000 On 10/15/11 11:27, Yuri wrote: > I keep seeing some artefacts, like text selection isn't cleared by > clicking anywhere else. Or when some strange (Unicode) symbol shows > up, for example on wikipedia article history. Or some page would > randomly blank out. Or some page would show message like "Aw, snap" > meaning some kind of failure. > > I did rebuild all dependencies, also updated system several times, but > such artefacts seem to persist. Contacting port maintainer didn't help > either as he couldn't reproduce some of them. > > So is it just my system, or others also see such things? Is chrome > considered to be stable on FreeBSD? > FF, on the contrary, doesn't show anything like that at all. > > Yuri > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Stable? It's a Google project isn't it? That means it's sort of in perpetual beta. It runs on my amd64/9.0-Beta3 box and it re-draws very very fast. Other than that, I'm unimpressed, and continue to use Firefox (7). YMMV and all that... r From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 16 01:35:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1221065689 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 01:35:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gobble.wa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77A58FC1F for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 01:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaky10 with SMTP id y10so5565772iak.13 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:35:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=mfa0mZ79LMJrEdPF1iLr67docv14JowfMP5yiE83Knk=; b=n0jOsuTiMMImrlfCahcli+NeI+Nqk1WvkQNQsKGlBV4OSgYNyYQYOCak9TtI7RJf7E yHvtxuymd3uYhbGdPpCqQtFYOQxgOfBNMWaMcT74/lR5Ncr3m892d29JxsoyyIy/Ldps ery+r8d2OPUV/HWO2UTvaahNv79cQx2bXOzDo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.135.69 with SMTP id o5mr27830412ict.34.1318728907922; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:35:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.199.15 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:35:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83F2C712-C50A-4CE8-AF50-7F0F5FADF3F8@my.gd> References: <83F2C712-C50A-4CE8-AF50-7F0F5FADF3F8@my.gd> Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:35:07 -0700 Message-ID: From: Waitman Gobble To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: boost issue freebsd 8.2 (32 bit) - infinite loop of boost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 01:35:10 -0000 On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > > On 15 Oct 2011, at 19:38, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > Hi, > > I identified the problem - the build script insists on fetching boost from > heanet.dl.sourceforge.net -- for some reason this hangs indefinitely from > my > connection. ie, wget > > http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/project/boost/boost/1.45.0/boost_1_45_0.tar.bz2resolves > and connects but never transfers any data. (from my IP however if i > try it from another network it works..). > > Manually fetching from > > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/boost/boost/1.45.0/boost_1_45_0.tar.bz2 > and putting in /usr/ports/distfiles solves the problem... I'm not sure > why > heanet host doesn't like my IP (or something else?) > > > > Anyway, I noticed I made some typos in my previous email, "34" should have > been "45". (boost_1_45_0 not boost_1_34_0). late night. lol. > > > Waitman > > > > Are you using a proxy ? > Can you try with another IP from the same netblock as you ? > Can you successfully telnet to their IP on port 80 and "HEAD / HTTP/1.0" ? > Hi, I am not using a proxy, however it is possible that ISP has a transparent cache/proxy. (at&t) Maybe I could release IP and request another one? I'm not sure it's worth it though.. (?) I was able to get the file from another host (manually) and continue without further issues.. telnet to port 80 connects but doesn't respond to HEAD request from this machine. Thanks Waitman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 16 03:20:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1F0106564A for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 03:20:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from rc3.surewest.net (rc3.surewest.net [66.60.130.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241A68FC0A for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 03:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.surewest.net ([66.60.130.145]) by rc3.surewest.net ({9c3c9505-091b-4be1-8280-6f177375641d}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTP id 20111016030945549 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 03:09:45 +0000 X-RC-FROM: X-RC-RCPT: Received: from smtpauth.surewest.net (smtpauth.surewest.net [66.60.130.153]) by smtp3.surewest.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4504F89762 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 20:09:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (unknown [69.62.230.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtpauth.surewest.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 296549C1A7 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 20:09:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.1.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90161165A95 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 20:09:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mykitchentable.net; s=default; t=1318734588; bh=ZcAEkY17IMAmf4B36dDU18zOqPz65dpfICIzxRggcpE=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Y+cL1T2ynTNh8kAwaoOvywzSh5G6kGHeznwoWatMvlGp6NN/Fq7j7LGph+P6ELEF7 6zIWyaNriMm0tTwPTtI6rZmDjCYvEhxJdr7Y6ehDPtki0Xcza3Z43xwkCC6D2rJPK6 Cy1Oa3n3rf/hKzz+BjFG4ZD8/9hC2TWLc6kVLIBw= Message-ID: <4E9A4AF4.7090608@mykitchentable.net> Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 20:09:40 -0700 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 111015-1, 10/15/2011), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: How To Fix "Use of assignment to $[ is deprecated" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 03:20:42 -0000 Somehow while trying to upgrade my ports, I got things out of whack. The final straw was that perl got upgraded from 5.8.9 to 5.12.4. I've read the notes in UPDATING but they are not helping my situation. Finally, I just decided that a "portupgrade -af" would be in my best interest. However now portupgrade complains that "Makefile possibly broken" and then give this more relevant error: Use of assignment to $[ is deprecated at /usr/local/sbin/apxs line 86. This seems to be the case for just about any port I try and fix. I think this file is part of apache22 so I attempted to rebuild it. It compiles fine but fails on the install portion with this output: ---> Installing the new version via the port ===> Installing for apache-2.2.21 ===> apache-2.2.21 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.12.4 - found ===> apache-2.2.21 depends on shared library: expat.6 - found ===> apache-2.2.21 depends on shared library: apr-1 - found ===> apache-2.2.21 depends on shared library: pcre.0 - found ===> apache-2.2.21 depends on shared library: iconv.3 - found ===> Generating temporary packing list Making install in srclib Making install in os Making install in unix Making install in server Making install in mpm Making install in prefork find: /usr/local/include/apr-1/apr.h: No such file or directory ... And then includes "No such file or directory" for 2-3 screens of files. How can I fix my system? Thanks, Drew -- Like card tricks? Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse to learn card magic secrets for free! http://alchemistswarehouse.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 16 08:05:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD00106566B for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 08:05:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joh.hendriks@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27938FC16 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 08:05:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so2750728eyd.13 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 01:05:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ySlqRyL9RJBXt2Yw07DFJlz5XGFK6s4PXA7dedFYhb0=; b=OFdRcZLmf04uhH9euGMGbO9C7vgSNh3l0gxY+lQ++mOia01hQ5X6Fb8iKVy8Oa33qE FsgUyXmDe3yuwvoiUi4gvzea6Qm3TV1P0IpErIbFc1yTg483MwTI+WJivIamB1u/P7ri 1+wGa/sNIzD1dYYRQubEWPPCF0KVeDo/vOvhI= Received: by 10.213.15.16 with SMTP id i16mr615168eba.30.1318752345629; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 01:05:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.13] (5ED0E470.cm-7-1d.dynamic.ziggo.nl. [94.208.228.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o4sm18703500eeb.0.2011.10.16.01.05.44 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 16 Oct 2011 01:05:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E9A9054.80700@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 10:05:40 +0200 From: johan Hendriks User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Drew Tomlinson , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4E9A4AF4.7090608@mykitchentable.net> In-Reply-To: <4E9A4AF4.7090608@mykitchentable.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: How To Fix "Use of assignment to $[ is deprecated" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 08:05:47 -0000 Op 16-10-11 05:09, Drew Tomlinson schreef: > Somehow while trying to upgrade my ports, I got things out of whack. > The final straw was that perl got upgraded from 5.8.9 to 5.12.4. I've > read the notes in UPDATING but they are not helping my situation. > Finally, I just decided that a "portupgrade -af" would be in my best > interest. However now portupgrade complains that "Makefile possibly > broken" and then give this more relevant error: > > Use of assignment to $[ is deprecated at /usr/local/sbin/apxs line 86. > > This seems to be the case for just about any port I try and fix. I > think this file is part of apache22 so I attempted to rebuild it. It > compiles fine but fails on the install portion with this output: > > ---> Installing the new version via the port > ===> Installing for apache-2.2.21 > ===> apache-2.2.21 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.12.4 - found > ===> apache-2.2.21 depends on shared library: expat.6 - found > ===> apache-2.2.21 depends on shared library: apr-1 - found > ===> apache-2.2.21 depends on shared library: pcre.0 - found > ===> apache-2.2.21 depends on shared library: iconv.3 - found > ===> Generating temporary packing list > Making install in srclib > Making install in os > Making install in unix > Making install in server > Making install in mpm > Making install in prefork > find: /usr/local/include/apr-1/apr.h: No such file or directory > ... > > And then includes "No such file or directory" for 2-3 screens of files. > > How can I fix my system? > > Thanks, > > Drew > I have had this on some systems also. Deinstall apache22 and your apr program. pkg_delete apache22 and pkg_delete apr-your-version. Then install apache22 again. cd /usr/local/www/apache22 make install clean It should install your apache22 and the corensponding and working apr version. regards Johan Hendriks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 16 16:42:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D45106564A for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:42:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Vikash.Badal@is.co.za) Received: from morpheus.is.co.za (morpheus.is.co.za [196.35.45.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1408FC14 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:42:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from morpheus.is.co.za (localhost.is.co.za [127.0.0.1]) by morpheus.is.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id A691EF2732 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:18:42 +0200 (SAST) Received: from ZABRYSVISMFW3 (zajnbisit03.mfw.is.co.za [196.26.2.110]) by morpheus.is.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A12F2729 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:18:42 +0200 (SAST) Received: from zabrysvisexhub3.af.didata.local (Not Verified[10.1.8.38]) by ZABRYSVISMFW3 with MailMarshal (v6, 7, 2, 8378) id ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:21:32 +0200 Received: from ZABRYSVISEXMBX1.af.didata.local ([fe80::1856:470d:1193:14bf]) by zabrysvisexhub3.af.didata.local ([fe80::9023:67c3:e2b7:a5ba%10]) with mapi; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:18:42 +0200 From: Vikash Badal To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:18:39 +0200 Thread-Topic: probably stupid questions about select() and FS_SET in a multithreaded environment [ select() failed (Bad file descriptor) ] Thread-Index: AcyMH0PhIRcTsTgLS3S41GEtz0UpQg== Message-ID: <9B425C841283E0418B1825D40CBCFA616E38A1AC3D@ZABRYSVISEXMBX1.af.didata.local> Accept-Language: en-US, en-ZA Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US, en-ZA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: probably stupid questions about select() and FS_SET in a multithreaded environment [ select() failed (Bad file descriptor) ] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:42:58 -0000 Greetings, Can some point me in the correction direction please. I have a treaded socket application that has a problem with select() retu= rning -1. The select() and accept() is taken care of in one thread. The worker thre= ads deal with client requests after the new client connection is pushed t= o queue. The logged error is : select() failed (Bad file descriptor) getdtablesize =3D 65536 Sysctls at the moment are: kern.maxfiles: 65536=20 kern.maxfilesperproc: 65536 void client_accept(int listen_socket) { ... =20 while ( loop ) =20 { =20 FD_ZERO(&socket_set); =20 FD_SET(listen_socket, &socket_set); =20 timeout.tv_sec =3D 1; =20 timeout.tv_usec =3D 0; =20 rcode =3D select(listen_socket + 1, &socket_set, NULL, NULL, &tim= eout); =20 if ( rcode < 0 ) =20 { =20 Log(DEBUG_0, "ERROR: select() failed (%s) getdtablesize =3D %d= ", =20 strerror(errno), getdtablesize()); =20 loop =3D 0; =20 sleep(30); =20 fcloseall(); =20 assert(1=3D=3D0); =20 } =20 if ( rcode > 0 ) =20 { =20 remotelen =3D sizeof(remote); =20 client_sock =3D accept(listen_socket, ..... =20 =20 =20 if (msgsock !=3D -1 ) =20 {=20 =20 // Allocate memory for request =20 request =3D malloc(sizeof(struct requests)); =20 // test for malloc etc ... =20 // set request values ... =20 // =20 // Push request to a queue.=20 =20 } =20 } =20 } =20... } void* tcpworker(void* arg) { =20 // initialise stuff =20 While ( loop ) =20 { =20 // pop request from queue =20 =20 =20 If ( request !=3D NULL ) =20 { =20 // deal with request =20 free(request) =20 } =20 } =20 } When the problem occurs, i have between 1000 and 1400 clients connected. Questions: 1. do i need to FD_CLR(client_sock,&socket_set) before i push to a queue = ? 2. do i need to FD_CLR(client_sock, &socket_set) when this client request= =20closes in the the tcpworker() function ? 3. would setting kern.maxfilesperproc and kern.maxfiles to higher values = solve the problem or just take longer for the problem to re-appear. 4. should is replace select() with kqueue() as from google-ing it seems s= elect() is not that great. Thanks Vikash Please note: This email and its content are subject to the disclaimer as = displayed at the following link http://www.is.co.za/legal/E-mail+Confiden= tiality+Notice+and+Disclaimer.htm. Should you not have Web access, send a= =20mail to disclaimers@is.co.za and a copy will be emailed to you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 16 17:13:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4103A1065687 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:13:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from rc3.surewest.net (rc3.surewest.net [66.60.130.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FF48FC19 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:13:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.surewest.net ([66.60.130.145]) by rc3.surewest.net ({9c3c9505-091b-4be1-8280-6f177375641d}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTP id 20111016171307612; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:13:07 +0000 X-RC-FROM: Received: from smtpauth.surewest.net (smtpauth.surewest.net [66.60.130.153]) by smtp1.surewest.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C5E89724; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 10:13:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (unknown [69.62.230.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtpauth.surewest.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E72C9C06D; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 10:13:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.1.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4EFF165AE5; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 10:13:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mykitchentable.net; s=default; t=1318785189; bh=04FXNo0+kjgwXK7Szk0RqFNRPESupijokOeTtYnKy40=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=0cIw918XkQ+Klez8My+YHaellaOpqLyeOuCriMUsMe9/LxPGON3sPuM6pPK/6aadn 35Dhm3xKWNBpJM5s5j0plh7Y9ts/0NSAwwu+tDWrGG5PdEvmvcvMQBynM1xef4YJxJ KH65CFQlyH/BGHuw8knmYuZD6eK+PfHoHE+0A2xo= Message-ID: <4E9B10A0.5020707@mykitchentable.net> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 10:13:04 -0700 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, joh.hendriks@gmail.com, Odhiambo Washington References: <4E9A4AF4.7090608@mykitchentable.net> In-Reply-To: <4E9A4AF4.7090608@mykitchentable.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 111016-0, 10/16/2011), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Re: How To Fix "Use of assignment to $[ is deprecated" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:13:11 -0000 Thank you both. Your suggestion to remove apache and apr before rebuilding seems to be working. Cheers, Drew On 10/15/2011 8:09 PM, Drew Tomlinson wrote: > Somehow while trying to upgrade my ports, I got things out of whack. > The final straw was that perl got upgraded from 5.8.9 to 5.12.4. I've > read the notes in UPDATING but they are not helping my situation. > Finally, I just decided that a "portupgrade -af" would be in my best > interest. However now portupgrade complains that "Makefile possibly > broken" and then give this more relevant error: > > Use of assignment to $[ is deprecated at /usr/local/sbin/apxs line 86. > > This seems to be the case for just about any port I try and fix. I > think this file is part of apache22 so I attempted to rebuild it. It > compiles fine but fails on the install portion with this output: > > ---> Installing the new version via the port > ===> Installing for apache-2.2.21 > ===> apache-2.2.21 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.12.4 - found > ===> apache-2.2.21 depends on shared library: expat.6 - found > ===> apache-2.2.21 depends on shared library: apr-1 - found > ===> apache-2.2.21 depends on shared library: pcre.0 - found > ===> apache-2.2.21 depends on shared library: iconv.3 - found > ===> Generating temporary packing list > Making install in srclib > Making install in os > Making install in unix > Making install in server > Making install in mpm > Making install in prefork > find: /usr/local/include/apr-1/apr.h: No such file or directory > ... > > And then includes "No such file or directory" for 2-3 screens of files. > > How can I fix my system? > > Thanks, > > Drew > -- Like card tricks? Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse to learn card magic secrets for free! http://alchemistswarehouse.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 16 19:35:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CD61065677 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 19:35:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) Received: from mailrelay006.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay006.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDF698FC0C for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 19:35:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsQHAJwqm05bsbDt/2dsb2JhbABCmgSMaYF0gQaBbgEBBVYjEAsYGQIICzkeiBq0RoUIAoJ+BIdSlQyIdA Received: from 237.176-177-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.177.176.237]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2011 21:05:34 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9GJ5XpX004742; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:05:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) From: Tijl Coosemans To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:05:22 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-BETA1; KDE/4.6.5; i386; ; ) References: <9B425C841283E0418B1825D40CBCFA616E38A1AC3D@ZABRYSVISEXMBX1.af.didata.local> In-Reply-To: <9B425C841283E0418B1825D40CBCFA616E38A1AC3D@ZABRYSVISEXMBX1.af.didata.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2519024.BcGF6WijWI"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201110162105.31476.tijl@coosemans.org> Cc: Vikash Badal Subject: Re: probably stupid questions about select() and FS_SET in a multithreaded environment [ select() failed (Bad file descriptor) ] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 19:35:07 -0000 --nextPart2519024.BcGF6WijWI Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday 16 October 2011 18:18:39 Vikash Badal wrote: > Greetings, >=20 > Can some point me in the correction direction please. >=20 > I have a treaded socket application that has a problem with select() > returning -1. > The select() and accept() is taken care of in one thread. The worker > threads deal with client requests after the new client connection is > pushed to queue. >=20 > The logged error is : > select() failed (Bad file descriptor) getdtablesize =3D 65536 >=20 > Sysctls at the moment are: > kern.maxfiles: 65536=20 > kern.maxfilesperproc: 65536 >=20 >=20 > > void client_accept(int listen_socket) > { > ... > while ( loop ) > { > FD_ZERO(&socket_set); > FD_SET(listen_socket, &socket_set); > timeout.tv_sec =3D 1; > timeout.tv_usec =3D 0; >=20 > rcode =3D select(listen_socket + 1, &socket_set, NULL, NULL, &timeo= ut); >=20 > if ( rcode < 0 ) > { > Log(DEBUG_0, "ERROR: select() failed (%s) getdtablesize =3D %d", > strerror(errno), getdtablesize()); > loop =3D 0; > sleep(30); > fcloseall(); > assert(1=3D=3D0); > } >=20 > if ( rcode > 0 ) > { > remotelen =3D sizeof(remote); > client_sock =3D accept(listen_socket, ..... > =20 > if (msgsock !=3D -1 ) > {=20 > // Allocate memory for request > request =3D malloc(sizeof(struct requests)); > // test for malloc etc ... > // set request values ... > // > // Push request to a queue.=20 > } > } >=20 > } > ... > } > void* tcpworker(void* arg) > { > // initialise stuff >=20 > While ( loop ) > { > // pop request from queue > =20 > If ( request !=3D NULL ) > { > // deal with request > free(request) > } > } =20 > } >=20 > > When the problem occurs, i have between 1000 and 1400 clients > connected. >=20 > Questions: > 1. do i need to FD_CLR(client_sock,&socket_set) before i push to a > queue ? > 2. do i need to FD_CLR(client_sock, &socket_set) when this client > request closes in the the tcpworker() function ? > 3. would setting kern.maxfilesperproc and kern.maxfiles to higher > values solve the problem or just take longer for the problem to > re-appear. > 4. should is replace select() with kqueue() as from google-ing it > seems select() is not that great. The size of an fd_set is limited by FD_SETSIZE which is 1024 by default. So if you pass a descriptor larger than that to FD_SET() or select(), you have a buffer overflow and memory beyond the fd_set can become corrupted. You can define FD_SETSIZE to a larger value before including sys/select.h, but you should also verify if a descriptor is less than =46D_SETSIZE before using it with select or any of the fd_set macros and return error if not. kqueue doesn't have this problem, but it's not as portable as select. --nextPart2519024.BcGF6WijWI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iF4EABEIAAYFAk6bKvsACgkQfoCS2CCgtivCVQD/bNpha14lvhQe/7VYVKX6VNQL Oh/MrF+LSoIl561F+OYA/2ofAtMPmE5aNvc6CR8FI+QkQ+6giE/X+Rzjpig3iV1V =qBhu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2519024.BcGF6WijWI-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 16 21:18:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2708D1065672 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:18:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from romain.garbage@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9168FC12 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:18:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws11 with SMTP id 11so2874992vws.13 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:18:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bMdanKqswZqZuD5YKv98WXGKFraJ2AZSz92nK/02C4c=; b=mEVm6j/e/6WEOx/5L6/dHLrqaq/FbDIjvartFAgxcV0/abrZSIsToQbrmt6x8yOCp9 /WP5PvbFak+lGmUqJFobUCEp+VOXUrjUkHgY79ytTE/zoU3FFep91byX4qWl7ucr1h4d H8mJ0YihqUxu5pZOrjBwJ8lvg3vjQwWXHCW+o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.88.231 with SMTP id bj7mr17250905vdb.81.1318798538577; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 13:55:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.176.68 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 13:55:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 22:55:38 +0200 Message-ID: From: Romain Garbage To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: bsdtar --gname switch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:18:58 -0000 Hi, According to bsdtar(1) manpage, tar has a --gname switch that permits to set an arbitrary groupname in the tar archive, but: $ tar -cf test.tar --gname root test.sh tar: Option --gname is not supported Usage: List: tar -tf Extract: tar -xf Create: tar -cf [filenames...] Help: tar --help I get the same error for --uname and --gid switches. I'm running 9.0-BETA3 (r226421). Did those switches used to work in previous releases of FreeBSD ? Regards, Romain From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 16 21:26:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A36106566C for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:26:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481A28FC08 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A3012E805CE; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:26:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:26:31 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20111016212628.GA30284@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. Of_Interest: With 25 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Subject: need to check for hex in C: how/ X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:26:32 -0000 if n == 15 and x is the int. i can say if ((int)x == 15) Or to check if x == 'A' i can cast x to (char)x. what's the syntax to chec if x is , say, 32/ -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org The 8.51a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 16 21:31:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF24106566C for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:31:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6769B8FC14 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkbzu17 with SMTP id zu17so3064919bkb.13 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:31:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=8qpcvb2J+2ppL+e25qLMKU/cjPIlx1aSs1mkmg3Vq0U=; b=OGVbgS0Zs9+UiC6IHFgSrWeFYqaQf/QBLnuy9sxFuvAX1DXbEnMXqc2rkZyXXSn8Gv 3cm7hSJg+UtNRfDaVhTn3Q6Lr1qzxThBDWcMEDb69hu2LKmvJGBblShYVTICJKj53znc 7sDcnt7tCSYkA0vfrITj6gEkkmFA0T7BLuDlY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.7.18 with SMTP id b18mr19835130fab.31.1318800712078; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:31:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.124.197 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:31:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:31:52 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Romain Garbage Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsdtar --gname switch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:31:53 -0000 On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Romain Garbage wrote: > According to bsdtar(1) manpage, tar has a --gname switch that permits > to set an arbitrary groupname in the tar archive, but: > $ tar -cf test.tar --gname root test.sh > tar: Option --gname is not supported > Usage: > List: tar -tf > Extract: tar -xf > Create: tar -cf [filenames...] > Help: tar --help > > I get the same error for --uname and --gid switches. I'm running > 9.0-BETA3 (r226421). Did those switches used to work in previous > releases of FreeBSD ? > No they didn't. I suggest filing a PR and contacting the CURRENT list. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 16 21:52:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3E3106566B for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:52:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4588FC14 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:52:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id p9GLpZHZ064824 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:51:35 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:51:35 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201110162151.p9GLpZHZ064824@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20111016212628.GA30284@thought.org> Subject: Re: need to check for hex in C: how/ X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:52:05 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Oct 16 16:27:46 2011 > Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:26:31 -0700 > From: Gary Kline > To: FreeBSD Mailing List > Cc: > Subject: need to check for hex in C: how/ > > > if n == 15 and x is the int. i can say > > if ((int)x == 15) Or to check if x == 'A' i can cast x to (char)x. > > what's the syntax to chec if x is , say, 32/ The advice from my computer-science professor was 'try it and find out'. It doesn't matter what anybody _says_ it is, the only thing that matters is what the computer (or, to be precise, the compiler) accepts? Now, for some information that you could/should get from any elementary book on C programming ("The C Programming Language", by Kerningan and Ritchie [r.i.p., this last week] is recommended): In general, you don't need _any_ explicit casts for those situations. C does 'automatic' promotion of numeric items so they have comparable 'width' for comparisons. For more details, see the 'fine manual' mentioned above. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 16 21:58:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0DD106564A for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:58:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D532C8FC13 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-40-141.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.40.141]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB5E3F6A3; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 23:58:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p9GLw3NT003221; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 23:58:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 23:58:03 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Gary Kline Message-Id: <20111016235803.40b2181a.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20111016212628.GA30284@thought.org> References: <20111016212628.GA30284@thought.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: need to check for hex in C: how/ X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:58:06 -0000 On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:26:31 -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > if n == 15 and x is the int. i can say > > if ((int)x == 15) Or to check if x == 'A' i can cast x to (char)x. > > what's the syntax to chec if x is , say, 32/ The integer types are automatically casted, no matter if you compare (int) or (char) to a numerical or character value. int i; char c; if(i == 32 || i == ' ') ... if(c == 32 || c == ' ') ... Functions or macros that deal with characters usually do return (int), even though one would expect (char). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 16 22:08:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1362E106566B for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 22:08:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FCD88FC18 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 22:08:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9GM87uL068668 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 23:08:07 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p9GM87uL068668 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1318802887; bh=LsqY5chhimL15y566b2/vsP4fbnS5LyNZL4xKhENyGw=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4E9B55BF.3090305@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20S un,=2016=20Oct=202011=2023:07:59=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20rv:7.0.1)=20Gecko/2 0110929=20Thunderbird/7.0.1|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20freebsd-ques tions@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20need=20to=20check=20for=20hex=2 0in=20C:=20how/|References:=20<20111016212628.GA30284@thought.org> |In-Reply-To:=20<20111016212628.GA30284@thought.org>|X-Enigmail-Ve rsion:=201.3.2|OpenPGP:=20id=3D60AE908C|Content-Type:=20multipart/ signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/p gp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enigFF2D72D1017D4 7DCEDBA86E3"; b=pWIMW245JFHWF4aHZIf0UVSZv5bGWjYCslJwgHAuTj8MmccJm0FR+cSj6xa3wNRQ/ sjCRlC/YA0RxCWpoixGU1tXrDqJnNEfXz5Q9qKAMwMBiyLbNZlilCk7d4wC05Puw4+ RYP13CMwT+qw/KnfXRmlCzrudUw+C2nqIce7GIyc= Message-ID: <4E9B55BF.3090305@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 23:07:59 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20111016212628.GA30284@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20111016212628.GA30284@thought.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigFF2D72D1017D47DCEDBA86E3" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: need to check for hex in C: how/ X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 22:08:19 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigFF2D72D1017D47DCEDBA86E3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 16/10/2011 22:26, Gary Kline wrote: > if n =3D=3D 15 and x is the int. i can say=20 >=20 > if ((int)x =3D=3D 15) Or to check if x =3D=3D 'A' i can cast x to (cha= r)x. >=20 > what's the syntax to chec if x is , say, 32/ In C code you can write an integer constant in hexadecimal by prefixing it with 0x -- so 0x32 is the hexadecimal constant equal to decimal 50. if ( x =3D=3D 0x32 ) ... I guess that's what you're asking; '32/' is not any sort of syntax I've ever seen before to indicate hexadecimal. Cheers, Matthew Tempted to interpret it as 32 shillings old money (=A31.60 in decimal coi= nage) --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigFF2D72D1017D47DCEDBA86E3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6bVcYACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzPjgCfbbN/5V6VeQzB5tNTv/au9obn Dm8AoJV52+YBYtvWQfLK0QzhuPKHGl29 =tlsK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigFF2D72D1017D47DCEDBA86E3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 16 22:41:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA11D1065670 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 22:41:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9899A8FC08 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 22:41:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CF55CE805CE; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 15:41:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 15:41:43 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20111016224143.GA1112@thought.org> References: <20111016212628.GA30284@thought.org> <4E9B55BF.3090305@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4E9B55BF.3090305@infracaninophile.co.uk> Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. Of_Interest: With 25 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: need to check for hex in C: how/ X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 22:41:44 -0000 On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:07:59PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 23:07:59 +0100 > From: Matthew Seaman > Subject: Re: need to check for hex in C: how/ > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > On 16/10/2011 22:26, Gary Kline wrote: > > if n == 15 and x is the int. i can say > > > > if ((int)x == 15) Or to check if x == 'A' i can cast x to (char)x. > > > > what's the syntax to chec if x is , say, 32/ > > In C code you can write an integer constant in hexadecimal by prefixing > it with 0x -- so 0x32 is the hexadecimal constant equal to decimal 50. > > if ( x == 0x32 ) ... > > I guess that's what you're asking; '32/' is not any sort of syntax I've > ever seen before to indicate hexadecimal. touche. we've got (char), (int), (long), and (long long); i always assumed there was a (hex). your ( x ==0x[hex]) will insure things don't fault because of, say, 'bad memory' or the like:) thankee, gary > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > Tempted to interpret it as 32 shillings old money (£1.60 in decimal coinage) > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW > -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org The 8.51a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 16 23:06:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691C31065670 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 23:06:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4820D8FC08 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 23:06:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D343AE805CE; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:06:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:06:54 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Polytropon Message-ID: <20111016230654.GB1112@thought.org> References: <20111016212628.GA30284@thought.org> <20111016235803.40b2181a.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111016235803.40b2181a.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. Of_Interest: With 25 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: need to check for hex in C: how/ X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 23:06:55 -0000 On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:58:03PM +0200, Polytropon wrote: > Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 23:58:03 +0200 > From: Polytropon > Subject: Re: need to check for hex in C: how/ > To: Gary Kline > Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List > X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) > > On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:26:31 -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > > > if n == 15 and x is the int. i can say > > > > if ((int)x == 15) Or to check if x == 'A' i can cast x to (char)x. > > > > what's the syntax to chec if x is , say, 32/ > > The integer types are automatically casted, no matter if > you compare (int) or (char) to a numerical or character > value. > > int i; > char c; > > if(i == 32 || i == ' ') ... > if(c == 32 || c == ' ') ... > > Functions or macros that deal with characters usually > do return (int), even though one would expect (char). > > this will bbe my 'sanity-checck' of sorts. the ck function will have something like: if ((char)x == 'a') { } > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org The 8.51a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 16 23:15:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 103421065674 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 23:15:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FE18FC13 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 23:15:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-40-141.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.40.141]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E841E823; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:15:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p9GNFRAC003616; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:15:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:15:27 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Gary Kline Message-Id: <20111017011527.e4d25568.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20111016230654.GB1112@thought.org> References: <20111016212628.GA30284@thought.org> <20111016235803.40b2181a.freebsd@edvax.de> <20111016230654.GB1112@thought.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: need to check for hex in C: how/ X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 23:15:30 -0000 On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:06:54 -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > this will bbe my 'sanity-checck' of sorts. the ck function will > have something like: > > if ((char)x == 'a') > { > } I'm not sure this is required. Many functions that deal with characters (in this case: letters) do operate on (int) instead of (char). For example getc() and getchar(), but also getch() from NCurses do so. It's common to simply compare those (int) value to character constants without casting them to (char) before comparison. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 00:19:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF01106564A for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:19:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766338FC08 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:19:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so2349048wwi.31 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:19:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.161.20 with SMTP id v20mr558935wek.12.1318810764901; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:19:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.47] (paris.c-mal.com. [88.170.200.60]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q30sm12228343wbn.17.2011.10.16.17.19.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:19:23 -0700 (PDT) References: <83F2C712-C50A-4CE8-AF50-7F0F5FADF3F8@my.gd> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8J2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <939E9BB7-0563-43D4-BFBF-AF8E4937CDF6@my.gd> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8J2) From: Damien Fleuriot Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 02:19:16 +0200 To: Waitman Gobble Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: boost issue freebsd 8.2 (32 bit) - infinite loop of boost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:19:26 -0000 On 16 Oct 2011, at 03:35, Waitman Gobble wrote: > On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On 15 Oct 2011, at 19:38, Waitman Gobble wrote: >>=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> I identified the problem - the build script insists on fetching boost fro= m >> heanet.dl.sourceforge.net -- for some reason this hangs indefinitely from= >> my >> connection. ie, wget >>=20 >> http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/project/boost/boost/1.45.0/boost_1_45_0.= tar.bz2resolves >> and connects but never transfers any data. (from my IP however if i >> try it from another network it works..). >>=20 >> Manually fetching from >>=20 >> http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/boost/boost/1.45.0/boost_1_45_0.= tar.bz2 >> and putting in /usr/ports/distfiles solves the problem... I'm not sure >> why >> heanet host doesn't like my IP (or something else?) >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> Anyway, I noticed I made some typos in my previous email, "34" should hav= e >> been "45". (boost_1_45_0 not boost_1_34_0). late night. lol. >>=20 >>=20 >> Waitman >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> Are you using a proxy ? >> Can you try with another IP from the same netblock as you ? >> Can you successfully telnet to their IP on port 80 and "HEAD / HTTP/1.0" ?= >>=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I am not using a proxy, however it is possible that ISP has a transparent > cache/proxy. (at&t) >=20 > Maybe I could release IP and request another one? I'm not sure it's worth i= t > though.. (?) I was able to get the file from another host (manually) and= > continue without further issues.. >=20 > telnet to port 80 connects but doesn't respond to HEAD request from this > machine. >=20 That's really odd, you should try releasing your current IP and get assigned= a new one, just for curiosity's sake.= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 00:51:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84B9106564A for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:51:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FBDA8FC0C for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:51:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id p9H0pNeP065733 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 19:51:23 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 19:51:23 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201110170051.p9H0pNeP065733@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20111016230654.GB1112@thought.org> Subject: Re: need to check for hex in C: how/ X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:51:52 -0000 > Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:06:54 -0700 > From: Gary Kline > Subject: Re: need to check for hex in C: how/ > > this will bbe my 'sanity-checck' of sorts. the ck function will > have something like: > > if ((char)x == 'a') > { > } > And, you deserve what happens if you use that kind of flawed checking. :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 07:24:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008F7106564A for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 07:24:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.spinella@rfc1925.net) Received: from mercy.rfc1925.net (host8-102-static.12-87-b.business.telecomitalia.it [87.12.102.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724A28FC14 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 07:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mercy.rfc1925.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercy.rfc1925.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C092CEC6B for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:08:32 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc1925.net Received: from mercy.rfc1925.net ([127.0.0.1]) by mercy.rfc1925.net (mercy.rfc1925.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s8nMb9InVIws for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:08:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from LSD25.communicationvalley.it (unknown [194.246.127.224]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: a.spinella@rfc1925.net) by mercy.rfc1925.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 767C52CEC49 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:08:30 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E9BD476.3070406@rfc1925.net> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:08:38 +0200 From: Alessandro Spinella User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111005 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20111013203815.GA77278@slackbox.erewhon.net> <011A9DDF-464D-49A7-B0F9-96AF6360ED62@olivent.com> <4E98608B.40705@pukruppa.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Dennis Ritchie has died. A suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 07:24:04 -0000 On 10/14/11 18:22, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > +1 > > FreeBSD-9 Codename Ritchie. > agree_counter++; Alessandro From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 07:42:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06291065675 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 07:42:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mihamina@rktmb.org) Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (slow3-v.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.89]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2F08FC13 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 07:42:18 +0000 (UTC) X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.195]) by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21FBB385F8 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:27:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.141 Received: from mfilter13-d.gandi.net (mfilter13-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.141]) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F77A808F for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:27:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter13-d.gandi.net Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]) by mfilter13-d.gandi.net (mfilter13-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8INkEHltm2v6 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:27:07 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 41.190.237.66 Received: from [192.168.0.111] (unknown [41.190.237.66]) (Authenticated sender: out@rktmb.org) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15E9DA8094 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:27:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E9BD8C7.6040109@rktmb.org> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:27:03 +0300 From: Mihamina Rakotomandimby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110918 Thunderbird/7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20111013203815.GA77278@slackbox.erewhon.net> <011A9DDF-464D-49A7-B0F9-96AF6360ED62@olivent.com> <4E98608B.40705@pukruppa.de> <4E9BD476.3070406@rfc1925.net> In-Reply-To: <4E9BD476.3070406@rfc1925.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Dennis Ritchie has died. A suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 07:42:19 -0000 On 10/17/2011 10:08 AM, Alessandro Spinella wrote: > On 10/14/11 18:22, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > >> +1 >> >> FreeBSD-9 Codename Ritchie. >> > > agree_counter++; agreed. -- RMA. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 07:55:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A06106564A for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 07:55:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ndhertbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237E38FC14 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 07:55:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaky10 with SMTP id y10so7242256iak.13 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:55:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=mqn1T7Jcia9vYzUZuqCgHLUuMPVD5nIe5MD/2I4mUE0=; b=paeC+0xsap9FmnfZ8t9V8Q4xD1MdD8oqHYGEocKxW1f/tB2PoofGNHerp5SFaKqRWi zfllRaF681FitAp3zFmhEXWM7lnmdms78WMg7AGwuuZVL5nH9YLLLGHFKUvLU/LvvIn+ BSddOvyF0h/Ol+hbnxUpa7DwOgVQndC28lI6k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.48.203 with SMTP id s11mr875622ibf.90.1318838108348; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:55:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.206.136 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:55:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:55:08 +0200 Message-ID: From: n dhert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: lev@FreeBSD.org Subject: subversion and subversion16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 07:55:14 -0000 There was a message in /usr/ports/UPDATING about subversion 1.6.x and 1.7.0 my daily # pkg_version -vIL= reports subversion-1.6.17_2 < needs updating (index has 1.7.0_1) I didn't use subversion-freebsd in the past and I want to stick to version 1.6 So from /usr/ports/UPDATING, I believe (c) applies to me I ran # cd /usr/ports/devel/subversion16 # make config this showed me the same options as I always had... No trace of the new options, which I would probably have wanted to deselect if they were there, but I would have expected them to be there ?? -- is this normal? # portupgrade -o devel/subversion16 devel/subversion takes 3 seconds, no output -- is this normal? # portupgrade -m "WITH_SUBVERSION_VER=16" -r devel/subversion16 takes also 3 seconfs, no output -- is this normal? What exactly do these things? I see not much change # pkg_version -vIL= reports still has subversion-1.6.17_2 < needs updating (index has 1.7.0_1) my /var/db/ports had still only a directory subversion with my options file as it was always I don't see a /var/db/ports/subversion16 directory yet Is this normal?? normally I would do (as every week) # portupgrade -yaRrpb I don't want to have 1.7.0 installed ... but before doing that I want to have to be sure ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 08:01:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4454E106564A for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:01:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B218FC0C for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:01:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id p9H81I2o082220 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:01:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id p9H81I7n082219; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:01:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA12080; Mon, 17 Oct 11 00:53:38 PDT Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 07:52:29 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk Message-Id: <4e9c412d.QqfMMl2gyoz0kkrB%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20111016212628.GA30284@thought.org> <4E9B55BF.3090305@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4E9B55BF.3090305@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: need to check for hex in C: how/ X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:01:19 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > '32/' is not any sort of syntax I've ever seen before to > indicate hexadecimal. I suspect it's a typo, intending '32.' My fingers are forever mixing up slashes and periods, since the keys are adjacent (on a US/English keyboard, dunno about other arrangements). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 08:24:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF701065670; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:24:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCA88FC12; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:24:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:586a:cd69:8b52:feee]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E65464AC2D; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:24:53 +0400 (MSD) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:24:46 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD Project X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <445240526.20111017122446@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: n dhert In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: lev@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: subversion and subversion16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:24:57 -0000 Hello, n. You wrote 17 =D0=BE=D0=BA=D1=82=D1=8F=D0=B1=D1=80=D1=8F 2011 =D0=B3., 11:55= :08: > There was a message in /usr/ports/UPDATING about subversion 1.6.x > and 1.7.0 > my daily > # pkg_version -vIL=3D =20 > reports > subversion-1.6.17_2 < needs updating (index has > 1.7.0_1) > I didn't use subversion-freebsd in the past and I want to stick to > version 1.6 > So from /usr/ports/UPDATING, I believe (c) applies to me > I ran > # cd /usr/ports/devel/subversion16 > # make config > this showed me the same options as I always had... > No trace of the new options, which I would probably have wanted to > deselect if they > were there, but I would have expected them to be there ?? > -- is this normal? It is strange. On my non-development system (one, where ports are updated= by regular csup from official servers, so it looks like any other FreeBSD = system in the world) "make config" shows this: Options for subversion 1.6.17_4 =E2=94= =82 =E2=94= =82 =E2=94=8C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=90= =E2=94=82 =E2=94= =82 =E2=94=82[X] P4_STYLE_MARKERS Perforce-style conflict markers = =E2=94=82 =E2=94=82 =E2=94= =82 =E2=94=82[X] ENHANCED_KEYWORD Enhanced svn:keyword support = =E2=94=82 =E2=94=82 =E2=94= =82 =E2=94=82[X] FREEBSD_TEMPLATE FreeBSD Project log template = =E2=94=82 =E2=94=82 =E2=94= =82 =E2=94=82[X] MOD_DAV_SVN mod_dav_svn module for Apache 2.X = =E2=94=82 =E2=94=82 =E2=94= =82 =E2=94=82[X] MOD_DONTDOTHAT mod_dontdothat for Apache 2.X = =E2=94=82 =E2=94=82 > # portupgrade -o devel/subversion16 devel/subversion > takes 3 seconds, no output > -- is this normal? No. It is something strange... > # portupgrade -m "WITH_SUBVERSION_VER=3D16" -r devel/subversion16=20 > takes also 3 seconfs, no output > -- is this normal? > =20 > What exactly do these things? I see not much change Could you, please, provide $FreeBSD$ line of devel/subversion16/Makefile?= And inspect it by eyes, how OPTIONS lines looks like? --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 08:35:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE1F106564A for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:35:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antonio@antonioshome.net) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A468FC08 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:35:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so2691634wwi.31 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:35:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.38.66 with SMTP id a2mr6613776wbe.81.1318840506336; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:35:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.95.68 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:35:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [87.223.6.33] Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:35:06 +0200 Message-ID: From: Antonio Vieiro To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: State of LuaJIT2 port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:35:08 -0000 Hi all, As far as I can tell there's no port of LuaJIT2 in FreeBSD. I think there were some problems to have this up and running. Does anyone know of advances on this port? Thanks, Antonio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 08:51:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3FFF1065672; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:51:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ndhertbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938B78FC1C; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaky10 with SMTP id y10so7304962iak.13 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:51:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=E8vCxj1TcfpPwTHbdPTQwHSpvSTkEC6p+otbOtF24yA=; b=J3KxPrmfI81am+TZDlZFJmVQxpqUgOw0AAndAvBizcmdZ5S0nmYJ0Vs7WxTFTx0o3x uEswL/uWmQvvH7QazTA1DFGMkhPQMu++gT2JDE82jXRDb85/B5RKJshUg8luoYRBySy4 DMwl4yGkOB4AI232fS+MvU0F5JVrqyZQuFOt0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.83.199 with SMTP id g7mr8233226ibl.78.1318841489198; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:51:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.206.136 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:51:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <445240526.20111017122446@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <445240526.20111017122446@serebryakov.spb.ru> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:51:28 +0200 Message-ID: From: n dhert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, lev@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: subversion and subversion16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:51:30 -0000 Hi, might the reason be the following? Every night I do (from cron), a # portsnap fetch but not portsnap update, this I do just before my weekly # portupgrade -yaRrpb I just did # portsnap update This updated files in /usr/ports/devel/subversion16/files (and also in /usr/ports/devel/subversion/files) with dates of yesterday The $FreeBSD$ line is now: # $FreeBSD: ports/devel/subversion16/Makefile,v 1.138 2011/10/16 14:31:47 lev Exp $ (before that I believe (I look on another FreeBSD system with subversion, where I didn't change anything yet) is was v 1.137 2011/04/01) Is it safe if I do the (c) procedure all over again? or should I first reset something before ? What woul normally be outputted with these (c) commands? 2011/10/17 Lev Serebryakov > Hello, n. > You wrote 17 =D0=BE=D0=BA=D1=82=D1=8F=D0=B1=D1=80=D1=8F 2011 =D0=B3., 11:= 55:08: > > > > There was a message in /usr/ports/UPDATING about subversion 1.6.x > > and 1.7.0 > > my daily > > # pkg_version -vIL=3D > > reports > > subversion-1.6.17_2 < needs updating (index has > > 1.7.0_1) > > I didn't use subversion-freebsd in the past and I want to stick to > > version 1.6 > > So from /usr/ports/UPDATING, I believe (c) applies to me > > I ran > > # cd /usr/ports/devel/subversion16 > > # make config > > this showed me the same options as I always had... > > No trace of the new options, which I would probably have wanted to > > deselect if they > > were there, but I would have expected them to be there ?? > > -- is this normal? > It is strange. On my non-development system (one, where ports are updat= ed > by regular csup from official servers, so it looks like any other FreeBSD > system in the world) "make config" shows this: > > Options for subversion 1.6.17_4 =E2=94= =82 > =E2= =94=82 > =E2=94=8C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=90 = =E2=94=82 > =E2= =94=82 =E2=94=82[X] > P4_STYLE_MARKERS Perforce-style conflict markers =E2=94=82 =E2= =94=82 > =E2= =94=82 =E2=94=82[X] > ENHANCED_KEYWORD Enhanced svn:keyword support =E2=94=82 =E2= =94=82 > =E2= =94=82 =E2=94=82[X] > FREEBSD_TEMPLATE FreeBSD Project log template =E2=94=82 =E2= =94=82 > =E2= =94=82 =E2=94=82[X] > MOD_DAV_SVN mod_dav_svn module for Apache 2.X =E2=94=82 =E2= =94=82 > =E2= =94=82 =E2=94=82[X] > MOD_DONTDOTHAT mod_dontdothat for Apache 2.X =E2=94=82 =E2= =94=82 > > > > # portupgrade -o devel/subversion16 devel/subversion > > takes 3 seconds, no output > > -- is this normal? > No. It is something strange... > > > # portupgrade -m "WITH_SUBVERSION_VER=3D16" -r devel/subversion16 > > takes also 3 seconfs, no output > > -- is this normal? > > > > What exactly do these things? I see not much change > Could you, please, provide $FreeBSD$ line of devel/subversion16/Makefil= e? > And inspect it by eyes, how OPTIONS lines looks like? > > -- > // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 09:24:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C66106566B for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:24:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5F38FC0C for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:24:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:586a:cd69:8b52:feee]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 11CBE4AC2D; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:24:41 +0400 (MSD) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:24:34 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD Project X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1758975009.20111017132434@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: n dhert In-Reply-To: References: <445240526.20111017122446@serebryakov.spb.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: subversion and subversion16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:24:43 -0000 Hello, n. You wrote 17 =D0=BE=D0=BA=D1=82=D1=8F=D0=B1=D1=80=D1=8F 2011 =D0=B3., 12:51= :28: > might the reason be the following? > Every night I do (from cron), a # portsnap fetch > but not portsnap update, this I do just before my weekly # > portupgrade -yaRrpb > =20 > I just did=20 > # portsnap update > This updated files in /usr/ports/devel/subversion16/files (and > also in /usr/ports/devel/subversion/files) > with dates of yesterday=20 > =20 > The $FreeBSD$ line is now: > # $FreeBSD: ports/devel/subversion16/Makefile,v 1.138 2011/10/16 14:31:47= lev Exp $ > =20 > (before that I believe (I look on another FreeBSD system with > subversion, where I didn't change anything yet) is was v 1.137 2011/04/01) Yep! It is the cause. =20 > Is it safe if I do the (c) procedure all over again? > or should I first reset something before ? Don't forget to `make config' in devel/subversion16 again. > What woul normally be outputted with these (c) commands? It should be safe now. Output should show re-building of port from scratc= hes. --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 16:30:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092E3106566C for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:30:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thecryof@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3E38FC0C for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:30:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggeq3 with SMTP id q3so4096443gge.13 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:30:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=cPji6pfhXFcKrlSxuo+dnrY/azsbWN9cR2oEGT4ukAk=; b=RngjBfo7ll+WTKtCVcu/pM4sko6oIouPKeEbG0FYZ9H+os+uIsnHULZlKfMw7v09WS Ji40ED4Zw5dopu3QdETjog/lIQ6ln7xB9XcAxrQMUknA5yrpLSmcQ+ka5xFiA8fZOVxZ j6hALKqbc3VG8ijh+jGsxg4Yxszwtq2XW5jEc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.138.195 with SMTP id a43mr9322902yhj.46.1318867457102; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:04:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.103.40 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:04:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E9BD8C7.6040109@rktmb.org> References: <20111013203815.GA77278@slackbox.erewhon.net> <011A9DDF-464D-49A7-B0F9-96AF6360ED62@olivent.com> <4E98608B.40705@pukruppa.de> <4E9BD476.3070406@rfc1925.net> <4E9BD8C7.6040109@rktmb.org> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:04:16 +0200 Message-ID: From: Michael M To: Mihamina Rakotomandimby Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dennis Ritchie has died. A suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:30:26 -0000 On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: > On 10/17/2011 10:08 AM, Alessandro Spinella wrote: > >> On 10/14/11 18:22, Odhiambo Washington wrote: >> >> +1 >>> >>> FreeBSD-9 Codename Ritchie. >>> >>> >> agree_counter++; >> > > agreed. > > > -- > RMA. > > ______________________________**_________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-** > unsubscribe@freebsd.org " > Terrific idea. +1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 19:21:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51AA5106564A for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:21:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: from mail6.hostpark.net (mail6.hostpark.net [212.243.197.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD3A8FC1B for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail6.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E0E176A6; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:04:27 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Received: from mail6.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail6.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10124) with ESMTP id 0oTuvQpXi8pu; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:04:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from saturn.pcs.ms (103-8.196-178.cust.bluewin.ch [178.196.8.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail6.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9F6E17072; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:04:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from saturn.pcs.ms (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.pcs.ms (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9HJ2rjN009115 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:02:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: (from martin@localhost) by saturn.pcs.ms (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p9HJ2rEk009114; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:02:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from martin) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:02:53 +0200 From: Martin Schweizer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111017190252.GR81547@saturn.pcs.ms> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH, CH-8608 Bubikon, Switzerland User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: FreeBSD 8.1/amd64: Boot from eSATA drive (external)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Martin Schweizer List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:21:03 -0000 Hello I'v got a notebook (HP Elite 2560p) which can boot from an exteral eSATA drive. Can FreeBSD boot from there? Is it supported? Kind regards, -- Martin Schweizer PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH; Bannholzstrasse 6; CH-8608 Bubikon Tel. +41 55 243 30 00; Fax: +41 55 243 33 22 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 20:08:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD2C1065677 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:08:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jarek-robo@o2.pl) Received: from tur.go2.pl (tur.go2.pl [193.17.41.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29168FC08 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:08:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moh2-ve2.go2.pl (moh2-ve2.go2.pl [193.17.41.200]) by tur.go2.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CD5230003 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:49:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from moh2-ve2.go2.pl (unknown [10.0.0.200]) by moh2-ve2.go2.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B05DA4008 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:49:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from o2.pl (unknown [10.0.0.146]) by moh2-ve2.go2.pl (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:49:39 +0200 (CEST) From: =?UTF-8?Q?jarek-robo?= To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <6a294fcb.6fe87cda.4e9c86d2.82456@o2.pl> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:49:38 +0200 X-Originator: 83.17.13.226 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: TeamSpeak 3 problem with FreeBSD 7.4 x64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:08:23 -0000 I=20installed=20FreeBSD=207.4=20x64=20but=20not=20working=20TeamSpeak=203= .=20I=20do=20not=20know=20why.=20The=20first=20time=20worked=20well.=20An= d=20now=20displayed=20in=20such=20a=20thing: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1:=20/lib/libiconv.so.3:=20unsupported=20file=20layout= Can=20you=20send=20me=20the=20files=20properly=20working???? I=20use=20google.translate=20not=20know=20English=20well From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 20:09:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C460106564A; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:09:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mx1.bjare.net (mx1.bjare.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6E88FC14; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:09:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0888B5E227; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:10:42 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx1.bjare.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.465 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.465 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.135, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] Received: from mx1.bjare.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.bjare.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 9zW6Bf7PO3EL; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:10:40 +0200 (CEST) X-BN-MX1: ja X-BN-MailInfo: BjareNet Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 544C05E17B; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:10:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E9C8B9E.6080801@eskk.nu> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:10:06 +0200 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111002 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: What is wrong here? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:09:37 -0000 I have a script that does portsnap fetch update pkg_version -vIL= on a Daily basis Today I got this little message about "corrupted record" and I would like to solve it ImageMagick-6.7.3.0_1 < needs updating (index has 6.7.3.1) pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring kdemultimedia-4.6.5 < needs updating (index has 4.7.2) libgtop-2.28.3_1 < needs updating (index has 2.28.3_2) Any suggestions? Thanks /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 22:30:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F6D106564A for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:30:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9707F8FC14 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:30:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9HMUoUS091631 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:30:50 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p9HMUoUS091631 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1318890650; bh=9SsJ0uGaA0cruy/yjDMzS+EsEGBhC+oUNA++OlpqfF8=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4E9CAC93.3080001@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20M on,=2017=20Oct=202011=2023:30:43=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20rv:7.0.1)=20Gecko/2 0110929=20Thunderbird/7.0.1|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20freebsd-ques tions@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20What=20is=20wrong=20here?|Refer ences:=20<4E9C8B9E.6080801@eskk.nu>|In-Reply-To:=20<4E9C8B9E.60808 01@eskk.nu>|X-Enigmail-Version:=201.3.2|OpenPGP:=20id=3D60AE908C|C ontent-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20 protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"---- --------enig9BEF91706BB784BC212CFB99"; b=XZozys0W88g9QTu1boi3Plgk8ZdyYYxdyItH1slyO723G11IjPueWr67UARz8VfpL Z1m0bk58CMRS0/F14Ku5p91yPhXXvkEpK/kjP4GfOp2AaWJeyC2NxrHTkN7+Gf6G9r CyNtYmlCCdQXHOAyc5h3OneBnM/keom9wkn1+Q+w= Message-ID: <4E9CAC93.3080001@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:30:43 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4E9C8B9E.6080801@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: <4E9C8B9E.6080801@eskk.nu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9BEF91706BB784BC212CFB99" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: What is wrong here? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:30:55 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9BEF91706BB784BC212CFB99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 17/10/2011 21:10, Leslie Jensen wrote: > Today I got this little message about "corrupted record" and I would > like to solve it >=20 >=20 > ImageMagick-6.7.3.0_1 < needs updating (index has 6.7.3= =2E1) > pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring > pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring > kdemultimedia-4.6.5 < needs updating (index has 4.7.2= ) > libgtop-2.28.3_1 < needs updating (index has 2.28.3_2= ) >=20 >=20 > Any suggestions? portmaster --check-depends Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig9BEF91706BB784BC212CFB99 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6crJoACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxmqgCdFaK8dQFV2wMClnWjXs2AbIKI kxcAn0F06Yek5bpSU0O6AYUcY4eUd6ER =7y1D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9BEF91706BB784BC212CFB99-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 22:53:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F5E106566C for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:53:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jusher71@yahoo.com) Received: from nm8.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm8.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.90.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 755008FC16 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:53:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.138.90.48] by nm8.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Oct 2011 22:53:19 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.240] by tm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Oct 2011 22:53:19 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1013.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Oct 2011 22:53:19 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 962824.36704.bm@omp1013.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 94953 invoked by uid 60001); 17 Oct 2011 22:53:19 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1318891999; bh=KoQx/LB+0DnoIQXf6iMYhaXIvltWIpX/OTZXxp98dbk=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VlCC2dE+3n8gEPyBuzMAefCTRyntArsnhRV5s7Ft2gmWUK75nKvfS2MRr38uxJrz+ZZ+i9oqlb7bR9iLqHUEmXTpU3QTcRiyNaVhhgwtLe7o8wNUiAxsG/fNcw+16Wj+S45TfuonIa4D4hnql94JyYPyY7//3FvWTNRKo4ff0sg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=3sO8CNEWLvetSCoWuTmep4ZODd3I+0DRS1rUAaE+ure7kQbe0riQpBMBf3kLdbMnZ/EIaxonsCp/0y52BnGIgRr63Y79cAJR8pucm3FMO/8yGG+5bf+Ien0uqjTB/1nyr21aWMpnw/mMsOnEbinvlm7Jxao4/c6p6HgFFCaASLQ=; X-YMail-OSG: 0aPHUB8VM1mi2KRfFYkTIvYOEZ2ZuSllWkFZj5x49zxA4uA 2leOC4b7OPN.kEzyCo9Wd4ziw1U1hD08XI82shhRDyEZ1SEZjbpifPfqB3Ht 9koOMboT2eutgcyX_dgs3jMVinovCnVMnyf9ks0Y8pLh9y7i8wZ2q__Ku49k 4qvPknu.aKLYbLvPpzAd1bZWNDtYtTmnQiH0Qu5Ma6LzZ4zN_9WE0fH5rJE8 xYibeiKayzbP.mLZ_hX.p6ot1n7oLZBp2BwxVrINICNynFZKcaa4dBPPLkAe B78Fxs80abuEcRcrfDCT7vl1RunBN5fnMnBKTsHoNGZ3GDZ65zp12Dh.1R9S TPHw3K1_Op0Y7llOZXlDrVrtVKe3YE_t9eQ_Ke9k8 Received: from [199.48.147.38] by web121216.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:53:19 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/14.0.7 YahooMailWebService/0.8.114.317681 Message-ID: <1318891999.94031.YahooMailClassic@web121216.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:53:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason Usher To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:08:22 +0000 Subject: USB thumb drives for bootable flash FreeBSD installation... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:53:20 -0000 I'm going to run FreeBSD off of a flash drive on some older mac mini systems. Before I begin, though, I'd like some advice on the best USB thumb drives for this. These systems will be deployed and left in place, hopefully for YEARS in a remote, inaccessible location. So, I'd like to make sure I get the most durable, fault-tolerant USB thumb drives possible. I'm not going to swap on them, or do lots of log writing, etc., but still ... I really don't want to fly across the world just because this one component died. Are they all the same, or are there some USB flash choices that are more durable and fault tolerant than others ? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 23:20:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25E0106566B for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout026.mac.com (asmtpout026.mac.com [17.148.16.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 995A48FC12 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:20:12 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp026.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0LT8001ONGT8MJ80@asmtp026.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:19:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813,1.0.211,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-10-17_05:2011-10-17, 2011-10-17, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1110170312 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <1318891999.94031.YahooMailClassic@web121216.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:19:56 -0700 Message-id: <27CA3493-BF60-401B-88EB-7C613EBA9FFB@mac.com> References: <1318891999.94031.YahooMailClassic@web121216.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> To: Jason Usher X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB thumb drives for bootable flash FreeBSD installation... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:20:12 -0000 Hi-- On Oct 17, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Jason Usher wrote: > Are they all the same, or are there some USB flash choices that are more durable and fault tolerant than others ? There's fairly significant differences: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_memory#Write_endurance SLC NOR flash tends to last longer than NAND flash; SLC also tends to last longer than MLC. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 23:59:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906B1106566B for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:59:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D8258FC17 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:59:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9HNxckV018811 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:59:38 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id p9HNxc7c018808; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:59:38 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:59:38 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Jason Usher In-Reply-To: <1318891999.94031.YahooMailClassic@web121216.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: References: <1318891999.94031.YahooMailClassic@web121216.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:59:38 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB thumb drives for bootable flash FreeBSD installation... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:59:39 -0000 On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Jason Usher wrote: > I'm going to run FreeBSD off of a flash drive on some older mac mini systems. > > Before I begin, though, I'd like some advice on the best USB thumb drives for this. > > These systems will be deployed and left in place, hopefully for YEARS > in a remote, inaccessible location. So, I'd like to make sure I get > the most durable, fault-tolerant USB thumb drives possible. Put them on the inside so they don't get snapped off. Or get a low-profile drive and shield it somehow. There are internal IDE/SATA to CF/SD adapters also. > I'm not going to swap on them, or do lots of log writing, etc., but > still ... I really don't want to fly across the world just because > this one component died. > > Are they all the same, or are there some USB flash choices that are > more durable and fault tolerant than others ? I don't know which are actually more durable rather than just being marketed that way, but I'd consider making a mirror of two different brands and models to try to improve the odds against media or mechanical failure. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 05:12:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528D7106566B for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:12:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32BD98FC12 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:12:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id p9I5CZ4u040455 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:12:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id p9I5CZFi040454; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:12:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA16214; Mon, 17 Oct 11 22:03:51 PDT Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:02:42 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: office@pc-service.ch Message-Id: <4e9d6ae2.X3FBp0ikh5r8VHiQ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20111017190252.GR81547@saturn.pcs.ms> In-Reply-To: <20111017190252.GR81547@saturn.pcs.ms> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.1/amd64: Boot from eSATA drive (external)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:12:37 -0000 Martin Schweizer wrote: > I'v got a notebook (HP Elite 2560p) which can boot from an exteral > eSATA drive. Can FreeBSD boot from there? Is it supported? It seems as if it should work. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 06:38:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB5A106564A for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:38:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ndhertbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5938FC12 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:38:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaky10 with SMTP id y10so424661iak.13 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:38:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=a8VNPAhFGFu6a+SWSEsrPncGSCC5NEIoI7hUsWq1Nig=; b=xwvZSCX+l0NyahQUhN8KIc/uQb7HZ2CFT/CcVh8oJifhZVFifyvGBKLNtD3JED+nBl m/HOm48yh/jXhd2VumYlZtfrjlfC6FUSU4BPHSx+bVZRpfaha6unC6u7mdbY8OM8K3fA Ap+f7wu9KC35EU2N2tmdlm1pL0QoAyDrMBHdM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.82.11 with SMTP id z11mr435673ibk.77.1318919924531; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:38:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.206.136 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:38:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:38:44 +0200 Message-ID: From: n dhert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: ISC dhcp server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:38:45 -0000 isc-dhcp31-server was removes from the ports. The Freebsd Handbook still refers to it... Can a /usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf configuration file from isc-dhcp31-server, without changealso be used in isc-dhcp42-4.2.2 ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 07:16:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E008D106564A for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:16:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ndhertbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A506C8FC17 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:16:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggeq3 with SMTP id q3so355447gge.13 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:16:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=eGEtJcJGNDBZv3Pzf+dsKF3bSHmq0/lx9oVcuryWs1A=; b=X5gwvEuhunE0bLHHnokvfGr044fJjg9Uby0PP5IoEOsi1yzwiIWS4s/B1DLxNZ2xhW fmVDufTiTAFds6V5L9TWc+nXfQec+pyKMWGwaKH9GONFXl0YPVICgYAFZwn+2RA5+XfJ dEj21cTX4QpreIR+hxWUNPktvBI6n8vv4dF4s= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.197.197 with SMTP id el5mr2250566icb.23.1318922196833; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.206.136 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:16:36 +0200 Message-ID: From: n dhert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: printing Cups Gutenprint X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:16:38 -0000 I updated the ports : gutenprint-base-5.2.4_2 < needs updating (index has 5.2.7) gutenprint-cups-5.2.4_2 < needs updating (index has 5.2.7) now printing a text file $ lp testfile.txt doesn't print and $ lpstat -t says: printer psg is idle. enabled since Tue Oct 18 08:55:19 2011 The PPD version (5.2.4) is not compatible with Gutenprint 5.2.7. the file remains in the queue until it cancel it How to solve? There was nothing about that in /usr/ports/UPDATING ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 07:24:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E56E1065675 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:24:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from mail.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6D88FC08 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:24:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gamma.lan.locolomo.org (gamma.lan.locolomo.org [192.168.0.33]) by mail.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59EB61C0841 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:08:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E9D2605.7000308@locolomo.org> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:08:53 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ISC dhcp server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:24:13 -0000 On 18/10/2011 08:38, n dhert wrote: > isc-dhcp31-server was removes from the ports. The Freebsd Handbook still > refers to it... > Can a /usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf configuration file from isc-dhcp31-server, > without changealso be used in isc-dhcp42-4.2.2 ? > I think so, I use dhcp 4.1 and didn't change my 3.1 configfile. BR, Erik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 07:49:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC37106564A for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:49:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ndhertbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED2EE8FC16 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaky10 with SMTP id y10so504443iak.13 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:49:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=9YQjNTAKBjLB/8zcTX56w3hJ1RILjXuvfRmpiar2jvs=; b=ewRx8xVNgmSZxEqUVj2nHcYR2q41YH+P+QXe7ByyLnP7tA7P33eHS0GxWhpMszmKnv Z8heWN8ACRgU2FbSNyb223YnhicIxBNoNseKSkMCjLS7m+qiBv0I2QXuq4WRVITyH8Z3 EpbXur/4DAA/FDiZCcwShkNSb5MWimjYEbTIM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.82.11 with SMTP id z11mr538158ibk.77.1318924194129; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:49:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.206.136 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:49:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:49:54 +0200 Message-ID: From: n dhert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: printing Cups Gutenprint X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:49:55 -0000 Solved: # cups-genppdupdate # ps -jaxw | grep cupsd --> of cupsd deamon # kill -HUP 2011/10/18 n dhert > I updated the ports : > gutenprint-base-5.2.4_2 < needs updating (index has 5.2.7) > gutenprint-cups-5.2.4_2 < needs updating (index has 5.2.7) > now printing a text file > $ lp testfile.txt > doesn't print and > $ lpstat -t > says: > printer psg is idle. enabled since Tue Oct 18 08:55:19 2011 > The PPD version (5.2.4) is not compatible with Gutenprint 5.2.7. > the file remains in the queue until it cancel it > > How to solve? > There was nothing about that in /usr/ports/UPDATING ... > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 09:34:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839CA1065744 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:34:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrei693@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136058FC13 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:34:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so470936eyd.13 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 02:34:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eMm/6mDvYcpi9JYXlWeIfsH5uy3DZq31YffX79B2xSs=; b=lWiqJ6D6dCuHQ1wlCzeggkqOhdV6tP74bZZgJkoq1+5LxY4nLqAiWrnsd/E8ba+f5Y RcQnK99ILlaNjzNYM5JU+NLQy2dDYuqtLICfZ7Yp5og3LpEhohsK4R3v2iTNXQFSSuEn 5lSWDtQTbBhMuqJnJyZJFaimmmTvT420dS0Uk= Received: by 10.14.14.103 with SMTP id c79mr147345eec.86.1318930483099; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 02:34:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([87.213.55.5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z58sm3956634eea.3.2011.10.18.02.34.42 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 18 Oct 2011 02:34:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E9D4830.1040701@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:34:40 +0200 From: Andrei Brezan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4E9D2605.7000308@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: <4E9D2605.7000308@locolomo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: ISC dhcp server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:34:44 -0000 On 10/18/2011 9:08 AM, Erik Nørgaard wrote: > On 18/10/2011 08:38, n dhert wrote: >> isc-dhcp31-server was removes from the ports. The Freebsd Handbook still >> refers to it... >> Can a /usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf configuration file from >> isc-dhcp31-server, >> without changealso be used in isc-dhcp42-4.2.2 ? >> > I think so, I use dhcp 4.1 and didn't change my 3.1 configfile. > > BR, Erik I've also used the old conf file from 3.1 with 4.2 without any issues. Regards, Andrei From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 13:16:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4AB1065673 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:16:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ihsan.junaidi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9CD8FC1A for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:16:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk35 with SMTP id 35so2559229qyk.13 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:16:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=VMLyuZqt1gUAcQoA3jXHXdbO+xutkQ77DcI7ZncPj/A=; b=LySf6FqK4UVenGvpEJRGI40fZ9PNkcf+99seT3+baMEscGPfIHTErmlTwMaHJA+vsN KB3ttT6cnG9Htx7O2BlApcLPUsm0RSchqOu6bi8CzIJZ9IhacMkv6QGJAlcn1zLfWUPw oOShZqQOfcJRljXHpoySa3xbn4lcrjp2k0pss= Received: by 10.68.209.37 with SMTP id mj5mr4554446pbc.123.1318941895790; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:44:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (173.179.159.110.tm-hsbb.tm.net.my. [110.159.179.173]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ki1sm7141957pbb.3.2011.10.18.05.44.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:44:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:44:50 +0800 Message-Id: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: Maximum gif(4) interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:16:17 -0000 Hi, I need to build a system that need to terminate a number of 6-in-4 and = 4-in-4 tunnels. Can someone point me to a direction, with gif auto-cloning and on = GENERIC, what is the maximum number of gif interfaces/tunnels that can = be supported? I'm on 8.2. Thanks in advance.= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 14:14:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8981F106566C for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:14:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE748FC16 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:14:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9IEEeA0047739; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:14:40 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id p9IEEeiK047736; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:14:40 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:14:40 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: n dhert In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:14:40 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ISC dhcp server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:14:41 -0000 On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, n dhert wrote: > isc-dhcp31-server was removes from the ports. The Freebsd Handbook still > refers to it... Now fixed. Thanks for mentioning that! > Can a /usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf configuration file from isc-dhcp31-server, > without changealso be used in isc-dhcp42-4.2.2 ? FWIW, I went from 3.1 to 4.1 to 4.2 and don't recall any problems. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 14:55:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC251065673 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:55:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E59DF8FC1C for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:55:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaky10 with SMTP id y10so1002468iak.13 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:55:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.146.195 with SMTP id k3mr5454270icv.13.1318949713361; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:55:13 -0700 (PDT) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.182.10.101 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:55:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:55:13 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: NTny2QL8-rrOO6_tfl9Rckc0GEg Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Where to post articles on FBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:55:15 -0000 Hi, I have been using FBSD with EzJail and a lot of Perl stuff like developing and maintaining Catalyst jails and flavours, and hos to create a jail based on a previous Catalyst jail and such, (taking advantage of bsdpan) etc. etc. I'd like to publish some articles on this because I think that many administrators simply ignore the power of FBSD and the jails system especially with things like EzJail where I found that the info was scattered, incomplete or outdated. Where would be the place to publish these articles? FBSD Diary? Thanks, -- Alejandro Imass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 14:59:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2AC1065672 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:59:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1-6.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113DD8FC0A for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:59:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a] (saphire3.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9IEx2rG065823; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:59:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <4E9D9434.4050706@sentex.net> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:59:00 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alejandro Imass References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Where to post articles on FBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:59:05 -0000 What about http://bsdmag.org/ ? ---Mike On 10/18/2011 10:55 AM, Alejandro Imass wrote: > Hi, > > I have been using FBSD with EzJail and a lot of Perl stuff like > developing and maintaining Catalyst jails and flavours, and hos to > create a jail based on a previous Catalyst jail and such, (taking > advantage of bsdpan) etc. etc. > > I'd like to publish some articles on this because I think that many > administrators simply ignore the power of FBSD and the jails system > especially with things like EzJail where I found that the info was > scattered, incomplete or outdated. > > Where would be the place to publish these articles? FBSD Diary? > > Thanks, > -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 15:04:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6DC106566C for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:04:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joh.hendriks@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B158FC08 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:04:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so841901eyd.13 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:04:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mKcK6PMUTxnsrZ7pGgCoWoFXlRANDlvD8mwGm7Ux/ys=; b=s/1kvDSzx7lpgZgaMOPTwbrJ1HC3Wl5KJuXnpJZ4v9cnN8fI8xOjNW/Fyd6Gxy87h5 CKdGv1Z1KzNylqS9ImSRTX5VBailgwXN1ceozGCxf88mdx0U1KMIaoMUUzeY6/kpkOBJ UAENY+3RkpY48h86ZeGCgurODjPjqQz1tlsMY= Received: by 10.14.2.82 with SMTP id 58mr342523eee.219.1318950258389; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:04:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.129] (schavemaker.nl. [213.84.84.186]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o4sm6626393eeb.0.2011.10.18.08.04.17 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:04:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E9D956F.3090004@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:04:15 +0200 From: Johan Hendriks User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alejandro Imass References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Where to post articles on FBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:04:20 -0000 Alejandro Imass schreef: > Hi, > > I have been using FBSD with EzJail and a lot of Perl stuff like > developing and maintaining Catalyst jails and flavours, and hos to > create a jail based on a previous Catalyst jail and such, (taking > advantage of bsdpan) etc. etc. > > I'd like to publish some articles on this because I think that many > administrators simply ignore the power of FBSD and the jails system > especially with things like EzJail where I found that the info was > scattered, incomplete or outdated. > > Where would be the place to publish these articles? FBSD Diary? > > Thanks, > Maybe the freebsd forums. There is a howto section. regards Johan Hendriks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 15:13:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1766B1065670 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:13:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikel.king@olivent.com) Received: from mail.olivent.com (mail.olivent.com [75.99.82.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8258FC17 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:13:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.olivent.com (Kerio Connect 7.0.0 patch 1) (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128 bits)); Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:13:21 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) From: mikel king In-Reply-To: <4E9D9434.4050706@sentex.net> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:13:21 -0400 Message-Id: References: <4E9D9434.4050706@sentex.net> To: Mike Tancsa X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: Where to post articles on FBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:13:28 -0000 On Oct 18, 2011, at 10:59 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote: > What about http://bsdmag.org/ ? > > ---Mike > > On 10/18/2011 10:55 AM, Alejandro Imass wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have been using FBSD with EzJail and a lot of Perl stuff like >> developing and maintaining Catalyst jails and flavours, and hos to >> create a jail based on a previous Catalyst jail and such, (taking >> advantage of bsdpan) etc. etc. >> >> I'd like to publish some articles on this because I think that many >> administrators simply ignore the power of FBSD and the jails system >> especially with things like EzJail where I found that the info was >> scattered, incomplete or outdated. >> >> Where would be the place to publish these articles? FBSD Diary? >> >> Thanks, >> BSD News is always on the lookout for new content. Regards, Mikel King BSD News Network http://bsdnews.net skype: mikel.king http://twitter.com/mikelking From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 15:25:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F69D106566B for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:25:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from claudiu.vasadi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B85E8FC13 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:25:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfo13 with SMTP id fo13so906037vcb.13 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:25:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Wenx4oAjeggGXc2pp4o5qXra7BRZs46/QaGsjobL44I=; b=G048ojpmk3k/6zLeA+b6IP2+U8aJLfilE1ukj06EXC7p6XQDYKo+gBIgPOHBhueS8M Je69f8wU8yEwPoBQz6p2k+ezBFmi4mp8sDBojBJjeimb3aXZBo5DpBpstXcg5wb44NQR F8mnXMYHPGBkv2KM6vYqw5BZKOKodPkibLkI0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.8.195 with SMTP id t3mr5536212pba.107.1318951544943; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:25:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.55.133 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:25:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:25:44 +0200 Message-ID: From: claudiu vasadi To: Warren Block , FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: ISC dhcp server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:25:46 -0000 Then again, one can alway use "dhcpd -t" to test the configuration file. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 16:55:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF78D106566B; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:55:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B1548FC08; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:55:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so1151072wwi.31 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:55:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=P9dSLn9mKjcCRTsyHqKmGa7hbeZwf2uMfrfPRnrtpOY=; b=NUg/IXNgUju65lp4xnKwpahgVJlacXO+koRvOmhlELJiP+SsIOMS71sPYkw20f3uBj sXVrQ/U5gmu0ITKllGagAYvzjaf0oC3x0txSb7q2aRU7ltyA8kqGhz5I3P3qqq6I9caT dqPbCPBpi6Iv4pN5NiBHuteU7GVwwGUsgZy18= Received: by 10.216.134.168 with SMTP id s40mr5744387wei.50.1318956951168; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:55:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.dg (41-132-93-69.dsl.mweb.co.za. [41.132.93.69]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o17sm2702449wbm.6.2011.10.18.09.55.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:55:50 -0700 (PDT) From: David Naylor To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:55:40 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-BETA2; KDE/4.7.1; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart25366988.ZHaIlbDXAI"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201110181855.44519.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.3.29 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:55:52 -0000 --nextPart25366988.ZHaIlbDXAI Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.3.29 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. =20 To date there has been 1119 (+183) downloads from mediafire. =20 nVidia uses should rerun patch-wine-nvidia.sh after updating wine. =20 Regards, David [1]=20 MD5 (freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.3.29,1.tbz) =3D 3c5d8896352dc16a829c045dc52c1= f2e MD5 (freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.3.29,1.txz) =3D db2855755650c300135c50ed8361c= bb9 [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 --nextPart25366988.ZHaIlbDXAI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk6dr5AACgkQUaaFgP9pFrJkAACeM+Mx7P9o6NqH8lLeIAle+NsO +10An3EWC6NxyAEalcGKSou7G3DKNZpd =JxFG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart25366988.ZHaIlbDXAI-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 19:57:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id 02046106566C; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:57:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:57:12 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20111018195712.GA18773@freebsd.org> References: <4E924B4D.4050801@centurytel.net> <20111010063740.GA23603@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4E92BF3C.8080807@centurytel.net> <20111010104450.GA28895@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4E9616FD.5080404@centurytel.net> <447h49yed0.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <4E9627A6.8000907@centurytel.net> <44vcrtohej.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20111013162524.GA75476@freebsd.org> <44wrc8iz09.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44wrc8iz09.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Subject: Re: Can't access a music CD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:57:13 -0000 On Thu Oct 13 11, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Alexander Best writes: > > > ano ther thought might be to implement an audio cd filesystem, so one could do > > 'mount -o audiocdfs /dev/cd0 /media/cd' and then all tracks appear as RAW pcm > > audio files. maybe fuse comes with something like this? > > > > /dev/acdt is no longer supported? nope. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 20:09:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000EB1065676 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:09:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nm.knife@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4C18FC08 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:09:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfo13 with SMTP id fo13so1337100vcb.13 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:09:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=OCEPeOPggU5nEtIqKzPNox2jTGZ/J90qFeMiQ5as3Jo=; b=TRKH/ux4KeYP/T1OmGpwPGoZj6wsR85DYBgG9bB25wP4IKoZ879StwVKDg5UTjfVkR /jejvUnaN5vvvZiWpodAHZXJii3yoNyjECnQrtR+B6/uvM0FhGYR+ZLMWylXfZcQRhPj TaCVpxuqAwDGzYH7HbMCm2E1zt69rRZFmREOM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.51.8 with SMTP id g8mr637076obo.37.1318968546917; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:09:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.116.36 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:09:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201110181855.44519.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> References: <201110181855.44519.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:09:06 -0700 Message-ID: From: =?windows-1251?B?y/7h7uzo8CDD8Ojj7vDu4g==?= To: David Naylor , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.3.29 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:09:08 -0000 version 1.30.1 fixed the no fonts issue in Steam source games. Thank you for porting and keep up the good work -- Lyubomir Grigorov (bgalakazam) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 21:04:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9177E106566B; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:04:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECAD38FC13; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:04:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi40 with SMTP id 40so1344263wyi.13 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:04:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=ztRs8/cKwWF673r2avKJfttjnxgqw7UtE2Ion6RaeB8=; b=FlY/ACjlnGbaEAkPZLuTXewYWIVmpN0mduIUeAU6b+KHcjRILPJt4bxLr17RtDAGHV I6V0YTOxPSx3144zH91HJxihmCLlQc38Ky/aahrwVXeZ5qFGmKmqzafKxteX0hjBoMn+ wUJLdastUFUfxiirA7crhhWblEL4aCKckyupw= Received: by 10.227.135.141 with SMTP id n13mr1436295wbt.53.1318971855772; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:04:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.dg (41-132-93-69.dsl.mweb.co.za. [41.132.93.69]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q30sm5796026wbn.17.2011.10.18.14.04.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:04:14 -0700 (PDT) From: David Naylor To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:03:51 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-BETA2; KDE/4.7.1; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2300292.PBbulX2PeA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201110182303.55268.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.3.30 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:04:17 -0000 --nextPart2300292.PBbulX2PeA Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.3.30 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. =20 To date there has been 1147 (+28) downloads from mediafire. =20 nVidia uses should rerun patch-wine-nvidia.sh after updating wine. =20 Regards, David [1]=20 MD5 (freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.3.30,1.tbz) =3D 9595e0991d8e9a9c10d6111f1d508= c21 MD5 (freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.3.30,1.txz) =3D 3aa8bf39a6ad49c6060e9ca7b3c64= d0d [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 --nextPart2300292.PBbulX2PeA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk6d6bsACgkQUaaFgP9pFrLN8ACghk4hZcfhN/aehvLK790kjYbr 1m0AnAjDqJDvgbPEQsMXjGgz7b1N/jRa =Kh9F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2300292.PBbulX2PeA-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 22:11:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA2B106566C for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:11:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from oceanpt.safeport.com (oceanpt.safeport.com [65.122.17.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E46B8FC14 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:11:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oceanpt.safeport.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p9IM3TMr016449 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:03:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:03:29 -0400 (EDT) From: doug@safeport.com To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (oceanpt.safeport.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:03:30 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Subject: multi-boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:11:26 -0000 I have a system with two physical disks with a version of FreeBSD installed on each disk. With various 7.x systems I had: F1 disk1 on slices ads5x F5 disk2 on slices ads6x I installed 8.2 on disk2, incorrectly saying leave the mbr alone. So when I boot from the second disk I get F6 PXE Boot: F1 I can then hit F1 or wait and all goes okay. I tried using sysinstall to rewrite the FBSD boot manager but that not effect any change. Must I rewrite the mbr on disk 1 also? _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-217-9220 Fax: 301-217-9277 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 01:28:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFEBB1065672 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 01:28:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from suicidecries@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF9E8FC08 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 01:28:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaky10 with SMTP id y10so1735269iak.13 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:28:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=wZn5kmYn4xG9Vy5V0EFwF0S5K0igMs46snptYGgd3Ks=; b=kepqztmAHu7Ww7woNuW+JfK3/BwmCo8ufXihYBqLo2dCo99whIDInrfVMTjIw6gHCc 4CoKW/tvJGGRV6yOJzwYPbPWgyZDFq/FgznccX4DVsdfGqUOJRwO9nwIjLxbYUKZ2H5e JdOCdUH80JJpJLp4WNi4Q9n3Zjbdx9mg+FRxk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.48.142 with SMTP id r14mr2011860ibf.5.1318985920708; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:58:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.17.2 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:58:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:58:40 -0600 Message-ID: From: Suicide Cries To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: OpenBGPd on FreeBSD 8.2 no kernel support for PF_KEY X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 01:28:17 -0000 Hello FreeBSD team, I am setting up OpenBGP on FreeBSD 8.2 and encountering an issue. We are using md5 authentication with our ISP and "no kernel support for PF_KEY" and "md5sig not available, disabling". Am I missing a device in my kernel configuraton? Other than the GENERIC configuration, here are the devices and options I have compiled in: device carp options IPSEC options IPSEC_NAT_T device crypto device pf device pfsync device pflog options ALTQ options ALTQ_CBQ options ALTQ_RED options ALTQ_RIO options ALTQ_HFSC options ALTQ_PRIQ options ALTQ_NOPCC relevant portions of bgpd.conf: AS 10753 router-id x.x.x.x network x.x.x.x/28 neighbor x.x.x.x { remote-as 3356 descr "AS 3356 peer 1" announce self tcp md5sig password XXXX } I've previously used OpenBPGD on OpenBSD and never had an issue. My guess is likely this is a quick fix and I would appreciate a quick response. Many thanks in advance. Kind regards, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 02:08:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8018C106564A for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:08:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darylXYZ@ci.com.au) Received: from mippet.ci.com.au (mippet.ci.com.au [192.65.182.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C32E8FC08 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:08:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mippet.ci.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mippet.ci.com.au (8.14.4/8.14.4/CE101231/cmlga) with ESMTP id p9J1vwMl088694 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:57:59 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from darylXYZ@ci.com.AU) Received: (from daryl@localhost) by mippet.ci.com.au (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p9J1vwRL088691; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:57:58 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from darylXYZ@ci.com.AU) X-Authentication-Warning: mippet.ci.com.au: daryl set sender to darylXYZ@ci.com.AU using -f Sender: daryl@ci.com.AU To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Daryl Sayers Date: 19 Oct 2011 12:57:58 +1100 Message-ID: Lines: 77 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 192.65.182.30 Subject: ZFS and glabels when export/importing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:08:45 -0000 Had a prblem when I needed to export a zpool and import again. The pool used glabels for each device but after the import the pool is now using the raw devices names. sandbox# zpool create -f tank3 raidz1 /dev/label/012 /dev/label/066 label/040 label/064 sandbox# zpool status pool: tank3 state: ONLINE scan: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank3 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/012 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/066 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/040 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/064 ONLINE 0 0 0 sandbox# glabel list | grep Name 1. Name: label/012 1. Name: ada0 1. Name: label/066 1. Name: ada1 1. Name: label/040 1. Name: ada2 1. Name: label/064 1. Name: ada3 sandbox# zpool export tank3 sandbox# glabel list | grep Name 1. Name: label/012 1. Name: ada0 1. Name: label/066 1. Name: ada1 1. Name: label/040 1. Name: ada2 1. Name: label/064 1. Name: ada3 sandbox# zpool import tank3 sandbox# glabel list sandbox# zpool status pool: tank3 state: ONLINE scan: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank3 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada2 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada3 ONLINE 0 0 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------ The only way I could get zfs to use the glabels without destroying the pool was to install a new drive, glabel it and then replace that with the first drive, then do the same for each drive. sandbox# zpool replace -f tank3 /dev/ada0 label/014 ... wait for completion sandbox# zpool replace -f tank3 /dev/ada1 label/012 ... wait for completion Note that I did not need to glabel any drive (except the newly installed spare) so the label was still intact on each drive. So, How do I do an export and import and still keep the glabels that the original pool was created with. -- Daryl Sayers To reply please remove the XYZ from the email address. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 02:15:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4370A1065672 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:15:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from unix.hacker@comcast.net) Received: from QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.59.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041228FC13 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta24.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.76]) by QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id mS5w1h00G1ei1Bg5BSFl3j; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:15:45 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([68.43.224.227]) by omta24.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id mSFk1h00e4uzdYs3kSFlu0; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:15:45 +0000 Message-ID: <4E9E32D1.7050900@comcast.net> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:15:45 -0400 From: Allen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20111013203815.GA77278@slackbox.erewhon.net> <011A9DDF-464D-49A7-B0F9-96AF6360ED62@olivent.com> <4E98608B.40705@pukruppa.de> <4E9BD476.3070406@rfc1925.net> <4E9BD8C7.6040109@rktmb.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Dennis Ritchie has died. A suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:15:45 -0000 On 10/17/2011 12:04 PM, Michael M wrote: *SNIP* / *PRUNE* For whatever it may be worth; I fully stand by dedicating the next release to dmr, as it wouldn't exist without him and Ken. -Allen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 02:44:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3581B106566B for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:44:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from suicidecries@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01CF58FC14 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:44:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaky10 with SMTP id y10so1811809iak.13 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:44:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=H0pgun3PPkBJFJnC4kHy6KqRZZabQrSZgiiDQrEsMPk=; b=N0G/J4fojVECiseUlQUlDmEnYBHBM9SomBC3mwUvC6wILlFdf9uCe4k2Bkwz9eJPK/ eH+NHv8sPBWkYdGMLF+rilrd88MHq1eAWWzWbZOeEBM+faZEUtnyyeJ3/xngU/pSm8OJ 1amo3wYvW538NFvpUXIDL8SUa0D+BvhgJv45Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.47.206 with SMTP id o14mr2103246ibf.18.1318992256141; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:44:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.17.2 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:44:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:44:16 -0600 Message-ID: From: Suicide Cries To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: OpenBGPd on FreeBSD 8.2 no kernel support for PF_KEY X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:44:17 -0000 Compiling in options TCP_SIGNATURE solved the issue. 2011/10/18 Suicide Cries > Hello FreeBSD team, > > I am setting up OpenBGP on FreeBSD 8.2 and encountering an issue. We are > using md5 authentication with our ISP and "no kernel support for PF_KEY" and > "md5sig not available, disabling". Am I missing a device in my kernel > configuraton? Other than the GENERIC configuration, here are the devices > and options I have compiled in: > > device carp > options IPSEC > options IPSEC_NAT_T > device crypto > device pf > device pfsync > device pflog > options ALTQ > options ALTQ_CBQ > options ALTQ_RED > options ALTQ_RIO > options ALTQ_HFSC > options ALTQ_PRIQ > options ALTQ_NOPCC > > relevant portions of bgpd.conf: > AS 10753 > router-id x.x.x.x > > network x.x.x.x/28 > > neighbor x.x.x.x { > remote-as 3356 > descr "AS 3356 peer 1" > announce self > tcp md5sig password XXXX > } > > I've previously used OpenBPGD on OpenBSD and never had an issue. My guess > is likely this is a quick fix and I would appreciate a quick response. Many > thanks in advance. > > > Kind regards, > > Chris > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 02:49:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692CE106564A for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:49:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ambrosehua@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CB88FC08 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:49:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkbzu17 with SMTP id zu17so1997647bkb.13 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:49:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=56x974nIIZN4j2drXiZKbhM94vJeSkKzhard7zlqmko=; b=FSg5Bhjomg2gYkqEUpF9vEp1RawowSgpVwLq2ng4QBJYgSaHh6Ta4PzJX/DjjSeF5f +jxYm19esjZzQcaQ3OqqrB9X3qJzgKvHaDZbmKq43inqGgyqj4z2WwkSwIRJo7mold7B fUfJX6bYf6GOk+Z+3tzyoJivDx7JdVJuUE9wA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.16.82 with SMTP id n18mr8020565faa.2.1318990866950; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.156.1 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:21:06 +0800 Message-ID: From: Paul Ambrose To: freebsd-current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: config(8) does not add post-processing for source file with compile-with command in sys/conf/files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:49:23 -0000 when I digged the a PR(bin/160275), I found in_proto.c and if_ethersubr.c ( see sys/conf/files ) does not get ${NORMAL_CTFCONVERT} post-processing in Makefile (/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL/Makefile) generated by config(8), so the objs does not contain ctf section In /usr/src/usr.sbin/config/mkmakefile.c, line 746 } compilewith = ftp->f_compilewith; if (compilewith == 0) { // no compile-with const char *ftype = NULL; switch (ftp->f_type) { case NORMAL: ftype = "NORMAL"; break; case PROFILING: if (!profiling) continue; ftype = "PROFILE"; break; default: fprintf(stderr, "config: don't know rules for %s\n", np); break; } // only add post-processing for source file without compile-with snprintf(cmd, sizeof(cmd), "${%s_%c%s}\n\t@${NORMAL_CTFCONVERT}", ftype, toupper(och), ftp->f_flags & NOWERROR ? "_NOWERROR" : ""); compilewith = cmd; } *cp = och; if (strlen(ftp->f_objprefix)) fprintf(f, "\t%s $S/%s\n\n", compilewith, np); else fprintf(f, "\t%s\n\n", compilewith); } } I wonder whether it was NOT allowed to add post-processing to files with compile-with, license or other issues? if not a license issue, then I wonder if this fix is OK( I test it on 8-stable with gcc, and 9-stable with both gcc and clang) diff --git a/usr.sbin/config/mkmakefile.c b/usr.sbin/config/mkmakefile.c index 2372839..25a85de 100644 --- a/usr.sbin/config/mkmakefile.c +++ b/usr.sbin/config/mkmakefile.c @@ -767,6 +767,14 @@ do_rules(FILE *f) ftp->f_flags & NOWERROR ? "_NOWERROR" : ""); compilewith = cmd; } + //handle CTF issule with NORMAL_C and NORMAL_C_NOERROR + else if (!strncmp(compilewith, "${NORMAL_C",sizeof("${NORMAL_C"))) { + snprintf(cmd, sizeof(cmd), + "%s\n\t@${NORMAL_CTFCONVERT}", compilewith); + compilewith = cmd; + } From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 03:19:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48783106566C for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:19:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juvix88@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7A68FC0A for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:19:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfo13 with SMTP id fo13so1799159vcb.13 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:19:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cM6/RfSXZGVh/xCrn/+bGpYs/8VW2EcIVueEB2sWRQo=; b=YvwkROnnjJZwYUCoK5ACpnuDbPm5VDMdXn6HyvvLHGXW4iKZLrvKqiXhW/YWx6qXYa vBonh+wKrCc0uY3oJssrw8AtSFqzmf1gaqTgxpCKXrcRsRBstkKF/CfbKVVT3PaM6mEH tdOkSqfajavPEQ162nHChUzEBdqnsft94DN2A= Received: by 10.220.153.19 with SMTP id i19mr370258vcw.117.1318994375962; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.199] (ool-18ba4338.dyn.optonline.net. [24.186.67.56]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c20sm4106226vdt.6.2011.10.18.20.19.34 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E9E41C6.3040309@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:19:34 -0400 From: Jonathan Vomacka User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20111013203815.GA77278@slackbox.erewhon.net> <011A9DDF-464D-49A7-B0F9-96AF6360ED62@olivent.com> <4E98608B.40705@pukruppa.de> <4E9BD476.3070406@rfc1925.net> <4E9BD8C7.6040109@rktmb.org> <4E9E32D1.7050900@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <4E9E32D1.7050900@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Dennis Ritchie has died. A suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:19:37 -0000 +1 On 10/18/2011 10:15 PM, Allen wrote: > On 10/17/2011 12:04 PM, Michael M wrote: > *SNIP* / *PRUNE* > > For whatever it may be worth; I fully stand by dedicating the next > release to dmr, as it wouldn't exist without him and Ken. > > -Allen > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 10:05:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD52106564A for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:05:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from execve@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907C18FC16 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:05:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so1955648eyd.13 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:05:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mOT2ms+wz8j//umMc7OFYjJDFocqlWF1CuttWohAJ9c=; b=Oe4NLf/CliJGHiAecIXWs2e+uyL90bYXC1EBH42S1dnpHzax4yfnHJKX+dV1az6TuB 9tB1W1GXWxPRl9EI+0mtWfZh1UVor9ETkyFbVcKuEAPKaAWn+zZjIZoMSoq+Gt/rh5XV N5f2OKzo82IcYIY76OM02ejlBB58puf7rZb+0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.230.83 with SMTP id i61mr2564411weq.54.1319018732902; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:05:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.15.65 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:05:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:35:32 +0530 Message-ID: From: Gautam To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=0016e658798006d8c504afa3fbec X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Wireless USB Adapter fails to work with ndisgen (rtl8192su) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:05:35 -0000 --0016e658798006d8c504afa3fbec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I am trying to use the Belkin Surf & Share Wireless USB Adapter on FreeBSD 8-Stable (csup-ed on 18.Oct), but it doesnt work. This is based on the realtek 8192 chip. After installing the new kernel and world, I then used ndisgen to generate the ko. I am able to get wlan0 "UP" after I manually load the generated kernel module rtl8192su_sys.ko ndis0: flags=8803 metric 0 mtu 2290 ether 94:44:52:61:e0:dc media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11b status: associated wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 94:44:52:61:e0:dc media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect ssid "" channel 1 (2412 MHz 11b) country US authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpower 0 bmiss 7 scanvalid 60 roaming MANUAL bintval 0 However, both "ifconfig wlan0 scan" and "ifconfig wlan0 list scan" yield nothing. # usbconfig ugen0.1: at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps) pwr=SAVE ugen1.1: at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps) pwr=SAVE ugen2.1: at usbus2, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps) pwr=SAVE ugen3.1: at usbus3, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps) pwr=SAVE ugen4.1: at usbus4, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=SAVE ugen4.2: at usbus4, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON ugen1.2: at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=LOW (1.5Mbps) pwr=ON ugen0.2: at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps) pwr=ON Relevant logs are: Oct 19 14:32:20 linbox kernel: ndis0: on usbus4 Oct 19 14:32:20 linbox kernel: ndis0: NDIS API version: 5.1 Oct 19 14:32:20 linbox kernel: ndis0: usbd_pnp: unsupported I/O dispatch 27:8 Oct 19 14:32:20 linbox root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x050d product 0x845a bus uhub4 Oct 19 14:32:20 linbox root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x050d product 0x845a bus uhub4 Oct 19 14:32:22 linbox kernel: wlan0: Ethernet address: 94:44:52:61:e0:dc I am attaching the relevant /var/log/messages and the typescript. Anything to be set in sysctl ? Any pointers on how to debug this further -- I would really like to get this to work on FreeBSD ? Thanks Gautam --0016e658798006d8c504afa3fbec Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=messages Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=messages Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_gty5hkwn0 T2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBzeXNsb2dkOiBrZXJuZWwgYm9vdCBmaWxlIGlzIC9ib290 L2tlcm5lbC9rZXJuZWwKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IENvcHlyaWdodCAo YykgMTk5Mi0yMDExIFRoZSBGcmVlQlNEIFByb2plY3QuCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gg a2VybmVsOiBDb3B5cmlnaHQgKGMpIDE5NzksIDE5ODAsIDE5ODMsIDE5ODYsIDE5ODgsIDE5ODks IDE5OTEsIDE5OTIsIDE5OTMsIDE5OTQKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IFRo ZSBSZWdlbnRzIG9mIHRoZSBVbml2ZXJzaXR5IG9mIENhbGlmb3JuaWEuIEFsbCByaWdodHMgcmVz ZXJ2ZWQuCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBGcmVlQlNEIGlzIGEgcmVnaXN0 ZXJlZCB0cmFkZW1hcmsgb2YgVGhlIEZyZWVCU0QgRm91bmRhdGlvbi4KT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMy IGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IEZyZWVCU0QgOC4yLVNUQUJMRSAjMDogVHVlIE9jdCAxOCAxMjowNjox NiBJU1QgMjAxMQpPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogcm9vdEBsaW5ib3g6L3Vz ci9vYmovdXNyL3NyYy9zeXMvR0VORVJJQyBpMzg2Ck9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2Vy bmVsOiBUaW1lY291bnRlciAiaTgyNTQiIGZyZXF1ZW5jeSAxMTkzMTgyIEh6IHF1YWxpdHkgMApP Y3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogQ1BVOiBJbnRlbChSKSBQZW50aXVtKFIpIDQg Q1BVIDMuMDZHSHogKDMwNTkuMDItTUh6IDY4Ni1jbGFzcyBDUFUpCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBs aW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBPcmlnaW4gPSAiR2VudWluZUludGVsIiAgSWQgPSAweGY0OSAgRmFtaWx5 ID0gZiAgTW9kZWwgPSA0ICBTdGVwcGluZyA9IDkKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJu ZWw6IEZlYXR1cmVzPTB4YmZlYmZiZmY8RlBVLFZNRSxERSxQU0UsVFNDLE1TUixQQUUsTUNFLENY OCxBUElDLFNFUCxNVFJSLFBHRSxNQ0EsQ01PVixQQVQsUFNFMzYsQ0xGTFVTSCxEVFMsQUNQSSxN TVgsRlhTUixTU0UsU1NFMixTUyxIVFQsVE0sUEJFPgpPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtl cm5lbDogRmVhdHVyZXMyPTB4NjUxZDxTU0UzLERURVM2NCxNT04sRFNfQ1BMLFRNMixDTlhULUlE LENYMTYseFRQUj4KT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IEFNRCBGZWF0dXJlcz0w eDIwMTAwMDAwPE5YLExNPgpPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogVFNDOiBQLXN0 YXRlIGludmFyaWFudApPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogcmVhbCBtZW1vcnkg ID0gMTA3Mzc0MTgyNCAoMTAyNCBNQikKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IGF2 YWlsIG1lbW9yeSA9IDEwMjgwNjczMjggKDk4MCBNQikKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBr ZXJuZWw6IEFDUEkgQVBJQyBUYWJsZTogPEludGVsUiBBV1JEQUNQST4KT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMy IGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IEZyZWVCU0QvU01QOiBNdWx0aXByb2Nlc3NvciBTeXN0ZW0gRGV0ZWN0 ZWQ6IDIgQ1BVcwpPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogRnJlZUJTRC9TTVA6IDEg cGFja2FnZShzKSB4IDEgY29yZShzKSB4IDIgSFRUIHRocmVhZHMKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxp bmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IGNwdTAgKEJTUCk6IEFQSUMgSUQ6ICAwCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5i b3gga2VybmVsOiBjcHUxIChBUC9IVCk6IEFQSUMgSUQ6ICAxCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5i b3gga2VybmVsOiBpb2FwaWMwOiBDaGFuZ2luZyBBUElDIElEIHRvIDQKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMy IGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IGlvYXBpYzAgPFZlcnNpb24gMi4wPiBpcnFzIDAtMjMgb24gbW90aGVy Ym9hcmQKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IGtiZDEgYXQga2JkbXV4MApPY3Qg MTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogYWNwaTA6IDxJbnRlbFIgQVdSREFDUEk+IG9uIG1v dGhlcmJvYXJkCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBhY3BpMDogW0lUSFJFQURd Ck9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBhY3BpMDogUG93ZXIgQnV0dG9uIChmaXhl ZCkKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IGFjcGkwOiByZXNlcnZhdGlvbiBvZiAw LCBhMDAwMCAoMykgZmFpbGVkCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBhY3BpMDog cmVzZXJ2YXRpb24gb2YgMTAwMDAwLCAzZjZmMDAwMCAoMykgZmFpbGVkCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOToz MiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBUaW1lY291bnRlciAiQUNQSS1zYWZlIiBmcmVxdWVuY3kgMzU3OTU0 NSBIeiBxdWFsaXR5IDg1MApPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogYWNwaV90aW1l cjA6IDwyNC1iaXQgdGltZXIgYXQgMy41Nzk1NDVNSHo+IHBvcnQgMHg0MDgtMHg0MGIgb24gYWNw aTAKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IGNwdTA6IDxBQ1BJIENQVT4gb24gYWNw aTAKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IGNwdTE6IDxBQ1BJIENQVT4gb24gYWNw aTAKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IGFjcGlfYnV0dG9uMDogPFBvd2VyIEJ1 dHRvbj4gb24gYWNwaTAKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IHBjaWIwOiA8QUNQ SSBIb3N0LVBDSSBicmlkZ2U+IHBvcnQgMHhjZjgtMHhjZmYgb24gYWNwaTAKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5 OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IHBjaTA6IDxBQ1BJIFBDSSBidXM+IG9uIHBjaWIwCk9jdCAxOSAx NDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiB2Z2FwY2kwOiA8VkdBLWNvbXBhdGlibGUgZGlzcGxheT4g cG9ydCAweGU0MDAtMHhlNDA3IG1lbSAweGQwMTAwMDAwLTB4ZDAxN2ZmZmYsMHhjMDAwMDAwMC0w eGNmZmZmZmZmLDB4ZDAxODAwMDAtMHhkMDFiZmZmZiBpcnEgMTYgYXQgZGV2aWNlIDIuMCBvbiBw Y2kwCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBhZ3AwOiA8SW50ZWwgODI5MTVHICg5 MTVHIEdNQ0gpIFNWR0EgY29udHJvbGxlcj4gb24gdmdhcGNpMApPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGlu Ym94IGtlcm5lbDogYWdwMDogYXBlcnR1cmUgc2l6ZSBpcyAyNTZNLCBkZXRlY3RlZCA3OTMyayBz dG9sZW4gbWVtb3J5Ck9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiB1aGNpMDogPEludGVs IDgyODAxRkIvRlIvRlcvRlJXIChJQ0g2KSBVU0IgY29udHJvbGxlciBVU0ItQT4gcG9ydCAweGUw MDAtMHhlMDFmIGlycSAyMyBhdCBkZXZpY2UgMjkuMCBvbiBwY2kwCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBs aW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiB1aGNpMDogW0lUSFJFQURdCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2Vy bmVsOiB1c2J1czA6IDxJbnRlbCA4MjgwMUZCL0ZSL0ZXL0ZSVyAoSUNINikgVVNCIGNvbnRyb2xs ZXIgVVNCLUE+IG9uIHVoY2kwCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiB1aGNpMTog PEludGVsIDgyODAxRkIvRlIvRlcvRlJXIChJQ0g2KSBVU0IgY29udHJvbGxlciBVU0ItQj4gcG9y dCAweGUxMDAtMHhlMTFmIGlycSAxOSBhdCBkZXZpY2UgMjkuMSBvbiBwY2kwCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoy OTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiB1aGNpMTogW0lUSFJFQURdCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5i b3gga2VybmVsOiB1c2J1czE6IDxJbnRlbCA4MjgwMUZCL0ZSL0ZXL0ZSVyAoSUNINikgVVNCIGNv bnRyb2xsZXIgVVNCLUI+IG9uIHVoY2kxCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiB1 aGNpMjogPEludGVsIDgyODAxRkIvRlIvRlcvRlJXIChJQ0g2KSBVU0IgY29udHJvbGxlciBVU0It Qz4gcG9ydCAweGUyMDAtMHhlMjFmIGlycSAxOCBhdCBkZXZpY2UgMjkuMiBvbiBwY2kwCk9jdCAx OSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiB1aGNpMjogW0lUSFJFQURdCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOToz MiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiB1c2J1czI6IDxJbnRlbCA4MjgwMUZCL0ZSL0ZXL0ZSVyAoSUNINikg VVNCIGNvbnRyb2xsZXIgVVNCLUM+IG9uIHVoY2kyCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2Vy bmVsOiB1aGNpMzogPEludGVsIDgyODAxRkIvRlIvRlcvRlJXIChJQ0g2KSBVU0IgY29udHJvbGxl ciBVU0ItRD4gcG9ydCAweGUzMDAtMHhlMzFmIGlycSAxNiBhdCBkZXZpY2UgMjkuMyBvbiBwY2kw Ck9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiB1aGNpMzogW0lUSFJFQURdCk9jdCAxOSAx NDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiB1c2J1czM6IDxJbnRlbCA4MjgwMUZCL0ZSL0ZXL0ZSVyAo SUNINikgVVNCIGNvbnRyb2xsZXIgVVNCLUQ+IG9uIHVoY2kzCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5i b3gga2VybmVsOiBlaGNpMDogPEludGVsIDgyODAxRkIgKElDSDYpIFVTQiAyLjAgY29udHJvbGxl cj4gbWVtIDB4ZDAxYzAwMDAtMHhkMDFjMDNmZiBpcnEgMjMgYXQgZGV2aWNlIDI5Ljcgb24gcGNp MApPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogZWhjaTA6IFtJVEhSRUFEXQpPY3QgMTkg MTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogdXNidXM0OiBFSENJIHZlcnNpb24gMS4wCk9jdCAxOSAx NDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiB1c2J1czQ6IDxJbnRlbCA4MjgwMUZCIChJQ0g2KSBVU0Ig Mi4wIGNvbnRyb2xsZXI+IG9uIGVoY2kwCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBw Y2liMTogPEFDUEkgUENJLVBDSSBicmlkZ2U+IGF0IGRldmljZSAzMC4wIG9uIHBjaTAKT2N0IDE5 IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IHBjaTE6IDxBQ1BJIFBDSSBidXM+IG9uIHBjaWIxCk9j dCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBybDA6IDxSZWFsVGVrIDgxMzkgMTAvMTAwQmFz ZVRYPiBwb3J0IDB4ZDAwMC0weGQwZmYgbWVtIDB4ZDAwMTAwMDAtMHhkMDAxMDBmZiBpcnEgMjMg YXQgZGV2aWNlIDExLjAgb24gcGNpMQpPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogbWlp YnVzMDogPE1JSSBidXM+IG9uIHJsMApPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogcmxw aHkwOiA8UmVhbFRlayBpbnRlcm5hbCBtZWRpYSBpbnRlcmZhY2U+IFBIWSAwIG9uIG1paWJ1czAK T2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IHJscGh5MDogIDEwYmFzZVQsIDEwYmFzZVQt RkRYLCAxMDBiYXNlVFgsIDEwMGJhc2VUWC1GRFgsIGF1dG8KT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJv eCBrZXJuZWw6IHJsMDogRXRoZXJuZXQgYWRkcmVzczogMDA6MTY6MTc6NGI6MGI6MjYKT2N0IDE5 IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IHJsMDogW0lUSFJFQURdCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBs aW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBwY2kwOiA8bXVsdGltZWRpYSwgYXVkaW8+IGF0IGRldmljZSAzMC4yIChu byBkcml2ZXIgYXR0YWNoZWQpCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBpc2FiMDog PFBDSS1JU0EgYnJpZGdlPiBhdCBkZXZpY2UgMzEuMCBvbiBwY2kwCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBs aW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBpc2EwOiA8SVNBIGJ1cz4gb24gaXNhYjAKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxp bmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IGF0YXBjaTA6IDxJbnRlbCBJQ0g2IFVETUExMDAgY29udHJvbGxlcj4gcG9y dCAweDFmMC0weDFmNywweDNmNiwweDE3MC0weDE3NywweDM3NiwweGYwMDAtMHhmMDBmIGF0IGRl dmljZSAzMS4xIG9uIHBjaTAKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IGF0YTA6IDxB VEEgY2hhbm5lbCAwPiBvbiBhdGFwY2kwCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBh dGEwOiBbSVRIUkVBRF0KT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IGF0YTE6IDxBVEEg Y2hhbm5lbCAxPiBvbiBhdGFwY2kwCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBhdGEx OiBbSVRIUkVBRF0KT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IGF0YXBjaTE6IDxJbnRl bCBJQ0g2IFNBVEExNTAgY29udHJvbGxlcj4gcG9ydCAweGU5MDAtMHhlOTA3LDB4ZWEwMC0weGVh MDMsMHhlYjAwLTB4ZWIwNywweGVjMDAtMHhlYzAzLDB4ZWQwMC0weGVkMGYgaXJxIDE5IGF0IGRl dmljZSAzMS4yIG9uIHBjaTAKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IGF0YXBjaTE6 IFtJVEhSRUFEXQpPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogYXRhMjogPEFUQSBjaGFu bmVsIDA+IG9uIGF0YXBjaTEKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IGF0YTI6IFtJ VEhSRUFEXQpPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogYXRhMzogPEFUQSBjaGFubmVs IDE+IG9uIGF0YXBjaTEKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IGF0YTM6IFtJVEhS RUFEXQpPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogcGNpMDogPHNlcmlhbCBidXMsIFNN QnVzPiBhdCBkZXZpY2UgMzEuMyAobm8gZHJpdmVyIGF0dGFjaGVkKQpPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIg bGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogYWNwaV90ejA6IDxUaGVybWFsIFpvbmU+IG9uIGFjcGkwCk9jdCAxOSAx NDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBhdHJ0YzA6IDxBVCByZWFsdGltZSBjbG9jaz4gcG9ydCAw eDcwLTB4NzMgaXJxIDggb24gYWNwaTAKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IGZk YzA6IDxmbG9wcHkgZHJpdmUgY29udHJvbGxlcj4gcG9ydCAweDNmMC0weDNmNSwweDNmNyBpcnEg NiBkcnEgMiBvbiBhY3BpMApPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogZmRjMDogW0ZJ TFRFUl0KT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IHVhcnQwOiA8MTY1NTAgb3IgY29t cGF0aWJsZT4gcG9ydCAweDNmOC0weDNmZiBpcnEgNCBmbGFncyAweDEwIG9uIGFjcGkwCk9jdCAx OSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiB1YXJ0MDogW0ZJTFRFUl0KT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMy IGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IHVhcnQxOiA8MTY1NTAgb3IgY29tcGF0aWJsZT4gcG9ydCAweDJmOC0w eDJmZiBpcnEgMyBvbiBhY3BpMApPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogdWFydDE6 IFtGSUxURVJdCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBwcGMwOiA8UGFyYWxsZWwg cG9ydD4gcG9ydCAweDM3OC0weDM3ZiwweDc3OC0weDc3YiBpcnEgNyBvbiBhY3BpMApPY3QgMTkg MTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogcHBjMDogR2VuZXJpYyBjaGlwc2V0IChOSUJCTEUtb25s eSkgaW4gQ09NUEFUSUJMRSBtb2RlCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBwcGMw OiBbSVRIUkVBRF0KT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IHBwYnVzMDogPFBhcmFs bGVsIHBvcnQgYnVzPiBvbiBwcGMwCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBwbGlw MDogPFBMSVAgbmV0d29yayBpbnRlcmZhY2U+IG9uIHBwYnVzMApPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGlu Ym94IGtlcm5lbDogcGxpcDA6IFtJVEhSRUFEXQpPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5l bDogbHB0MDogPFByaW50ZXI+IG9uIHBwYnVzMApPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5l bDogbHB0MDogW0lUSFJFQURdCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBscHQwOiBJ bnRlcnJ1cHQtZHJpdmVuIHBvcnQKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IHBwaTA6 IDxQYXJhbGxlbCBJL08+IG9uIHBwYnVzMApPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDog YXRrYmRjMDogPEtleWJvYXJkIGNvbnRyb2xsZXIgKGk4MDQyKT4gcG9ydCAweDYwLDB4NjQgaXJx IDEgb24gYWNwaTAKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IGF0a2JkMDogPEFUIEtl eWJvYXJkPiBpcnEgMSBvbiBhdGtiZGMwCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBr YmQwIGF0IGF0a2JkMApPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogYXRrYmQwOiBbR0lB TlQtTE9DS0VEXQpPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogYXRrYmQwOiBbSVRIUkVB RF0KT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IHBtdGltZXIwIG9uIGlzYTAKT2N0IDE5 IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IG9ybTA6IDxJU0EgT3B0aW9uIFJPTT4gYXQgaW9tZW0g MHhkNDAwMC0weGQ0ZmZmIHBucGlkIE9STTAwMDAgb24gaXNhMApPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGlu Ym94IGtlcm5lbDogc2MwOiA8U3lzdGVtIGNvbnNvbGU+IGF0IGZsYWdzIDB4MTAwIG9uIGlzYTAK T2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IHNjMDogVkdBIDwxNiB2aXJ0dWFsIGNvbnNv bGVzLCBmbGFncz0weDMwMD4KT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IHZnYTA6IDxH ZW5lcmljIElTQSBWR0E+IGF0IHBvcnQgMHgzYzAtMHgzZGYgaW9tZW0gMHhhMDAwMC0weGJmZmZm IG9uIGlzYTAKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IHA0dGNjMDogPENQVSBGcmVx dWVuY3kgVGhlcm1hbCBDb250cm9sPiBvbiBjcHUwCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2Vy bmVsOiBwNHRjYzE6IDxDUFUgRnJlcXVlbmN5IFRoZXJtYWwgQ29udHJvbD4gb24gY3B1MQpPY3Qg MTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogVGltZWNvdW50ZXJzIHRpY2sgZXZlcnkgMS4wMDAg bXNlYwpPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogdXNidXMwOiAxMk1icHMgRnVsbCBT cGVlZCBVU0IgdjEuMApPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogdXNidXMxOiAxMk1i cHMgRnVsbCBTcGVlZCBVU0IgdjEuMApPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogdXNi dXMyOiAxMk1icHMgRnVsbCBTcGVlZCBVU0IgdjEuMApPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtl cm5lbDogdXNidXMzOiAxMk1icHMgRnVsbCBTcGVlZCBVU0IgdjEuMApPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIg bGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogdXNidXM0OiA0ODBNYnBzIEhpZ2ggU3BlZWQgVVNCIHYyLjAKT2N0IDE5 IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IHVnZW4wLjE6IDxJbnRlbD4gYXQgdXNidXMwCk9jdCAx OSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiB1aHViMDogPEludGVsIFVIQ0kgcm9vdCBIVUIsIGNs YXNzIDkvMCwgcmV2IDEuMDAvMS4wMCwgYWRkciAxPiBvbiB1c2J1czAKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMy IGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IHVnZW4xLjE6IDxJbnRlbD4gYXQgdXNidXMxCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOToz MiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiB1aHViMTogPEludGVsIFVIQ0kgcm9vdCBIVUIsIGNsYXNzIDkvMCwg cmV2IDEuMDAvMS4wMCwgYWRkciAxPiBvbiB1c2J1czEKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBr ZXJuZWw6IHVnZW4yLjE6IDxJbnRlbD4gYXQgdXNidXMyCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gg a2VybmVsOiB1aHViMjogPEludGVsIFVIQ0kgcm9vdCBIVUIsIGNsYXNzIDkvMCwgcmV2IDEuMDAv MS4wMCwgYWRkciAxPiBvbiB1c2J1czIKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IHVn ZW4zLjE6IDxJbnRlbD4gYXQgdXNidXMzCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiB1 aHViMzogPEludGVsIFVIQ0kgcm9vdCBIVUIsIGNsYXNzIDkvMCwgcmV2IDEuMDAvMS4wMCwgYWRk ciAxPiBvbiB1c2J1czMKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IHVnZW40LjE6IDxJ bnRlbD4gYXQgdXNidXM0Ck9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiB1aHViNDogPElu dGVsIEVIQ0kgcm9vdCBIVUIsIGNsYXNzIDkvMCwgcmV2IDIuMDAvMS4wMCwgYWRkciAxPiBvbiB1 c2J1czQKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IGFjZDA6IERWRFIgPEhMLURULVNU RFZELVJBTSBHU0EtSDIwTi8xLjAxPiBhdCBhdGEwLW1hc3RlciBVRE1BMzMgCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoy OTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBhdGEwOiBETUEgbGltaXRlZCB0byBVRE1BMzMsIGNvbnRyb2xs ZXIgZm91bmQgbm9uLUFUQTY2IGNhYmxlCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBh ZDE6IDM4MjA0TUIgPFNBTVNVTkcgU1A0MDAySCBRVTEwMC02MT4gYXQgYXRhMC1zbGF2ZSBVRE1B MzMgCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBhZDQ6IDc2MzE5TUIgPFdEQyBXRDgw MEJELTIyTFJBMCAwNi4wMUQwNj4gYXQgYXRhMi1tYXN0ZXIgVURNQTEwMCBTQVRBCk9jdCAxOSAx NDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBTTVA6IEFQIENQVSAjMSBMYXVuY2hlZCEKT2N0IDE5IDE0 OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IFJvb3QgbW91bnQgd2FpdGluZyBmb3I6IHVzYnVzNCB1c2J1 czMgdXNidXMyIHVzYnVzMSB1c2J1czAKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IHVo dWIwOiAyIHBvcnRzIHdpdGggMiByZW1vdmFibGUsIHNlbGYgcG93ZXJlZApPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6 MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogdWh1YjE6IDIgcG9ydHMgd2l0aCAyIHJlbW92YWJsZSwgc2VsZiBw b3dlcmVkCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiB1aHViMjogMiBwb3J0cyB3aXRo IDIgcmVtb3ZhYmxlLCBzZWxmIHBvd2VyZWQKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6 IHVodWIzOiAyIHBvcnRzIHdpdGggMiByZW1vdmFibGUsIHNlbGYgcG93ZXJlZApPY3QgMTkgMTQ6 Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogUm9vdCBtb3VudCB3YWl0aW5nIGZvcjogdXNidXM0Ck9jdCAx OSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3ggbGFzdCBtZXNzYWdlIHJlcGVhdGVkIDIgdGltZXMKT2N0IDE5IDE0 OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IHVodWI0OiA4IHBvcnRzIHdpdGggOCByZW1vdmFibGUsIHNl bGYgcG93ZXJlZApPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogUm9vdCBtb3VudCB3YWl0 aW5nIGZvcjogdXNidXM0Ck9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiB1Z2VuNC4yOiA8 dmVuZG9yIDB4MDUwZD4gYXQgdXNidXM0Ck9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBU cnlpbmcgdG8gbW91bnQgcm9vdCBmcm9tIHVmczovZGV2L2FkNHMxYQpPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIg bGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogdWdlbjEuMjogPHZlbmRvciAweDA0ZjM+IGF0IHVzYnVzMQpPY3QgMTkg MTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogdW1zMDogPHZlbmRvciAweDA0ZjMgT00sIGNsYXNzIDAv MCwgcmV2IDEuMTAvMjQuNTgsIGFkZHIgMj4gb24gdXNidXMxCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5i b3gga2VybmVsOiB1Z2VuMC4yOiA8dmVuZG9yIDB4MTEzMD4gYXQgdXNidXMwCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoy OTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiB1bXMwOiAzIGJ1dHRvbnMgYW5kIFtYWVpdIGNvb3JkaW5hdGVz IElEPTAKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IHVoaWQwOiA8dmVuZG9yIDB4MTEz MCBVU0IgIEFVRElPLCBjbGFzcyAwLzAsIHJldiAxLjEwLzEuNDAsIGFkZHIgMj4gb24gdXNidXMw Ck9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiB1YXVkaW8wOiA8dmVuZG9yIDB4MTEzMCBV U0IgIEFVRElPLCBjbGFzcyAwLzAsIHJldiAxLjEwLzEuNDAsIGFkZHIgMj4gb24gdXNidXMwCk9j dCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMiBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiB1YXVkaW8wOiBQbGF5OiA0ODAwMCBIeiwgMiBj aCwgMTYtYml0IFMtTEUgUENNIGZvcm1hdApPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDog dWF1ZGlvMDogTm8gcmVjb3JkaW5nIQpPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzIgbGluYm94IGtlcm5lbDogdWF1 ZGlvMDogTm8gbWlkaSBzZXF1ZW5jZXIKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMyIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IHBj bTA6IDxVU0IgYXVkaW8+IG9uIHVhdWRpbzAKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjMzIGxpbmJveCB0aHR0cGRb MTA5MV06IHRodHRwZC8yLjI1YiAyOWRlYzIwMDMgc3RhcnRpbmcgb24gcG9ydCA4MApPY3QgMTkg MTQ6Mjk6MzMgbGluYm94IHRodHRwZFsxMDkxXTogc3RhcnRlZCBhcyByb290IHdpdGhvdXQgcmVx dWVzdGluZyBjaHJvb3QoKSwgd2FybmluZyBvbmx5Ck9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozMyBsaW5ib3gga2Vy bmVsOiBybDA6IGxpbmsgc3RhdGUgY2hhbmdlZCB0byBVUApPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzQgbGluYm94 IG50cGRbMTMwN106IG50cGQgNC4yLjRwNS1hICgxKQpPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzUgbGluYm94IGRo Y2xpZW50OiBOZXcgSVAgQWRkcmVzcyAocmwwKTogMTAuMC4wLjIKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjM1IGxp bmJveCBkaGNsaWVudDogTmV3IFN1Ym5ldCBNYXNrIChybDApOiAyNTUuMjU1LjI1NS4wCk9jdCAx OSAxNDoyOTozNSBsaW5ib3ggZGhjbGllbnQ6IE5ldyBCcm9hZGNhc3QgQWRkcmVzcyAocmwwKTog MTAuMC4wLjI1NQpPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzUgbGluYm94IGRoY2xpZW50OiBOZXcgUm91dGVycyAo cmwwKTogMTAuMC4wLjEKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjM2IGxpbmJveCBkYnVzWzEyMjldOiBbc3lzdGVt XSBBY3RpdmF0aW5nIHNlcnZpY2UgbmFtZT0nb3JnLmZyZWVkZXNrdG9wLkNvbnNvbGVLaXQnICh1 c2luZyBzZXJ2aWNlaGVscGVyKQpPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzYgbGluYm94IGRidXNbMTIyOV06IFtz eXN0ZW1dIEFjdGl2YXRpbmcgc2VydmljZSBuYW1lPSdvcmcuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3AuUG9saWN5S2l0 MScgKHVzaW5nIHNlcnZpY2VoZWxwZXIpCk9jdCAxOSAxNDoyOTozNiBsaW5ib3ggZGJ1c1sxMjI5 XTogW3N5c3RlbV0gU3VjY2Vzc2Z1bGx5IGFjdGl2YXRlZCBzZXJ2aWNlICdvcmcuZnJlZWRlc2t0 b3AuUG9saWN5S2l0MScKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjI5OjM2IGxpbmJveCBkYnVzWzEyMjldOiBbc3lzdGVt XSBTdWNjZXNzZnVsbHkgYWN0aXZhdGVkIHNlcnZpY2UgJ29yZy5mcmVlZGVza3RvcC5Db25zb2xl S2l0JwpPY3QgMTkgMTQ6Mjk6MzkgbGluYm94IGxvZ2luOiBST09UIExPR0lOIChyb290KSBPTiB0 dHl2MApPY3QgMTkgMTQ6MzA6MzMgbGluYm94IG50cGRbMTMwN106IG5vIHJlcGx5OyBjbG9jayBu b3Qgc2V0Ck9jdCAxOSAxNDozMjoyMCBsaW5ib3gga2VybmVsOiBuZGlzMDogPHZlbmRvciAweDA1 MGQgcHJvZHVjdCAweDg0NWEsIGNsYXNzIDAvMCwgcmV2IDIuMDAvMi4wMCwgYWRkciAyPiBvbiB1 c2J1czQKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjMyOjIwIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IG5kaXMwOiBORElTIEFQSSB2ZXJz aW9uOiA1LjEKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjMyOjIwIGxpbmJveCBrZXJuZWw6IG5kaXMwOiB1c2JkX3BucDog dW5zdXBwb3J0ZWQgSS9PIGRpc3BhdGNoIDI3OjgKT2N0IDE5IDE0OjMyOjIwIGxpbmJveCByb290 OiBVbmtub3duIFVTQiBkZXZpY2U6IHZlbmRvciAweDA1MGQgcHJvZHVjdCAweDg0NWEgYnVzIHVo dWI0Ck9jdCAxOSAxNDozMjoyMCBsaW5ib3ggcm9vdDogVW5rbm93biBVU0IgZGV2aWNlOiB2ZW5k b3IgMHgwNTBkIHByb2R1Y3QgMHg4NDVhIGJ1cyB1aHViNApPY3QgMTkgMTQ6MzI6MjIgbGluYm94 IGtlcm5lbDogd2xhbjA6IEV0aGVybmV0IGFkZHJlc3M6IDk0OjQ0OjUyOjYxOmUwOmRjCk9jdCAx OSAxNDozMjo1MCBsaW5ib3ggbG9naW46IFJPT1QgTE9HSU4gKHJvb3QpIE9OIHR0eXYxCg== --0016e658798006d8c504afa3fbec Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=typescript Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=typescript Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_gty5htj41 U2NyaXB0IHN0YXJ0ZWQgb24gV2VkIE9jdCAxOSAxNDozMTozMyAyMDExCgpbcm9vdEBsaW5ib3gg fi9mcmVlYnNkL3J0bDgxOTIvV2luWFBdIyBpZmNvbmZpZwpybDA6IGZsYWdzPTg4NDM8VVAsQlJP QURDQVNULFJVTk5JTkcsU0lNUExFWCxNVUxUSUNBU1Q+IG1ldHJpYyAwIG10dSAxNTAwCglvcHRp b25zPTM4MDg8VkxBTl9NVFUsV09MX1VDQVNULFdPTF9NQ0FTVCxXT0xfTUFHSUM+CglldGhlciAw MDoxNjoxNzo0YjowYjoyNgoJaW5ldCAxMC4wLjAuMiBuZXRtYXNrIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAgYnJvYWRj YXN0IDEwLjAuMC4yNTUKCW1lZGlhOiBFdGhlcm5ldCBhdXRvc2VsZWN0ICgxMDBiYXNlVFggPGZ1 bGwtZHVwbGV4PikKCXN0YXR1czogYWN0aXZlCnBsaXAwOiBmbGFncz04ODEwPFBPSU5UT1BPSU5U LFNJTVBMRVgsTVVMVElDQVNUPiBtZXRyaWMgMCBtdHUgMTUwMApsbzA6IGZsYWdzPTgwNDk8VVAs TE9PUEJBQ0ssUlVOTklORyxNVUxUSUNBU1Q+IG1ldHJpYyAwIG10dSAxNjM4NAoJb3B0aW9ucz0z PFJYQ1NVTSxUWENTVU0+CglpbmV0NiBmZTgwOjoxJWxvMCBwcmVmaXhsZW4gNjQgc2NvcGVpZCAw eDggCglpbmV0NiA6OjEgcHJlZml4bGVuIDEyOCAKCWluZXQgMTI3LjAuMC4xIG5ldG1hc2sgMHhm ZjAwMDAwMCAKCW5kNiBvcHRpb25zPTM8UEVSRk9STU5VRCxBQ0NFUFRfUlRBRFY+Cltyb290QGxp bmJveCB+L2ZyZWVic2QvcnRsODE5Mi9XaW5YUF0jIHVzYmNvbmZpZwp1Z2VuMC4xOiA8VUhDSSBy b290IEhVQiBJbnRlbD4gYXQgdXNidXMwLCBjZmc9MCBtZD1IT1NUIHNwZD1GVUxMICgxMk1icHMp IHB3cj1TQVZFCnVnZW4xLjE6IDxVSENJIHJvb3QgSFVCIEludGVsPiBhdCB1c2J1czEsIGNmZz0w IG1kPUhPU1Qgc3BkPUZVTEwgKDEyTWJwcykgcHdyPVNBVkUKdWdlbjIuMTogPFVIQ0kgcm9vdCBI VUIgSW50ZWw+IGF0IHVzYnVzMiwgY2ZnPTAgbWQ9SE9TVCBzcGQ9RlVMTCAoMTJNYnBzKSBwd3I9 U0FWRQp1Z2VuMy4xOiA8VUhDSSByb290IEhVQiBJbnRlbD4gYXQgdXNidXMzLCBjZmc9MCBtZD1I T1NUIHNwZD1GVUxMICgxMk1icHMpIHB3cj1TQVZFCnVnZW40LjE6IDxFSENJIHJvb3QgSFVCIElu dGVsPiBhdCB1c2J1czQsIGNmZz0wIG1kPUhPU1Qgc3BkPUhJR0ggKDQ4ME1icHMpIHB3cj1TQVZF CnVnZW40LjI6IDxwcm9kdWN0IDB4ODQ1YSB2ZW5kb3IgMHgwNTBkPiBhdCB1c2J1czQsIGNmZz0w IG1kPUhPU1Qgc3BkPUhJR0ggKDQ4ME1icHMpIHB3cj1PTgp1Z2VuMS4yOiA8T00gdmVuZG9yIDB4 MDRmMz4gYXQgdXNidXMxLCBjZmc9MCBtZD1IT1NUIHNwZD1MT1cgKDEuNU1icHMpIHB3cj1PTgp1 Z2VuMC4yOiA8VVNCICBBVURJTyB2ZW5kb3IgMHgxMTMwPiBhdCB1c2J1czAsIGNmZz0wIG1kPUhP U1Qgc3BkPUZVTEwgKDEyTWJwcykgcHdyPU9OCltyb290QGxpbmJveCB+L2ZyZWVic2QvcnRsODE5 Mi9XaW5YUF0jIGxzCm5ldDgxOTJzdS5jYXQJCXJ0bDgxOTJzdS5zeXMJCXR5cGVzY3JpcHQKbmV0 ODE5MnN1LmluZgkJcnRsODE5MnN1X3N5cy5rbwpbcm9vdEBsaW5ib3ggfi9mcmVlYnNkL3J0bDgx OTIvV2luWFBdIyBrbGRsb2FkIHJ0bAc4MTkyc3Vfc3lzLmtvIAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIG1sx QC4bWzFALwpbcm9vdEBsaW5ib3ggfi9mcmVlYnNkL3J0bDgxOTIvV2luWFBdIyAKW3Jvb3RAbGlu Ym94IH4vZnJlZWJzZC9ydGw4MTkyL1dpblhQXSMgaWZjb25maWcgCnJsMDogZmxhZ3M9ODg0MzxV UCxCUk9BRENBU1QsUlVOTklORyxTSU1QTEVYLE1VTFRJQ0FTVD4gbWV0cmljIDAgbXR1IDE1MDAK CW9wdGlvbnM9MzgwODxWTEFOX01UVSxXT0xfVUNBU1QsV09MX01DQVNULFdPTF9NQUdJQz4KCWV0 aGVyIDAwOjE2OjE3OjRiOjBiOjI2CglpbmV0IDEwLjAuMC4yIG5ldG1hc2sgMHhmZmZmZmYwMCBi cm9hZGNhc3QgMTAuMC4wLjI1NQoJbWVkaWE6IEV0aGVybmV0IGF1dG9zZWxlY3QgKDEwMGJhc2VU WCA8ZnVsbC1kdXBsZXg+KQoJc3RhdHVzOiBhY3RpdmUKcGxpcDA6IGZsYWdzPTg4MTA8UE9JTlRP UE9JTlQsU0lNUExFWCxNVUxUSUNBU1Q+IG1ldHJpYyAwIG10dSAxNTAwCmxvMDogZmxhZ3M9ODA0 OTxVUCxMT09QQkFDSyxSVU5OSU5HLE1VTFRJQ0FTVD4gbWV0cmljIDAgbXR1IDE2Mzg0CglvcHRp b25zPTM8UlhDU1VNLFRYQ1NVTT4KCWluZXQ2IGZlODA6OjElbG8wIHByZWZpeGxlbiA2NCBzY29w ZWlkIDB4OCAKCWluZXQ2IDo6MSBwcmVmaXhsZW4gMTI4IAoJaW5ldCAxMjcuMC4wLjEgbmV0bWFz ayAweGZmMDAwMDAwIAoJbmQ2IG9wdGlvbnM9MzxQRVJGT1JNTlVELEFDQ0VQVF9SVEFEVj4KbmRp czA6IGZsYWdzPTg4MDM8VVAsQlJPQURDQVNULFNJTVBMRVgsTVVMVElDQVNUPiBtZXRyaWMgMCBt dHUgMjI5MAoJZXRoZXIgOTQ6NDQ6NTI6NjE6ZTA6ZGMKCW1lZGlhOiBJRUVFIDgwMi4xMSBXaXJl bGVzcyBFdGhlcm5ldCBhdXRvc2VsZWN0IG1vZGUgMTFiCglzdGF0dXM6IGFzc29jaWF0ZWQKd2xh bjA6IGZsYWdzPTg4NDM8VVAsQlJPQURDQVNULFJVTk5JTkcsU0lNUExFWCxNVUxUSUNBU1Q+IG1l dHJpYyAwIG10dSAxNTAwCglldGhlciA5NDo0NDo1Mjo2MTplMDpkYwoJbWVkaWE6IElFRUUgODAy LjExIFdpcmVsZXNzIEV0aGVybmV0IGF1dG9zZWxlY3QKCXNzaWQgIiIgY2hhbm5lbCAxICgyNDEy IE1IeiAxMWIpCgljb3VudHJ5IFVTIGF1dGhtb2RlIE9QRU4gcHJpdmFjeSBPRkYgdHhwb3dlciAw IGJtaXNzIDcgc2NhbnZhbGlkIDYwCglyb2FtaW5nIE1BTlVBTCBiaW50dmFsIDAKW3Jvb3RAbGlu Ym94IH4vZnJlZWJzZC9ydGw4MTkyL1dpblhQXSMgaWZjb25maWcgd2xhbjAgc2Nhbgpbcm9vdEBs aW5ib3ggfi9mcmVlYnNkL3J0bDgxOTIvV2luWFBdIyBpZmNvbmZpZyB3bGFuMCBzY2FuCCAICCAI CCAICCAIbGlzdCBzY2FuCltyb290QGxpbmJveCB+L2ZyZWVic2QvcnRsODE5Mi9XaW5YUF0jIBtb SBtbSltyb290QGxpbmJveCB+L2ZyZWVic2QvcnRsODE5Mi9XaW5YUF0jIGlmY29uZmlnCnJsMDog ZmxhZ3M9ODg0MzxVUCxCUk9BRENBU1QsUlVOTklORyxTSU1QTEVYLE1VTFRJQ0FTVD4gbWV0cmlj IDAgbXR1IDE1MDAKCW9wdGlvbnM9MzgwODxWTEFOX01UVSxXT0xfVUNBU1QsV09MX01DQVNULFdP TF9NQUdJQz4KCWV0aGVyIDAwOjE2OjE3OjRiOjBiOjI2CglpbmV0IDEwLjAuMC4yIG5ldG1hc2sg MHhmZmZmZmYwMCBicm9hZGNhc3QgMTAuMC4wLjI1NQoJbWVkaWE6IEV0aGVybmV0IGF1dG9zZWxl Y3QgKDEwMGJhc2VUWCA8ZnVsbC1kdXBsZXg+KQoJc3RhdHVzOiBhY3RpdmUKcGxpcDA6IGZsYWdz PTg4MTA8UE9JTlRPUE9JTlQsU0lNUExFWCxNVUxUSUNBU1Q+IG1ldHJpYyAwIG10dSAxNTAwCmxv MDogZmxhZ3M9ODA0OTxVUCxMT09QQkFDSyxSVU5OSU5HLE1VTFRJQ0FTVD4gbWV0cmljIDAgbXR1 IDE2Mzg0CglvcHRpb25zPTM8UlhDU1VNLFRYQ1NVTT4KCWluZXQ2IGZlODA6OjElbG8wIHByZWZp eGxlbiA2NCBzY29wZWlkIDB4OCAKCWluZXQ2IDo6MSBwcmVmaXhsZW4gMTI4IAoJaW5ldCAxMjcu MC4wLjEgbmV0bWFzayAweGZmMDAwMDAwIAoJbmQ2IG9wdGlvbnM9MzxQRVJGT1JNTlVELEFDQ0VQ VF9SVEFEVj4KbmRpczA6IGZsYWdzPTg4MDM8VVAsQlJPQURDQVNULFNJTVBMRVgsTVVMVElDQVNU PiBtZXRyaWMgMCBtdHUgMjI5MAoJZXRoZXIgOTQ6NDQ6NTI6NjE6ZTA6ZGMKCW1lZGlhOiBJRUVF IDgwMi4xMSBXaXJlbGVzcyBFdGhlcm5ldCBhdXRvc2VsZWN0IG1vZGUgMTFiCglzdGF0dXM6IGFz c29jaWF0ZWQKd2xhbjA6IGZsYWdzPTg4NDM8VVAsQlJPQURDQVNULFJVTk5JTkcsU0lNUExFWCxN VUxUSUNBU1Q+IG1ldHJpYyAwIG10dSAxNTAwCglldGhlciA5NDo0NDo1Mjo2MTplMDpkYwoJbWVk aWE6IElFRUUgODAyLjExIFdpcmVsZXNzIEV0aGVybmV0IGF1dG9zZWxlY3QKCXNzaWQgIiIgY2hh bm5lbCAxICgyNDEyIE1IeiAxMWIpCgljb3VudHJ5IFVTIGF1dGhtb2RlIE9QRU4gcHJpdmFjeSBP RkYgdHhwb3dlciAwIGJtaXNzIDcgc2NhbnZhbGlkIDYwCglyb2FtaW5nIE1BTlVBTCBiaW50dmFs IDAKW3Jvb3RAbGluYm94IH4vZnJlZWJzZC9ydGw4MTkyL1dpblhQXSMgaWZjb25maWcgCBtbSyB3 bGFuMCBsaXN0IHNjYW4ICAgICAgICAgbWzVQc2Nhbgpbcm9vdEBsaW5ib3ggfi9mcmVlYnNkL3J0 bDgxOTIvV2luWFBdIyBzeXNjdGwgLWEgfCBncmVwIHdsYW4KbmV0LndsYW4uY2FjX3RpbWVvdXQ6 IDYwCm5ldC53bGFuLm5vbF90aW1lb3V0OiAxODAwCm5ldC53bGFuLmRlYnVnOiAwCm5ldC53bGFu LmFkZGJhX21heHRyaWVzOiAzCm5ldC53bGFuLmFkZGJhX2JhY2tvZmY6IDEwMDAwCm5ldC53bGFu LmFkZGJhX3RpbWVvdXQ6IDI1MApuZXQud2xhbi5yZWN2X2JhcjogMQpuZXQud2xhbi5hbXBkdV9h Z2U6IDUwMApuZXQud2xhbi5od21wLmluYWN0OiA1MDAwCm5ldC53bGFuLmh3bXAucmFubmludDog MTAwMApuZXQud2xhbi5od21wLnJvb3RpbnQ6IDIwMDAKbmV0LndsYW4uaHdtcC5yb290dGltZW91 dDogNTAwMApuZXQud2xhbi5od21wLnBhdGhsaWZldGltZTogNTAwMApuZXQud2xhbi5od21wLnJl cGx5Zm9yd2FyZDogMQpuZXQud2xhbi5od21wLnRhcmdldG9ubHk6IDAKbmV0LndsYW4ubWVzaC5t YXhyZXRyaWVzOiAyCm5ldC53bGFuLm1lc2guY29uZmlybXRpbWVvdXQ6IDQwCm5ldC53bGFuLm1l c2guaG9sZGluZ3RpbWVvdXQ6IDQwCm5ldC53bGFuLm1lc2gucmV0cnl0aW1lb3V0OiA0MApuZXQu d2xhbi4wLiVwYXJlbnQ6IG5kaXMwCm5ldC53bGFuLjAuZHJpdmVyX2NhcHM6IDI1MTc0NTMxCm5l dC53bGFuLjAuZGVidWc6IDAKbmV0LndsYW4uMC5ibWlzc19tYXg6IDIKbmV0LndsYW4uMC5pbmFj dF9ydW46IDMwMApuZXQud2xhbi4wLmluYWN0X3Byb2JlOiAzMApuZXQud2xhbi4wLmluYWN0X2F1 dGg6IDE4MApuZXQud2xhbi4wLmluYWN0X2luaXQ6IDMwCltyb290QGxpbmJveCB+L2ZyZWVic2Qv cnRsODE5Mi9XaW5YUF0jIHN5c2N0bCAtYSB8IGdyZXAgd2xhbgggCAggCAggCAggCG5kcwggCGlz Cm5ldC53bGFuLjAuJXBhcmVudDogbmRpczAKZGVidWcubmRpczogMApody5uZGlzX2ZpbGVwYXRo OiAvY29tcGF0L25kaXMKaHcubmRpc3VzYi5oYWx0OiAxCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuJWRlc2M6IHZlbmRv ciAweDA1MGQgcHJvZHVjdCAweDg0NWEsIGNsYXNzIDAvMCwgcmV2IDIuMDAvMi4wMCwgYWRkciAy CmRldi5uZGlzLjAuJWRyaXZlcjogbmRpcwpkZXYubmRpcy4wLiVsb2NhdGlvbjogYnVzPTEgaHVi YWRkcj04IHBvcnQ9NCBkZXZhZGRyPTIgaW50ZXJmYWNlPTAKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC4lcG5waW5mbzog dmVuZG9yPTB4MDUwZCBwcm9kdWN0PTB4ODQ1YSBkZXZjbGFzcz0weDAwIGRldnN1YmNsYXNzPTB4 MDAgc2VybnVtPSIiIHJlbGVhc2U9MHgwMjAwIG1vZGU9aG9zdCBpbnRjbGFzcz0weGZmIGludHN1 YmNsYXNzPTB4ZmYgaW50cHJvdG9jb2w9MHhmZiAKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC4lcGFyZW50OiB1aHViNApk ZXYubmRpcy4wLkFIX0JjbkludHY6IDEwMApkZXYubmRpcy4wLkNoYW5uZWw6IDEwCmRldi5uZGlz LjAuRG90MTFkRW5hYmxlOiAwCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuUFNQWGxpbmtNb2RlOiAwCmRldi5uZGlzLjAu V2lyZWxlc3NNb2RlOiA4CmRldi5uZGlzLjAuUkZPZmY6IDAKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5MZWRDdHJsOiAx CmRldi5uZGlzLjAuRGVmYXVsdEtleUlEOiAwCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuRGVmYXVsdEtleTA6IApkZXYu bmRpcy4wLkRlZmF1bHRLZXkxOiAKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5EZWZhdWx0S2V5MjogCmRldi5uZGlzLjAu RGVmYXVsdEtleTM6IApkZXYubmRpcy4wLkVudmlyb25tZW50OiAxCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuTmRpc1Zl cnNpb246IDB4MDAwNTAwMDEKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5TbG90TnVtYmVyOiAwMQpkZXYubmRpcy4wLk5l dENmZ0luc3RhbmNlSWQ6IHsxMjM0NTY3OC0xMjM0LTU2NzgtQ0FGRTAtMTIzNDU2Nzg5QUJDfQpk ZXYubmRpcy4wLkRyaXZlckRlc2M6IE5ESVMgTmV0d29yayBBZGFwdGVyCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuQnVz VHlwZTogMTUKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5OZXR3b3JrQWRkcmVzczogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5TU0lE OiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLkJzc2lkOiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLkNoYXJnZVB1bXA6IFVO U0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuQ29ybmVyQ2hhbmdlOiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLlRYQW50ZW5uYTog VU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5SWEFudGVubmE6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuV2lGaTExYklic3M6 IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuV2lGaTExZ0lic3M6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuQmNuRGVub21p bmF0b3I6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuQ2hhbm5lbFBsYW46IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuRm9y Y2VkRGF0YVJhdGU6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuQ3RzVG9TZWxmUmF0ZTogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5k aXMuMC5XaXJlbGVzc01vZGU0U2Nhbkxpc3Q6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuRGF0YUVuY0FsZzog VU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5FbmNBbGdvcml0aG06IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuQXV0aGVudEFs ZzogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5EZWZhdWx0S2V5VzA6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuRGVmYXVs dEtleVcxOiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLkRlZmF1bHRLZXlXMjogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5E ZWZhdWx0S2V5VzM6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuTmV0d29ya1R5cGU6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlz LjAuRW5hYmxlUHJlQXV0aDogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5Qb3dlclNhdmVNb2RlOiBVTlNFVApk ZXYubmRpcy4wLklic3NCZWFjb246IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuQWN0aW5nQXNBcDogVU5TRVQK ZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5EdGltUGVyaW9kOiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLlByZWFtYmxlTW9kZTogVU5T RVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5Rb1M6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuU3RhVWFwc2Q6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5u ZGlzLjAuTWF4U1BMZW5ndGg6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuRm9yY2VkUHJpb3JpdHk6IFVOU0VU CmRldi5uZGlzLjAuQ2N4RW5hYmxlOiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLkNjeFJtOiBVTlNFVApkZXYu bmRpcy4wLkNjeE9mZkxpbmVEdXJVcExpbWl0OiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLkRiZ1JtQ2FzZTog VU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5iSHdQYXJhRmlsZTogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5Qcm90ZWN0aW9u SW1wTW9kZTogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5iUmVnVHhQb3dlckNvbnRyb2w6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5u ZGlzLjAuUmVnVFBDUG9sYXJpdHk6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuTG93UmZkVGhyZXNob2xkOiBV TlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLlJlZ1NXVHhFbmNyeXB0RmxhZzogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5SZWdT V1J4RGVjcnlwdEZsYWc6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuSGN0VGVzdDogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMu MC5IaWdoUG93ZXJNZWNoYW5pc206IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuYlJhdGVBZGFwdGl2ZTogVU5T RVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5UdXJib01vZGU6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuU3dBbnRlbm5hRGl2ZXJz aXR5OiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLkF1dG9TZWxDaG5sOiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLkNobmxX ZWlnaHQ6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuTGl2ZVRpbWU6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuV2RzTW9k ZTogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5DdXN0b21lcklEOiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLkZyYWdUaHJl c2g6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuSW5pdEdhaW5Db250cm9sTW9kZTogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMu MC5BcEVEQ0FQYXJhbUJFOiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLkFwRURDQVBhcmFtQks6IFVOU0VUCmRl di5uZGlzLjAuQXBFRENBUGFyYW1WSTogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5BcEVEQ0FQYXJhbVZPOiBV TlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLlN0YUVEQ0FQYXJhbUJFOiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLlN0YUVEQ0FQ YXJhbUJLOiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLlN0YUVEQ0FQYXJhbVZJOiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4w LlN0YUVEQ0FQYXJhbVZPOiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLk5vQWNrOiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4w LkVuYWJsZVJ4SW1tQkE6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuSW5hY3RpdmVQczogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5k aXMuMC5iTGVpc3VyZVBzOiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLktlZXBBbGl2ZUxldmVsOiBVTlNFVApk ZXYubmRpcy4wLkhUX0VuYWJsZUNjazogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5CVzQwTUh6OiBVTlNFVApk ZXYubmRpcy4wLlNob3J0R0kyME1IejogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5TaG9ydEdJNDBNSHo6IFVO U0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuQU1TRFU6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuQU1TRFVfTWF4U2l6ZTogVU5T RVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5BTVBEVUVuYWJsZTogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5BTVBEVV9GYWN0b3I6 IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuTVBEVV9EZW5zaXR5OiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLkRpc2FibGVS YXRlRmFsbEJhY2s6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuVXNlRHJpdmVyQXNzaW5nZWRSYXRlOiBVTlNF VApkZXYubmRpcy4wLkVuYWJsZUZ3Q2FsY0R1cjogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5NaW1vUHM6IFVO U0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuUlQyUlRBZ2dyZWdhdGlvbjogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5XaUZpQ29u Zmc6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuUmVnUk9BTVNlbnNpdGl2ZUxldmVsOiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRp cy4wLlJlZ1JvYW1pbmdMaW1pdDogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5SeFJlb3JkZXI6IFVOU0VUCmRl di5uZGlzLjAuUnhSZW9yZGVyX1dpblNpemU6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuUnhSZW9yZGVyX1Bl bmRUaW1lOiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLlVzYlJ4RndBZ2dyRW46IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAu VXNiUnhGd0FnZ3JQYWdlTnVtOiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLlVzYlJ4RndBZ2dyUGFja2V0TnVt OiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLlVzYlJ4RndBZ2dyVGltZW91dDogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5Q YWNrZXRCdWZmZXJQYWdlOiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLlNjYW5EZWxheTogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5k aXMuMC5DY2tQd0VubDogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5IYWxmTk1vZGU6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlz LjAuRGlzYWJsZVNpbGVudFJlc2V0OiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLkZ3UldSRjogVU5TRVQKZGV2 Lm5kaXMuMC5BY2NlcHRBZGRiYVJlcTogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5QTlBDYXBhYmlsaXRpZXM6 IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuRE1Jbml0aWFsR2FpbjogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5TaG93UmF0 ZTogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5HUElPUkZTVzogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5US0lQaW5ObW9k ZTogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5SZWdUeExvd0NvbnRleHRDb3VudDogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMu MC5SZWdUeEhpZ2hDb250ZXh0Q291bnQ6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuSW5pdEdhaW5TdGF0ZTog VU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5ESUdPZmRtRmFUaHJlc2hvbGQ6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuQ1dp bk1heE1pbjogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5SZWdFSENJc3AxVHhNb2RlOiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRp cy4wLk1heEJ1bGtJbkNudDogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5Vc2JJRjogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMu MC5UaHJlZVdpcmVNb2RlOiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLkJvYXJkVHlwZTogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5k aXMuMC5QYU1vZGVsOiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLkVuYWJsZVJ4U3RhbGxDaGVjazogVU5TRVQK ZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5FbmFibGVUeFN0YWxsRml4OiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLkRJR09mZG1IaVB3 ckZhVGg6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuRElHT2ZkbU5vbkhpUHdyRmFUaDogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5k aXMuMC5aMkhpUHdyVXBwZXJUaDogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5aMkhpUHdyTG93ZXJUaDogVU5T RVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5DQ0tUaE1lY2hhbmlzbTogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5DQ0tUaFN0YWdl OiBVTlNFVApkZXYubmRpcy4wLkNDS1VwcGVyVGg6IFVOU0VUCmRldi5uZGlzLjAuQ0NLTG93ZXJU aDogVU5TRVQKZGV2Lm5kaXMuMC5Vc2JJblRva2VuUmV2OiBVTlNFVApbcm9vdEBsaW5ib3ggfi9m cmVlYnNkL3J0bDgxOTIvV2luWFBdIyBleGl0CgpTY3JpcHQgZG9uZSBvbiBXZWQgT2N0IDE5IDE0 OjM0OjM3IDIwMTEK --0016e658798006d8c504afa3fbec-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 10:17:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8064C106566B for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:17:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglist@modernbiztonsag.org) Received: from mail.modernbiztonsag.org (mail.modernbiztonsag.org [212.52.166.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC458FC1D for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from admin.modernbiztonsag.org (www.jails [10.0.0.4]) by mail.modernbiztonsag.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078D715AD94 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:00:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 80.99.60.194 (proxying for 80.99.60.194) (SquirrelMail authenticated user mailinglist@modernbiztonsag.org) by admin.modernbiztonsag.org with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:00:37 +0200 Message-ID: <6d9cb583e9d189d0d6be30317cdbb5a6.squirrel@admin.modernbiztonsag.org> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:00:37 +0200 From: mailinglist@modernbiztonsag.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: 8.2-STABLE ZFS degraded and "freezing" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:17:33 -0000 Dear List, I was running a ZFS pool, consisting of 6 disk (2 raidz1 striped) under 8.2-STABLE. The OS was running from a dedicated geom mirror. One of the ZFS disks died and the machine just froze. I've disconnected the driver and now it shows symptoms of very high I/O wait with no response. The first case was normal boot process and it froze at the "mounting local filesystems" part. For nearly 60 minutes I saw from the HDD leds that the ZFS array was working but after that no response. Even ctrl+alt+delete wasn't working. In single user mode I've disabled the ZFS rc script and after that the system booted fine. then I've started ZFS manually and it was stuck at the mounting state. I saw with zpool iostat that it was reading around 200-500kbytes constantly from the pool for about 60 minutes. During that time i could use the machine, even check ZFS with zpool status of zfs status. The only issue was that df only showed one of the 6 zfs filesystems mounted from the pool. After about 60 minutes of constats HDD working everything stopped, like when there's a very high I/O wait because of a faulty HDD. Even commands running from the dedicated gmirror drive stopped working. I've checked every HDD with badblocks and only one (the original faulty drive) showed errors. I've booted up a 9-BETA install CD and from the rescue shell I've run a scrub process and it was finished in 21 hours and if fixed about 3MB worth of data from 800GB. Even that didn't help. Could it be that some metadata got damaged and the zfs filesystems cannot be mounted? I'm not an expert on ZFS, i'm just starting to learn it and this was just an experimental system but i just don't want to start it over. If there is a slight possibility for recovery i would like to do that, but i don't know how to narrow down the problem. Please, if you have any idea let me know of it. Best regards, Mate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 11:48:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 337E31065672 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:48:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s18.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s18.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.157]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8EFB8FC15 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:48:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP50 ([65.55.111.136]) by blu0-omc4-s18.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:48:33 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [76.182.105.57] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([76.182.105.57]) by BLU0-SMTP50.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:48:32 -0700 Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3SNs3f4z7dz2CG4d for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:48:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:48:30 -0400 From: Carmel To: FreeBSD Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEUAAABYRlwJCw4FAgAIBwKprDkBAQFQLR0BAgCir7VRttp8AAACAUlEQVQ4jZWUTYvbMBCGTVl8V2hX6Gg5G5FbWQdBj0lEfE7BhN4cyzi5Wt1E5L70roWy6N92xok/skkP+5IYrMcz78xIduDWpNM3vFzuA/jX5EY1AI6KHFwW/CzFuQAwqUBbV12p+CzIh6Awq7sg33pn5D64SQXAexffeuQlA/L35RrkaB551OjGfP/cAO8mCNaDcgvfky5ijoD0pAXlCQCnljiAjsJD9Ax05Ko5sZxbnLQcmM+dZg5IjREfZrWIHK0JuwU68pAGwHvfRxBundRzTxxz3r9dNUikPsEihjz2Dc4kjp1hKsJGuot4EDxaxzMoC7XqhxhOSfZrTS6gSX1JVdjp+o1PvWfekXgw3WL0g70nDEwA0H0HQsEZc8sTmFMTkWUfYWC/vdR1zQy3xLQgLwzu90QnlnFLjeiGWBjwhb4Sa42IqOg2qqS4O1/zhKokFUb1Q8Rj4Eb69WVflXEehJ35DgChVTE5n50eaGyMLOfH8AOodoSM4PVYAQgQdBulOa+knklYks3vAuQ+uX492lTl+A+e8qBV2AKoXalVKFfyuUp0pUp1ARaUHh82lv9MN+Ig7CZtgE6FNYvjlywT2VP2dMgOG46gTIWcqdfvuwyXNz0oMJNd/N5lh1YNiJt19ADTUo3VuFSNeQwVqRSrGjSCp53fk2g+Mvfk/gfoPxHeUS8MH9vRAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Oct 2011 11:48:32.0207 (UTC) FILETIME=[06A9FDF0:01CC8E55] Subject: Problems after updating KDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:48:34 -0000 I have had numerous problems after updating to the latest KDE version. For starters, I lost my desktop and only had a blank (black) screen when starting up. I did manage to figure out how to correct that, but numerous other problems exist. For starters: 1) The (ALT)+(TAB) key no longer works. It doesn't switch between applications or anything. 2) I lost my desktop configuration completely. I have tried to restore it but I cannot find a way to add a URL shortcut to the desktop. There is no option in the menu, or at least none that I can find. 3) I use to use a (CTRL)(ALT)(V) combination to activate the "klipper" clipboard. That no longer works. In fact, virtually all of my shortcut keys have vanished. To the best of my knowledge I followed the directions in the UPDATINg file correctly. "Portmaster" bombed out twice so I had to resort to using "portupgrade" to complete the task. This command always fails: ortmaster -o net/linphone-base ortp With this error: ===> linphone-base-3.2.1_1,1 conflicts with installed package(s): ortp-0.13.0_1 So I guess I will have to delete both packages and start over. I am just not sure which package to delete. -- Carmel ✌ carmel_ny@hotmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 11:55:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836F3106564A for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:55:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s28.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s28.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.167]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343AC8FC18 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:55:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP190 ([65.55.111.137]) by blu0-omc4-s28.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:55:41 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [76.182.105.57] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([76.182.105.57]) by BLU0-SMTP190.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:55:40 -0700 Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3SNsCv0vZlz2CG4d for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:55:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:55:38 -0400 From: Carmel To: FreeBSD Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Oct 2011 11:55:40.0633 (UTC) FILETIME=[06069C90:01CC8E56] Subject: pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:55:42 -0000 After attempting to use "portmaster" to update the KDE port, I am receiving repeated error messages when running the command: pkg_version -vIL= The error message: pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring I am at a lost as to how to correct this problem. -- Carmel ✌ carmel_ny@hotmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 11:57:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DCAF106564A for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:57:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joh.hendriks@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C138FC12 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:57:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so2117612eyd.13 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:57:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+JHjQDzXYvjnaUutioK6lQrm4WdIxBxLaWtt6yLpqQ0=; b=tFyqwQocO7kQhdKbeYeT+NkVOp6hhmuN62tDqKIiGJ4KsKC7HqtT8w2IWMsHFpzgv6 8gwKVVuAZZc1+FhTCx7jYiVVPLdE5Q2cwPRJvvT7uprq0aXOo+YlaVc6yZfT2ODvjq0l fXotZiMBNc+tSiKiRPMjphjshOWnAi2rABYHA= Received: by 10.213.10.196 with SMTP id q4mr1053788ebq.135.1319025461793; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:57:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.50.106] (double-l.xs4all.nl. [80.126.205.144]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z58sm14924238eea.3.2011.10.19.04.57.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:57:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E9EBB33.7050500@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:57:39 +0200 From: Johan Hendriks User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Problems after updating KDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:57:43 -0000 Carmel schreef: > I have had numerous problems after updating to the latest KDE > version. For starters, I lost my desktop and only had a blank (black) > screen when starting up. I did manage to figure out how to correct > that, but numerous other problems exist. > > For starters: > > 1) The (ALT)+(TAB) key no longer works. It doesn't switch between > applications or anything. > > 2) I lost my desktop configuration completely. I have tried to restore > it but I cannot find a way to add a URL shortcut to the desktop. There > is no option in the menu, or at least none that I can find. > > 3) I use to use a (CTRL)(ALT)(V) combination to activate the "klipper" > clipboard. That no longer works. In fact, virtually all of my shortcut > keys have vanished. > > To the best of my knowledge I followed the directions in the UPDATINg > file correctly. "Portmaster" bombed out twice so I had to resort to > using "portupgrade" to complete the task. This command always fails: > > ortmaster -o net/linphone-base ortp > > With this error: > > > ===> linphone-base-3.2.1_1,1 conflicts with installed package(s): > ortp-0.13.0_1 > > > So I guess I will have to delete both packages and start over. I am > just not sure which package to delete. > As i understand things correctly, the ortp port is no longer needed as linphone is doing the ortp part. So you could say ortp has merged into ortp. deleting ortp is the right choice. regards, Johan Hendriks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 11:58:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A250E1065672 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:58:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joh.hendriks@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303038FC13 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so2119159eyd.13 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:58:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EPNbmyadug9mlNhn2vob/xkmys3E6YR5klayMN6Yvcc=; b=r11+Av4Nk6yjAeyGvTUTP6N4vMjNDSt8CyR9qjcLr9xFL5kLWbO/fxAsYp1bRTaXkH iGh8hSQYbdU/WGrxcneiiDGMLyOMyxE6VAdh/b9OXARYLMB1iQz0DXt+ecg6lTYRxUhV dPL0L7yMy/9yAnd05zbg1M8mviLglmgQDLhgk= Received: by 10.213.33.196 with SMTP id i4mr808252ebd.64.1319025528277; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:58:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.50.106] (double-l.xs4all.nl. [80.126.205.144]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f16sm14886828eec.8.2011.10.19.04.58.47 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:58:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E9EBB75.4040909@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:58:45 +0200 From: Johan Hendriks User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:58:49 -0000 Carmel schreef: > After attempting to use "portmaster" to update the KDE port, I am > receiving repeated error messages when running the command: > > pkg_version -vIL= > > The error message: > > pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring > > I am at a lost as to how to correct this problem. > run portmaster --check-depends. You will find the dependencies that no longer exist. regards Johan Hendriks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 12:01:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070C81065672 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:01:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joh.hendriks@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921A38FC17 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:01:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so2122852eyd.13 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 05:01:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=T/EGFFCoM9ZjjYwScZsTZ0XZFH6vZZostKqGOyJHNJs=; b=XZYTitTfiTVUM9tQyWInHx9f827PKcq4OieFgPJvliD1VpBhKpRw4Q5Qo0rEiAtK5h e3a1AwLBVRK2yDeSawnoVB1fzO21fkxvn5dCI4g5Ctn2qZjEx82xOwlEq7WnjxZWEOwy TdtEbc04Q5qHiBoCat9Dy0eOy1bTIX+IyGbDk= Received: by 10.14.11.38 with SMTP id 38mr800096eew.156.1319025680675; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 05:01:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.50.106] (double-l.xs4all.nl. [80.126.205.144]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q50sm14903057eef.9.2011.10.19.05.01.19 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 05:01:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E9EBC0D.1050204@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:01:17 +0200 From: Johan Hendriks User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD References: <4E9EBB33.7050500@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E9EBB33.7050500@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Problems after updating KDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:01:22 -0000 Johan Hendriks schreef: > So you could say ortp has merged into ortp. should read So you could say ortp has merged into linphone Sorry for any confusion caused. regards Johan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 12:18:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D16106566B for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:18:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s7.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s7.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.146]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 662B08FC14 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP160 ([65.55.111.135]) by blu0-omc4-s7.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 05:18:14 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [76.182.105.57] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([76.182.105.57]) by BLU0-SMTP160.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 05:18:13 -0700 Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3SNsjw4lf7z2CG4d for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:18:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:18:12 -0400 From: Carmel To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <4E9EBB75.4040909@gmail.com> References: <4E9EBB75.4040909@gmail.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Oct 2011 12:18:13.0761 (UTC) FILETIME=[2C8D8F10:01CC8E59] Subject: Re: pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:18:15 -0000 On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:58:45 +0200 Johan Hendriks articulated: > Carmel schreef: > > After attempting to use "portmaster" to update the KDE port, I am > > receiving repeated error messages when running the command: > > > > pkg_version -vIL= > > > > The error message: > > > > pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), > > ignoring > > > > I am at a lost as to how to correct this problem. > > > run portmaster --check-depends. > You will find the dependencies that no longer exist. I did that but it failed to correct the problem. I am now running "pkgdb -L". When it completes I will see if the problem still exists. -- Carmel ✌ carmel_ny@hotmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 12:32:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6C6106566B for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:32:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0C98FC0C for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:32:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.41]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8543FA7185C for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:32:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 11479 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2011 12:32:12 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 29389, pid: 13614, t: 0.1418s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 19 Oct 2011 12:32:12 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C0C2E0D9; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:32:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id CA5663983C; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:32:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: doug@safeport.com References: Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:32:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: (doug@safeport.com's message of "Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:03:29 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: <44hb3588my.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: multi-boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:32:14 -0000 doug@safeport.com writes: > I have a system with two physical disks with a version of FreeBSD > installed on each disk. With various 7.x systems I had: > > F1 disk1 on slices ads5x > F5 disk2 on slices ads6x > > I installed 8.2 on disk2, incorrectly saying leave the mbr alone. So > when I boot from the second disk I get > > F6 PXE > Boot: F1 > > I can then hit F1 or wait and all goes okay. I tried using sysinstall > to rewrite the FBSD boot manager but that not effect any change. Must > I rewrite the mbr on disk 1 also? That's what I would expect to have to do... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 13:11:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D7A106564A for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:11:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739D28FC18 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.39]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA6CA720A4 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:11:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 24309 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2011 13:11:29 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 2029, pid: 11933, t: 0.1538s scanners: clamav: m: Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 19 Oct 2011 13:11:29 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6717A2E0DA; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:11:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3701D3983C; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:11:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim References: Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:11:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim's message of "Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:44:50 +0800") Message-ID: <44botd86tk.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maximum gif(4) interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:11:30 -0000 Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim writes: > I need to build a system that need to terminate a number of 6-in-4 and 4-in-4 tunnels. > > Can someone point me to a direction, with gif auto-cloning and on GENERIC, what is the maximum number of gif interfaces/tunnels that can be supported? > > I'm on 8.2. The implementation is in src/sys/net/if_gif.c. There is no absolute limit to the number of cloned interfaces. They are stored in a linked list (as are interfaces as a whole), so having large numbers of them could be a performance issue in some cases. I would guess that such cases would mostly involve having high rates of tunnel creation and destruction, but you would have to test to be sure. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 14:14:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897AD106566C for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:14:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from spock-ext.obspm.fr (spock-ext.obspm.fr [145.238.186.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E298FC19 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pcjas.obspm.fr (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.184.233]) by spock-ext.obspm.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/DIO Observatoire de Paris - 15/04/10) with ESMTP id p9JEEhop005145 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:14:44 +0200 Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:14:43 +0200 From: Albert Shih To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org Message-ID: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.4 (spock-ext.obspm.fr [145.238.186.20]); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:14:44 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at spock-ext.obspm.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:14:46 -0000 Hi Sorry to cross-posting. I don't knwon which mailing-list I should post this message. I'll would like to use FreeBSD with ZFS on some Dell server with some MD1200 (classique DAS). When we buy a MD1200 we need a RAID PERC H800 card on the server so we have two options : 1/ create a LV on the PERC H800 so the server see one volume and put the zpool on this unique volume and let the hardware manage the raid. 2/ create 12 LV on the perc H800 (so without raid) and let FreeBSD and ZFS manage the raid. which one is the best solution ? Any advise about the RAM I need on the server (actually one MD1200 so 12x2To disk) Regards. JAS -- Albert SHIH DIO batiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26/06 86 69 95 71 Heure local/Local time: mer 19 oct 2011 16:11:40 CEST From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 14:35:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21B7106564A for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:35:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dcherednik@masterhost.ru) Received: from mail.corp.masterhost.ru (wincas02.mail.corp.masterhost.ru [90.156.219.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346698FC14 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:35:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kzholnay-pc.masterhost.ru (87.242.97.5) by mail.corp.masterhost.ru (90.156.219.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.339.1; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:35:05 +0400 Message-ID: <4E9EE018.205@masterhost.ru> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:35:04 +0400 From: Daniil Cherednik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: X-Originating-IP: [87.242.97.5] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: sigprocmask system call X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:35:09 -0000 Hello. We are using FreeBSD 8.2 on hight load projects. When I was preparing system for production I sow strange (as me think) behavior that can lead to increased load on servers. If I made truss on httpd (apache22) process, I saw too much syscalls such us: 24822: sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) 24822: sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) 24822: sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) 24822: sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) 24822: sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) ... too many line ... and 24822: sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,SIGHUP|SIGINT|SIGQUIT|SIGKILL|SIGPIPE|SIGALRM|SIGTERM|SIGURG|SIGSTOP|SIGTSTP|SIGCONT|SIGCHLD|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|S IGWINCH|SIGINFO|SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2,0x0) = 0 (0x0) 24822: sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) 24822: sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,SIGHUP|SIGINT|SIGQUIT|SIGKILL|SIGPIPE|SIGALRM|SIGTERM|SIGURG|SIGSTOP|SIGTSTP|SIGCONT|SIGCHLD|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|S IGWINCH|SIGINFO|SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2,0x0) = 0 (0x0) 24822: sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) 24822: sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,SIGHUP|SIGINT|SIGQUIT|SIGKILL|SIGPIPE|SIGALRM|SIGTERM|SIGURG|SIGSTOP|SIGTSTP|SIGCONT|SIGCHLD|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|S IGWINCH|SIGINFO|SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2,0x0) = 0 (0x0) 24822: sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) ... too many line ... but apache, and modules loaded from it do not call this directly. I was trying to use DTRACE for getting information about syscalls, and I got same result. I wrote tiny sample code: #include main(){ fork(); } I ran it on FreeBSD: truss -f ./mytest 2>&1 | grep sigprocmask | wc -l 30 Is it normal to call so many syscalls ? For example, there is no sigprocmask syscalls when I run it in Linux. -- ? ?????????, Daniil Cherednik .masterhost From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 14:40:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A86FA1065689 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:40:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6738FC1D for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:40:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGXJt-0002Mo-S6 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:40:37 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:40:37 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:40:37 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:40:23 +0200 Lines: 62 Message-ID: References: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig26B48E778C196AE21FBE514A" X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111004 Thunderbird/7.0.1 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:40:39 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig26B48E778C196AE21FBE514A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 19/10/2011 16:30, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Albert Shih wro= te: >> Hi >> >> Sorry to cross-posting. I don't knwon which mailing-list I should post= this >> message. >> >> I'll would like to use FreeBSD with ZFS on some Dell server with some >> MD1200 (classique DAS). >> >> When we buy a MD1200 we need a RAID PERC H800 card on the server so we= have >> two options : >> >> 1/ create a LV on the PERC H800 so the server see one volume an= d put >> the zpool on this unique volume and let the hardware manage the= >> raid. >> >> 2/ create 12 LV on the perc H800 (so without raid) and let Free= BSD >> and ZFS manage the raid. >> >> which one is the best solution ? >=20 > Neither. >=20 > The best solution is to find a controller which can pass the disk as > JBOD (not encapsulated as virtual disk). Failing that, I'd go with (1) > (though others might disagree). Depending on the requirements and the purpose of the machine, it might idea to combine it by having the hardware handle multiple RAID-1 devices. E.g. if you want to implement RAID-10, you might create N RAID-1 volumes of two drives each in hardware. This is especially good since FreeBSD's ZFS doesn't yet handle hot spares. --------------enig26B48E778C196AE21FBE514A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6e4VcACgkQldnAQVacBcj83wCeL2nrV3r18Je7DbNSdxHXySOO BtIAn3tG2H6nOP544xeWR7kMwT5PcOAU =26RL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig26B48E778C196AE21FBE514A-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 14:40:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E925D10656A5 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:40:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E84D8FC17 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwn22 with SMTP id 22so6455066wwn.1 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:40:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.53.195 with SMTP id n3mr1540235wbg.77.1319035250005; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:40:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i29sm10168820wbp.22.2011.10.19.07.40.47 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:40:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E9EE16E.30507@my.gd> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:40:46 +0200 From: Damien Fleuriot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> In-Reply-To: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:40:52 -0000 On 10/19/11 4:14 PM, Albert Shih wrote: > Hi > > Sorry to cross-posting. I don't knwon which mailing-list I should post this > message. > > I'll would like to use FreeBSD with ZFS on some Dell server with some > MD1200 (classique DAS). > > When we buy a MD1200 we need a RAID PERC H800 card on the server so we have > two options : > > 1/ create a LV on the PERC H800 so the server see one volume and put > the zpool on this unique volume and let the hardware manage the > raid. > > 2/ create 12 LV on the perc H800 (so without raid) and let FreeBSD > and ZFS manage the raid. > > which one is the best solution ? > > Any advise about the RAM I need on the server (actually one MD1200 so 12x2To disk) > > Regards. > > JAS Why would you post about freebsd on opensolaris' list is beyond me. Regarding your options with the ZFS pool, you will want to set your disks as JBOD, so you can aggregate them with ZFS and use its native features (including the self healing). If you setup a hardware RAID then create a ZFS pool off it, you'll miss on the self healing because ZFS will not see the individual drives. Regarding your RAM needs, you are providing too few information for an accurate answer. What will you use the server for ? Regarding the H800 card on freebsd, I would test it beforehand if I were you, there were problems getting the H200 working on 8.2 before. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 14:44:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507761065676 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:44:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike.jeays@rogers.com) Received: from nm19.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (nm19.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.94.237.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0485B8FC17 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:44:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [66.94.237.198] by nm19.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Oct 2011 14:44:22 -0000 Received: from [98.139.221.67] by tm9.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Oct 2011 14:44:22 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp104.rog.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Oct 2011 14:44:22 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rogers.com; s=s1024; t=1319035462; bh=JsrK+91DPd4TkUxR4yW0wucHqs9qiKVlCT6Jlb59rAw=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=cFezZpN7DlMwnbDoe26UJFI1pyEspefPjEdubGX/zA45XSNM8fWmVzHnhHYvjCxRBf8IimaEn5NEglnhp2hUQPx2T5R9+jZSIh6YA61WY0DByKGtOc/lKnCt4H7AE/w1KWn7bdT+jgBwMPzj9uf4ZlCMZ1ajXfjEnEK9JToZdAA= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 283718.2668.bm@smtp104.rog.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: bxyEUawVM1lGaUckVdHkuTlvbBsLvaGr_LFeTWixktCuhK9 OHeETqaVCwlQini38_1VeYWyJrsb9biF_f4qXQ4XOnzdro6f7QkGvndwPSIg jUk4ULxALIqyrn2GDmeYnHh_ShUZvMs6OY0VSkGciy5LULxQ5EdDq7xaVr.v KFnI9YmTnWybdEU4RRH38LBeTTkz6h4jNwgXFJkQptTHgiwn3BRJ4RskG2Vj 541rscRkyLRHFmzD7P69EJTR2_RHPyL8NtXwBYc8bWsnZPLWr0goyjwizWBE pdOgwTIGQRfLG_e_pCpI6oBE1yjfc9ND6M_2iSLBjJrw3q5hzBzoYd43QHR1 6KB8zRUO6pZyYthyHs96ZKnfsd62R3_wPQ2_xsUE2RFcJO96.ZGJCAJnC.1J Rs1P9JAeoUzttOUcEomDZQDTRaZ9qJ73EuE1O97rkHfUI9c9.nEXoi1E5cJZ I3si5cIJBv1hx00f9tRfss3lJlpzhj4lJ1V374Wc- X-Yahoo-SMTP: N82WFx6swBBjwcHWPFR2CGt6udzA8RPrA.xm0enFFXaK2g-- Received: from napoleon (mike.jeays@99.224.68.20 with login) by smtp104.rog.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Oct 2011 07:44:22 -0700 PDT Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:44:21 -0400 From: Mike Jeays To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111019104421.6fe469ef@napoleon> In-Reply-To: <44botd86tk.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <44botd86tk.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim Subject: www.clubrunner.ca X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:44:23 -0000 I find weird behaviour with this site. It works fine on Windows systems, but Firefox on FreeBSD (and also Firefox, Opera and Chrome on Ubuntu) fails to connect. It immediately tries to retrieve www.clubrunner.ca/Home, but then the connection hangs. Does anyone have any clues, please? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 14:54:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA2D106566B for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:54:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jorge@bsdchile.cl) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2736E8FC08 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi40 with SMTP id 40so2328151wyi.13 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:54:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.178.141 with SMTP id bm13mr2947697wbb.33.1319034482272; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:28:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.96.161 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:28:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> References: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:28:02 -0300 Message-ID: From: Jorge Medina To: Albert Shih Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:54:47 -0000 On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Albert Shih wrote: > Hi > > Sorry to cross-posting. I don't knwon which mailing-list I should post th= is > message. > > I'll would like to use FreeBSD with ZFS on some Dell server with some > MD1200 (classique DAS). > > When we buy a MD1200 we need a RAID PERC H800 card on the server so we ha= ve > two options : > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A01/ create a LV on the PERC H800 so the server see one volu= me and put > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0the zpool on this unique volume and let the hardware manag= e the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0raid. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A02/ create 12 LV on the perc H800 (so without raid) and let= FreeBSD > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0and ZFS manage the raid. > > which one is the best solution ? > > Any advise about the RAM I need on the server (actually one MD1200 so 12x= 2To disk) > > Regards. for ZFS approach the second option in my opinion is better. > JAS > -- > Albert SHIH > DIO batiment 15 > Observatoire de Paris > 5 Place Jules Janssen > 92195 Meudon Cedex > T=E9l=E9phone : 01 45 07 76 26/06 86 69 95 71 > Heure local/Local time: > mer 19 oct 2011 16:11:40 CEST > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > --=20 Jorge Andr=E9s Medina Oliva. Computer engineer. IT consultant http://www.bsdchile.cl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 14:56:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5886D1065672 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:56:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fajar@fajar.net) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC148FC1C for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaky10 with SMTP id y10so2669785iak.13 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:56:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.154.201 with SMTP id r9mr12710075icw.14.1319034631791; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:30:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.241.2 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:30:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> References: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:30:31 +0700 Message-ID: From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" To: Albert Shih Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:56:04 -0000 On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Albert Shih wrote: > Hi > > Sorry to cross-posting. I don't knwon which mailing-list I should post th= is > message. > > I'll would like to use FreeBSD with ZFS on some Dell server with some > MD1200 (classique DAS). > > When we buy a MD1200 we need a RAID PERC H800 card on the server so we ha= ve > two options : > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A01/ create a LV on the PERC H800 so the server see one volu= me and put > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0the zpool on this unique volume and let the hardware manag= e the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0raid. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A02/ create 12 LV on the perc H800 (so without raid) and let= FreeBSD > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0and ZFS manage the raid. > > which one is the best solution ? Neither. The best solution is to find a controller which can pass the disk as JBOD (not encapsulated as virtual disk). Failing that, I'd go with (1) (though others might disagree). > > Any advise about the RAM I need on the server (actually one MD1200 so 12x= 2To disk) The more the better :) Just make sure do NOT use dedup untul you REALLY know what you're doing (which usually means buying lots of RAM and SSD for L2ARC). --=20 Fajar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 15:22:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80907106568C for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:22:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from movszx@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A68A8FC18 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:22:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfo13 with SMTP id fo13so2464828vcb.13 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:22:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cArbtzhDjtZeZ/bwnMM+J0o9xGWJhECEDc6aRDOtaTI=; b=fx7DAC+qMKragueLb66Qnxl2uaPrBTHT9VK353g75r8JKtxURelqt3igT5D0ubk22G ldd5YjS95BbOb05/J5BIDjT9lEoYJzp6MmN58q24lGErB8Hk5UIaxG5Y4ulr/DE4grgY 80fNllUeEe8bS6NAOMg8voQsA1fWbFXWBzaRk= Received: by 10.52.37.36 with SMTP id v4mr1595962vdj.61.1319035948265; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:52:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.195.66 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:52:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> References: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> From: Krunal Desai Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:52:07 -0400 Message-ID: To: Albert Shih Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:22:32 -0000 On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Albert Shih wrote: > When we buy a MD1200 we need a RAID PERC H800 card on the server so we ha= ve > two options : > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A01/ create a LV on the PERC H800 so the server = see one volume and put > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0the zpool on this unique volume and let the ha= rdware manage the > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0raid. > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A02/ create 12 LV on the perc H800 (so without r= aid) and let FreeBSD > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0and ZFS manage the raid. > > which one is the best solution ? > > Any advise about the RAM I need on the server (actually one MD1200 so 12x= 2To disk) I know the PERC H200 can be flashed with IT firmware, making it in effect a "dumb" HBA perfect for ZFS usage. Perhaps the H800 has the same? (If not, can you get the machine configured with a H200?) If that's not an option, I think Option 2 will work. My first ZFS server ran on a PERC 5/i, and I was forced to make 8 single-drive RAID 0s in the PERC Option ROM, but Solaris did not seem to mind that. --khd From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 15:24:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62DD106566B for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:24:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CAD8FC16 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:24:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGY0j-0000uC-1x for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:24:53 +0200 Received: from pool-173-79-99-96.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.99.96]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:24:53 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-99-96.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:24:53 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:24:37 -0400 Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <44botd86tk.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20111019104421.6fe469ef@napoleon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-99-96.washdc.fios.verizon.net Subject: Re: www.clubrunner.ca X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:24:54 -0000 Mike Jeays wrote: > I find weird behaviour with this site. It works fine on Windows systems, > but Firefox on FreeBSD (and also Firefox, Opera and Chrome on Ubuntu) > fails to connect. It immediately tries to retrieve www.clubrunner.ca/Home, > but then the connection hangs. > > Does anyone have any clues, please? Does charset=windows-1252 ring any bells? I only looked at it very briefly, but my first impression is this is just one of the most terribly coded pages I've seen recently. I wouldn't waste any time with something as much a mess as this. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 15:36:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9011065674 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:36:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=2661bf2fd=pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com) Received: from ip-002.utdallas.edu (ip-002.utdallas.edu [129.110.20.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610578FC17 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:36:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Group: None X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArsIAOTmnk6BbgogU2dsb2JhbABEqQwBGwYCEBQlgi0CLoE1Gp1vn26DMIQKYQSIAp1x X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,372,1315198800"; d="scan'208";a="71946662" Received: from zxtm01.utdallas.edu (HELO utd71538.utdallas.edu) ([129.110.10.32]) by ip-002.utdallas.edu with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 19 Oct 2011 10:07:23 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:07:22 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: FreeBSD Questions List Message-ID: X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: My tribute to Dennis Ritchie X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:36:02 -0000 # grep -ir Ritchie /usr/src/* /usr/src/bin/cat/cat.1:.An Dennis Ritchie /usr/src/contrib/ntp/util/ansi2knr.1:ansi2knr \- convert ANSI C to Kernighan & Ritchie C /usr/src/contrib/tcpdump/print-rx.c: * Sigh. This is gross. Ritchie forgive me. /usr/src/games/fortune/datfiles/fortunes: -- Dennis M. Ritchie /usr/src/games/fortune/datfiles/fortunes: -- Ken Thompson and Dennis M. Ritchie /usr/src/games/fortune/datfiles/fortunes: -- Dennis M. Ritchie /usr/src/games/fortune/datfiles/fortunes: -- Dennis M. Ritchie /usr/src/games/fortune/datfiles/fortunes:Dennis Ritchie is twice as bright as Steve Jobs, and only half wrong. /usr/src/games/fortune/datfiles/fortunes: -- Dennis M. Ritchie /usr/src/games/fortune/datfiles/fortunes:Ritchie's Rule: /usr/src/games/fortune/datfiles/fortunes: -- Dennis M. Ritchie /usr/src/lib/libc/rpc/PSD.doc/xdr.rfc.ms:[1] Brian W. Kernighan & Dennis M. Ritchie, "The C Programming /usr/src/lib/libcompat/regexp/README:a V8 manual page sent to me by Dennis Ritchie (the manual page enclosed /usr/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/SMM.doc/3.t:I thank Bill Joy, Sam Leffler, Robert Elz and Dennis Ritchie /usr/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/SMM.doc/3.t:.IP [Ritchie78] 20 /usr/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/SMM.doc/3.t:Ritchie, D. M., and Thompson, K., /usr/src/share/doc/papers/devfs/paper.me:published on UNIX by Ritchie and Thompson [Ritchie74]: /usr/src/share/doc/papers/devfs/paper.me:The initial implementation used hardcoded inode numbers [Ritchie98]. /usr/src/share/doc/papers/devfs/paper.me:[Ritchie74] /usr/src/share/doc/papers/devfs/paper.me:D.M. Ritchie and K. Thompson: /usr/src/share/doc/papers/devfs/paper.me:[Ritchie98] /usr/src/share/doc/papers/devfs/paper.me:Dennis Ritchie: private conversation at USENIX Annual Technical Conference /usr/src/share/doc/papers/fsinterface/fsinterface.ms:filesystem [Ritchie74], /usr/src/share/doc/papers/fsinterface/fsinterface.ms:.IP Ritchie74 /usr/src/share/doc/papers/fsinterface/fsinterface.ms:Ritchie, D.M. and K. Thompson, ``The Unix Time-Sharing System,'' /usr/src/share/doc/papers/kerntune/4.t:.IP [Ritchie74] 20 /usr/src/share/doc/papers/kerntune/4.t:Ritchie, D. M. and Thompson, K., /usr/src/share/doc/papers/malloc/malloc.ms:studied in the ``Old testament'', chapter 8 verse 7 [Kernighan & Ritchie] /usr/src/share/doc/papers/sysperf/7.t:.IP [Ritchie74] 20 /usr/src/share/doc/papers/sysperf/7.t:Ritchie, D. M. and Thompson, K., /usr/src/share/doc/psd/01.cacm/p1:D. M. Ritchie and K. Thompson /usr/src/share/doc/psd/01.cacm/p1:c programming language kernighan ritchie prentice-hall /usr/src/share/doc/psd/01.cacm/ref.bib:%A D. M. Ritchie /usr/src/share/doc/psd/02.implement/implement:ritchie thompson unix bstj 1978 /usr/src/share/doc/psd/02.implement/ref.bib:%A D. M. Ritchie /usr/src/share/doc/psd/03.iosys/iosys:Dennis M. Ritchie /usr/src/share/doc/psd/04.uprog/p0:Dennis M. Ritchie /usr/src/share/doc/psd/04.uprog/p8:K. L. Thompson and D. M. Ritchie, /usr/src/share/doc/psd/04.uprog/p8:B. W. Kernighan and D. M. Ritchie, /usr/src/share/doc/psd/04.uprog/p9:D. M. Ritchie /usr/src/share/doc/psd/06.Clang/Clang.ms:Dennis M. Ritchie /usr/src/share/doc/psd/06.Clang/Clang.ms:by Brian W. Kernighan and Dennis M. Ritchie, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1978. /usr/src/share/doc/psd/15.yacc/ref.bib:%A D. M. Ritchie /usr/src/share/doc/psd/15.yacc/ss0:Ritchie Kernighan Language Prentice /usr/src/share/doc/psd/15.yacc/ssB:D. M. Ritchie, B. W. Kernighan, and M. O. Harris helped translate this document into English. /usr/src/share/doc/psd/16.lex/lex.ms:B. W. Kernighan and D. M. Ritchie, /usr/src/share/doc/psd/16.lex/lex.ms:B. W. Kernighan, D. M. Ritchie and K. L. Thompson, /usr/src/share/doc/psd/16.lex/lex.ms:D. M. Ritchie, /usr/src/share/doc/psd/17.m4/m4.ms:Dennis M. Ritchie /usr/src/share/doc/psd/17.m4/m4.ms:which was written by D. M. Ritchie /usr/src/share/doc/psd/20.ipctut/tutor.me:[Kernighan & Ritchie 1978], /usr/src/share/doc/psd/20.ipctut/tutor.me:B.W. Kernighan & D.M. Ritchie, 1978, /usr/src/share/doc/psd/contents/contents.ms:Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson's original paper about UNIX, reprinted /usr/src/share/doc/psd/contents/contents.ms:Dennis Ritchie's overview of the I/O System of Version 7; still helpful for /usr/src/share/doc/psd/contents/contents.ms:B.W. Kernighan and D.M. Ritchie, Prentice-Hall, 1978, that /usr/src/share/doc/smm/05.fastfs/1.t:[Ritchie74], [Thompson78].* /usr/src/share/doc/smm/05.fastfs/6.t:We also acknowledge Dennis Ritchie for his suggestions /usr/src/share/doc/smm/05.fastfs/6.t:.IP [Ritchie74] 20 /usr/src/share/doc/smm/05.fastfs/6.t:Ritchie, D. M. and Thompson, K., /usr/src/share/man/man9/style.9:Dennis Ritchie in /usr/src/share/misc/bsd-family-tree:[dmr] Dennis Ritchie, via E-Mail /usr/src/usr.bin/calendar/calendars/calendar.birthday:09/09 Dennis Ritchie born, 1941 /usr/src/usr.bin/calendar/calendars/calendar.computer:01/16 Set uid bit patent issued, to Dennis Ritchie, 1979 /usr/src/usr.bin/calendar/calendars/calendar.music:04/14 Ritchie Blackmore (Deep Purple, Rainbow) is born, 1945 /usr/src/usr.bin/m4/NOTES: Kernighan, Brian W. and Dennis M. Ritchie, -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ******************************************* "It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson "There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them." George Orwell From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 15:38:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165681065672 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:38:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from editor@d3photography.com) Received: from server.cwis.biz (70-89-202-5-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27B88FC08 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.cwis.biz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAC2278ED53; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:41:34 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cwis.biz Received: from server.cwis.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (server.cwis.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lTtqDJTM-Sto; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:41:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [192.168.46.167] (173-160-104-249-Minnesota.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.160.104.249]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2506278ED52; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:41:21 -0500 (CDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Ryan Coleman In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:37:51 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6066E0B8-71EE-47BC-A122-3488FD6EC62D@d3photography.com> References: <44botd86tk.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20111019104421.6fe469ef@napoleon> To: nightrecon@hotmail.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: www.clubrunner.ca X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:38:06 -0000 It did take me two page loads to get it to even render on Firefox in OS = X (Lion). On Oct 19, 2011, at 10:24 AM, Michael Powell wrote: > Mike Jeays wrote: >=20 >> I find weird behaviour with this site. It works fine on Windows = systems, >> but Firefox on FreeBSD (and also Firefox, Opera and Chrome on Ubuntu) >> fails to connect. It immediately tries to retrieve = www.clubrunner.ca/Home, >> but then the connection hangs. >>=20 >> Does anyone have any clues, please? >=20 > Does charset=3Dwindows-1252 ring any bells?=20 >=20 > I only looked at it very briefly, but my first impression is this is = just one=20 > of the most terribly coded pages I've seen recently. I wouldn't waste = any=20 > time with something as much a mess as this. >=20 > -Mike >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 15:56:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3845106566B for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:56:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFDA8FC24 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi40 with SMTP id 40so2418016wyi.13 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:56:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=UKaGyZtCWs9YgsCLJsym88DFVNYTnOhStNDEbrVSZnI=; b=KhEDnkY7VFgxRGDVYn8Jrv8T/9JqHixI/sgoNlDmfqKG1MhWoCzePlu48boIJiy5eP /nZRKproCk0/fWgtPwdJ5OcizLet7aBrNXOVnHv+wW/QhjdXhR69qc1f4Emv9CQbhPw3 yTIGyhnBZPMK8wBW2u/6kmWDk+gqTBtqwhPaM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.19.203 with SMTP id c11mr2615723wbb.107.1319038384526; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:33:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.96.104 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:33:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:33:04 -0400 Message-ID: From: Ryan Stone To: Paul Ambrose Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-current , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: config(8) does not add post-processing for source file with compile-with command in sys/conf/files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:56:01 -0000 I have run into the same issue recently. I have been testing the following patch(on 8.2-RELEASE) and it seems to have worked for me: --- mkmakefile.c 11:09:30.000000000 -0400 +++ mkmakefile.c 2011-10-06 11:13:31.000000000 -0400 @@ -742,15 +742,16 @@ break; } snprintf(cmd, sizeof(cmd), - "${%s_%c%s}\n.if defined(NORMAL_CTFCONVERT) && " - "!empty(NORMAL_CTFCONVERT)\n" - "\t${NORMAL_CTFCONVERT}\n.endif", ftype, + "${%s_%c%s}\n", ftype, toupper(och), ftp->f_flags & NOWERROR ? "_NOWERROR" : ""); compilewith = cmd; } *cp = och; - fprintf(f, "\t%s\n\n", compilewith); + fprintf(f, "\t%s\n", compilewith); + fprintf(f, ".if defined(NORMAL_CTFCONVERT) && " + "!empty(NORMAL_CTFCONVERT)\n" + "\t${NORMAL_CTFCONVERT}\n.endif\n\n"); } } From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 15:59:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460051065670 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:59:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi.sergio@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE408FC14 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:59:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qadz30 with SMTP id z30so1976895qad.13 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:59:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references :disposition-notification-to:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer; bh=zfsbf6JgmQOaTxIF0mATg49/iw+RWsX2KL6u1+Ifr7U=; b=qM+d4MAoOAaEuccZVLycYii0XmSeeJOazFpoSV/4DZHT+D+jImtpQsIfFNDfjSZrX3 P46iQq4/faZ0RyVUn5aJwoq5707HlXDJiJD7IMYNV+g7VdK0VmPTstVyplmfxSM+QLVE vZT5yl7liUq4oNVgVwV6tfObNtcVLdx77iMAs= Received: by 10.229.66.224 with SMTP id o32mr1618858qci.13.1319038576497; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:36:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.6.230] ([201.21.151.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bz6sm7043035qab.22.2011.10.19.08.36.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:36:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi To: Jorge Medina In-Reply-To: References: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:36:11 -0200 Message-ID: <1319038571.43689.13.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Albert Shih , zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:59:24 -0000 I have several dells with the perc controller and I can say that the best solution is to user raid 0 (see both disks) and let zfs to mirror them.. This works ok, and you can use the zfs tools to manage the disks. Howerver this does not solve the problem that I had with the perc controller.. The problem is that all the storage you have is in the perc controller, even it is reliable, when it "breaks", all of your storage (and so the computer...) is useless. You cannot move the drives (HD) to another machine because the "normal" controller (ad, ada) will not recognize the disk. Even if you have a spare perc controller of the same kind at hand (and I bet you do not have...) the disks are "signed" by the other (the broken) controller and so will not be recognized by the new controller. In my case I had to call dell support, and only after several hours I could put the HD online again. I mount only one disk (of the zfs pool) in the new controller, and even with the dell support in the phone the new controller wipe out the disk. A new call (with a different dell support) was able to re-initialize the disk, that includes re-install Freebsd... and after that "attach" the old disk, and using zpool detatch, followed by zpool attach (the old disk), it than reconstruct the mirror... resulting in almost 6 hour downtime and a loss of one day working for the hole company. Now, a dell support (here) does not attend you if you say that the OS is FreeBSD, you must say to them that you are installing Linux... to get the support. Conclusion: now I prefer the IBM 32XX series... Ok that is my story Sergio. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 18:14:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60B51065670 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:14:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FEBF8FC1D for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.53]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C163C84C5 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:14:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 11076 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2011 18:14:43 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 10430, pid: 15471, t: 0.1733s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:13495 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 19 Oct 2011 18:14:42 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id BCF792E0DA; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:14:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: doug@safeport.com References: <44hb3588my.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:14:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: (doug@safeport.com's message of "Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:53:19 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: <44pqhsu9v2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multi-boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:14:44 -0000 doug@safeport.com writes: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > >> doug@safeport.com writes: >> >>> I have a system with two physical disks with a version of FreeBSD >>> installed on each disk. With various 7.x systems I had: >>> >>> F1 disk1 on slices ads5x >>> F5 disk2 on slices ads6x >>> >>> I installed 8.2 on disk2, incorrectly saying leave the mbr alone. So >>> when I boot from the second disk I get >>> >>> F6 PXE >>> Boot: F1 >>> >>> I can then hit F1 or wait and all goes okay. I tried using sysinstall >>> to rewrite the FBSD boot manager but that not effect any change. Must >>> I rewrite the mbr on disk 1 also? >> >> That's what I would expect to have to do... > > Pre 8.2 the behavior the selected system just boot without the extra > message. I had a 7.0 and a 7.4 system installed. I replaced the 7.4 > system with 8,2 With the boot setup I understand the FreeBSD boot > manager would be on sector 0 track 0 of disk 1. The boot record for > disk 1 is in the first logical sector for the drive. The boot record > for disk 2 should be similarly placed on disk 2. > > What I think is missing is putting the boot manager on disk 2. If that > is the case, is there a way to do that without reinstalling? boot0cfg(8) from the system that does boot. Or boot in "rescue" mode from a CD (or other removable media) and use sysinstall. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 18:23:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7144106566C for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:23:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from oceanpt.safeport.com (oceanpt.safeport.com [65.122.17.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8F98FC0C for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:23:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oceanpt.safeport.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p9JIFfXE037522 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:15:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:15:41 -0400 (EDT) From: doug@safeport.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <44pqhsu9v2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Message-ID: References: <44hb3588my.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <44pqhsu9v2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (oceanpt.safeport.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:15:41 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: multi-boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:23:42 -0000 On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > doug@safeport.com writes: > >> On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> >>> doug@safeport.com writes: >>> >>>> I have a system with two physical disks with a version of FreeBSD >>>> installed on each disk. With various 7.x systems I had: >>>> >>>> F1 disk1 on slices ads5x >>>> F5 disk2 on slices ads6x >>>> >>>> I installed 8.2 on disk2, incorrectly saying leave the mbr alone. So >>>> when I boot from the second disk I get >>>> >>>> F6 PXE >>>> Boot: F1 >>>> >>>> I can then hit F1 or wait and all goes okay. I tried using sysinstall >>>> to rewrite the FBSD boot manager but that not effect any change. Must >>>> I rewrite the mbr on disk 1 also? >>> >>> That's what I would expect to have to do... >> >> Pre 8.2 the behavior the selected system just boot without the extra >> message. I had a 7.0 and a 7.4 system installed. I replaced the 7.4 >> system with 8,2 With the boot setup I understand the FreeBSD boot >> manager would be on sector 0 track 0 of disk 1. The boot record for >> disk 1 is in the first logical sector for the drive. The boot record >> for disk 2 should be similarly placed on disk 2. >> >> What I think is missing is putting the boot manager on disk 2. If that >> is the case, is there a way to do that without reinstalling? > > boot0cfg(8) from the system that does boot. > Or boot in "rescue" mode from a CD (or other removable media) > and use sysinstall. thanks _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-217-9220 Fax: 301-217-9277 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 18:53:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340E6106567F for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:53:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42448FC16 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so2707641eyd.13 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:53:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vUeEkxA+IQvCUP4oYpTHhPKnUKqgsC0aslkXO2kI2rs=; b=NAY2LoSkbd1fUklNq3r0+Np4rahKmRFz0zkrWoGdcbZ3lWP+Mh53HC5Bw0QnXl4wwM xewf1WXRNQ9L3A0dTCq40a1XeH9EXjtC4muTkMf9jD/PatGCrLPjeXaKuFL42Kw/2+ky v5Gq8X0XBEkb/F5vB/OZMRd1t/Bu5DYhSmqzM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.16.82 with SMTP id n18mr12683467faa.2.1319048616081; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:23:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.11.42 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:23:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:23:36 +0200 Message-ID: From: Andy Wodfer To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Help! Can't delete files ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:53:27 -0000 A client has uploaded several files through a CMS and these files contain Norwegian letters (I think). =C6 =D8 and =C5. I need to delete about 20 files, but I can't do it through the CMS nor by command line on this FreeBSD 8.1 STABLE server. There's something with the character encoding/keyboard or server setup I think. Please advice. This is what a file looks like when I ls: 28b Kjoepesenter n?ringsg?rdeier.docx ls | more: 28b Kjoepesenter n<91>ringsg<86>rdeier.docx If I try: # rm 28b Kjoepesenter n<91>ringsg<86>rdeier.docx Ambiguous input redirect ... Thanks! Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 18:55:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34D41065670 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:55:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480968FC0C for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:55:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi40 with SMTP id 40so2670422wyi.13 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:55:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Jf8wGmwapOv0bk+LePqoWFxi2xSLdP7LF9WOM0adNyM=; b=PyIQCpjo5yiHv/V9QsXt9RW5nDR1HP1+Y5aJsvkJ/eCz6z0h87waPcE8u1qV/mdRed 3EpAE+QYqbPaFjZDsl3tp36jS5Y4nZwkjWDdaNYDoWN5g/ZWekA//ZYlEDiWANvwyKgU LQjS+csC4bGh3eIKhEnmul/dQ3KvhUCxnDCv8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.221.80 with SMTP id q58mr557367wep.36.1319050532268; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:55:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.26.213 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:55:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:55:32 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Upgrading from 6.2-RELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:55:33 -0000 I have gotten custody of an old machine running the aforementioned, and it's in production. I can take it down for a couple of hours if necessary, but would prefer to have it down as little as possible. What are my options for getting it to a supported release - looking at the handbook it doesn't appear the the freebsd-update utility will work in this case, as it's not 6.3? Can I, for instance, boot from a CD of a supported version and do an upgrade, or am I stuck doing a download of sorce for 7.0-RELEASE, compiling that, and then an freebsd-update to 7.4? Thanks, Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 19:00:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45794106564A for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout020.mac.com (asmtpout020.mac.com [17.148.16.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E648FC12 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:00:04 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp020.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0LTB0067BU3UOR40@asmtp020.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:59:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813,1.0.211,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-10-19_07:2011-10-19, 2011-10-19, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1110190226 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:59:53 -0700 Message-id: References: To: Andy Wodfer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Help! Can't delete files ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:00:05 -0000 Hi-- On Oct 19, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Andy Wodfer wrote: > I need to delete about 20 files, but I can't do it through the CMS nor by > command line on this FreeBSD 8.1 STABLE server. There's something with the > character encoding/keyboard or server setup I think. > > Please advice. > > This is what a file looks like when I ls: > > 28b Kjoepesenter n?ringsg?rdeier.docx That's probably UTF-8 encoding of the Norwegian string. You'd need to quote the characters in a fashion appropriate for whichever shell you use; but an easier way is likely: rm -i *Kjoepesenter* Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 19:01:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CCFD1065670 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:01:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCE68FC12 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:01:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so2718028eyd.13 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:01:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mABuwcbLbq+wC90XVzufBbq6f2321CY4kJK9HY8H78Q=; b=lfa6d3191hlTXws2pZFgrJZGJp4R80nvWe6azwupoQzpPXkdbfhTdUSAsBfKZdwF9V 7EWjp2a7A95MdIP+EdkxqpR9+oudWRj31sbaY7wdJQbwO3xVY+Fv562sr1wIANgAQbUE 4V5vATH1W1QFHddoWJX3TA6UF+VR3S3PxV76Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.76.27 with SMTP id a27mr12840090fak.26.1319050891610; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:01:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.124.197 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:01:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:01:31 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Kurt Buff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading from 6.2-RELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:01:33 -0000 On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: > I have gotten custody of an old machine running the aforementioned, > and it's in production. I can take it down for a couple of hours if > necessary, but would prefer to have it down as little as possible. > > What are my options for getting it to a supported release - looking at > the handbook it doesn't appear the the freebsd-update utility will > work in this case, as it's not 6.3? Can I, for instance, boot from a > CD of a supported version and do an upgrade, or am I stuck doing a > download of sorce for 7.0-RELEASE, compiling that, and then an > freebsd-update to 7.4? > You're probably best off to go 6.2 -> 6_3 then do your freebsd-update stuff. I don't think the upgrading from CD works -- at least I've heard some horror stories. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 19:03:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912D2106566B for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:03:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout024.mac.com (asmtpout024.mac.com [17.148.16.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 792AF8FC08 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:03:40 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp024.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0LTB002RNUA3DM80@asmtp024.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:03:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813,1.0.211,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-10-19_07:2011-10-19, 2011-10-19, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1110190226 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:03:39 -0700 Message-id: References: To: Kurt Buff X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading from 6.2-RELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:03:40 -0000 On Oct 19, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Kurt Buff wrote: > I have gotten custody of an old machine running the aforementioned, > and it's in production. I can take it down for a couple of hours if > necessary, but would prefer to have it down as little as possible. The most straightforward solution would be to build out and validate a new system running FreeBSD-7.4 or 8.2, and drop it in place of the old box. If all is good, decommission the old hardware. > What are my options for getting it to a supported release - looking at > the handbook it doesn't appear the the freebsd-update utility will > work in this case, as it's not 6.3? Can I, for instance, boot from a > CD of a supported version and do an upgrade, or am I stuck doing a > download of sorce for 7.0-RELEASE, compiling that, and then an > freebsd-update to 7.4? You can do either. However, it's probably easier to just download and burn the 7.4 or 8.2 image, and do an upgrade directly than it would be do upgrade via source to 7.0-RELEASE and then try freebsd-update. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 19:04:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F0610656A5 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:04:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB2E8FC1A for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi40 with SMTP id 40so2681668wyi.13 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:04:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tzSwFUc6Nuy1anNTRYAql34XKc0WqjpnZZpd5/JQQUY=; b=fjgqkRy+mMr3Ilggqg04pV5uf0UJjkll0vT5iaeTEACx8A3ZbvX1LZsDyjf0/LZ887 Pfw6u87JZ3OgHKNW3Yas1hWa8A/4m44R0xdOpS+06i+Uh22qiKd+abLLZVf+rXcmpn6E Gg9ogYE5VGxxXxYtZES5TwiLJaeIAYLF/LlaI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.229.30 with SMTP id g30mr2923519weq.51.1319051054479; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.26.213 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:04:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:04:14 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: Paul Schmehl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Questions List Subject: Re: My tribute to Dennis Ritchie X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:04:16 -0000 A fitting tribute, except for one line... On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 08:07, Paul Schmehl wrot= e: > # grep -ir Ritchie /usr/src/* > /usr/src/usr.bin/calendar/calendars/calendar.music:04/14 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0Ritchie > Blackmore (Deep Purple, Rainbow) is born, 1945 I don't know if Dennis Ritchie was a fan of Deep Purple... Heh. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 19:04:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2596E10656B8 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:04:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D7C8FC1B for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:04:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id p9JJ4Ago092104; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:04:10 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:04:10 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201110191904.p9JJ4Ago092104@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, wodfer@gmail.com In-Reply-To: Cc: Subject: Re: Help! Can't delete files ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:04:33 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Oct 19 13:53:33 2011 > Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:23:36 +0200 > From: Andy Wodfer > To: freebsd-questions > Subject: Help! Can't delete files ... > > A client has uploaded several files through a CMS and these files contain > Norwegian letters (I think). AE O and A. > > I need to delete about 20 files, but I can't do it through the CMS nor by > command line on this FreeBSD 8.1 STABLE server. There's something with the > character encoding/keyboard or server setup I think. > > Please advice. > > This is what a file looks like when I ls: > > 28b Kjoepesenter n?ringsg?rdeier.docx > > ls | more: > > 28b Kjoepesenter n<91>ringsg<86>rdeier.docx > > If I try: > > # rm 28b Kjoepesenter n<91>ringsg<86>rdeier.docx > Ambiguous input redirect A) learn to use wildcards. B) learn to use the '-i' option to rm C) learn to use 'echo' to 'test' filename expansions. For your 'problem' files, put a '?' in anywhere there is a space or a 'strange character'. Check what happens using echo, then use 'rm -i', so you make sure that you delete *only* the particular file you intend to. e.g. for the specific file you cited above try: echo 28b?Kjoepesenter?n?ringsg?rdeier.docx *ASSUMING* that that shows; 28b Kjoepesenter n<91>ringsg<86>rdeier.docx then try: rm -i 28b?Kjoepesenter?n?ringsg?rdeier.docx Assuming that it asks yout about deleting the full file name, type a 'y'. Repeat for each 'problem' file. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 19:32:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696DC1065674 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:32:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58768FC13 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:32:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkbzu17 with SMTP id zu17so3279777bkb.13 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:32:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=HB0igYhiO9oK+C03leORKLHDg5f7XkrLpPjhQGqOyec=; b=mFQLKJnO9YNBEQq402azxvllFR2WaxXr88GwteDOLHA5Zj7y53cIX3noajD8CBvZhC tG55Y4DsHX1O+TiLQGH/3Ub+eMw9u4b3Bcbbf8O6qrsC4fqeztGYdWa6JjUt36lG/2kY v2wC5ISLUi/pARtEs2uwbZR9xYPePAVJVJtLI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.76.201 with SMTP id d9mr12999244fak.12.1319052759608; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.11.42 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:32:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201110191904.p9JJ4Ago092104@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <201110191904.p9JJ4Ago092104@mail.r-bonomi.com> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:32:39 +0200 Message-ID: From: Andy Wodfer To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Help! Can't delete files ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:32:41 -0000 On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote: > A) learn to use wildcards. > I know how to use wildcards, but I forgot to tell in my first email that there are 4 files that have almost the same filenames, so I couldn't do it this way. > B) learn to use the '-i' option to rm > C) learn to use 'echo' to 'test' filename expansions. > Thanks! Very useful info. For your 'problem' files, put a '?' in anywhere there is a space or a > 'strange character'. Check what happens using echo, then use 'rm -i', so > you make sure that you delete *only* the particular file you intend to. > > e.g. for the specific file you cited above try: > > echo 28b?Kjoepesenter?n?ringsg?rdeier.docx > > *ASSUMING* that that shows; > 28b Kjoepesenter n<91>ringsg<86>rdeier.docx > > then try: > rm -i 28b?Kjoepesenter?n?ringsg?rdeier.docx > > Assuming that it asks yout about deleting the full file name, type a 'y'. > > Repeat for each 'problem' file. Thanks a lot! That did it! :-) Cheers, Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 19:34:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id 684451065698; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:34:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:34:13 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111019193413.GA9065@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: small du(1) question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:34:13 -0000 hi there, the du(1) man page states the following: " -B blocksize Calculate block counts in blocksize byte blocks. This is differ- ent from the -k, -m options or setting BLOCKSIZE and gives an estimate of how much space the examined file hierarchy would require on a filesystem with the given blocksize. Unless in -A mode, blocksize is rounded up to the next multiple of 512. " is this a doc bug, or does du(1) really always assume that every filesystem's blocksize == 512? cheers. alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 19:39:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CB81065670 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:39:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout028.mac.com (asmtpout028.mac.com [17.148.16.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092228FC0C for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:39:26 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp028.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0LTB00M03VXDOR00@asmtp028.mac.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:39:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813,1.0.211,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-10-19_07:2011-10-19, 2011-10-19, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1110190236 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <20111019193413.GA9065@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:39:13 -0700 Message-id: <6620A8F5-523D-4A1E-9CC1-9C2D917BF0C2@mac.com> References: <20111019193413.GA9065@freebsd.org> To: Alexander Best X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: small du(1) question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:39:28 -0000 On Oct 19, 2011, at 12:34 PM, Alexander Best wrote: > the du(1) man page states the following: > > " > -B blocksize > Calculate block counts in blocksize byte blocks. This is differ- > ent from the -k, -m options or setting BLOCKSIZE and gives an > estimate of how much space the examined file hierarchy would > require on a filesystem with the given blocksize. Unless in -A > mode, blocksize is rounded up to the next multiple of 512. > " > > is this a doc bug, or does du(1) really always assume that every filesystem's > blocksize == 512? The default blocksize is 512 bytes. The -B option flag lets you tell du to assume a different filesystem blocksize. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 19:45:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F321065670 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:45:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F1C8FC08 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so3035091wwi.31 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:45:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OPUe3DOvdAyA+TupmFJMP+dwegvY1Mpd8T4XT20cNPo=; b=lP9VgHjH0FuejRAn83/ndMDr7GDjn3J9GQzio+/WiQjEl3mCOvBWJG53WjWXIvHtat lEl+K7ccL0T2kPUcKShGJWigMsdVK9Sxi/0pBMTGnX9/4I0JnG6ce/lDEqNQRurcWU4i MZXiPPof5HP0Bk+xQIUuRfa1XpwMrFpgN8ZFI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.221.80 with SMTP id q58mr609440wep.36.1319053523941; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:45:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.26.213 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:45:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:45:23 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Upgrading from 6.2-RELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:45:25 -0000 On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:03, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Oct 19, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Kurt Buff wrote: >> I have gotten custody of an old machine running the aforementioned, >> and it's in production. I can take it down for a couple of hours if >> necessary, but would prefer to have it down as little as possible. > > The most straightforward solution would be to build out and validate a ne= w system running FreeBSD-7.4 or 8.2, and drop it in place of the old box. = =C2=A0If all is good, decommission the old hardware. I agree. I've already got a new VM started with 8.2. I'm trying to see if I can migrate the data to the new host, but it's not finished yet, and the old box's ports aren't functioning and can't be upgraded, so I'm stuck in a bit of a scramble. >> What are my options for getting it to a supported release - looking at >> the handbook it doesn't appear the the freebsd-update utility will >> work in this case, as it's not 6.3? Can I, for instance, boot from a >> CD of a supported version and do an upgrade, or am I stuck doing a >> download of sorce for 7.0-RELEASE, compiling that, and then an >> freebsd-update to 7.4? > > You can do either. =C2=A0However, it's probably easier to just download a= nd burn the 7.4 or 8.2 image, and do an upgrade directly than it would be d= o upgrade via source to 7.0-RELEASE and then try freebsd-update. Gotta love conflicting answers from you and Adam I've got an ISO of 7.4. I think I'll do a dump of my data to a remote machine, do the update, and see what that gets me. Thanks, Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 19:50:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB4C1065670 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:50:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout025.mac.com (asmtpout025.mac.com [17.148.16.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5EE8FC0C for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:50:02 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp025.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0LTB0011AWEPX880@asmtp025.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:49:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813,1.0.211,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-10-19_07:2011-10-19, 2011-10-19, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1110190239 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:49:37 -0700 Message-id: References: To: Kurt Buff X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading from 6.2-RELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:50:02 -0000 On Oct 19, 2011, at 12:45 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: >> You can do either. However, it's probably easier to just download and burn the 7.4 or 8.2 image, and do an upgrade directly than it would be do upgrade via source to 7.0-RELEASE and then try freebsd-update. > > Gotta love conflicting answers from you and Adam Well, you did ask for opinions. They tend to not be conflict-free.... :-) I haven't had problems doing a reinstall from a new ISO image to update a FreeBSD box which was more than a major release out of date. But, I was at pains to verify that I had complete backups and time to rollback if needed, and I also made sure to rebuild all of the ports after doing the OS reinstall/upgrade. > I've got an ISO of 7.4. I think I'll do a dump of my data to a remote > machine, do the update, and see what that gets me. OK. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 20:19:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9451065675 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:19:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24FA98FC0C for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:19:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9JKJLlC082985 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:19:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p9JKJLvD082982 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:19:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:19:21 -0400 (EDT) From: doug To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <44hb3588my.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <44pqhsu9v2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:19:21 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: multi-boot (fixed) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: doug@safeport.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:19:22 -0000 > On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > >> doug@safeport.com writes: >> >>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >>> >>>> doug@safeport.com writes: >>>> >>>>> I have a system with two physical disks with a version of FreeBSD >>>>> installed on each disk. With various 7.x systems I had: >>>>> >>>>> F1 disk1 on slices ads5x >>>>> F5 disk2 on slices ads6x >>>>> >>>>> I installed 8.2 on disk2, incorrectly saying leave the mbr alone. So >>>>> when I boot from the second disk I get >>>>> >>>>> F6 PXE >>>>> Boot: F1 >>>>> >>>>> I can then hit F1 or wait and all goes okay. I tried using sysinstall >>>>> to rewrite the FBSD boot manager but that not effect any change. Must >>>>> I rewrite the mbr on disk 1 also? >>>> >>>> That's what I would expect to have to do... >>> >>> Pre 8.2 the behavior the selected system just boot without the extra >>> message. I had a 7.0 and a 7.4 system installed. I replaced the 7.4 >>> system with 8,2 With the boot setup I understand the FreeBSD boot >>> manager would be on sector 0 track 0 of disk 1. The boot record for >>> disk 1 is in the first logical sector for the drive. The boot record >>> for disk 2 should be similarly placed on disk 2. >>> >>> What I think is missing is putting the boot manager on disk 2. If that >>> is the case, is there a way to do that without reinstalling? >> >> boot0cfg(8) from the system that does boot. >> Or boot in "rescue" mode from a CD (or other removable media) >> and use sysinstall. > > thanks This is a classic cast (I think) of RTFM. Thanks for hanging in with me. The correct answer is install the standard boot record on disk 2. I think I can interpert the handbook that way. I did this with sysinstall as my second attempt at boot0cfg seriously broke the system on disk 2. boot0cfg is left to me as homework. This is a case where I may be able to get from the code what I could not from the man page. I do not know if part of the different is the BIOS has raid0 build in which almost works. I just turned this off giving me two test systems. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 20:36:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B99106564A for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:36:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [94.23.254.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9627C8FC0C for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:36:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (63.9.74.86.rev.sfr.net [86.74.9.63]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B014DFAA2C87; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:36:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845A17305B; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:36:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:36:27 +0200 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111019223627.6e5947ca@davenulle.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Paul Schmehl Subject: Re: My tribute to Dennis Ritchie X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:36:16 -0000 Le Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:07:22 -0500, Paul Schmehl a écrit : > # grep -ir Ritchie /usr/src/* Nice! I've posted a copy of your mail on linuxfr.org (a french web site about Linux and free softwares) https://linuxfr.org/nodes/87797/comments/1281756 "Dennis Ritchie is twice as bright as Steve Jobs, and only half wrong." RIP guys... Regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 20:37:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id E8A61106567D; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:37:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:37:13 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: Chuck Swiger Message-ID: <20111019203713.GA19350@freebsd.org> References: <20111019193413.GA9065@freebsd.org> <6620A8F5-523D-4A1E-9CC1-9C2D917BF0C2@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6620A8F5-523D-4A1E-9CC1-9C2D917BF0C2@mac.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: small du(1) question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:37:14 -0000 On Wed Oct 19 11, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Oct 19, 2011, at 12:34 PM, Alexander Best wrote: > > the du(1) man page states the following: > > > > " > > -B blocksize > > Calculate block counts in blocksize byte blocks. This is differ- > > ent from the -k, -m options or setting BLOCKSIZE and gives an > > estimate of how much space the examined file hierarchy would > > require on a filesystem with the given blocksize. Unless in -A > > mode, blocksize is rounded up to the next multiple of 512. > > " > > > > is this a doc bug, or does du(1) really always assume that every filesystem's > > blocksize == 512? > > The default blocksize is 512 bytes. > > The -B option flag lets you tell du to assume a different filesystem blocksize. so when running freebsd on a hdd with a blocksize of 4k, a simple 'du -h' will always display incorrect results, unless '-B 4096' was also specified? isn't there a way to automatically query the blocksize of the underlying device, instead of always asuming the blocksize is 512 byte? cheers. alex > > Regards, > -- > -Chuck > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 20:47:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id A8A04106566B; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:47:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:47:54 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: Chuck Swiger Message-ID: <20111019204754.GA23081@freebsd.org> References: <20111019193413.GA9065@freebsd.org> <6620A8F5-523D-4A1E-9CC1-9C2D917BF0C2@mac.com> <20111019203713.GA19350@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111019203713.GA19350@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: small du(1) question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:47:54 -0000 On Wed Oct 19 11, Alexander Best wrote: > On Wed Oct 19 11, Chuck Swiger wrote: > > On Oct 19, 2011, at 12:34 PM, Alexander Best wrote: > > > the du(1) man page states the following: > > > > > > " > > > -B blocksize > > > Calculate block counts in blocksize byte blocks. This is differ- > > > ent from the -k, -m options or setting BLOCKSIZE and gives an > > > estimate of how much space the examined file hierarchy would > > > require on a filesystem with the given blocksize. Unless in -A > > > mode, blocksize is rounded up to the next multiple of 512. > > > " > > > > > > is this a doc bug, or does du(1) really always assume that every filesystem's > > > blocksize == 512? > > > > The default blocksize is 512 bytes. > > > > The -B option flag lets you tell du to assume a different filesystem blocksize. > > so when running freebsd on a hdd with a blocksize of 4k, a simple 'du -h' will > always display incorrect results, unless '-B 4096' was also specified? isn't > there a way to automatically query the blocksize of the underlying device, > instead of always asuming the blocksize is 512 byte? ...also: since -A is supposed to take the actual file size into account and not the blocksize of the underlying filesystem, shouldn't the output of 'du -A -B4096' and 'du -A' be the same? just tested this on freebsd 7 and freebsd 10 and the outputs differ. cheers. alex > > cheers. > alex > > > > > Regards, > > -- > > -Chuck > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 20:48:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9020106577A for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:48:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4194B8FC14 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:48:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi40 with SMTP id 40so2808510wyi.13 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:48:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0JWbPuzGhdC1pWW1QxdhY4ViXgns6F6JjVMkm3DO0Zc=; b=blRucvJoH4X3szjYTxsAx9MVHYpaLGlZio4Zi7ZletDUp2bmbPj+KjV7HfYUzZt/kq +O7233eea8WCpicR48JWPClBizSPLjSTKcnf8TSQtWqGJpBETimHdMkNM8QbnfOzTxsN VqYYKOd7aAi+w0eoPxKuVgjmje6+wxry4hfLk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.221.163 with SMTP id r35mr3135613wep.21.1319057324070; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:48:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.26.213 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:48:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:48:44 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Upgrading from 6.2-RELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:48:45 -0000 On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:49, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Oct 19, 2011, at 12:45 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: >>> You can do either. =C2=A0However, it's probably easier to just download= and burn the 7.4 or 8.2 image, and do an upgrade directly than it would be= do upgrade via source to 7.0-RELEASE and then try freebsd-update. >> >> Gotta love conflicting answers from you and Adam > > Well, you did ask for opinions. =C2=A0They tend to not be conflict-free..= .. :-) Well, I *actually* asked for free technical assistance, but I know that the same maxim applies. ;-o > I haven't had problems doing a reinstall from a new ISO image to update a= FreeBSD box which was > more than a major release out of date. =C2=A0But, I was at pains to verif= y that I had complete backups and > time to rollback if needed, and I also made sure to rebuild all of the po= rts after doing the OS reinstall/upgrade. That is also definitely part of the plan... >> I've got an ISO of 7.4. I think I'll do a dump of my data to a remote >> machine, do the update, and see what that gets me. > > OK. Thanks for your help! Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 22:02:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94240106566C; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:02:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout024.mac.com (asmtpout024.mac.com [17.148.16.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B1898FC0A; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:02:58 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp024.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0LTC00AEZ2KHMI00@asmtp024.mac.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:02:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813,1.0.211,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-10-19_09:2011-10-19, 2011-10-19, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1110190284 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <20111019203713.GA19350@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:02:41 -0700 Message-id: References: <20111019193413.GA9065@freebsd.org> <6620A8F5-523D-4A1E-9CC1-9C2D917BF0C2@mac.com> <20111019203713.GA19350@freebsd.org> To: Alexander Best X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: small du(1) question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:02:58 -0000 On Oct 19, 2011, at 1:37 PM, Alexander Best wrote: >> The default blocksize is 512 bytes. >> >> The -B option flag lets you tell du to assume a different filesystem blocksize. > > so when running freebsd on a hdd with a blocksize of 4k, a simple 'du -h' will > always display incorrect results, unless '-B 4096' was also specified? Which blocksize? The filesystem's DEV_BSIZE kept in the superblock info, the logical sector size provided by the device to the BIOS/UEFI/firmware, or the actual physical device blocksize? > isn't there a way to automatically query the blocksize of the underlying device, > instead of always asuming the blocksize is 512 byte? There is a way to query the blocksize of a physical device-- ie, ATA's IDENTIFY DEVICE, or SCSI's MODE SENSE-- but various drives lie about their actual physical blocksize to work around bugs in BIOS and drivers. Also, while one does prefer to have all of the three blocksizes mentioned above correspond for performance reasons, they aren't always the same. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 22:16:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8691065670 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:16:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107D38FC08 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:16:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id p9JMFmKW093269 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:15:48 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:15:48 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201110192215.p9JMFmKW093269@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20111019204754.GA23081@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: small du(1) question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:16:10 -0000 > Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:47:54 +0000 > From: Alexander Best > Subject: Re: small du(1) question > > the blocksize of the underlying filesystem, shouldn't the output of > 'du -A -B4096' and 'du -A' be the same? just tested this on freebsd 7 and > freebsd 10 and the outputs differ. > "So much for the theory", one might say. The answer to your 'intended as rhetorical' question is 'no'. Filesystems have 'overhead' on a per-file basis, as well as 'filesystem' (as a whole) basis. Do you know about 'index blocks' for files that are more than one block long? Does the size of the index block change if the blocksize of ghe underlying filesystem is different? Does the -A option include the index block(s), if any? Do I need to keep asking questions ? *grin* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 23:25:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97DAE106566C for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 23:25:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3298FC18 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 23:25:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id p9JNPCK4047452 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:25:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id p9JNPCPc047451; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:25:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA26131; Wed, 19 Oct 11 16:17:06 PDT Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 23:15:55 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: ml@my.gd Message-Id: <4e9fbc9b.xu1noYDEvV6hZ922%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> <4E9EE16E.30507@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <4E9EE16E.30507@my.gd> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 23:25:14 -0000 Damien Fleuriot wrote: > Why would you post about freebsd on opensolaris' list is beyond me. Presumably because opensolaris is the ZFS upstream. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 00:00:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3B8106566B for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:00:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nm.knife@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D798FC15 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:00:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxn16 with SMTP id 16so2841256yxn.13 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:00:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=QXQkyCAo3CKeoZpqk9L74Bqz3Vov5pdiz6z3vs1xV/s=; b=aeOya7GlhQpPrVp1ca7pflmpE8CXNFUVMKJlTB+ik2/mBKSlKYxESQFn85IWdqHC37 fTxdpYlYXx5S1KEH6UaYTrYiLvg/iol4lt9EfcOADGCq28qE0VlhnonMyQzxz02MheyU YvlgJaVuDEG5ZL1HEoqW5Sz06YlUVgJipPdI8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.74.72 with SMTP id r8mr1459822obv.47.1319068822741; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:00:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.116.36 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:00:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4e9fbc9b.xu1noYDEvV6hZ922%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> <4E9EE16E.30507@my.gd> <4e9fbc9b.xu1noYDEvV6hZ922%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:00:22 -0700 Message-ID: From: =?windows-1251?B?y/7h7uzo8CDD8Ojj7vDu4g==?= To: ml@my.gd, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:00:24 -0000 If by OpenSolaris you mean OpenIndiana, (OpenSolaris is dead), both OI and FreeBSD have the same ZFS pool version (28). There is no "native" advantage of using OI over FreeBSD regarding ZFS. If you want the latest ZFS with cryto (30), you need to go with closed source Solaris 11 Express, which you need to buy a support license (a no-no) if you want to use in production or commercially. 2011/10/19 > Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > > Why would you post about freebsd on opensolaris' list is beyond me. > > Presumably because opensolaris is the ZFS upstream. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Lyubomir Grigorov (bgalakazam) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 00:01:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC43106566C for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:01:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64758FC17 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.49]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A053C86A6 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:01:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 9876 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2011 00:01:46 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 23224, pid: 17256, t: 0.1573s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 20 Oct 2011 00:01:45 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E28C2E0D9; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:01:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id DE3EF39848; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:01:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Chuck Swiger References: <20111019193413.GA9065@freebsd.org> <6620A8F5-523D-4A1E-9CC1-9C2D917BF0C2@mac.com> <20111019203713.GA19350@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:01:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Chuck Swiger's message of "Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:02:41 -0700") Message-ID: <441uu85y58.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alexander Best , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: small du(1) question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:01:47 -0000 Chuck Swiger writes: > On Oct 19, 2011, at 1:37 PM, Alexander Best wrote: >>> The default blocksize is 512 bytes. >>> >>> The -B option flag lets you tell du to assume a different filesystem blocksize. >> >> so when running freebsd on a hdd with a blocksize of 4k, a simple 'du -h' will >> always display incorrect results, unless '-B 4096' was also specified? > > Which blocksize? > > The filesystem's DEV_BSIZE kept in the superblock info, the logical sector size provided by the device to the BIOS/UEFI/firmware, or the actual physical device blocksize? du(1) uses DEV_BSIZE, but it looks like that's the version from sys/param.h, which is always 512. I would suggest fixing that to look at the filesystem's definition, but then I'd have to figure out what the correct behaviour would be when recursing into through multiple filesystems with different blocksizes. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 00:54:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1271065673 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:54:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607158FC14 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:54:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so3339779wwi.31 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:54:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.38.89 with SMTP id a25mr3309937wbe.70.1319072063060; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:54:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.47] (paris.c-mal.com. [88.170.200.60]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id es5sm12830675wbb.11.2011.10.19.17.54.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:54:21 -0700 (PDT) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8J2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8J2) From: Damien Fleuriot Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:54:13 +0200 To: Kurt Buff Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Upgrading from 6.2-RELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:54:26 -0000 On 19 Oct 2011, at 21:45, Kurt Buff wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:03, Chuck Swiger wrote: >> On Oct 19, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Kurt Buff wrote: >>> I have gotten custody of an old machine running the aforementioned, >>> and it's in production. I can take it down for a couple of hours if >>> necessary, but would prefer to have it down as little as possible. >>=20 >> The most straightforward solution would be to build out and validate a ne= w system running FreeBSD-7.4 or 8.2, and drop it in place of the old box. I= f all is good, decommission the old hardware. >=20 > I agree. I've already got a new VM started with 8.2. I'm trying to see > if I can migrate the data to the new host, but it's not finished yet, > and the old box's ports aren't functioning and can't be upgraded, so > I'm stuck in a bit of a scramble. >=20 >>> What are my options for getting it to a supported release - looking at >>> the handbook it doesn't appear the the freebsd-update utility will >>> work in this case, as it's not 6.3? Can I, for instance, boot from a >>> CD of a supported version and do an upgrade, or am I stuck doing a >>> download of sorce for 7.0-RELEASE, compiling that, and then an >>> freebsd-update to 7.4? >>=20 >> You can do either. However, it's probably easier to just download and bu= rn the 7.4 or 8.2 image, and do an upgrade directly than it would be do upgr= ade via source to 7.0-RELEASE and then try freebsd-update. >=20 > Gotta love conflicting answers from you and Adam >=20 I'll give you more conflict. I'd do source upgrades from 6.2 -> 6.3 -> 7.0 -> 7.4 -> 8.0 -> 8.2 Or at the very least 6.2 -> 7.0 -> (8.0 ->) 8.2 The idea here is to get to the latest stable version of a branch, then hop t= o the lowest version of the next one, rince/repeat. This way, imo, you update more progressively and bit by bit. I wouldn't be confident doing for instance 6.2 -> 8.2 And I'd be even muuuuuch less confident running binary upgrades or upgrades f= rom CD. I think a CD upgrade will not update your config files properly for instance= . You'll be missing new system accounts (like hast for example), you'll have e= xtra init scripts lying around, you'll miss some, you'll miss stuff from per= iodic, startup script fixes... Do not do a binary upgrade for major version hops. Read UPDATING carefully and consider its contents take precedence over the w= ebsite/handbook.= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 01:25:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738EA106567A for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:25:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mnorwick@centurytel.net) Received: from mail961c35.nsolutionszone.com (mail961c35.nsolutionszone.com [209.235.152.151]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20898FC13 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:25:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Authenticated-User: mnorwick.centurytel.net Received: from bucksnort.norwickhouse.net (174-124-37-123.dyn.centurytel.net [174.124.37.123]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail961c35.nsolutionszone.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p9K1PjP4011776 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:25:47 GMT Message-ID: <4E9F7899.6070401@centurytel.net> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:25:45 -0500 From: "Michael D. Norwick" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110829 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4E924B4D.4050801@centurytel.net> <20111010063740.GA23603@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4E92BF3C.8080807@centurytel.net> <20111010104450.GA28895@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4E9616FD.5080404@centurytel.net> <447h49yed0.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <4E9627A6.8000907@centurytel.net> <44vcrtohej.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20111013162524.GA75476@freebsd.org> <44wrc8iz09.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20111018195712.GA18773@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20111018195712.GA18773@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=1.1 cv=5evdw4iMqN/JdwfqWffyRdC2utGnej+UzE5jqTExdn8= c=1 sm=1 a=_tW4y8GFV1YA:10 a=RWe5u1kQBc0A:10 a=3WPTVEtZbjMA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=nRHtrj2pbMUmV2THcod+iQ==:17 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=BS9W1z6sMXAzXvCVbLEA:9 a=y9U0mFCAYH9D-1jGvVMA:7 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=nRHtrj2pbMUmV2THcod+iQ==:117 Subject: Re: Can't access a music CD (or any other media now) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:25:49 -0000 On 10/18/11 14:57, Alexander Best wrote: > On Thu Oct 13 11, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> Alexander Best writes: >> < snip > Good Day; It seems that I still cannot figure this out. No amount of searching the docs or mailing lists has gotten me closer to a solution. I csup'd the source tree again last night and built another kernel and world for; *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_9 *default delete use-rel-suffix /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/KERNEL_101811 contains (among other things); # ATA controllers device ahci # AHCI-compatible SATA controllers device ata # Legacy ATA/SATA controllers options ATA_CAM # Handle legacy controllers with CAM options ATA_STATIC_ID # Static device numbering device mvs # Marvell 88SX50XX/88SX60XX/88SX70XX/SoC SATA device siis # SiliconImage SiI3124/SiI3132/SiI3531 SATA # SCSI Controllers # ATA/SCSI peripherals device scbus # SCSI bus (required for ATA/SCSI) device ch # SCSI media changers device da # Direct Access (disks) device sa # Sequential Access (tape etc) device cd # CD device pass # Passthrough device (direct ATA/SCSI access) device ses # SCSI Environmental Services (and SAF-TE) /usr/src/UPDATING and /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/NOTES did not seem to contain anything applicable to this issue. The buildkernel KERNCONF=KERNEL_101811 step resulted in; $uname -a FreeBSD ****.****.net 9.0-RC1 FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 #1: Wed Oct 19 05:37:43 CDT 2011 michael@****.****.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KERNEL_101811 amd64 and the following cd devices in /dev; $ ls -l cd* crw-rw-rw- 1 root operator 0, 105 Oct 19 19:08 cd0 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8 Oct 19 19:08 cdrom -> /dev/cd0 No /dev/acd* devices but I would think that there are not supposed to be. /etc/devfs.conf contains; # Commonly used by many ports #link acd0 cdrom link /dev/cd0 cdrom perm /dev/cd0 0660 # Allow a user in the wheel group to query the smb0 device perm /dev/smb0 0660 # Allow members of group operator to cat things to the speaker #own speaker root:operator #perm speaker 0660 perm /dev/pass0 0660 perm /dev/xpt0 0660 perm /dev/pass1 0660 perm /dev/mdctl 0660 perm /dev/md0 0660 perm /dev/bpf0 0660 perm /dev/bpf1 0660 perm /dev/bpf2 0660 perm /dev/bpf3 0660 perm /dev/bpf4 0660 link /tmp shm $ cat /boot/loader.conf atapicam_load="YES" hw.ata.atapi_dma=0 linux_load="YES" snd_hda_load="YES" $ cat /etc/rc.conf hostname="****.****.net" keymap=us.iso.kbd ifconfig_bge0=" inet 192.168.1.22 netmask 255.255.255.0" defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" hald_enable="YES" dbus_enable="YES" gdm_enable="YES" sshd_enable="YES" linux_enable="YES" abi_enable="YES" sysctl_enable="YES" ntpd_enable="YES" powerd_enable="YES" $dmesg (snipped somewhat) cd0 at ata0 bus 0 scbus1 target 0 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd0: 33.300MB/s transfers (UDMA2, ATAPI 12bytes, PIO 65534bytes) cd0: cd present [26466 x 2048 byte records] (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 0 67 61 0 0 1 0 (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): SCSI sense: HARDWARE FAILURE asc:3e,2 (Timeout on logical unit) (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 0 67 61 0 0 1 0 (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): SCSI sense: HARDWARE FAILURE asc:3e,2 (Timeout on logical unit) (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 0 67 61 0 0 1 0 (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): SCSI sense: HARDWARE FAILURE asc:3e,2 (Timeout on logical unit) (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 0 67 61 0 0 1 0 (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): SCSI sense: HARDWARE FAILURE asc:3e,2 (Timeout on logical unit) (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 0 67 61 0 0 1 0 (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): SCSI sense: HARDWARE FAILURE asc:3e,2 (Timeout on logical unit) (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): cddone: got error 0x5 back with a data CD in the drive during reboot. Trying to manually mount the drive results in; $ sudo mount_cd9660 /dev/cd0 /media/dvdrom mount_cd9660: /dev/cd0: Invalid argument $ cat /etc/fstab # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass# proc /proc procfs rw 0 0 /dev/ada0p2 / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/ada0p3 none swap sw 0 0 /dev/ada0p4 /var ufs rw 2 2 /dev/ada0p5 /usr ufs rw 2 2 /dev/ada0p6 /home ufs rw 2 2 linproc /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 /dev/cd0 /media/dvdrom cd9660 rw,noauto 0 0 $ cdcontrol info Starting track = 1, ending track = 1, TOC size = 18 bytes track start duration block length type ------------------------------------------------- 1 0:02.00 5:52.66 0 26466 data 170 5:54.66 - 26466 - - Before I recompiled the kernel, when I inserted a music CD, Gnome would display a folder containing the *.wav files but I could not play them (using the command line or not). Now I cannot even access a data CD. Again, the machine is a Dell Latitude D630 laptop. The livefs CD - FreeBSD 8.2 amd64 dated 05/14/2011 boots to the sysinstall screen so i assume the drive is ok. Thank You, Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 01:38:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5864A1065670 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:38:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.zfs@alfordmedia.com) Received: from smtp.alfordmedia.com (smtp.alfordmedia.com [69.26.223.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366BB8FC14 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:38:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.alfordmedia.com ([192.168.67.6]) by smtp.alfordmedia.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RGgvv-0004B2-JA; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:56:31 -0500 X-Find-Attachment: Scanned X-ExtScanner: Niversoft's Find_Attachments Received: from [76.183.154.110] (account dave.lists@alfordmedia.com HELO [192.168.74.51]) by mail.alfordmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 26161510; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:56:30 -0500 User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.13.0.110805 Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:56:28 -0500 From: Dave Pooser Sender: Dave Pooser To: , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:38:17 -0000 On 10/19/11 9:14 AM, "Albert Shih" wrote: >When we buy a MD1200 we need a RAID PERC H800 card on the server No, you need a card that includes 2 external x4 SFF8088 SAS connectors. I'd recommend an LSI SAS 9200-8e HBA flashed with the IT firmware-- then it presents the individual disks and ZFS can handle redundancy and recovery. -- Dave Pooser Manager of Information Services Alford Media http://www.alfordmedia.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 02:13:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AFFD1065670 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:13:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18AD8FC16 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:13:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-104-16.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.104.16]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF9A1D9A4; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 04:13:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p9K2DusM002081; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 04:13:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 04:13:56 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Ryan Coleman Message-Id: <20111020041356.273cf49e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <6066E0B8-71EE-47BC-A122-3488FD6EC62D@d3photography.com> References: <44botd86tk.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20111019104421.6fe469ef@napoleon> <6066E0B8-71EE-47BC-A122-3488FD6EC62D@d3photography.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: www.clubrunner.ca X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:13:59 -0000 On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:37:51 -0500, Ryan Coleman wrote: > It did take me two page loads to get it to even render on Firefox > in OS X (Lion). Very faulty "IIS" on clubrunner's side of the Internet. :-) Trying to load http://www.clubrunner.ca/Home leads to the famouse "The page cannot be found" error page. Instead accessing http://web.clubrunner.ca/Home leads to the desired page -- the URL bar shows http://www.clubrunner.ca/Home! Again: If you access http://www.clubrunner.ca/Home, you get "HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found" in wget, but if you access http://www.clubrunner.ca/, it works and you get index.html, of course in a wrong encoding and with superfluous MS-DOS linebreaks. If you examine index.html's source a bit, you can see a typical desaster of "Cloud Computing". :-) Seems to be a real configuration mess there... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 02:23:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D101065675 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:23:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rockys@dataonstorage.com) Received: from mailserver.dataonstorage.com (unknown [IPv6:2002:d8ed:2545::d8ed:2545]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3264D8FC12 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:23:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from RD1 (216.237.37.66) by mailserver.dataonstorage.com (216.237.37.69) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.0.639.21; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:23:17 -0700 From: Rocky Shek To: 'Dave Pooser' , , References: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:23:26 -0700 Message-ID: <001301cc8ecf$3f8447f0$be8cd7d0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcyOw0mDSh8PeOKpQ/GaOCVBNemkDwACr35w Content-Language: en-us Cc: Subject: RE: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:23:49 -0000 I also recommend LSI 9200-8E or new 9205-8E with the IT firmware based on past experience Also LSI Original HBA normally released FW earlier than OEM. Plus, most of users in community use LSI HBA. Rocky -----Original Message----- From: zfs-discuss-bounces@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-bounces@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Dave Pooser Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 5:56 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD On 10/19/11 9:14 AM, "Albert Shih" wrote: >When we buy a MD1200 we need a RAID PERC H800 card on the server No, you need a card that includes 2 external x4 SFF8088 SAS connectors. I'd recommend an LSI SAS 9200-8e HBA flashed with the IT firmware-- then it presents the individual disks and ZFS can handle redundancy and recovery. -- Dave Pooser Manager of Information Services Alford Media http://www.alfordmedia.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 02:24:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7F810656D9 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:24:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fajar@fajar.net) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C098FC1B for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaky10 with SMTP id y10so3453981iak.13 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:23:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.154.194 with SMTP id r2mr16116609icw.50.1319077439568; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:23:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.241.2 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:23:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:23:59 +0700 Message-ID: From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" To: Albert Shih Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:24:00 -0000 On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Dave Pooser wrote: > On 10/19/11 9:14 AM, "Albert Shih" wrote: > >>When we buy a MD1200 we need a RAID PERC H800 card on the server > > No, you need a card that includes 2 external x4 SFF8088 SAS connectors. > I'd recommend an LSI SAS 9200-8e HBA flashed with the IT firmware-- then > it presents the individual disks and ZFS can handle redundancy and > recovery. Exactly, thanks for suggesting an exact controller model that can present disks as JBOD. With hardware RAID, you'd pretty much rely on the controller to behave nicely, which is why I suggested to simply create one big volume for zfs to use (so you pretty much only use features like snapshot, clones, etc, but don't use zfs self healing feature). Again, others might (and have) disagree and suggest using volumes for individual disk (even when you're still relying on hardware RAID controller). But ultimately there's no question that the best possible setup would be to present the disks as JBOD and let zfs handle it directly. -- Fajar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 02:25:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EABE11065709 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:25:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE0288FC1B for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:25:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-104-16.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.104.16]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C565B1E121; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 04:25:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p9K2Pp8m002186; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 04:25:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 04:25:51 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Andy Wodfer Message-Id: <20111020042551.9427391a.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <201110191904.p9JJ4Ago092104@mail.r-bonomi.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Help! Can't delete files ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:25:53 -0000 On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:32:39 +0200, Andy Wodfer wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote: > > > A) learn to use wildcards. > > > > I know how to use wildcards, but I forgot to tell in my first email that > there are 4 files that have almost the same filenames, so I couldn't do it > this way. In this case, try to use a terminal emulator which does have support for UTF-8 both on input and on output. Make sure your charsets are configured properly. With this preparation, you should (1st) see the correct file names in your native language and (2nd) be able to enter (or complete) their filenames as desired on the command line. > > B) learn to use the '-i' option to rm > > C) learn to use 'echo' to 'test' filename expansions. > > > > Thanks! Very useful info. I may add: D) Learn to avoid non-ASCII characters in filenames (just like whitespaces and "special" characters). I'm following this rule for my entire "IT career" now and I'm very pleased by the results. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 03:19:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8F51065778 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:19:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A09C8FC15 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:19:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-104-16.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.104.16]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87CE3CCFD; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 05:19:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p9K3J2oq002365; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 05:19:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 05:19:02 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "Michael D. Norwick" Message-Id: <20111020051902.1d120865.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4E9F7899.6070401@centurytel.net> References: <4E924B4D.4050801@centurytel.net> <20111010063740.GA23603@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4E92BF3C.8080807@centurytel.net> <20111010104450.GA28895@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4E9616FD.5080404@centurytel.net> <447h49yed0.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <4E9627A6.8000907@centurytel.net> <44vcrtohej.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20111013162524.GA75476@freebsd.org> <44wrc8iz09.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20111018195712.GA18773@freebsd.org> <4E9F7899.6070401@centurytel.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't access a music CD (or any other media now) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:19:04 -0000 On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:25:45 -0500, Michael D. Norwick wrote: > Before I recompiled the kernel, when I inserted a music CD, Gnome would > display a folder containing the *.wav files but I could not play them > (using the command line or not). There are no *.wav files on a music CD. This must be some kind of representation known from "Windows" land where files (!) are displayed that do NOT exist. And *.wav is especially wrong as a WAV file would contain a header and data, while a CD audio track is DATA ONLY (in a strictly defined format). Seems that Gnome "inherited" that nonsense... What if you use Gnome's CD playing application, or something like XMMS with the CD audio plugin? I think your permissions are okay so you could make the drive play from your (non-root) user account. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 03:24:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AEE6106564A for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:24:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@penx.com) Received: from Elmer.dco.penx.com (elmer.dco.penx.com [174.46.214.165]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83618FC0A for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:24:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Elmer.dco.penx.com (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9K3OrrM079163 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:24:55 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@penx.com) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:24:53 -0600 (MDT) From: Dennis Glatting X-X-Sender: dennisg@Elmer.dco.penx.com To: "Fajar A. Nugraha" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Albert Shih , zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:24:58 -0000 On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Dave Pooser wrote: >> On 10/19/11 9:14 AM, "Albert Shih" wrote: >> >>> When we buy a MD1200 we need a RAID PERC H800 card on the server >> >> No, you need a card that includes 2 external x4 SFF8088 SAS connectors. >> I'd recommend an LSI SAS 9200-8e HBA flashed with the IT firmware-- then >> it presents the individual disks and ZFS can handle redundancy and >> recovery. > > Exactly, thanks for suggesting an exact controller model that can > present disks as JBOD. > > With hardware RAID, you'd pretty much rely on the controller to behave > nicely, which is why I suggested to simply create one big volume for zfs > to use (so you pretty much only use features like snapshot, clones, etc, > but don't use zfs self healing feature). Again, others might (and have) > disagree and suggest using volumes for individual disk (even when you're > still relying on hardware RAID controller). But ultimately there's no > question that the best possible setup would be to present the disks as > JBOD and let zfs handle it directly. > I saw something interesting and different today, which I'll just throw out. A buddy has a HP370 loaded with disks (not the only machine that provides these services, rather the one he was showing off). The 370's disks are managed by the underlying hardware RAID controller, which he built as multiple RAID1 volumes. ESXi 5.0 is loaded and in control of the volumes, some of which are partitioned. Consequently, his result is vendor supported interfaces between disks, RAID controller, ESXi, and managing/reporting software. The HP370 has multiple FreeNAS instances whose "disks" are the "disks" (volumes/partitions) from ESXi (all on the same physical hardware). The FreeNAS instances are partitioned according to their physical and logical function within the infrastructure, whether by physical or logical connections. The FreeNAS instances then serves its "disks" to consumers. We have not done any performance testing. Generally, his NAS consumers are not I/O pigs though we want the best performance possible (some consumers are over the WAN resulting in any HP/ESXi/FreeNAS performance issues possibly moot). (I want to do some performance testing because, well, it may have significant amusement value.) A question we have is whether ZFS (ARC, maybe L2ARC) within FreeNAS is possible or would provide any value. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 03:49:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E724C106564A for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:49:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from basarevych@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC8CD8FC08 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:49:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qadz32 with SMTP id z32so204208qad.13 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:49:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=l7DaP2qfgsiTQUrbk59eC2jDy44Z1QXYwcB9es+DE1c=; b=bHWC4DeLBheOgIKb4cJC5rOpsylPJcIm1y2GezG2YSeYMGKMH2t6vg3XgpsjrmiRkr rhvWbLqUWRjWd8TK+lyBIS+HjHuMF4+IN3Lw/LjcUcM7nZZ6KKOWioZ8Fsf7l2PHr1v4 e9ALRyzO9kEbM52KM10OY6AEo7f8F8k9yaZzA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.27.81 with SMTP id h17mr7690452qac.95.1319082597837; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:49:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.45.82 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:49:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 06:49:57 +0300 Message-ID: From: Ross To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Bad sector in UFS2 journal area X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:49:59 -0000 I don't actually have this problem, I'm just curious. What will happen if read fails on sector in UFS2 journal area? Sector won't get remapped until write, so reads will be failing until then. I've had experience with bad sectors with non-journaled filesystems =E2=80= =94 the system was online and working. The only problem was that particular file and messages in /var/log/messages until the Current Pending Sector counter was cleared and sector was remapped. Will it be the same (online system) with bad sector in journal area? And will it damage the filesystem? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 08:18:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7BB106566B for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B80A8FC14 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:18:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnq2 with SMTP id q2so1597386ggn.13 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:18:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.99.1 with SMTP id b1mr2044808anm.9.1319098699535; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:18:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.68.149.197] ([92.90.16.70]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r9sm12479784anh.8.2011.10.20.01.18.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:18:17 -0700 (PDT) References: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> From: Damien Fleuriot Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:15:44 +0200 To: Dennis Glatting Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8J2) X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8J2) Cc: Albert Shih , "zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org" , "Fajar A. Nugraha" , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:18:20 -0000 On 20 Oct 2011, at 05:24, Dennis Glatting wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: >=20 >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Dave Pooser w= rote: >>> On 10/19/11 9:14 AM, "Albert Shih" wrote: >>>=20 >>>> When we buy a MD1200 we need a RAID PERC H800 card on the server >>>=20 >>> No, you need a card that includes 2 external x4 SFF8088 SAS connectors. >>> I'd recommend an LSI SAS 9200-8e HBA flashed with the IT firmware-- then= >>> it presents the individual disks and ZFS can handle redundancy and >>> recovery. >>=20 >> Exactly, thanks for suggesting an exact controller model that can >> present disks as JBOD. >>=20 >> With hardware RAID, you'd pretty much rely on the controller to behave ni= cely, which is why I suggested to simply create one big volume for zfs to us= e (so you pretty much only use features like snapshot, clones, etc, but don'= t use zfs self healing feature). Again, others might (and have) disagree and= suggest using volumes for individual disk (even when you're still relying o= n hardware RAID controller). But ultimately there's no question that the bes= t possible setup would be to present the disks as JBOD and let zfs handle it= directly. >>=20 >=20 > I saw something interesting and different today, which I'll just throw out= . >=20 > A buddy has a HP370 loaded with disks (not the only machine that provides t= hese services, rather the one he was showing off). The 370's disks are manag= ed by the underlying hardware RAID controller, which he built as multiple RA= ID1 volumes. >=20 > ESXi 5.0 is loaded and in control of the volumes, some of which are partit= ioned. Consequently, his result is vendor supported interfaces between disks= , RAID controller, ESXi, and managing/reporting software. >=20 > The HP370 has multiple FreeNAS instances whose "disks" are the "disks" (vo= lumes/partitions) from ESXi (all on the same physical hardware). The FreeNAS= instances are partitioned according to their physical and logical function w= ithin the infrastructure, whether by physical or logical connections. The Fre= eNAS instances then serves its "disks" to consumers. >=20 > We have not done any performance testing. Generally, his NAS consumers are= not I/O pigs though we want the best performance possible (some consumers a= re over the WAN resulting in any HP/ESXi/FreeNAS performance issues possibly= moot). (I want to do some performance testing because, well, it may have si= gnificant amusement value.) A question we have is whether ZFS (ARC, maybe L2= ARC) within FreeNAS is possible or would provide any value. >=20 Possible, yes. Provides value, somewhat. You still get to use snapshots, compression, dedup... You don't get ZFS self healing though which IMO is a big loss. Regarding the ARC, it totally depends on the kind of files you serve and the= amount of RAM you have available. If you keep serving huge, different files all the time, it won't help as muc= h as when clients request the same small/avg files over and over again.= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 08:19:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CCCE1065679 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:19:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BB18FC19 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:19:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so3423608eyd.13 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:19:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=BCRQ7KaI2+ambVFCxmVGhThuSiEIadev1v5ej/zNAww=; b=rg5pSTJXC7Lz0R8wOaO1RpL56Wl3/0fFj+iJ3QGpmOlz7ByFGq/zzztx702CkBb492 bD0+yAE48CPKLMy1/Pwl9WctTmwDKustZzC3ZioAct+vcKb2qRyaPVvKgFqrdEWZCCPA OJfD2NAmmXSAzlX1tUWcOVmit7o08Lw9Ttnic= Received: by 10.213.13.129 with SMTP id c1mr1976085eba.75.1319098764151; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:19:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.105.211 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:18:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:18:44 +0300 Message-ID: To: Kurt Buff Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary=0015174beab242cb1c04afb69daf X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading from 6.2-RELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:19:27 -0000 --0015174beab242cb1c04afb69daf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 21:55, Kurt Buff wrote: > I have gotten custody of an old machine running the aforementioned, > and it's in production. I can take it down for a couple of hours if > necessary, but would prefer to have it down as little as possible. > > What are my options for getting it to a supported release - looking at > the handbook it doesn't appear the the freebsd-update utility will > work in this case, as it's not 6.3? Can I, for instance, boot from a > CD of a supported version and do an upgrade, or am I stuck doing a > download of sorce for 7.0-RELEASE, compiling that, and then an > freebsd-update to 7.4? > > You can ignore everything you have been told so far and head to http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/upgrade/ and follow the procedures there, one at a time, and you will be able to update your box all the way to FreeBSD 9.x !! I have used them before to upgrade several boxes. I prompted RSE to write the 8.x->9.x procedure and I tested it step by step and I am currently running 9.0-BETA3 on one of my boxes: [wash@jaribu ~]$ uname -a FreeBSD jaribu.kictanet.or.ke 9.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3 #0: Fri Oct 7 14:11:20 EAT 2011 root@jaribu.kictanet.or.ke:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GW i386 So what you need is to upgrade to RELENG_6 first, using csup/cvsup, then start the procedures of 6.x-7.x, 7.x->8.x and if you want, 8.x->9.x Good luck! -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler. Please consider the environment before printing this email. --0015174beab242cb1c04afb69daf-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 09:33:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A95F1065673 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:33:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from spock-ext.obspm.fr (spock-ext.obspm.fr [145.238.186.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4BA48FC13 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:33:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pcjas.obspm.fr (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.184.233]) by spock-ext.obspm.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/DIO Observatoire de Paris - 15/04/10) with ESMTP id p9K9X9AF010202 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:33:10 +0200 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:33:09 +0200 From: Albert Shih To: "Fajar A. Nugraha" Message-ID: <20111020093309.GA83424@pcjas.obspm.fr> References: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.4 (spock-ext.obspm.fr [145.238.186.20]); Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:33:10 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at spock-ext.obspm.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:33:13 -0000 Le 19/10/2011 à 21:30:31+0700, Fajar A. Nugraha a écrit > > Sorry to cross-posting. I don't knwon which mailing-list I should post this > > message. > > > > I'll would like to use FreeBSD with ZFS on some Dell server with some > > MD1200 (classique DAS). > > > > When we buy a MD1200 we need a RAID PERC H800 card on the server so we have > > two options : > > > >        1/ create a LV on the PERC H800 so the server see one volume and put > >        the zpool on this unique volume and let the hardware manage the > >        raid. > > > >        2/ create 12 LV on the perc H800 (so without raid) and let FreeBSD > >        and ZFS manage the raid. > > > > which one is the best solution ? > > Neither. > > The best solution is to find a controller which can pass the disk as > JBOD (not encapsulated as virtual disk). Failing that, I'd go with (1) > (though others might disagree). Thanks. That's going to be very complicate...but I'm going to try. > > > > > Any advise about the RAM I need on the server (actually one MD1200 so 12x2To disk) > > The more the better :) Well, my employer is not so rich. It's first time I'm going to use ZFS on FreeBSD on production (I use on my laptop but that's mean nothing), so what's in your opinion the minimum ram I need ? Is something like 48 Go is enough ? > Just make sure do NOT use dedup untul you REALLY know what you're > doing (which usually means buying lots of RAM and SSD for L2ARC). Ok. Regards. JAS -- Albert SHIH DIO batiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26/06 86 69 95 71 Heure local/Local time: jeu 20 oct 2011 11:30:49 CEST From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 09:40:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B5B106564A for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:40:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fajar@fajar.net) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B328FC16 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:40:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaky10 with SMTP id y10so3930132iak.13 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:40:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.50.201 with SMTP id vf9mr12403154icb.10.1319103638596; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:40:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.241.2 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:40:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20111020093309.GA83424@pcjas.obspm.fr> References: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20111020093309.GA83424@pcjas.obspm.fr> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:40:38 +0700 Message-ID: From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" To: Albert Shih Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:40:40 -0000 On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Albert Shih wrote: >> > Any advise about the RAM I need on the server (actually one MD1200 so 12x2To disk) >> >> The more the better :) > > Well, my employer is not so rich. > > It's first time I'm going to use ZFS on FreeBSD on production (I use on my > laptop but that's mean nothing), so what's in your opinion the minimum ram > I need ? Is something like 48 Go is enough ? If you don't use dedup (recommended), should be more than enough. If you use dedup, search zfs-discuss archive for some calculation method posted. For comparison purposes, you could also look at Oracle's zfs storage appliance configuration: https://shop.oracle.com/pls/ostore/f?p=dstore:product:3479784507256153::NO:RP,6:P6_LPI,P6_PROD_HIER_ID:424445158091311922637762,114303924177622138569448 -- Fajar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 09:49:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A104106566B for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:49:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from spock-ext.obspm.fr (spock-ext.obspm.fr [145.238.186.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258B88FC13 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:49:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pcjas.obspm.fr (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.184.233]) by spock-ext.obspm.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/DIO Observatoire de Paris - 15/04/10) with ESMTP id p9K9nD7O025644 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:49:15 +0200 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:49:13 +0200 From: Albert Shih To: Krunal Desai Message-ID: <20111020094913.GC83424@pcjas.obspm.fr> References: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.4 (spock-ext.obspm.fr [145.238.186.20]); Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:49:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at spock-ext.obspm.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:49:16 -0000 Le 19/10/2011 à 10:52:07-0400, Krunal Desai a écrit > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Albert Shih wrote: > > When we buy a MD1200 we need a RAID PERC H800 card on the server so we have > > two options : > > > >        1/ create a LV on the PERC H800 so the server see one volume and put > >        the zpool on this unique volume and let the hardware manage the > >        raid. > > > >        2/ create 12 LV on the perc H800 (so without raid) and let FreeBSD > >        and ZFS manage the raid. > > > > which one is the best solution ? > > > > Any advise about the RAM I need on the server (actually one MD1200 so 12x2To disk) > > I know the PERC H200 can be flashed with IT firmware, making it in > effect a "dumb" HBA perfect for ZFS usage. Perhaps the H800 has the > same? (If not, can you get the machine configured with a H200?) I'm not sure what you mean when you say «H200 flashed with IT firmware» ? > If that's not an option, I think Option 2 will work. My first ZFS > server ran on a PERC 5/i, and I was forced to make 8 single-drive RAID > 0s in the PERC Option ROM, but Solaris did not seem to mind that. OK. I don't have choice (too complexe to explain and it's meanless here) but I can only buy at Dell at this moment. On the Dell website I've the choice between : SAS 6Gbps External Controller PERC H800 RAID Adapter for External JBOD, 512MB Cache, PCIe PERC H800 RAID Adapter for External JBOD, 512MB NV Cache, PCIe PERC H800 RAID Adapter for External JBOD, 1GB NV Cache, PCIe PERC 6/E SAS RAID Controller, 2x4 Connectors, External, PCIe 256MB Cache PERC 6/E SAS RAID Controller, 2x4 Connectors, External, PCIe 512MB Cache LSI2032 SCSI Internal PCIe Controller Card I've no idea what's the first thing is. But what I understand the best solution is the first or the last ? Regards. JAS -- Albert SHIH DIO batiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26/06 86 69 95 71 Heure local/Local time: jeu 20 oct 2011 11:44:39 CEST From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 09:57:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C14106564A for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:57:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4436C8FC12 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:57:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi40 with SMTP id 40so3442480wyi.13 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.135.34 with SMTP id t34mr8387205wei.62.1319104627024; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gd6sm14817791wbb.1.2011.10.20.02.57.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E9FF072.6030104@my.gd> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:57:06 +0200 From: Damien Fleuriot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20111020094913.GC83424@pcjas.obspm.fr> In-Reply-To: <20111020094913.GC83424@pcjas.obspm.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:57:08 -0000 On 10/20/11 11:49 AM, Albert Shih wrote: > Le 19/10/2011 à 10:52:07-0400, Krunal Desai a écrit >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Albert Shih wrote: >>> When we buy a MD1200 we need a RAID PERC H800 card on the server so we have >>> two options : >>> >>> 1/ create a LV on the PERC H800 so the server see one volume and put >>> the zpool on this unique volume and let the hardware manage the >>> raid. >>> >>> 2/ create 12 LV on the perc H800 (so without raid) and let FreeBSD >>> and ZFS manage the raid. >>> >>> which one is the best solution ? >>> >>> Any advise about the RAM I need on the server (actually one MD1200 so 12x2To disk) >> >> I know the PERC H200 can be flashed with IT firmware, making it in >> effect a "dumb" HBA perfect for ZFS usage. Perhaps the H800 has the >> same? (If not, can you get the machine configured with a H200?) > > I'm not sure what you mean when you say «H200 flashed with IT firmware» ? > >> If that's not an option, I think Option 2 will work. My first ZFS >> server ran on a PERC 5/i, and I was forced to make 8 single-drive RAID >> 0s in the PERC Option ROM, but Solaris did not seem to mind that. > > OK. > > I don't have choice (too complexe to explain and it's meanless here) but I > can only buy at Dell at this moment. > > On the Dell website I've the choice between : > > > SAS 6Gbps External Controller > PERC H800 RAID Adapter for External JBOD, 512MB Cache, PCIe > PERC H800 RAID Adapter for External JBOD, 512MB NV Cache, PCIe > PERC H800 RAID Adapter for External JBOD, 1GB NV Cache, PCIe > PERC 6/E SAS RAID Controller, 2x4 Connectors, External, PCIe 256MB Cache > PERC 6/E SAS RAID Controller, 2x4 Connectors, External, PCIe 512MB Cache > LSI2032 SCSI Internal PCIe Controller Card > > I've no idea what's the first thing is. But what I understand the best > solution is the first or the last ? > > Regards. > > JAS > The best solution is to get a dumb HBA which will present your drives directly to the OS (JBOD), then create your ZFS pools there. Many people have already recommended LSI because it's widely used on the list. Also, what do they mean by "SAS 6Gbps External Controller" ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 12:00:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD22106566B for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:00:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thecryof@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D65B8FC1B for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:00:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywm3 with SMTP id 3so3487783ywm.13 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 05:00:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=D3WBmqF9z8DqiJvGBMkVNNfzUpEvD0vZKxLYXGHT7Ak=; b=dCtKUW7sKs+1hBfcjhk9/u7pLIQndJVh+LSszhgURgOh2GCqyKDLsT04ZX8gmnx1A+ i5u5BHwEMwgYbv7HgpuR7Qj9iq4Ic+d1tVo7ttiOivrum4tdCFBCF9aQBKn/LVlZF6q8 lWJVF2paXGRFZSZny7MUhY51WYiYoMf2bCRSw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.173.199 with SMTP id v47mr15394417yhl.11.1319112018802; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 05:00:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.110.51 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 05:00:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:00:18 +0200 Message-ID: From: Michael M To: Paul Schmehl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions List Subject: Re: My tribute to Dennis Ritchie X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:00:21 -0000 On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > # grep -ir Ritchie /usr/src/* > /usr/src/bin/cat/cat.1:.An Dennis Ritchie > /usr/src/contrib/ntp/util/**ansi2knr.1:ansi2knr \- convert ANSI C to > Kernighan & Ritchie C > /usr/src/contrib/tcpdump/**print-rx.c: * Sigh. This is gross. > Ritchie forgive me. > /usr/src/games/fortune/**datfiles/fortunes: -- Dennis M. > Ritchie > /usr/src/games/fortune/**datfiles/fortunes: -- Ken Thompson > and Dennis M. Ritchie > /usr/src/games/fortune/**datfiles/fortunes: -- Dennis M. > Ritchie > /usr/src/games/fortune/**datfiles/fortunes: -- Dennis M. > Ritchie > /usr/src/games/fortune/**datfiles/fortunes:Dennis Ritchie is twice as > bright as Steve Jobs, and only half wrong. > /usr/src/games/fortune/**datfiles/fortunes: -- Dennis M. > Ritchie > /usr/src/games/fortune/**datfiles/fortunes:Ritchie's Rule: > /usr/src/games/fortune/**datfiles/fortunes: -- Dennis M. > Ritchie > /usr/src/lib/libc/rpc/PSD.doc/**xdr.rfc.ms:[1] Brian W. Kernighan & > Dennis M. Ritchie, "The C Programming > /usr/src/lib/libcompat/regexp/**README:a V8 manual page sent to me by > Dennis Ritchie (the manual page enclosed > /usr/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/SMM.**doc/3.t:I thank Bill Joy, Sam Leffler, Robert > Elz and Dennis Ritchie > /usr/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/SMM.**doc/3.t:.IP [Ritchie78] 20 > /usr/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/SMM.**doc/3.t:Ritchie, D. M., and Thompson, K., > /usr/src/share/doc/papers/**devfs/paper.me:published on UNIX by Ritchie > and Thompson [Ritchie74]: > /usr/src/share/doc/papers/**devfs/paper.me:The initial implementation used > hardcoded inode numbers [Ritchie98]. > /usr/src/share/doc/papers/**devfs/paper.me:[Ritchie74] > /usr/src/share/doc/papers/**devfs/paper.me:D.M. Ritchie and K. Thompson: > /usr/src/share/doc/papers/**devfs/paper.me:[Ritchie98] > /usr/src/share/doc/papers/**devfs/paper.me:Dennis Ritchie: private > conversation at USENIX Annual Technical Conference > /usr/src/share/doc/papers/**fsinterface/fsinterface.ms:fil**esystem > [Ritchie74], > /usr/src/share/doc/papers/**fsinterface/fsinterface.ms:.IP Ritchie74 > /usr/src/share/doc/papers/**fsinterface/fsinterface.ms:Rit**chie, D.M. and > K. Thompson, ``The Unix Time-Sharing System,'' > /usr/src/share/doc/papers/**kerntune/4.t:.IP [Ritchie74] 20 > /usr/src/share/doc/papers/**kerntune/4.t:Ritchie, D. M. and Thompson, K., > /usr/src/share/doc/papers/**malloc/malloc.ms:studied in the ``Old > testament'', chapter 8 verse 7 [Kernighan & Ritchie] > /usr/src/share/doc/papers/**sysperf/7.t:.IP [Ritchie74] 20 > /usr/src/share/doc/papers/**sysperf/7.t:Ritchie, D. M. and Thompson, K., > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/01.**cacm/p1:D. M. Ritchie and K. Thompson > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/01.**cacm/p1:c programming language kernighan > ritchie prentice-hall > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/01.**cacm/ref.bib:%A D. M. Ritchie > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/02.**implement/implement:ritchie thompson unix bstj > 1978 > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/02.**implement/ref.bib:%A D. M. Ritchie > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/03.**iosys/iosys:Dennis M. Ritchie > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/04.**uprog/p0:Dennis M. Ritchie > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/04.**uprog/p8:K. L. Thompson and D. M. Ritchie, > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/04.**uprog/p8:B. W. Kernighan and D. M. Ritchie, > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/04.**uprog/p9:D. M. Ritchie > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/06.**Clang/Clang.ms:Dennis M. Ritchie > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/06.**Clang/Clang.ms:by Brian W. Kernighan and > Dennis M. Ritchie, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1978. > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/15.**yacc/ref.bib:%A D. M. Ritchie > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/15.**yacc/ss0:Ritchie Kernighan Language Prentice > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/15.**yacc/ssB:D. M. Ritchie, B. W. Kernighan, and > M. O. Harris helped translate this document into English. > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/16.lex/**lex.ms:B. W. Kernighan and D. M. Ritchie, > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/16.lex/**lex.ms:B. W. Kernighan, D. M. Ritchie and > K. L. Thompson, > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/16.lex/**lex.ms:D. M. Ritchie, > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/17.m4/**m4.ms:Dennis M. Ritchie > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/17.m4/**m4.ms:which was written by D. M. Ritchie > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/20.**ipctut/tutor.me:[Kernighan & Ritchie 1978], > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/20.**ipctut/tutor.me:B.W. Kernighan & D.M. Ritchie, > 1978, > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/**contents/contents.ms:Dennis Ritchie and Ken > Thompson's original paper about UNIX, reprinted > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/**contents/contents.ms:Dennis Ritchie's overview of > the I/O System of Version 7; still helpful for > /usr/src/share/doc/psd/**contents/contents.ms:B.W. Kernighan and D.M. > Ritchie, Prentice-Hall, 1978, that > /usr/src/share/doc/smm/05.**fastfs/1.t:[Ritchie74], [Thompson78].* > /usr/src/share/doc/smm/05.**fastfs/6.t:We also acknowledge Dennis Ritchie > for his suggestions > /usr/src/share/doc/smm/05.**fastfs/6.t:.IP [Ritchie74] 20 > /usr/src/share/doc/smm/05.**fastfs/6.t:Ritchie, D. M. and Thompson, K., > /usr/src/share/man/man9/style.**9:Dennis Ritchie in > /usr/src/share/misc/bsd-**family-tree:[dmr] Dennis Ritchie, via E-Mail > /usr/src/usr.bin/calendar/**calendars/calendar.birthday:**09/09 Dennis > Ritchie born, 1941 > /usr/src/usr.bin/calendar/**calendars/calendar.computer:**01/16 Set > uid bit patent issued, to Dennis Ritchie, 1979 > /usr/src/usr.bin/calendar/**calendars/calendar.music:04/14 Ritchie > Blackmore (Deep Purple, Rainbow) is born, 1945 > /usr/src/usr.bin/m4/NOTES: Kernighan, Brian W. and Dennis M. Ritchie, > > -- > Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst > As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions > are my own and not those of my employer. > ********************************************* > "It is as useless to argue with those who have > renounced the use of reason as to administer > medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson > "There are some ideas so wrong that only a very > intelligent person could believe in them." George Orwell > > ______________________________**_________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-** > unsubscribe@freebsd.org " > Excellent! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 12:30:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F50F106566B for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:30:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DBC48FC0A for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:30:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGrlO-0007Ch-My for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:30:22 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:30:22 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:30:22 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:30:03 +0200 Lines: 48 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigFA59B64FA634378E4560A37E" X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111004 Thunderbird/7.0.1 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Subject: Re: Bad sector in UFS2 journal area X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:30:25 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigFA59B64FA634378E4560A37E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 20/10/2011 05:49, Ross wrote: > I don't actually have this problem, I'm just curious. What will happen > if read fails on sector in UFS2 journal area? Sector won't get > remapped until write, so reads will be failing until then. >=20 > I've had experience with bad sectors with non-journaled filesystems =E2= =80=94 > the system was online and working. The only problem was that > particular file and messages in /var/log/messages until the Current > Pending Sector counter was cleared and sector was remapped. >=20 > Will it be the same (online system) with bad sector in journal area? > And will it damage the filesystem? Well, SUJ is new enough that there's no general disseminated knowledge about it, but from a quick look at the code: 1) the journal recovery is only ever done in the fsck_ffs program, so it's unlikely that the kernel will panic from a bad sector 2) if the journal cannot be read at any point, the recovery code *should* offer the user to nuke the journal and perform a normal, full fsck, which presumably should leave the file system in a usable state 3) journal writes are done via the normal mechanisms, so it also shouldn't lead to kernel panics on bad sectors, but the "normal" cannot-write-to-device kernel error message and continued operation. --------------enigFA59B64FA634378E4560A37E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6gFFIACgkQldnAQVacBcgiGgCgmOM7FSrCv6/oTc5Butmb/66P CywAoOi15hQ53vWj6PKCSRl8JT7vclAW =E8MJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigFA59B64FA634378E4560A37E-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 13:20:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D471065675 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:20:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0DA8FC19 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:20:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnq2 with SMTP id q2so1912965ggn.13 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 06:20:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.146.223.19 with SMTP id v19mr2375530yag.14.1319116854721; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 06:20:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-105-057.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.105.57]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r9sm14547520anh.8.2011.10.20.06.20.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 20 Oct 2011 06:20:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3SPW3m400Sz2CG4M for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:20:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:20:52 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20111020092052.30d2a947@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:20:55 -0000 After attempting unsuccessfully to update KDE4 via "portmaster", I found a number of errors printed out when using "pkg_version-vIL=". I eventually used "portmanager" to update the KDE4 port successfully; however, I am still receiving the following error messages. These ports need updating: pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring koffice-kde4-2.3.3_3 < needs updating (index has 2.3.3_5) postgresql-client-8.2.21 < needs updating (index has 8.2.22_1) I have not found a way to ascertain which ports contain the corrupted records. Originally, there were over a dozen of them but "portmanager" fixed most of them for me. How can I determine what ports are still damaged so that I might correct them. -- Jerry ✌ jerry+fbsd@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or ignored. Do not CC this poster. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 14:37:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EE51065679 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:37:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from axelbsd@ymail.com) Received: from nm9-vm0.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (nm9-vm0.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.146.183.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 231FE8FC19 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:37:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [217.146.183.213] by nm9.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Oct 2011 14:24:40 -0000 Received: from [77.238.184.77] by tm6.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Oct 2011 14:24:40 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp146.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Oct 2011 14:24:40 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1319120680; bh=9DPHjWsYpw+zzGU+IFmPfYQk6wYE0GgG2QTeC0um85w=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Received:Received:MIME-Version:Received:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Content-Type; b=ZpODl71DXGzDZVf1nxyWWQpvFVjf4S7NEuj+uucgl1b61ceqMkOGBQq/NSPrOpsZ9VCa9bflCJGr4mxhAufVhpTZY7uRR0Q5h50bGCVNm2qFjNr3uCuGWKm+AMi1Xt19VFissnuF3DQPRsJxAhJU3euWqc9bwMYwT6udEht7afE= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 398242.29111.bm@smtp146.mail.ukl.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: lYwNtM4VM1neo.eZcTX7oUHI1l5xpqhVBzWBK8TtxfV1Uz3 fQMslNGobabxi3GvhdUnRYox2opgkB2KkktsWN_rhbzSkr6.wxGdhqEgEprE htFUIJHDjppF1hd_bU4xTt66k4_5kO4l2stP.QLxeBsNn.TTnHXNmy4AIUFR ZCj_FXKy0jOtK5W59CnorKJVoy.nZBwEUOlkxABMcfzhv7y0Yikfc5K7LMJv u2fzHQdghd2oCPMoEVNZxMRUMOSf4tLw633xlZElj0Q.7n4bT8yh0hmNSvMJ qpNIu3BbXJ31bpPfboRWLfLLlJpqlzL9EdnolUJCXLXVZeHye.jVC3Nv2VmW .xXxb9dauCEQkKYWzct_N6cCCCP5nbvYJXcQukemUXcSmeKDPYCXFiAsiQCt cmDpaggDuSs3KJptmmzLGVISbFE1WoZ.YHnawz9v9G22eJnOIkJ_VrZHmZpd f36.iGa4NEbnhWWSlmxFSphWwJbKG1yqElM84cAKL_t5tHAUypJwNf1VYyY5 bX0SWQhTMlx.8IO9DkB1665cfDYaEWnYKw6yVzJY4uqunW1Coqh1DQU2a5jK JkgIKzrBVm4aCpxLBuZt6lnD5MBEnPxmMUgAAs16m.zqJFIgHV_q8baFbvVk Bhb0.1KIXTukCjzqh_SCc32n.KNOgDDjt5JPDgQ3bIfqnuwVfuqsXb1YDFQ0 HPowK3zxyYYkx4Q-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: S65s63SswBDjU54Gjqw2GSWlZmfgiEU_X3tN1_9u Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (axelbsd@209.85.161.182 with plain) by smtp146.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Oct 2011 14:24:40 +0000 GMT Received: by ggnq2 with SMTP id q2so1996072ggn.13 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:24:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.159.1 with SMTP id j1mr19142879icx.20.1319120679166; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:24:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.218.136 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:24:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20111020092052.30d2a947@scorpio> References: <20111020092052.30d2a947@scorpio> From: Alexandre Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:24:19 +0200 Message-ID: To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:37:24 -0000 On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Jerry wrote: > After attempting unsuccessfully to update KDE4 via "portmaster", I > found a number of errors printed out when using "pkg_version-vIL=3D". > > I eventually used "portmanager" to update the KDE4 port successfully; > however, I am still receiving the following error messages. > > These ports need updating: > pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring > pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring > pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring > koffice-kde4-2.3.3_3 < needs updating (index has 2.3.3_5= ) > postgresql-client-8.2.21 < needs updating (index has 8.2.22_= 1) > > I have not found a way to ascertain which ports contain the corrupted > records. Originally, there were over a dozen of them but "portmanager" > fixed most of them for me. How can I determine what ports are still > damaged so that I might correct them. > > -- > Jerry =E2=9C=8C > jerry+fbsd@seibercom.net > Hi Jerry, Have you tried this : # portmaster --check-depends # portmaster -Da Source : http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/pkg_version-corrupted-record-pkgdep-line-witho= ut-argument-ignoring/ You can have a look on this thread, where Doug Barton (portmaster's author) explain another way to resolve this problem. http://groups.google.com/group/lucky.freebsd.ports/browse_thread/thread/e20= 54d1cfadc0e3a/66c038dfffb36d40?lnk=3Draot&pli=3D1 Regards, Alexandre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 14:55:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC04A1065670 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:55:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@experts-exchange.com) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B588C8FC13 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A3AA6FFA2A; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:55:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=e-e.com; h= user-agent:organization:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:content-type:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:subject:from:from:date:date :received:received:received; s=ee; t=1319122515; x=1320936915; bh=hbm8yJxYseUQcGp/HRclTkdg5l1dYPGaoaJFpK4TosY=; b=KjUtsoHnb7Qk hILjSzS1tIDU1AhuWBS6ujvhzYYQDl5Bb9C6APmmquXKRZsvTOTbtxZOv5jr9Vzs 0Jm2v2bKp4LFlCFSbWdBh20D8QFUC1bD5xPUObaqXUvitDmmJvSzO831inyT7aqI kLJ2NLYIj+NCFskoHbBM5eblgBeYtQ0= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L9A9HngJZprc; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:55:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from experts-exchange.com (unknown [192.168.103.122]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 263AE6FFA14; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:55:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 61285 invoked by uid 1001); Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:55:14 -0000 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:55:14 -0700 From: Jason Helfman To: Alexandre Message-ID: <20111020145514.GA61229@eggman.experts-exchange.com> References: <20111020092052.30d2a947@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE Organization: Experts-Exchange, LLC. http://www.experts-exchange.com X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:55:16 -0000 On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 04:24:19PM +0200, Alexandre thus spake: >On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Jerry wrote: > >> After attempting unsuccessfully to update KDE4 via "portmaster", I >> found a number of errors printed out when using "pkg_version-vIL=". >> >> I eventually used "portmanager" to update the KDE4 port successfully; >> however, I am still receiving the following error messages. >> >> These ports need updating: >> pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring >> pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring >> pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring >> koffice-kde4-2.3.3_3 < needs updating (index has 2.3.3_5) >> postgresql-client-8.2.21 < needs updating (index has 8.2.22_1) >> >> I have not found a way to ascertain which ports contain the corrupted >> records. Originally, there were over a dozen of them but "portmanager" >> fixed most of them for me. How can I determine what ports are still >> damaged so that I might correct them. >> >> -- >> Jerry ✌ >> jerry+fbsd@seibercom.net >> > >Hi Jerry, > >Have you tried this : ># portmaster --check-depends ># portmaster -Da > >Source : >http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/pkg_version-corrupted-record-pkgdep-line-without-argument-ignoring/ > >You can have a look on this thread, where Doug Barton (portmaster's author) >explain another way to resolve this problem. >http://groups.google.com/group/lucky.freebsd.ports/browse_thread/thread/e2054d1cfadc0e3a/66c038dfffb36d40?lnk=raot&pli=1 > Try looking into reporting pkgs from the output of this too: #!/bin/sh grep -A1 "^@pkgdep $" /var/db/pkg/*/+CONTENTS -jgh -- Jason Helfman System Administrator experts-exchange.com http://www.experts-exchange.com/M_4830110.html E4AD 7CF1 1396 27F6 79DD 4342 5E92 AD66 8C8C FBA5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 16:53:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF47106564A for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:53:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout022.mac.com (asmtpout022.mac.com [17.148.16.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1CBA8FC13 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:53:05 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp022.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0LTD001FNIVV4CB0@asmtp022.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:52:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813,1.0.211,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-10-20_07:2011-10-20, 2011-10-20, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1110200178 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <4E9FF072.6030104@my.gd> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:52:42 -0700 Message-id: <9B27B4D4-69C8-482A-A918-F77FD03614E3@mac.com> References: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20111020094913.GC83424@pcjas.obspm.fr> <4E9FF072.6030104@my.gd> To: Damien Fleuriot X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:53:07 -0000 Hi-- On Oct 20, 2011, at 2:57 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > Also, what do they mean by "SAS 6Gbps External Controller" ? SAS is "serial attached SCSI"; it permits multipath connections to devices and thus is more similar to fibre channel HBAs than SATA, although some SAS controllers will also work with normal SATA drives. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 16:59:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A45951065675 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:59:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392948FC0A for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:59:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi40 with SMTP id 40so3998065wyi.13 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:59:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.23.203 with SMTP id s11mr4429963wbb.83.1319129958689; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:59:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fi11sm16667123wbb.9.2011.10.20.09.59.16 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:59:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4EA05363.5010808@my.gd> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:59:15 +0200 From: Damien Fleuriot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Swiger References: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20111020094913.GC83424@pcjas.obspm.fr> <4E9FF072.6030104@my.gd> <9B27B4D4-69C8-482A-A918-F77FD03614E3@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <9B27B4D4-69C8-482A-A918-F77FD03614E3@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:59:20 -0000 On 10/20/11 6:52 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Hi-- > > On Oct 20, 2011, at 2:57 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> Also, what do they mean by "SAS 6Gbps External Controller" ? > > SAS is "serial attached SCSI"; it permits multipath connections to devices and thus is more similar to fibre channel HBAs than SATA, although some SAS controllers will also work with normal SATA drives. > > Regards, I know what SAS stands for. My question was, what do they mean by *external* controller ? Do you get to provide your own ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 17:06:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D30AF10656F0 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:06:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout020.mac.com (asmtpout020.mac.com [17.148.16.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77A78FC18 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:06:03 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp020.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0LTD0027OJHO6360@asmtp020.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:05:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813,1.0.211,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-10-20_08:2011-10-20, 2011-10-20, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1110200183 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <4EA05363.5010808@my.gd> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:05:47 -0700 Message-id: References: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20111020094913.GC83424@pcjas.obspm.fr> <4E9FF072.6030104@my.gd> <9B27B4D4-69C8-482A-A918-F77FD03614E3@mac.com> <4EA05363.5010808@my.gd> To: Damien Fleuriot X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:06:03 -0000 On Oct 20, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> SAS is "serial attached SCSI"; it permits multipath connections to devices and thus is more similar to fibre channel HBAs than SATA, although some SAS controllers will also work with normal SATA drives. > > I know what SAS stands for. OK. > My question was, what do they mean by *external* controller ? It means the connections to the devices are external, rather than being intended for internal devices: http://www.dell.com/content/topics/topic.aspx/global/products/pvaul/topics/en/us/raid_controller?c=us&l=en&cs=555 > Do you get to provide your own ? Devices? Yes. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 20:36:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D054106566C for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:36:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from movszx@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199BA8FC08 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:36:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfo13 with SMTP id fo13so4372785vcb.13 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:36:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Msp1BebFaXkGHbBmUcAPdumAugeTldtMNTrXgemGIiU=; b=OmFg8McrlbT/eRLXjo5P01R/sFeNOyKIbqzjp2mNHzlx5phWNhQba8LCKY3falT9Cn hUPfrywaCpp8t/AlSVSQGv6YeV0sEV/Hu28uhh7/eL3oi1Asgejiorc8+qwLeZtbfcbd NFLu+dQjN/93U6QIpD0koJN1l4cmGm+UFHP5s= Received: by 10.220.8.195 with SMTP id i3mr859125vci.209.1319142975175; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:36:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.98.21 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:35:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20111020094913.GC83424@pcjas.obspm.fr> References: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20111020094913.GC83424@pcjas.obspm.fr> From: Krunal Desai Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:35:55 -0400 Message-ID: To: Albert Shih Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:36:16 -0000 On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Albert Shih wrote: > I'm not sure what you mean when you say =C2=ABH200 flashed with IT firmwa= re=C2=BB ? IT is "Initiator Target", and many LSI chips have a version of their firmware available that will put them into this mode, which is desirable for ZFS. This is opposed to other LSI firmware modes like "IR" which is RAID, I believe. (which you do not want). Since the H200 uses a LSI chip, you can download that firmware from LSI and flash it to the card turning it into an IT-mode card and a simple HBA. --khd From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 20:40:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC5DA1065670 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:40:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Jan-Peter.Koopmann@seceidos.de) Received: from mailfilter1.seceidos.com (mailfilter1.seceidos.com [194.97.154.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8048FC17 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:40:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailfilter1.seceidos.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailfilter1.seceidos.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9KKTQb4030723 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:29:27 +0200 Received: from mail.seceidos.de (de-sapp03rz.intern.seceidos.de [192.168.200.15]) by mailfilter1.seceidos.com (mailfilter1.seceidos.com [192.168.200.20]) envelope-from with ESMTP id n9JMYQ24172001949V ret-id none; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:29:27 +0200 From: "Koopmann, Jan-Peter" To: Albert Shih Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:28:59 +0200 Thread-Index: AcyPZuXDwFzoldsLQQiiNrU8Wf1FGw== Message-ID: References: <20111019141443.GQ4592@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20111020094913.GC83424@pcjas.obspm.fr> In-Reply-To: <20111020094913.GC83424@pcjas.obspm.fr> Accept-Language: de-DE Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: de-DE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MsgInfo-Seceidos: This message was scanned for viruses. If you have any questions please contact postmaster@seceidos.de X-Seceidos-MailScanner-ID: 1RGzEl-0004gp-VD Thread-Topic: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-smtpf-Report: sid=n9JMYQ241720019400; tid=n9JMYQ24172001949V; client=lan,relay,grey,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=1:0; fails=0 Received-SPF: None; receiver=mailfilter1.seceidos.com; client-ip=192.168.200.15; helo= Received-SPF: None; receiver=mailfilter1.seceidos.com; client-ip=192.168.200.15; envelope-from= Cc: "zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org" , Krunal Desai , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on Dell with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:40:35 -0000 >=20 > On the Dell website I've the choice between :=20 >=20 >=20 > SAS 6Gbps External Controller > PERC H800 RAID Adapter for External JBOD, 512MB Cache, PCIe=20 > PERC H800 RAID Adapter for External JBOD, 512MB NV Cache, PCIe=20 > PERC H800 RAID Adapter for External JBOD, 1GB NV Cache, PCIe > PERC 6/E SAS RAID Controller, 2x4 Connectors, External, PCIe 256MB Cac= he > PERC 6/E SAS RAID Controller, 2x4 Connectors, External, PCIe 512MB Cac= he > LSI2032 SCSI Internal PCIe Controller Card >=20 The first one probably is a LSI card. However check with DELL (and if it is= LSI, check what card exactly). And check if with that controller they supp= ort seeing all individual drives in the chassis as JBOD.=20 Otherwise consider buying the chassis without the controller and get just t= he LSI from someone else.=20 Regards, JP= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 20:58:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20963106566B for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:58:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www@s113.loopia.se) Received: from s87.loopia.se (s87.loopia.se [194.9.95.112]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B099B8FC0A for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from s101.loopia.se (s101.loopia.se [194.9.95.47]) by s87.loopia.se (Postfix) with SMTP id 29247465414 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:40:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 37673 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2011 20:40:23 -0000 Received: from s113.loopia.se (HELO s113.loopia.se) (194.9.94.207) by s101.loopia.se (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:40:23 +0200 Received: from s113.loopia.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s113.loopia.se (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9KKePOU008032 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:40:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from www@s113.loopia.se) Received: (from www@localhost) by s113.loopia.se (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p9KKePqr008031; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:40:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from www) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:40:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <201110202040.p9KKePqr008031@s113.loopia.se> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Security Center Paypal MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Security Center Paypal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:58:32 -0000 [1]PayPal [pixel.gif] Information Regarding Your account: Dear PayPal Member: Attention! Your PayPal account has been limited! As part of our security measures, we regularly screen activity in the PayPal system.We recently contacted you after noticing an issue on your account.We requested information from you for the following reason: Our system detected unusual charges to a credit card linked to your PayPal account. Reference Number: PP-259-187-991 This is the Last reminder to log in to PayPal as soon as possible. Once you log in, you will be provided with steps to restore your account access. Once you log in, you will be provided with steps to restore your account access. We appreciate your understanding as we work to ensure account safety. [2]Click here to activate your account We thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Please understand that this is a security measure intended to help protect you and your account. We apologise for any inconvenience.. Sincerely, PayPal Account Review Department _________________________________________________________________ Copyright © 1999-2011 PayPal. All rights reserved. PayPal Ltd. PayPal FSA Register Number: 226056. [pixel.gif] PayPal Email ID PP059 Protect Your Account Info Make sure you never provide your password to fraudulent websites. To safely and securely access the PayPal website or your account, open a new web browser (e.g. Internet Explorer or Netscape) and type in the PayPal login page (http://paypal.com/) to be sure you are on the real PayPal site. For more information on protecting yourself from fraud, please review our Security Tips at https://www.paypal.com/us/securitytips Protect Your Password You should never give your PayPal password to anyone. References 1. https://www.paypal.com/us 2. http://paypalupdate.com.security.online.unlimited.conceptec.net/paypal.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 21:35:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6E7106564A for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 21:35:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from openslateproj@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4A48FC13 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 21:35:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfo13 with SMTP id fo13so4434470vcb.13 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:35:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xqXAQk9C0X5/PS44PL3Gg6TJwlJr9/MDniKcddvGmSs=; b=b4qXjtm5r97RC6cD0bi/rND6ARvm3wbAqjj5YmmT7/aF6WhShy5+NBl1PcBfUGXYUj WOc21+kqgA2fTrlITKQYinaG9rnxE1okosbY8nNSXJURQyW5EQNcF7Fdpu6RWNTHq4wT UPA2Yzxtvc/YJ68RSTSRd9U61rhTpDk6MJnUY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.193.67 with SMTP id dt3mr911828vcb.61.1319146550319; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:35:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.182.202 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:35:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:35:50 -1000 Message-ID: From: Open Slate To: n dhert Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: printing Cups Gutenprint X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 21:35:51 -0000 On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:49 PM, n dhert wrote: > Solved: > # cups-genppdupdate > # ps -jaxw | grep cupsd > --> of cupsd deamon > # kill -HUP > > 2011/10/18 n dhert > >> I updated the ports : >> gutenprint-base-5.2.4_2 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 < =A0 needs updating (in= dex has 5.2.7) >> gutenprint-cups-5.2.4_2 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 < =A0 needs updating (in= dex has 5.2.7) >> now printing a text file >> $ lp testfile.txt >> doesn't print and >> $ lpstat -t >> says: >> printer psg is idle. =A0enabled since Tue Oct 18 08:55:19 2011 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 The PPD version (5.2.4) is not compatible with Gutenprin= t 5.2.7. >> the file remains in the queue until it cancel it >> >> How to solve? >> There was nothing about that in /usr/ports/UPDATING ... Perhaps this should be noted in /usr/ports/UPDATING -- Gary Dunn Open Slate Project http://openslate.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 22:12:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8A8106564A for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:12:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from openslateproj@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFAE38FC12 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfo13 with SMTP id fo13so4462776vcb.13 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:12:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Ksii+JQgipBmG/9nxM/STN5CdxPe/jIYhjCLUjGWY0I=; b=p9ehLG3arVhBhBPElcHhZAxJLMykc1fPonRnm5EXNSSxLZFMH+2fmJEV9nYHgBCZCM Ndl6nHSUqKSvz9uNyGfisnRO92LMaEb9ELU9dMl4cn/8lXUhaVWGZVE2+Kc6BL4RndaI QE/6VcUU/1qXjcPjAF4tULvX9QbVDR/1ca+ds= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.114.232 with SMTP id jj8mr12128694vdb.94.1319148767195; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:12:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.182.202 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:12:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:12:47 -1000 Message-ID: From: Open Slate To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Enlightenment icon path X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:12:48 -0000 I have installed Enlightenment after Gnome. My etc/rc.conf is now moused_enable="YES" mouse_type="AUTO" dbus_enable="YES" hald_enable="YES" polkitd_enable="YES" #gnome_enable="YES" I have installed the xdm port and my ~/.xsession is /usr/local/bin/enlightenment_start I still use some Gnome apps. Gedit menus display all icons, Epiphany web browser. does not. For example, on File menu, Open, Save As, Print Preview, Print, and Close have icons to the left of the command. New Tab, New Window, Page Setup, and Send Link by Email have the red X "no image" icon. These all work in Gnome. Is there a path I need to set? -- Gary Dunn Open Slate Project http://openslate.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 22:56:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0955106566C for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:56:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from openslateproj@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4ACE8FC19 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:56:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws11 with SMTP id 11so3625621vws.13 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:56:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XYfYaHoYeY5AXUwl+Ui5/UPgQTzu1smSOaeJcLeVEZg=; b=JwFDd307r4puUZJ/O8kIvJr0j8+QXAL51x9pBkx+Z66IiiqCGxeF03595EOIbOBphD sTd8VQp13oYTYtOnHKTaq6yEXJqxGihrczjB2q9GUNJ/KOXxEVrlkaKy/5AM0n7vShcB Vw+4veheAOJYaJWDpJsONUb0CDWh4vkoEjBQ8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.28.141 with SMTP id b13mr12330498vdh.128.1319151392388; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:56:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.182.202 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:56:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:56:32 -1000 Message-ID: From: Open Slate To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Enlightenment "Power Off" on system menu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:56:35 -0000 My Enlightenment system menu has some useful commands disabled. Is there a way to selectively enable them? Enabled: Lock Log Out Cancel Disabled: Power Off Suspend Reboot Hibernate I want to enable Power Off and Reboot. I have never had any luck getting FreeBSD to suspend, much less hibernate, so I am happy to leave those disabled. I am trying to use xdm rather than gdm or kdm, and lacking Power Off and Reboot on the system menu makes these tasks awkward. -- Gary Dunn Open Slate Project http://openslate.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 23:14:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436B4106566B for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 23:14:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from openslateproj@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013C58FC0A for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 23:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws11 with SMTP id 11so3638007vws.13 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:14:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MV3zDjc72g2PhDlDlSnvt9FFn1/6RtYVl84SB5Gl6/U=; b=JUFwbDkzQej+QTf5+b4dN6OY8PXM32HYQf/7EsmTviS14clx1Ujnar6FyGek/maRwp 00TzNMDERzJ4rMHODmU+nakh9iZX2PODktjF69VxCu2dw2LZw4dFK3YaJGHAPcAheAF9 OUFJwI1JaKhfFU5bgfNyCCu2XjkYwO5xBfVY4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.28.141 with SMTP id b13mr12367686vdh.128.1319152441248; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:14:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.182.202 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:14:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:14:01 -1000 Message-ID: From: Open Slate To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Enlightenment cpufreq gadget broken display X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 23:14:02 -0000 I added the cpugreq gadget to my shelf. It appears to be an analog tachometer but the only data displayed is digital, just below the center of where the tach needle should be. And the font makes to number too small to be useful, even on the desktop. Anybody have a working cpufreq gadget? The one in gnome work just fine. -- Gary Dunn Open Slate Project http://openslate.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 02:27:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC164106564A for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:27:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from smtpauth02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpauth02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B91038FC15 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:27:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8582 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2011 02:01:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (71.170.154.177) by smtpauth02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.182) with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2011 02:01:12 -0000 Message-ID: <02c39d17-c16b-4eb4-b544-5f23c328295a@blur> From: "Eric Schuele" To: "Open Slate", freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 21:01:10 -0500 X-Mailer: Motorola android mail 1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; Format="Flowed"; DelSp="Yes"; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Enlightenment cpufreq gadget broken display X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:27:53 -0000 Gary, Fwiw.... You might try #e on freenode. :) -Eric -----Original message----- From: Open Slate To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Thu, Oct 20, 2011 23:14:01 GMT+00:00 Subject: Enlightenment cpufreq gadget broken display I added the cpugreq gadget to my shelf. It appears to be an analog tachometer but the only data displayed is digital, just below the center of where the tach needle should be. And the font makes to number too small to be useful, even on the desktop. Anybody have a working cpufreq gadget? The one in gnome work just fine. -- Gary Dunn Open Slate Project http://openslate.org/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 02:27:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7305E106566B for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:27:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from smtpauth14.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpauth14.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5080D8FC13 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:27:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11891 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2011 02:01:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (71.170.154.177) by smtpauth14.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.39) with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2011 02:01:13 -0000 Message-ID: <02c39d17-c16b-4eb4-b544-5f23c328295a@blur> From: "Eric Schuele" To: "Open Slate", freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 21:01:12 -0500 X-Mailer: Motorola android mail 1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; Format="Flowed"; DelSp="Yes"; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Enlightenment cpufreq gadget broken display X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:27:54 -0000 Gary, Fwiw.... You might try #e on freenode. :) -Eric -----Original message----- From: Open Slate To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Thu, Oct 20, 2011 23:14:01 GMT+00:00 Subject: Enlightenment cpufreq gadget broken display I added the cpugreq gadget to my shelf. It appears to be an analog tachometer but the only data displayed is digital, just below the center of where the tach needle should be. And the font makes to number too small to be useful, even on the desktop. Anybody have a working cpufreq gadget? The one in gnome work just fine. -- Gary Dunn Open Slate Project http://openslate.org/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 02:57:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ECCE106566B for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:57:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066B58FC14 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:57:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.homeip.net (c80-217-64-49.bredband.comhem.se [80.217.64.49]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p9L2vP2u093497; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 04:57:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <4EA0DF95.50206@bananmonarki.se> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 04:57:25 +0200 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:7.0) Gecko/20111001 Thunderbird/7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Michael D. Norwick" References: <4E924B4D.4050801@centurytel.net> <20111010063740.GA23603@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4E92BF3C.8080807@centurytel.net> <20111010104450.GA28895@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4E9616FD.5080404@centurytel.net> <447h49yed0.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <4E9627A6.8000907@centurytel.net> <44vcrtohej.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20111013162524.GA75476@freebsd.org> <44wrc8iz09.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20111018195712.GA18773@freebsd.org> <4E9F7899.6070401@centurytel.net> In-Reply-To: <4E9F7899.6070401@centurytel.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't access a music CD (or any other media now) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:57:34 -0000 2011-10-20 03:25, Michael D. Norwick skrev: > > with a data CD in the drive during reboot. > Trying to manually mount the drive results in; > > $ sudo mount_cd9660 /dev/cd0 /media/dvdrom > mount_cd9660: /dev/cd0: Invalid argument You have a typo in your mount command. The correct one would be; mount_-t cd9660 /dev/cd0 /media/dvdrom > Thank You, > Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 07:53:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB99106564A for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:53:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Received: from ifdnrg30.ifdnrg.com (outbound.ifdnrg.com [193.200.98.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329528FC17 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:53:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.75] (188-221-77-161.zone12.bethere.co.uk [188.221.77.161]) (authenticated bits=0) by ifdnrg30.ifdnrg.com (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9L7rh9v071937 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:53:44 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Message-ID: <4EA12507.7090703@ifdnrg.com> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:53:43 +0100 From: Paul Macdonald User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: which ports require dialog during update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:53:46 -0000 Hi, Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input during update, i have some auto update scripts which when prompted will run through updates, but occassionally i forget which will require user input and this leads to dialog running ( often @ 100%) until i notice. Obviously i only do this for what i'd consider to be trivial updates and it makes things a lot quicker when you have a lot of boxes to do! I had initialy thought that checking for make targets might be an idea, the lack of a config target for example. On one box which does have a config/options target, i see options come up via dialog. /usr/ports/security/p5-IO-Socket-SSL brings up the config options for this port, both unchecked [ ] IDN International Domain Names (IDN) support x x [ ] IPV6 IPv6 support on another box there's no dialog from either an update via portupgarde or via a direct make in the port dir ( make config is the same on both and does bring up the dialog) the Makefiles are identical both in the ports dir and in the work dir, both systems are 8.2-REL. Can i programmatically tell if user input is required? thanks Paul. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 07:57:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E450106566B for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:57:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA828FC16 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:57:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so5247583wwi.31 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:57:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.62.196 with SMTP id y4mr5316958wbh.19.1319183828043; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:57:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfleuriot.technique-admin.paris.hi-media-techno.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 11sm20167300wby.15.2011.10.21.00.57.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4EA125D1.1020204@my.gd> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:57:05 +0200 From: Damien Fleuriot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4EA12507.7090703@ifdnrg.com> In-Reply-To: <4EA12507.7090703@ifdnrg.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: which ports require dialog during update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:57:09 -0000 On 10/21/11 9:53 AM, Paul Macdonald wrote: > > Hi, > > Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input during > update, > > i have some auto update scripts Stop doing this. Your update scripts do not read /usr/ports/UPDATING. Your update scripts do not read package changelogs. What you're doing is irresponsible, and potentially dangerous/harmful if your server is in production. You should really be very careful about this. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 09:02:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30158106564A for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:02:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brentgclarklist@gmail.com) Received: from mail1.dur1.host-h.net (mail1.dur1.host-h.net [196.7.18.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D408FC08 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:02:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [196.7.147.49] (helo=[192.168.1.86]) by mail1.dur1.host-h.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RHANY-0004BH-Rw for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:23:00 +0200 Message-ID: <4EA12BE4.7000903@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:23:00 +0200 From: Brent Clark User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110307 Lightning/1.0b1 Icedove/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.97.2/13831/Fri Oct 21 00:23:55 2011) Subject: smb browing via nautilus X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:02:47 -0000 Good day Ive got this problem whereby via gnomes nautilus, smb browing is *incredibly slow*. For example, if I type and try to connect to smb://foo, it takes quite awhile, before the shares are available. Then I can click on the share. I wait a bit more. I find if I manually mount the smb share (mount_smb), then browse to the mount point via nautilus, copying files is a breeze. If someone could help me it would be appreciated. Kindest Regards Brent Clark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 09:14:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D9FE106566C for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:14:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Received: from ifdnrg30.ifdnrg.com (outbound.ifdnrg.com [193.200.98.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E9F8FC15 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:14:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.85] (93-97-172-73.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.172.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by ifdnrg30.ifdnrg.com (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9L9EiLp077070 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:14:45 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Message-ID: <4EA13806.5000803@ifdnrg.com> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:14:46 +0100 From: Paul Macdonald User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4EA12507.7090703@ifdnrg.com> <4EA125D1.1020204@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <4EA125D1.1020204@my.gd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: which ports require dialog during update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:14:47 -0000 >Hi, Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input during update, i have some auto update scripts > Stop doing this. > > Your update scripts do not read /usr/ports/UPDATING. > Your update scripts do not read package changelogs. > > What you're doing is irresponsible, and potentially dangerous/harmful if > your server is in production. > > You should really be very careful about this. i do of course read those files (which require daily checking to confirm usually no relevant changes, but thats another issue!).. however i don't need to read UPDATING on every box, (this tool is an assistent, not a replacement, for monitored updates.) i do need to check that an update that went fine on the initial test box will behave the same on other boxes, which is my question, can i tell if the options dialog is going to be invoked? thanks Paul. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 09:21:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DEC4106566B for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:21:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A95D8FC08 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so5358324wwi.31 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:21:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.24.144 with SMTP id v16mr3175629wbb.7.1319188867029; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:21:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ek13sm20605941wbb.3.2011.10.21.02.21.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4EA13980.4090505@my.gd> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:21:04 +0200 From: Damien Fleuriot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4EA12507.7090703@ifdnrg.com> <4EA125D1.1020204@my.gd> <4EA13806.5000803@ifdnrg.com> In-Reply-To: <4EA13806.5000803@ifdnrg.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: which ports require dialog during update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:21:08 -0000 On 10/21/11 11:14 AM, Paul Macdonald wrote: >>Hi, Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input > during update, i have some auto update scripts >> Stop doing this. >> >> Your update scripts do not read /usr/ports/UPDATING. >> Your update scripts do not read package changelogs. >> >> What you're doing is irresponsible, and potentially dangerous/harmful if >> your server is in production. >> >> You should really be very careful about this. > i do of course read those files (which require daily checking to confirm > usually no relevant changes, but thats another issue!).. > > however i don't need to read UPDATING on every box, (this tool is an > assistent, not a replacement, for monitored updates.) > > i do need to check that an update that went fine on the initial test box > will behave the same on other boxes, which is my question, > > can i tell if the options dialog is going to be invoked? > > thanks > Paul. I'm afraid I can't see an option in portmanager that would handle this. I think you portupgrade's --batch mode might be the answer to your question though. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 09:27:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD80106566C for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:27:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6727@bellsouth.net) Received: from fmailhost01.isp.att.net (fmailhost01.isp.att.net [204.127.217.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3788FC16 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:27:26 +0000 (GMT) X-Comment: Sending client does not conform to RFC822 minimum requirements X-Comment: Date has been added by Maillennium Received: from localhost (adsl-68-210-172-143.sdf.bellsouth.net[68.210.172.143]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc01) with SMTP id <20111021092725H0100n3gkle>; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:27:26 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [68.210.172.143] From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20111021092727.DCD80106566C@hub.freebsd.org> Cc: Subject: csup: How do I know I have correct version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:27:27 -0000 After I run csup /usr/share/examples/releng9-supfile how do I know I have the correct version, like 9.0-BETA3 or 9.0-RC1? I can't find any such information explicitly anywhere under /usr/src . This releng9-supfile was made from stable-supfile by changing RELENG_8 to RELENG_9 in the line *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 I've been following the emailing lists current, questions and ports, noticed the heads-up that HEAD was going to 10-current. Maybe also I should put this releng9-supfile in a safer place where it won't be deleted by the next installation/upgrade? Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 09:47:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7441065670 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:47:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75728FC0C for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:47:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so5391039wwi.31 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:47:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.132.215 with SMTP id o65mr5048070wei.104.1319190444805; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:47:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id eu16sm20683430wbb.7.2011.10.21.02.47.22 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:47:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4EA13FA9.9030405@my.gd> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:47:21 +0200 From: Damien Fleuriot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20111021092727.DCD80106566C@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20111021092727.DCD80106566C@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: csup: How do I know I have correct version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:47:26 -0000 On 10/21/11 11:27 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote: > After I run > > csup /usr/share/examples/releng9-supfile > > how do I know I have the correct version, like 9.0-BETA3 or 9.0-RC1? > > I can't find any such information explicitly anywhere under /usr/src . > > This releng9-supfile was made from stable-supfile by changing RELENG_8 to RELENG_9 in the line > > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 > > I've been following the emailing lists current, questions and ports, > noticed the heads-up that HEAD was going to 10-current. > > Maybe also I should put this releng9-supfile in a safer place where > it won't be deleted by the next installation/upgrade? > Indeed you should. >From my /etc/make.conf: SUP_UPDATE= yes SUP= /usr/bin/csup SUPFLAGS= -zgL 2 SUPHOST= cvsup1.fr.freebsd.org SUPFILE= /etc/cvsup/stable-supfile PORTSSUPFILE= /etc/cvsup/ports-supfile DOCSUPFILE= /etc/cvsup/doc-supfile Then, you just have to copy the sample supfiles to /etc/cvsup/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 09:53:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE35D1065673 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:53:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55EA28FC12 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:53:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9L9rdmG028523 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:53:39 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.1 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p9L9rdmG028523 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1319190819; bh=GcDRtR9XvUiKIR6+7OMiV08zOrnoZtmMJX1oRmQzq5E=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=XQG6h7PmqaqLYgEYOPNgHtnvwksH703YbFlwaUmTiFcQN+SdpDn8TNv+B8+0ZBt8R aqhMcC7Ug9mJO6Aj8+GyY/5ImnIPtH3YozmB9Nqy6w+f2musN77zEWtFMvNRV94zm7 KiytK/vYBx7d/rxpWuTmIn2G1UhIf3eYeivBow/c= Message-ID: <4EA1411B.3050300@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:53:31 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Mueller References: <20111021092727.DCD80106566C@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20111021092727.DCD80106566C@hub.freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig18D871E34727CF0A21415A10" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: csup: How do I know I have correct version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:53:46 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig18D871E34727CF0A21415A10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 21/10/2011 10:27, Thomas Mueller wrote: > After I run=20 >=20 > csup /usr/share/examples/releng9-supfile >=20 > how do I know I have the correct version, like 9.0-BETA3 or 9.0-RC1? So long as you're confident that you have actually downloaded the sources from the RELENG_9 branch, then you can be confident that the system version will be one of those -- at the moment, you'll get 9.0-RC1 but over time this will eventually change to 9.0-STABLE. > I can't find any such information explicitly anywhere under /usr/src . The file you want is /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh This is a script that edits version information into various source code files. The bit you need is near the top of the file -- just following line 33: 33 TYPE=3D"FreeBSD" 34 REVISION=3D"9.0" 35 BRANCH=3D"RC1" 36 if [ "X${BRANCH_OVERRIDE}" !=3D "X" ]; then 37 BRANCH=3D${BRANCH_OVERRIDE} 38 fi 39 RELEASE=3D"${REVISION}-${BRANCH}" 40 VERSION=3D"${TYPE} ${RELEASE}" 41 SYSDIR=3D$(dirname $0)/.. Unfortunately the value want is RELEASE, which is assembled from parts, so not trivially grep'able. But you can easily see the REVISION is set to 9.0 and BRANCH is RC1 so the whole things comes to 9.0-RC1. Simple. > This releng9-supfile was made from stable-supfile by changing RELENG_8 = to RELENG_9 in the line >=20 > *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_8 >=20 > I've been following the emailing lists current, questions and ports,=20 > noticed the heads-up that HEAD was going to 10-current. >=20 > Maybe also I should put this releng9-supfile in a safer place where=20 > it won't be deleted by the next installation/upgrade? No -- you shouldn't need to worry about that. The name 'releng9-supfile' you chose doesn't match anything produced by the system, so it won't be overwritten. (Not that you shouldn't keep a backup somewhere -- that's only sensible.) Hmmm.... actually you have highlighted a small omission in the procedures for branching RELENG_9 and RELENG_9_0 -- the cvsup example supfiles /usr/src/share/examples/{stable,standard}-supfile should be updated to match the branch they are installed from. In your case both of those files should use the RELENG_9 tag, but that hasn't been commmitted yet. Cheers Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig18D871E34727CF0A21415A10 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6hQSMACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzNcgCeMrBSrms6W5WH4qi6sax9Hl6T w+0AnRcBIKyWB05Z8ThxtBpY/END0RmG =vnKC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig18D871E34727CF0A21415A10-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 11:04:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D91106564A for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:04:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kron24@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE888FC1A for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:04:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so5054614eyd.13 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 04:04:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mIQcKhm/iHvkDLvhJxLlFlphYO/7/QfZTX5pa5V+mbg=; b=rvODbsqH5EBw51sw4ABu+2cCLhQShTAP2Y2mxyBAGd4duVVTnjNm0VOelKJtG2BAm5 XpThSk6rt+10bmZH9UE4mSj0rAO8qRdORq6A8Vms7HK6Y9VL7MWBMKhWKHLE/TBL7rwo TzUr+Hz2Q4PiIe3qPEBeaQrcM2ohD8GSfc5d4= Received: by 10.213.8.80 with SMTP id g16mr3165134ebg.74.1319195065107; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 04:04:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nbvk.local (uidzr185150.sattnet.cz. [212.96.185.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o4sm33959798eeb.0.2011.10.21.04.04.21 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 21 Oct 2011 04:04:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4EA151B4.8060102@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:04:20 +0200 From: kron24 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111005 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4EA12507.7090703@ifdnrg.com> <4EA125D1.1020204@my.gd> <4EA13806.5000803@ifdnrg.com> <4EA13980.4090505@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <4EA13980.4090505@my.gd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: which ports require dialog during update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:04:26 -0000 On 2011/10/21 11:21, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > > On 10/21/11 11:14 AM, Paul Macdonald wrote: >>> Hi, Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input >> during update, i have some auto update scripts >>> Stop doing this. >>> >>> Your update scripts do not read /usr/ports/UPDATING. >>> Your update scripts do not read package changelogs. >>> >>> What you're doing is irresponsible, and potentially dangerous/harmful if >>> your server is in production. >>> >>> You should really be very careful about this. >> i do of course read those files (which require daily checking to confirm >> usually no relevant changes, but thats another issue!).. >> >> however i don't need to read UPDATING on every box, (this tool is an >> assistent, not a replacement, for monitored updates.) >> >> i do need to check that an update that went fine on the initial test box >> will behave the same on other boxes, which is my question, >> >> can i tell if the options dialog is going to be invoked? >> >> thanks >> Paul. > > I'm afraid I can't see an option in portmanager that would handle this. > > I think you portupgrade's --batch mode might be the answer to your > question though. I use portupgrade's --batch or portmaster's PM_MAKE_ARGS='BATCH=true'. The BATCH variable is recognized in ports' makefiles so there should be a way in portmanager too. OP may want to look on 'make config-recursive'. BR Oli From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 11:06:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BF7106564A for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:06:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F165C8FC16 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:06:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.13) with ESMTPSA id 21145196 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:06:01 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9LB60iK019460 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:06:00 +0700 (OMSST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p9LB60xT019459 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:06:00 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:06:00 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111021110600.GA19417@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 Subject: strange behavior of restore(8) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:06:07 -0000 Colleagues, I am trying to restore a UFS2 zero level dump sized about 51G. restore has created 6105 directories and no files at all, and now is waiting forever in the runnable state. What could the problem be? I have always used dump/restore with success. Does the number 6105 look somewhat suspiciuos? I have tried "restore -rN" with the same result: after some time it just seems to do nothing, not reading from tape or disk. Still it is not frozen, you can press ^C and it will ask: restore interrupted, continue? [yn] Its /tmp/rstdir1318692759 file has the size about 38M, I still have plenty of room in /tmp. TIA for any ideas. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 12:39:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064F41065670; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:39:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ambrosehua@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB878FC14; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:39:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyd8 with SMTP id 8so4895133gyd.13 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 05:39:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JR4JiYZSqJVyUMZS5pkkR4vp+CMt2Xqe/VSiPsxYvi0=; b=tkTRGJR/kO81O1iIZDmYhz/C+oKP/ZDFR/BPimFI0FMesc5iYvPaxooUMaxh25IIi2 n4cnlClXmRClnc8D+IyKxSphsdbJ9SJCHPF72agkf2A+rM06Q0XlSfIjFlstentRKrSS ovasAdnlqwZU1wAIglKFBLq2Ea4mCfzdvMTOA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.39.20 with SMTP id d20mr22292180fae.37.1319200748570; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 05:39:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.156.1 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 05:39:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:39:08 +0800 Message-ID: From: Paul Ambrose To: Ryan Stone Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-current , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: config(8) does not add post-processing for source file with compile-with command in sys/conf/files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:39:10 -0000 There are many other compile-with not started with ${NORMAL_C}, your patch adds ${NORMAL_CTFCONVERT} to them too, which could not be suitable for this. 2011/10/19 Ryan Stone : > I have run into the same issue recently. =A0I have been testing the > following patch(on 8.2-RELEASE) and it seems to have worked for me: > > --- mkmakefile.c 11:09:30.000000000 -0400 > +++ mkmakefile.c =A0 =A0 =A0 =A02011-10-06 11:13:31.000000000 -0400 > @@ -742,15 +742,16 @@ > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0break; > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0} > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0snprintf(cmd, sizeof(cmd), > - =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "${%s_%c%s}\n.if de= fined(NORMAL_CTFCONVERT) && " > - =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "!empty(NORMAL_CTFC= ONVERT)\n" > - =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "\t${NORMAL_CTFCONV= ERT}\n.endif", ftype, > + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "${%s_%c%s}\n", fty= pe, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0toupper(och), > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ftp->f_flags & NOW= ERROR ? "_NOWERROR" : ""); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0compilewith =3D cmd; > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0} > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0*cp =3D och; > - =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 fprintf(f, "\t%s\n\n", compilewith); > + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 fprintf(f, "\t%s\n", compilewith); > + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 fprintf(f, ".if defined(NORMAL_CTFCONVERT) = && " > + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0"!empty(NORMAL_C= TFCONVERT)\n" > + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0"\t${NORMAL_CTFC= ONVERT}\n.endif\n\n"); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0} > =A0} > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 13:18:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA51106564A for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:18:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884648FC08 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9LDIUFJ034833; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:18:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id p9LDIU1k034830; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:18:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:18:30 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Paul Macdonald In-Reply-To: <4EA12507.7090703@ifdnrg.com> Message-ID: References: <4EA12507.7090703@ifdnrg.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:18:30 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: which ports require dialog during update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:18:31 -0000 On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Paul Macdonald wrote: > Can i programmatically tell if user input is required? It might require reinventing the logic used by the ports system Makefiles. Or maybe there's a way to run make config-recursive but get dialog to immediately cancel any config screens that appear (redirect input from /dev/null?). Detect whether the output of that is not empty. 'make config-recursive' was already mentioned, but portupgrade has the -c and -C options, and running all the config screens before starting a build is automatic for portmaster. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 16:53:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FCDA106564A for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:53:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cjr@cruwe.de) Received: from cruwe.de (cruwe.de [188.40.164.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309C78FC14 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:53:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cruwe.de (unknown [127.0.0.4]) by cruwe.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D038728E28 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:53:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by cruwe.de (Postfix, from userid 65534) id B2D3D28E26; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:53:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.cruwe.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from dijkstra (p57BDF4D9.dip.t-dialin.net [87.189.244.217]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cruwe.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC06C28E20 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:53:43 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:53:33 +0200 From: "Christopher J. Ruwe" To: Message-ID: <20111021185333.7c197a2a@dijkstra> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/KSJWPN/4p3V9fMgEx=oJYIa"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV on mail.cruwe.de using ClamSMTP Subject: trying to learn systems programming, fear I have not understood and thus messed up X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:53:47 -0000 --Sig_/KSJWPN/4p3V9fMgEx=oJYIa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To improve on my C and to learn something about systems programming, I have begun to pick out "bite-size bits" from the bin-PRs. Currently, I am dispairing about bin/149972, which is about 1) adding error handling to pw being invoced "pw -u " and 2) trying to get a uid from the (incorrectly) passed username. Currently, I cannot accomplish want I wanted to do, so I turn here for hints or help. Three developers which I have failed to reach by mail (gpf@, kibab@, bcr@) have added the necessary code if ((arg =3D getarg(args, 'u')) !=3D NULL) { if(isdigit((unsigned char)*arg->val)) { pwd->pw_uid =3D (uid_t) atol(arg->val); edited =3D 1; if (pwd->pw_uid !=3D 0 && strcmp(pwd->pw_name, "root") =3D=3D 0) errx(EX_DATAERR, "can't change uid of `root' account"); if (pwd->pw_uid =3D=3D 0 && strcmp(pwd->pw_name, "root") !=3D 0) warnx("WARNING: account `%s' will have a uid of 0 (superuser access!)", pwd->pw_name); } else { /* Found something, but not a number */ /* * XXX Shouldn't we try to map the passed string to the username? * man page however says that we're expecting numeric uid... */ errx(EX_DATAERR, "Expected numeric user id as an argument to -u\n"); } } I have tried to follow the suggestion from the comment by modifiying the else-statement thus: } else { struct passwd *trgpwd; if (!(trgpwd =3D GETPWNAM(arg->val))) errx(EX_DATAERR, "User %s does not exist", arg->val); =20 if (strcmp(a_name->val,"root") =3D=3D 0) errx(EX_DATAERR, "can't change uid of `root' account"); if (strcmp(trgpwd->pw_name, "root") =3D=3D 0) warnx("WARNING: account `%s' will have a uid of 0 (superuser access!)", pwd->pw_name); pwd->pw_uid =3D (uid_t) (trgpwd->pw_uid); =20 edited =3D 1; }=20 What happens is not what I intended. I invoke as "sudo ./pw usermod testuser1 -u testuser2". I can get testuser2's pwd-entry by GETPWNAM allright, but when I assign the pw_uid, so as to make testuser2's uid the same as testuser1's and imgaining to retain all other values, ./pw reports "pw: user 'testuser2' disappeared during update" and the testuser2's /etc/passwd entry is replaced by testuser1's. I fear I have not understood GETPWNAM correctly, as it seems to replace the struct pwd as some sort of sideeffect. I could manually set all pwd-members to the correct ones (those of testuser2), but I fear that I have messed something up beforehand. I am grateful for any suggestions and/or correction.=20 --=20 Christopher J. Ruwe TZ GMT + 2 --Sig_/KSJWPN/4p3V9fMgEx=oJYIa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOoaOUAAoJEJTIKW/o3iwUtaUP/jR5wTY21F+WfbHAlgIowlDS 3S97t0Ak9j7SzM2+zmcRY0KH/5c41UzEygRhUnw0VZS/m19QUvLDKKsf5tU8ZlZq JjJR4KpIZfDFuST2picmwegw4rYaZ/1yK9gauN5uQLqjRVgNw8m7mY+PRW+h9+Sn oVEQUbYrwsMpqMBZ5ySEuqnJ6vdbnJdW2EVvtdqQoVLS66XTZUbD5fyEJJq2mvPr OmHQvKrradej/2IwlvkboJ1sLVr8TY2CceqBXWLsEQoktNqY8JljrOB7+f1m6f2l wApUHkd9JMWVM3BFRhVUWL9vyHEzsI7PTIeYXgECPLjwIhTJcuC7RYFMfdUgyUCI Pwp3ll93MToOWh8RiFmuNJ1R4LfvOuSo0whDMf9QcL0xxTdWS/gHwS45sg9Jlr0b HWpYRQPwvVItEiRUplqisvdlibOotQMEFe4JG1E7EDVUjoS0xYfAapCt64Czytmy l78UJ5EHGhCS2aIjTQw9ozWqlpztm9x78nObONPW/8v2HNTet3szIQgrd0v8YmHE jRC8bLT7W/K6LW6+hYAQ3bduvhckc9p//8hy7FKl1w0K1bjcuPXOIOXFR2EGi2Fc DdESoIpvCCr9ZdvA8jCcBkwI6IY8c+TwpnHNpxnuHp4i4E51fnHoLo/H+a39In/1 uxUF0jh2yFgfZsOyPdXL =++oG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/KSJWPN/4p3V9fMgEx=oJYIa-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 16:55:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B56106564A for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:55:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gull@gull.us) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703E38FC0A for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:55:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkbzu17 with SMTP id zu17so6578190bkb.13 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:55:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.112.6 with SMTP id eq6mr11376400bkc.16.1319216156024; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:55:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.148.66 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:55:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [128.95.17.27] In-Reply-To: <20111021110600.GA19417@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20111021110600.GA19417@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:55:55 -0700 Message-ID: From: David Brodbeck To: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: strange behavior of restore(8) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:55:57 -0000 On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Colleagues, > > I am trying to restore a UFS2 zero level dump sized about 51G. > restore has created 6105 directories and no files at all, and now is > waiting forever in the runnable state. I don't have any specific advice here, but if it were me I think my next troubleshooting step would be to attach truss to the restore process after it gets "stuck," to try to see exactly what it's doing. That may give you a clue as to why it's taking so long and whether it's actually making any progress. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 18:46:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965A51065670 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:46:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rpistanbulbilisim@setrow.com) Received: from mgw02-41.relay02.setrow.com (mgw02-41.relay02.setrow.com [212.252.24.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BBC8FC0A for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:46:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mgw02-41.relay02.setrow.com (PowerMTA(TM) v3.5r16) id hk6v1s12p1cm for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:46:23 +0300 (envelope-from ) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:46:05 +0300 To: questions@freebsd.org From: =?utf-8?Q?=C4=B0stanbul_Bili=C5=9Fim?= Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Setrow Importance: Normal Precedence: bulk X-MAIL-INFORMATION: 43223508-7540-270-Tr-0-questions@freebsd.org-1 Delivered-To: =?utf-8?Q?=C4=B0stanbul_Bili=C5=9Fim_?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: =?utf-8?q?Hepsi_birbirinden_=C3=B6zel=2Chepsi_birbirinden_g?= =?utf-8?b?w7x6ZWw=?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:46:55 -0000 Size =C3=B6zel b=C3=BClteni g=C3=B6rmek i=C3=A7in a=C5=9Fa=C4=9F=C4=B1daki = linke t=C4=B1klay=C4=B1n=C4=B1z:=20 T=C4=B1klay=C4=B1n=C4=B1z=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 18:49:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0B6106564A for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:49:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from openslateproj@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A5F8FC12 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfo13 with SMTP id fo13so5582264vcb.13 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:49:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yZx7FQTNBZ07LDVtw+Lu2eL4rosToO9CtpVZMZzWV2Q=; b=JxAXOHBWdrnLDGFJdThB0ezd+bsUJ9xwEPzYjgJFtkLJur6vh/ARKCp8eZVQCHfBgT KHxbGPtP8ju0aGvG/UjDWRqAelnFbLXYSNjvkmWHNvUao9Jug37aGkpvgZEIsypYjGiq kGf5haKKCpzeHMZew2Y+lYBzVAcsE1MavzKp4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.107.81 with SMTP id a17mr1127250vcp.96.1319222996200; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:49:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.182.202 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:49:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <02c39d17-c16b-4eb4-b544-5f23c328295a@blur> References: <02c39d17-c16b-4eb4-b544-5f23c328295a@blur> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:49:56 -1000 Message-ID: From: Open Slate To: Eric Schuele Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Enlightenment cpufreq gadget broken display X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:49:57 -0000 On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Eric Schuele wrot= e: > Gary, > > Fwiw....=A0 You might try #e on freenode.=A0 :) Good idea. Thanks. I'm there now on my cell (AndroIRC, recommended) and no response. I'll hang out awhile. My handle is gd808mobile in case anyone wants to hook up. --=20 Gary Dunn Open Slate Project http://openslate.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 20:42:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC748106564A for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:42:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcg@sulfegate.org) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5868FC08 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:42:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxt33 with SMTP id 33so491466yxt.13 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:41:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sulfegate.org; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:from:date:x-google-sender-auth :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=J6WeYyvgJhij6mX2kPNfv8KQ/qwqft0XlY0wRSSguGo=; b=fi3rGHWTwrjzsuPJywH8BzhRfk+VB5dwatZSEnkq2XZEPGboF2srEUf/+PxDqpvl7D L6JWShbD55LvdbwYZYIb51TPOaom/V0wxWX8VQhIs18WWVr6Mz377b3EOCCKoMvSZqRA a+ecKtY/4qCUhnAXhc3BpgdlKz2F200Oum+J4= Received: by 10.68.23.6 with SMTP id i6mr30100438pbf.13.1319228010144; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:13:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: mcg@sulfegate.org Received: by 10.142.174.6 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:13:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [98.170.233.66] From: "Galati, Michael" Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:13:00 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 75Jgnd-dlk1ZjHPGGqNLke5TNCg Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: which ports require dialog during update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:42:00 -0000 > =A0>Hi, Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input > during update, i have some auto update scripts > > Stop doing this. > > > > Your update scripts do not read /usr/ports/UPDATING. > > Your update scripts do not read package changelogs. > > > > What you're doing is irresponsible, and potentially dangerous/harmful i= f > > your server is in production. > > > > You should really be very careful about this. > i do of course read those files (which require daily checking to confirm > usually no relevant changes, but thats another issue!).. > > however i don't need to read UPDATING on every box, (this tool is an > assistent, not a replacement, for monitored updates.) > > i do need to check that an update that went fine on the initial test box > will behave the same on other boxes, which is my question, > > can i tell if =A0the options dialog is going to be invoked? > > thanks > Paul. If you use portmaster, it will get the make config step out of the way up front (as others have mentioned). Since you're already building on a test machine, why not use that system to build packages for your other systems? Invoking portmaster with the "-g" option will create packages in /usr/ports/packages. From there, upload the packages to an FTP (or HTTP) server, or host them directly the test machine. Setting the PACKAGEROOT environment variable will make pkg_add -r pull packages from the test machine. Doing things this way, you don't have to worry about getting prompted for package options. I'm yet to see any package actually require user interaction during install, but YMMV. This method, however, assumes that: - You are running the same version of FreeBSD on all systems - You use the same CPU arch. on all systems - You do not need ports build with different options on some systems - You are not using any conflicting packages Unfortunately, there's no good way of upgrading packages on FreeBSD (that I'm aware of, at least). My solution (crude as it may be) has been to remove all the packages and reinstall. HTH, Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 21:03:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297381065743 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:03:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from openslateproj@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA36F8FC14 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:03:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws11 with SMTP id 11so4834818vws.13 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:03:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=qrn/85PFySNi+4dTOndhVaWMDB6KUSnFcIv0uNaVmx4=; b=erZvnsN8u7fcglMx94sed7qYLDlwDB9dG480zgkTI/jqobJl+YY8YqBxdXZlHcf5zf Q3xaPK+D+jc1+Ni5+OIY1qn/Dof/lbOtCEU4oYBmCeKW5or0E4mQh5AKWILBzROLmBaT C9AtJZsUVW4wJuCW9bJUrhzQ1OkpoCSTSvd7w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.28.141 with SMTP id b13mr15667516vdh.128.1319231024313; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:03:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.182.202 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:03:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.182.202 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:03:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4EA12507.7090703@ifdnrg.com> References: <4EA12507.7090703@ifdnrg.com> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:03:44 -1000 Message-ID: From: Open Slate To: Paul Macdonald Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: which ports require dialog during update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:03:45 -0000 Not exactly an answer to your question, but I use the batch flag to bypass configuration menus. If you have one or two ports you do not install with default settings, you can go back and install manually. On Oct 20, 2011 9:54 PM, "Paul Macdonald" wrote: Hi, Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input during update, i have some auto update scripts which when prompted will run through updates, but occassionally i forget which will require user input and this leads to dialog running ( often @ 100%) until i notice. Obviously i only do this for what i'd consider to be trivial updates and it makes things a lot quicker when you have a lot of boxes to do! I had initialy thought that checking for make targets might be an idea, the lack of a config target for example. On one box which does have a config/options target, i see options come up via dialog. /usr/ports/security/p5-IO-**Socket-SSL brings up the config options for this port, both unchecked [ ] IDN International Domain Names (IDN) support x x [ ] IPV6 IPv6 support on another box there's no dialog from either an update via portupgarde or via a direct make in the port dir ( make config is the same on both and does bring up the dialog) the Makefiles are identical both in the ports dir and in the work dir, both systems are 8.2-REL. Can i programmatically tell if user input is required? thanks Paul. ______________________________**_________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-** unsubscribe@freebsd.org " From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 00:15:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9177C1065670 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from openslateproj@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A89B8FC0A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:15:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfo13 with SMTP id fo13so5821984vcb.13 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:15:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4eRhj5WyHDF41kjWuY2/i0gboI3F3RUBKLMJJhnCuw8=; b=OUxfvtt1Ecj/7Q6uqKeDC3yZ9hHRYmOYET3EXOgjSQm9q20cPC6XLgQCLnwKFZugAg yWbpPha8vrVOSY2ycZe1aKPcIi29RL13J9VdwnrmXR7sw9i1yg3AC/SIcBCWlz9ZztU6 PVc4M2CTCbfmid2CDSiaGep8nR3EMEqYhB8VY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.193.67 with SMTP id dt3mr1208729vcb.61.1319242558307; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:15:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.182.202 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:15:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <02c39d17-c16b-4eb4-b544-5f23c328295a@blur> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:15:58 -1000 Message-ID: From: Open Slate To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Enlightenment cpufreq gadget broken display X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:15:59 -0000 On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Open Slate wrote= : > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Eric Schuele wr= ote: >> Gary, >> >> Fwiw....=A0 You might try #e on freenode.=A0 :) > > Good idea. Thanks. I'm there now on my cell (AndroIRC, recommended) > and no response. I'll hang out awhile. My handle is gd808mobile in > case anyone wants to hook up. Got an answer, trying some themes. Apparently this gadget is digital by design, the default theme gives it an analog looking background. Icon dock (shelf) looks better with increase height. --=20 Gary Dunn Open Slate Project http://openslate.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 01:05:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468DA1065674 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 01:05:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-announce@chthonic.com) Received: from www5.pairlite.com (www5.pairlite.com [64.130.10.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280F18FC12 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 01:05:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whisperer.chthonixia.net (cpe-66-65-69-148.nyc.res.rr.com [66.65.69.148]) by www5.pairlite.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31D612E2BD for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:50:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:54:42 -0400 From: Joe Altman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111022005442.GA68656@whisperer.chthonixia.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Upgrading libxul, dependency on Firefox 3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-announce@chthonic.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 01:05:59 -0000 Greetings... I was running portupgrade on libxul and noticed it depends on Firefox 3.x. I cancelled the upgrade, because I thought FF3.x was insecure and therefore deprecated while FF7 was recommended and secure. My questions: 1) is the dependency libxul has for FF3 a security problem? 2) is the dependency on FF3 a bug in libxul? If it is a bug, who should receive a report: gecko@ or the Mozilla project? FYI: I'm pretty sure it was portsclean -D (and not me) that deleted FF3...yet libxul tried to pull it in during the portupgrade. Best regards, Joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 01:07:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4EF5106566B for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 01:07:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482A08FC1B for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 01:07:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9M17sX0041352; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:07:54 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id p9M17spe041349; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:07:54 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:07:54 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: "Galati, Michael" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:07:54 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: which ports require dialog during update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 01:07:56 -0000 On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Galati, Michael wrote: > Unfortunately, there's no good way of upgrading packages on FreeBSD > (that I'm aware of, at least). My solution (crude as it may be) has > been to remove all the packages and reinstall. There's pkg_upgrade from sysutils/bsdadminscripts. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 01:45:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6A6C106564A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 01:45:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C69668FC13 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 01:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E3ABDC34 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:29:25 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:29:25 -0700 Message-ID: <20331.1319246965@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Help needed: sound/audio only semi-working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 01:45:48 -0000 I've been bringing up a new amd64 box with 8.2-RELEASE. So far I've managed to get everything installed OK, including a boatload of freshly-built ports. I've even gotten flash10 working with firefox... well... Unfortunately, this is only MOSTLY working. The video works great, but for audio all I get is absolute silence. The really strange thing is that after I followed all the directions here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/sound-setup.html This command: cat /dev/random > /dev/dsp *does* produce quite a bit of white noise sound. However when I perform the other officially recommended basic audio functionality test: cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0 play 1 with one of my favorite old audo CDs in the drive (AND with that special little wire running from the back of the drive to my motherboard) all that happens is that the CD/DVD drive apparently _does_ start to read some stuff... as evidenced by the blinking access light in the front of the drive... but I still get no sound out, and YouTube videos still aren't giving me any audio even though the video seems to be playing perfectly. So, um, I am grasping for ideas here on how I can debug this problem furher. I really have no idea what to do next to get this debugged. I supposed that if nobody gives me a good suggestion, I'm gonna try swapping out that special little wire for another one and then try swapping the CD/DVD drive for another one if that still doesn't solve it. Sigh. :-( I just checked and yes, the CD/DVD drive _can_ mount a data CD alright. No problems doing that. So how can it be that this works just fine: cat /dev/random > /dev/dsp even while this: cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0 play 1 causes the disk to spin up and read, but otherwise produces utter silence? I'm flummoxed. Any help would be appreciated. Regards, rfg P.S. My motherboard (w/ onboard audio) is a Gigabyte GA-M55Plus-S3G. Here is what a get when I cat /dev/sndstat: FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 64bit 2009061500/amd64) Installed devices: pcm0: (play/rec) default pcm1: (play/rec) pcm2: (play/rec) Additional info: % sysctl hw.snd.default_unit hw.snd.default_unit: 0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 03:22:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB521106567B for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 03:22:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mnorwick@centurytel.net) Received: from mail941c35.nsolutionszone.com (mail941c35.nsolutionszone.com [209.235.152.131]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B83B8FC15 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 03:22:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Authenticated-User: mnorwick.centurytel.net Received: from bucksnort.norwickhouse.net (174-124-37-123.dyn.centurytel.net [174.124.37.123]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail941c35.nsolutionszone.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p9M3M7ZH013202 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 03:22:09 GMT Message-ID: <4EA236DF.8040109@centurytel.net> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 22:22:07 -0500 From: "Michael D. Norwick" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110829 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20331.1319246965@tristatelogic.com> In-Reply-To: <20331.1319246965@tristatelogic.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=1.1 cv=NcoHE5DaVL9GfFGiyPHSQE0Yfj1Tns2zweE9wUucXs4= c=1 sm=1 a=_tW4y8GFV1YA:10 a=DemjIyI1e84A:10 a=3WPTVEtZbjMA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=nRHtrj2pbMUmV2THcod+iQ==:17 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=1aUzhgCuc3emgC5X5nMA:9 a=4hwyQvC9Fxevj2NeuN4A:7 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=s3s7mknTn3gA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=nRHtrj2pbMUmV2THcod+iQ==:117 Subject: Re: Help needed: sound/audio only semi-working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 03:22:11 -0000 On 10/21/11 20:29, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > I've been bringing up a new amd64 box with 8.2-RELEASE. So far I've managed > to get everything installed OK, including a boatload of freshly-built ports. > I've even gotten flash10 working with firefox... well... > > Unfortunately, this is only MOSTLY working. The video works great, but for > audio all I get is absolute silence. > > The really strange thing is that after I followed all the directions here: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/sound-setup.html > > This command: > > cat /dev/random> /dev/dsp > > *does* produce quite a bit of white noise sound. However when I perform > the other officially recommended basic audio functionality test: > > cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0 play 1 > > with one of my favorite old audo CDs in the drive (AND with that special > little wire running from the back of the drive to my motherboard) all that > happens is that the CD/DVD drive apparently _does_ start to read some stuff... > as evidenced by the blinking access light in the front of the drive... but I > still get no sound out, and YouTube videos still aren't giving me any audio > even though the video seems to be playing perfectly. > > So, um, I am grasping for ideas here on how I can debug this problem furher. > I really have no idea what to do next to get this debugged. I supposed that > if nobody gives me a good suggestion, I'm gonna try swapping out that special > little wire for another one and then try swapping the CD/DVD drive for another > one if that still doesn't solve it. > > Sigh. :-( I just checked and yes, the CD/DVD drive _can_ mount a data CD > alright. No problems doing that. > > So how can it be that this works just fine: > > cat /dev/random> /dev/dsp > > even while this: > > cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0 play 1 > > causes the disk to spin up and read, but otherwise produces utter silence? > > I'm flummoxed. > > Any help would be appreciated. > > > Regards, > rfg > > > > P.S. My motherboard (w/ onboard audio) is a Gigabyte GA-M55Plus-S3G. Here > is what a get when I cat /dev/sndstat: > > FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 64bit 2009061500/amd64) > Installed devices: > pcm0: (play/rec) default > pcm1: (play/rec) > pcm2: (play/rec) > > Additional info: > > % sysctl hw.snd.default_unit > hw.snd.default_unit: 0 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Please see my posts on this list as well as on freebsd-multimedia under the subject 'can't access a music cd'. I appear to be experiencing the exact same issue. I am also using snd_hda on freebsd 9. Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 04:29:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98821106564A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 04:29:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) Received: from redcondor1.peak.org (redcondor1.peak.org [69.59.192.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660758FC0A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 04:29:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmail-mta01.peak.org ([207.55.16.111]) by redcondor1.peak.org ({e03e86cd-14ae-47ce-9578-3c080ce9c462}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTP id 20111022042937299 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 04:29:37 +0000 X-RC-FROM: X-RC-RCPT: Received: from maple.localnet (unknown [207.55.106.132]) by zmail-mta01.peak.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8331491527 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:29:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oak.localnet (oak.localnet [IPv6:2001:1938:266::6f:616b]) by maple.localnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E0F61F71 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:29:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oak.localnet (localhost.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by oak.localnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064C5C642 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:29:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from carlj@localhost) by oak.localnet (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p9M4TXwV071455; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:29:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) X-Authentication-Warning: oak.localnet: carlj set sender to carlj@peak.org using -f From: Carl Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20331.1319246965@tristatelogic.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:29:33 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20331.1319246965@tristatelogic.com> (Ronald F. Guilmette's message of "Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:29:25 -0700") Message-ID: <87aa8t6442.fsf@oak.localnet> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Help needed: sound/audio only semi-working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 04:29:38 -0000 "Ronald F. Guilmette" writes: > I've been bringing up a new amd64 box with 8.2-RELEASE. So far I've managed > to get everything installed OK, including a boatload of freshly-built ports. > I've even gotten flash10 working with firefox... well... > > Unfortunately, this is only MOSTLY working. The video works great, but for > audio all I get is absolute silence. > > The really strange thing is that after I followed all the directions here: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/sound-setup.html > > This command: > > cat /dev/random > /dev/dsp > > *does* produce quite a bit of white noise sound. However when I perform > the other officially recommended basic audio functionality test: > > cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0 play 1 > > with one of my favorite old audo CDs in the drive (AND with that special > little wire running from the back of the drive to my motherboard) all that > happens is that the CD/DVD drive apparently _does_ start to read some stuff... > as evidenced by the blinking access light in the front of the drive... but I > still get no sound out, and YouTube videos still aren't giving me any audio > even though the video seems to be playing perfectly. > > So, um, I am grasping for ideas here on how I can debug this problem furher. > I really have no idea what to do next to get this debugged. I supposed that > if nobody gives me a good suggestion, I'm gonna try swapping out that special > little wire for another one and then try swapping the CD/DVD drive for another > one if that still doesn't solve it. > > Sigh. :-( I just checked and yes, the CD/DVD drive _can_ mount a data CD > alright. No problems doing that. > > So how can it be that this works just fine: > > cat /dev/random > /dev/dsp > > even while this: > > cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0 play 1 > > causes the disk to spin up and read, but otherwise produces utter silence? > > I'm flummoxed. > > Any help would be appreciated. > > > Regards, > rfg > > > > P.S. My motherboard (w/ onboard audio) is a Gigabyte GA-M55Plus-S3G. Here > is what a get when I cat /dev/sndstat: > > FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 64bit 2009061500/amd64) > Installed devices: > pcm0: (play/rec) default > pcm1: (play/rec) > pcm2: (play/rec) > > Additional info: > > % sysctl hw.snd.default_unit > hw.snd.default_unit: 0 I also have a Gigabyte board with HDA audio, and it won't directly play CD sound either. I had already ripped all of my CDs to .ogg files, so I hadn't needed to play the CDs directly. I just tested ripping a small section of a CD using cdparanoia and it does produce a .wav audio file that can be played using sox. I also notice on my computer that mixer doesn't show any controls for CD audio. Unfortunately, I don't remember if CDs worked properly on this computer when I had Linux installed, so I don't know if the problem is FreeBSD or the motherboard. I did find that I have a program called kscd (for KDE) that will play, but I suspect that it uses digital extraction instead of playing from audio. My system uses a Gigabyte GA-MA785GPM-US2H, and the sndstat output is: FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 64bit 2009061500/amd64) Installed devices: pcm0: (play) pcm1: (play/rec) default pcm2: (play/rec) pcm3: (play/rec) Let me know if you want further information. -- Carl Johnson carlj@peak.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 05:33:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663E2106566B for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 05:33:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FFE08FC16 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 05:33:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.13) with ESMTPSA id 21160168 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:33:16 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9M5XF7D030773 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:33:16 +0700 (OMSST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p9M5XF02030772 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:33:15 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:33:15 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111022053315.GA30712@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20111021110600.GA19417@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 Subject: Re: strange behavior of restore(8) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 05:33:19 -0000 David Brodbeck wrote: > > > > I am trying to restore a UFS2 zero level dump sized about 51G. > > restore has created 6105 directories and no files at all, and now is > > waiting forever in the runnable state. > > I don't have any specific advice here, but if it were me I think my > next troubleshooting step would be to attach truss to the restore > process after it gets "stuck," to try to see exactly what it's doing. > That may give you a clue as to why it's taking so long and whether > it's actually making any progress. It's doing something like that. I should have piped the output through uniq not to clutter the list, but on second thought, I decided not to: # truss -p 18568 lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25395100 (0x1837f9c) read(4,"\M^JD\M^^\0$\0\b\^Y68.rospotrebn"...,1024) = 1024 (0x400) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) break(0xdb1b000) = 0 (0x0) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25396124 (0x183839c) read(4,"\M-)D\M^^\0 \0\b\^Uwww.SafeMarke"...,1024) = 1024 (0x400) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25397148 (0x183879c) read(4,"\M-JD\M^^\0 \0\b\^Vkonfeta007.be"...,1024) = 1024 (0x400) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) break(0xdb1c000) = 0 (0x0) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) break(0xdb1d000) = 0 (0x0) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25398172 (0x1838b9c) read(4,"\M-kD\M^^\0\^\\0\b\^Phappykidz.r"...,1024) = 1024 (0x400) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25399196 (0x1838f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25399196 (0x1838f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25399196 (0x1838f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25399196 (0x1838f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25399196 (0x1838f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25399196 (0x1838f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25399196 (0x1838f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25399196 (0x1838f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25399196 (0x1838f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25399196 (0x1838f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25399196 (0x1838f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25399196 (0x1838f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25399196 (0x1838f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25399196 (0x1838f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25399196 (0x1838f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25399196 (0x1838f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25399196 (0x1838f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25399196 (0x1838f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25399196 (0x1838f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25399196 (0x1838f9c) lseek(4,0x0,SEEK_CUR) = 25399196 (0x1838f9c) I hope this means something meaningful. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 07:32:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC767106566C for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:32:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nec556@retena.com) Received: from resmaa12.ono.com (smtp12.ono.com [62.42.230.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C7E8FC14 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:32:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from GogPortatil.retena.com (95.20.141.164) by resmaa12.ono.com (8.5.113) (authenticated as nec556@retena.com) id 4E5EF2B000DE2E53; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:32:44 +0200 Message-ID: <4E5EF2B000DE2E53@> (added by postmaster@resmaa12.ono.com) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:32:47 +0200 To: freebsd-announce@chthonic.com,freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Eduardo Morras In-Reply-To: <20111022005442.GA68656@whisperer.chthonixia.net> References: <20111022005442.GA68656@whisperer.chthonixia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Antivirus: AVG for E-mail 10.0.1411 [1522/3966] Cc: Subject: Re: Upgrading libxul, dependency on Firefox 3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:32:47 -0000 At 02:54 22/10/2011, Joe Altman wrote: >Greetings... > >I was running portupgrade on libxul and noticed it depends on Firefox >3.x. I cancelled the upgrade, because I thought FF3.x was insecure and >therefore deprecated while FF7 was recommended and secure. > >My questions: > >1) is the dependency libxul has for FF3 a security problem? > >2) is the dependency on FF3 a bug in libxul? If it is a bug, who > should receive a report: gecko@ or the Mozilla project? > >FYI: I'm pretty sure it was portsclean -D (and not me) that deleted >FF3...yet libxul tried to pull it in during the portupgrade. As far as i know, the libxul port is inside ff3. Installing libxul doesn't install ff3, only libxul. Perhaps it's an old libxul and the newr one is inside ff7, so libxul port should point there, don't know that. >Best regards, > >Joe >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 09:22:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CDE0106567B for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:22:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6727@bellsouth.net) Received: from fmailhost04.isp.att.net (fmailhost04.isp.att.net [204.127.217.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DB28FC19 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:22:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:22:23 +0000 (GMT) X-Comment: Sending client does not conform to RFC822 minimum requirements X-Comment: Date has been added by Maillennium Received: from localhost (adsl-68-210-172-143.sdf.bellsouth.net[68.210.172.143]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc04) with SMTP id <20111022092221H0400is7sie>; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:22:23 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [68.210.172.143] From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <4EA1411B.3050300@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4EA13FA9.9030405@my.gd> Message-Id: <20111022092226.5CDE0106567B@hub.freebsd.org> Cc: Damien Fleuriot Subject: Re: csup: How do I know I have correct version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:22:26 -0000 From: Damien Fleuriot : > > Maybe also I should put this releng9-supfile in a safer place where > > it won't be deleted by the next installation/upgrade? > Indeed you should. > >>From my /etc/make.conf: > SUP_UPDATE= yes > SUP= /usr/bin/csup > SUPFLAGS= -zgL 2 > SUPHOST= cvsup1.fr.freebsd.org > SUPFILE= /etc/cvsup/stable-supfile > PORTSSUPFILE= /etc/cvsup/ports-supfile > DOCSUPFILE= /etc/cvsup/doc-supfile > Then, you just have to copy the sample supfiles to /etc/cvsup/ Then how do you update the system source, ports tree or doc? Something with 'make'? 'make update' ? For ports, I run portsnap fetch update For system source, I run csup /usr/share/examples/releng9-supfile though I subsequently moved the releng9-supfile to /myconfig . from Matthew Seaman : > The file you want is /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh This is a script that > edits version information into various source code files. The bit you > need is near the top of the file -- just following line 33: > 33 TYPE="FreeBSD" > 34 REVISION="9.0" > 35 BRANCH="RC1" > 36 if [ "X${BRANCH_OVERRIDE}" != "X" ]; then > 37 BRANCH=${BRANCH_OVERRIDE} > 38 fi > 39 RELEASE="${REVISION}-${BRANCH}" > 40 VERSION="${TYPE} ${RELEASE}" > 41 SYSDIR=$(dirname $0)/.. > Unfortunately the value want is RELEASE, which is assembled from parts, > so not trivially grep'able. But you can easily see the REVISION is set > to 9.0 and BRANCH is RC1 so the whole things comes to 9.0-RC1. Simple. That's the file I was looking for, I was not familiar with that particular file name. It's easy to find a needle in the haystack when somebody points it out to me! My thanks! > > Maybe also I should put this releng9-supfile in a safer place where > > it won't be deleted by the next installation/upgrade? > No -- you shouldn't need to worry about that. The name > 'releng9-supfile' you chose doesn't match anything produced by the > system, so it won't be overwritten. (Not that you shouldn't keep a > backup somewhere -- that's only sensible.) > Hmmm.... actually you have highlighted a small omission in the > procedures for branching RELENG_9 and RELENG_9_0 -- the cvsup example > supfiles /usr/src/share/examples/{stable,standard}-supfile should be > updated to match the branch they are installed from. In your case both > of those files should use the RELENG_9 tag, but that hasn't been > commmitted yet. > Cheers > Matthew Good point. I had to make the little modification in the stable-supfile to accommodate RELENG_9 . Since my current efforts are directed toward a working FreeBSD 9.0 system, I am not currently doing anything with 10-current. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 10:45:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43FB1106566B for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:45:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075468FC0A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-104-16.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.104.16]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1D13D5FA; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:45:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p9MAjC0J001908; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:45:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:45:11 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Eduardo Morras Message-Id: <20111022124511.152f777b.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4E5EF2B000DE2E53@> References: <20111022005442.GA68656@whisperer.chthonixia.net> <4E5EF2B000DE2E53@> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading libxul, dependency on Firefox 3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:45:14 -0000 On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:32:47 +0200, Eduardo Morras wrote: > As far as i know, the libxul port is inside ff3. Installing libxul > doesn't install ff3, only libxul. Perhaps it's an old libxul and the > newr one is inside ff7, so libxul port should point there, don't know that. I'm not sure if it still applies, but in earlier Firefox version transitions (and the consideration of dependencies) some programs depending on libxul would install an outdated Firefox version. The solution has been WITH_GECKO=libxul in /etc/make.conf so only the current version of this library would have been installed in the end. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 10:49:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73A0106566C for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:49:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54FEE8FC0A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:49:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9MAnDrt007715 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:49:13 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.1 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p9MAnDrt007715 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1319280553; bh=kDD1OhLj7ZhEV/OpOXgNLuXR7TgMogG/zT0pLuw22zk=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=WspKVRFQZA127l4+e5W+oPtbL1bboHiffth96h+wS24tFltyXlVvC9DnTGjCtwpUf VbpZqzO11tia5Z7MwHdWWOctwn5Mn9XhVuIUexOjwPkcTqC9M0xyUgpGZvPRHjq3UO tdgQazJ2HLrnYUYJKMjXZW0YGBBy2nMA+MWBDY3Q= Message-ID: <4EA29FA1.2040706@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:49:05 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Mueller References: <4EA1411B.3050300@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4EA13FA9.9030405@my.gd> <201110221023.p9MAN4NW007056@smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <201110221023.p9MAN4NW007056@smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig08C45280992986CA2D4F16B9" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Damien Fleuriot , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: csup: How do I know I have correct version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:49:20 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig08C45280992986CA2D4F16B9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 22/10/2011 10:22, Thomas Mueller wrote: > From: Damien Fleuriot : >>> > >>From my /etc/make.conf: >> > SUP_UPDATE=3D yes >> > SUP=3D /usr/bin/csup >> > SUPFLAGS=3D -zgL 2 >> > SUPHOST=3D cvsup1.fr.freebsd.org >> > SUPFILE=3D /etc/cvsup/stable-supfile >> > PORTSSUPFILE=3D /etc/cvsup/ports-supfile >> > DOCSUPFILE=3D /etc/cvsup/doc-supfile >=20 >=20 >> > Then, you just have to copy the sample supfiles to /etc/cvsup/ > Then how do you update the system source, ports tree or doc? > Something with 'make'? 'make update' ? make update is the correct command. > For ports, I run > portsnap fetch update >=20 > For system source, I run=20 > csup /usr/share/examples/releng9-supfile >=20 > though I subsequently moved the releng9-supfile to /myconfig . Don't define PORTSSUPFILE in /etc/make.conf if you're using portsnap(1). Apart from anything else, typing 'make update' in /usr/src will attempt to cvsup not just the system sources but as well any of PORTS, DOC where you've defined a ...SUPFILE. In fact, without PORTSUPFILE defined in /etc/make.conf typing 'make update' in /usr/ports will invoke portsnap for you, so long as you obtained the ports tree by 'portsnap fetch extract' originally. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig08C45280992986CA2D4F16B9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6in6kACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzppACdFOMz0It5rvTtdVqTy8IyoK0v ZB4An1oZ7XaFZTZnAYGPyIw900Q+IVxm =VLWQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig08C45280992986CA2D4F16B9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 10:52:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D43106566B for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:52:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE9D8FC0A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-104-16.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.104.16]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0903D481; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:52:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p9MAq9KP001931; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:52:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:52:09 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Message-Id: <20111022125209.9ba97a1f.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20331.1319246965@tristatelogic.com> References: <20331.1319246965@tristatelogic.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help needed: sound/audio only semi-working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:52:11 -0000 On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:29:25 -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > The really strange thing is that after I followed all the directions here: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/sound-setup.html > > This command: > > cat /dev/random > /dev/dsp > > *does* produce quite a bit of white noise sound. However when I perform > the other officially recommended basic audio functionality test: > > cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0 play 1 > > with one of my favorite old audo CDs in the drive (AND with that special > little wire running from the back of the drive to my motherboard) all that > happens is that the CD/DVD drive apparently _does_ start to read some stuff... > as evidenced by the blinking access light in the front of the drive... but I > still get no sound out, and YouTube videos still aren't giving me any audio > even though the video seems to be playing perfectly. Does the Handbook mention to check your mixer settings? Make sure to try that. Use any "simple-enough" media player to play some MP3, OGG or WAV file (e. g. per xmms or whatever comes with your preferred desktop environment). Make sure you have "vol" and "pcm" up. % mixer Mixer vol is currently set to 100:100 <--- This. Mixer pcm is currently set to 84:84 <--- And this. Mixer line is currently set to 75:75 Mixer mic is currently set to 0:0 Mixer cd is currently set to 75:75 <--- This too. Mixer rec is currently set to 75:75 Mixer igain is currently set to 0:0 Mixer monitor is currently set to 75:75 Recording source: mic The problem regarding audio CDs seems to be quite "modern". I also cannot play them anymore (but I don't have that special wire installed at the moment). Audio is VIA HDA. > So, um, I am grasping for ideas here on how I can debug this problem furher. Check mixer and play "simple stuff". :-) > So how can it be that this works just fine: > > cat /dev/random > /dev/dsp > > even while this: > > cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0 play 1 > > causes the disk to spin up and read, but otherwise produces utter silence? CD audio subsystem has been "modernized". :-) > P.S. My motherboard (w/ onboard audio) is a Gigabyte GA-M55Plus-S3G. Here > is what a get when I cat /dev/sndstat: > > FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 64bit 2009061500/amd64) > Installed devices: > pcm0: (play/rec) default > pcm1: (play/rec) > pcm2: (play/rec) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 11:34:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D425106566C for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:34:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE4D8FC08 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:34:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk35 with SMTP id 35so1501151qyk.13 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 04:34:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.66.7 with SMTP id l7mr1896512qci.185.1319283246289; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 04:34:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-105-057.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.105.57]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id em9sm18884783qab.10.2011.10.22.04.34.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 22 Oct 2011 04:34:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3SQhbb0tTdz2CG4d for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:34:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:34:02 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20111022073402.1745f6dd@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20111022124511.152f777b.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20111022005442.GA68656@whisperer.chthonixia.net> <4E5EF2B000DE2E53@> <20111022124511.152f777b.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Upgrading libxul, dependency on Firefox 3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:34:07 -0000 On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:45:11 +0200 Polytropon articulated: > I'm not sure if it still applies, but in earlier Firefox > version transitions (and the consideration of dependencies) > some programs depending on libxul would install an outdated > Firefox version. The solution has been WITH_GECKO=libxul in > /etc/make.conf so only the current version of this library > would have been installed in the end. I haven't had that notation in my file in ages and I am not experiencing the problems that the OP is reporting. Perhaps if the OP gave a fuller description of his system, and perhaps a perusal of his file a solution could be more readily deduced. -- Jerry ✌ jerry+fbsd@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or ignored. Do not CC this poster. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 13:44:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E8C5106566B for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:44:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@thorshammare.org) Received: from smtprelay-b11.telenor.se (smtprelay-b11.telenor.se [62.127.194.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F568FC15 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:44:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from iph2.telenor.se (iph2.telenor.se [195.54.127.133]) by smtprelay-b11.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB86BC9A9 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:44:07 +0200 (CEST) X-SENDER-IP: [83.227.225.121] X-LISTENER: [smtp.bredband.net] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ak9DANzHok5T4+F5PGdsb2JhbAA9BoJNmH6NVRkBAQEBNzKBdQggBRwCAQowBRYCKScUDAMHFQEEEwuHdwaSapIEAY0MgzaBZoMkBKVm X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,391,1315173600"; d="scan'208,217";a="499036426" Received: from ua-83-227-225-121.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO odin.thorshammare.org) ([83.227.225.121]) by iph2.telenor.se with ESMTP; 22 Oct 2011 15:44:06 +0200 Received: from Obah (obah [192.168.1.10]) by odin.thorshammare.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9MDhqVT027075 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:43:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from admin@thorshammare.org) From: "Admin ValhallaProjectet" To: Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:43:44 +0200 Organization: The Valhalla Project Message-ID: <000001cc90c0$a0c16050$e24420f0$@org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcyQtOB72NlDknoAQZGT3DY5QlSzpw== Content-Language: sv X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at odin.thorshammare.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on odin.thorshammare.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Breakin attempt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:44:10 -0000 Hello all FreeBSD odin.thorshammare.org 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Sat Oct 22 10:14:48 CEST 2011 hasse@odin.thorshammare.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ODIN i386 Firewall PF. Blocking China and some other related countries in that region. Disabled ssh root logins Apparently, I'm under some kind of attack, for the last 3 days. Lots of attempts to ssh in as root from many different IP addresses. No bruteforce attempts. This just puzzles me. Using all these resources ? To achieve what ? Below is a one hour snip from my auth.log Nothing unusual in pflog Appreciate all ideas of how to proceed with this mather. Best regards Hasse Oct 22 12:00:19 odin sshd[14359]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from server.fabian.cz Oct 22 12:01:08 odin sshd[14365]: Address 87.105.187.194 maps to client-arsmedica-2.wroclaw.dialog.net.pl, but this does not map back to the address - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! Oct 22 12:01:09 odin sshd[14365]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 87.105.187.194 Oct 22 12:02:59 odin sshd[14422]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 87.229.7.163 Oct 22 12:03:36 odin sshd[14865]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 201.25.53.34 Oct 22 12:03:53 odin sshd[15571]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 109.237.210.147 Oct 22 12:05:18 odin sshd[18357]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 12.222.202.34 Oct 22 12:05:36 odin sshd[18375]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from mx.aysor.am Oct 22 12:05:53 odin sshd[18537]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 190.129.11.76 Oct 22 12:07:06 odin sshd[19429]: Address 80.188.13.214 maps to www.profitaxi.cz, but this does not map back to the address - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! Oct 22 12:07:06 odin sshd[19429]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 80.188.13.214 Oct 22 12:07:27 odin sshd[19542]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 85.185.180.48 Oct 22 12:08:05 odin sshd[19591]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 208.125.137.121 Oct 22 12:09:45 odin sshd[19629]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 83.14.240.10 Oct 22 12:10:53 odin sshd[19699]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 200.160.121.246 Oct 22 12:10:59 odin sshd[19702]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 151.1.183.216 Oct 22 12:11:38 odin sshd[19787]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from crm.nepinc.com Oct 22 12:12:16 odin sshd[19830]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 189.16.12.146 Oct 22 12:12:45 odin sshd[19843]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from narro.uaaan.mx Oct 22 12:14:14 odin sshd[19913]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 217.128.151.181 Oct 22 12:14:56 odin sshd[19925]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for panda.zsuvoz.cz [195.178.81.116] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! Oct 22 12:14:56 odin sshd[19925]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 195.178.81.116 Oct 22 12:16:14 odin sshd[19995]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 87.193.246.26 Oct 22 12:16:23 odin sshd[20008]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 219.94.144.230 Oct 22 12:16:39 odin sshd[20026]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 82.130.143.216 Oct 22 12:17:41 odin sshd[20073]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 87.193.246.26 Oct 22 12:17:52 odin sshd[20102]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 82.130.143.216 Oct 22 12:21:16 odin sshd[20268]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 203.141.158.120 Oct 22 12:21:34 odin sshd[20286]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 208.125.137.121 Oct 22 12:22:05 odin sshd[20326]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for 86-100-134-185-ip.balticum.lt [86.100.134.185] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! Oct 22 12:22:05 odin sshd[20326]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 86.100.134.185 Oct 22 12:22:22 odin sshd[20339]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 201.232.69.113 Oct 22 12:23:35 odin sshd[20428]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 87.229.7.163 Oct 22 12:23:58 odin sshd[20486]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 65.161.248.26 Oct 22 12:24:39 odin sshd[20605]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 210.238.91.147 Oct 22 12:25:08 odin sshd[21400]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 12.222.202.34 Oct 22 12:26:08 odin sshd[23744]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from zodiaq3d.info Oct 22 12:26:56 odin sshd[23747]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from mx.cbc-group.kz Oct 22 12:30:26 odin sshd[23752]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 190.152.145.53 Oct 22 12:30:54 odin sshd[23757]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 80.24.95.85 Oct 22 12:30:59 odin sshd[23759]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 200.183.172.2 Oct 22 12:31:13 odin sshd[23755]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from starless.com.pl Oct 22 12:31:38 odin sshd[23764]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 61.19.252.236 Oct 22 12:32:21 odin sshd[23767]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 109.237.210.147 Oct 22 12:32:29 odin sshd[23770]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 65.82.69.5 Oct 22 12:33:36 odin sshd[23785]: Address 161.200.90.2 maps to dsprl.eng.chula.ac.th, but this does not map back to the address - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! Oct 22 12:33:37 odin sshd[23785]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 161.200.90.2 Oct 22 12:34:48 odin sshd[23788]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 83.139.194.70 Oct 22 12:35:46 odin sshd[23793]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 61.19.45.119 Oct 22 12:36:20 odin sshd[23796]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for nat-div.azores.gov.pt [83.240.154.46] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! Oct 22 12:36:21 odin sshd[23796]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 83.240.154.46 Oct 22 12:36:56 odin sshd[23799]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 109.237.210.147 Oct 22 12:37:06 odin sshd[23802]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from supermodels.com Oct 22 12:38:45 odin sshd[23805]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 193.77.58.207 Oct 22 12:39:04 odin sshd[23808]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 80.26.69.233 Oct 22 12:40:53 odin sshd[23813]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from www.iitkgp.ac.in Oct 22 12:43:47 odin sshd[24680]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 213.195.75.188 Oct 22 12:44:20 odin sshd[24697]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 99.13.226.154 Oct 22 12:45:05 odin sshd[24730]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from bk19.com Oct 22 12:45:52 odin sshd[24738]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 91.191.170.146 Oct 22 12:46:01 odin sshd[24735]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 81.56.57.50 Oct 22 12:46:15 odin sshd[24743]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 217.128.151.181 Oct 22 12:46:27 odin sshd[24746]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for z-atman-ett.net.pl [193.111.37.122] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! Oct 22 12:46:28 odin sshd[24746]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 193.111.37.122 Oct 22 12:47:33 odin sshd[24749]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 202.28.37.63 Oct 22 12:48:34 odin sshd[24752]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 189.19.13.239 Oct 22 12:49:38 odin sshd[24755]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 82.228.250.163 Oct 22 12:49:46 odin sshd[24758]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for customer-201-134-39-146.uninet-ide.com.mx [201.134.39.146] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! Oct 22 12:49:46 odin sshd[24758]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 201.134.39.146 Oct 22 12:49:57 odin sshd[24761]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for 138-65-162-69.reverse.lstn.net [69.162.65.138] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! Oct 22 12:49:57 odin sshd[24761]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 69.162.65.138 Oct 22 12:50:15 odin sshd[24770]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 217.128.151.181 Oct 22 12:53:04 odin sshd[24774]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for 86-100-134-185-ip.balticum.lt [86.100.134.185] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! Oct 22 12:53:04 odin sshd[24774]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 86.100.134.185 Oct 22 12:53:28 odin sshd[24781]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 12.222.202.34 Oct 22 12:53:31 odin sshd[24784]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 109.237.210.147 Oct 22 12:55:19 odin sshd[24801]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 87.193.246.26 Oct 22 12:55:51 odin sshd[24804]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 219.94.144.230 Oct 22 12:56:24 odin sshd[24807]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 213.192.8.22 Oct 22 12:56:28 odin sshd[24810]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from server.fabian.cz Oct 22 12:57:07 odin sshd[24813]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 62.213.201.100 Oct 22 12:57:26 odin sshd[24816]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 83.18.24.58 Oct 22 12:58:03 odin sshd[24822]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 99.13.226.154 Oct 22 12:58:38 odin sshd[24825]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from crm.nepinc.com Oct 22 13:00:06 odin sshd[24846]: error: PAM: authentication error for root from 85.22.60.6 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 13:56:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27BEF106566C for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:56:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s18.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s18.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.157]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DA88FC13 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:56:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP235 ([65.55.111.137]) by blu0-omc4-s18.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 22 Oct 2011 06:56:15 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [76.182.105.57] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([76.182.105.57]) by BLU0-SMTP235.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 22 Oct 2011 06:56:13 -0700 Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3SQllc5Yvdz2CG4d for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:56:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:56:12 -0400 From: Carmel To: FreeBSD Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2011 13:56:13.0803 (UTC) FILETIME=[5C9203B0:01CC90C2] Subject: Configuring IPFW X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:56:16 -0000 I am attempting to set up a firewall using IPFW with a stateful behavior. While I have investigated how to set up these rules, I have run into conflicting opinions as to whether to all or deny "established" behavior. EXAMPLE: (preceded by a "checkstate" rule) allow tcp from any to any established Some documentation states that it should be denied and others say it should be allowed. Neither has given me a convincing reason to follow either scenario or any real documentation either for that fact. If possible, could someone with some real firewall knowledge and familiarity with IPFW please give me some advice. Thanks! -- Carmel ✌ carmel_ny@hotmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 13:58:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F45E106566C for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:58:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D314D8FC0A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:58:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [88.217.19.133] (helo=localhost.my.domain) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RHc68-0004Tu-2B; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:58:52 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9MDwsek003356; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:58:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id p9MDwrAS003355; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:58:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:58:52 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: Admin ValhallaProjectet Message-ID: <20111022135852.GA3310@tinyCurrent> References: <000001cc90c0$a0c16050$e24420f0$@org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <000001cc90c0$a0c16050$e24420f0$@org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 88.217.19.133 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Breakin attempt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:58:56 -0000 El día Saturday, October 22, 2011 a las 03:43:44PM +0200, Admin ValhallaProjectet escribió: > Hello all > > > > FreeBSD odin.thorshammare.org 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Sat Oct 22 > 10:14:48 CEST 2011 hasse@odin.thorshammare.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ODIN > i386 > > Firewall PF. > > Blocking China and some other related countries in that region. This 'rule' is interesting. What are 'other related countries in that region' exactly or as regular expression? United States? :-) > Disabled ssh root logins Disable PAM, i.e. set ChallengeResponseAuthentication to 'no'. HIH matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 14:05:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F40106564A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:05:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cjr@cruwe.de) Received: from cruwe.de (cruwe.de [188.40.164.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C41BF8FC16 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cruwe.de (unknown [127.0.0.4]) by cruwe.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57EFD2936E for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by cruwe.de (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 38C322936D; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:05:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.cruwe.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from dijkstra (p57BDFBB0.dip.t-dialin.net [87.189.251.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cruwe.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 25D8A2936A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:05:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:04:53 +0200 From: "Christopher J. Ruwe" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111022160453.35dac1f3@dijkstra> In-Reply-To: <20111021185333.7c197a2a@dijkstra> References: <20111021185333.7c197a2a@dijkstra> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/1rLdDmL7vN6lqRD_ouhCIdb"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV on mail.cruwe.de using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: trying to learn systems programming, fear I have not understood and thus messed up X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:05:13 -0000 --Sig_/1rLdDmL7vN6lqRD_ouhCIdb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:53:33 +0200 "Christopher J. Ruwe" wrote: > [...] >=20 > I have tried to follow the suggestion from the comment by modifiying > the else-statement thus: >=20 > } else { > struct passwd *trgpwd; > if (!(trgpwd =3D GETPWNAM(arg->val))) > errx(EX_DATAERR, "User %s does not exist", arg->val); > =20 > if (strcmp(a_name->val,"root") =3D=3D 0) > errx(EX_DATAERR, "can't change uid of `root' account"); > if (strcmp(trgpwd->pw_name, "root") =3D=3D 0) > warnx("WARNING: account `%s' will have a uid of 0 (superuser > access!)", pwd->pw_name); >=20 > pwd->pw_uid =3D (uid_t) (trgpwd->pw_uid); =20 > edited =3D 1; > }=20 >=20 > What happens is not what I intended. I invoke as "sudo ./pw usermod > testuser1 -u testuser2". I can get testuser2's pwd-entry by GETPWNAM > allright, but when I assign the pw_uid, so as to make testuser2's uid > the same as testuser1's and imgaining to retain all other values, ./pw > reports "pw: user 'testuser2' disappeared during update" and the > testuser2's /etc/passwd entry is replaced by testuser1's. >=20 > I fear I have not understood GETPWNAM correctly, as it seems to > replace the struct pwd as some sort of sideeffect. I could manually > set all pwd-members to the correct ones (those of testuser2), but I > fear that I have messed something up beforehand. >=20 > I am grateful for any suggestions and/or correction.=20 It seems I have indeed not understood GETPWNAM correctly. I have worked out a method which works by calling GETPWNAM twice: else { /* * operation as follows: * a_name->val is passed as usermod * arg->val is passed as -u * * first check if we do someting stupid, i.e., want * to set root uid to some other users uid or * to set some user accout's uid to root uid. * then get pwd to that of uname passed as -u . * store uid from that pwdent. * get pwd to that of uname passed as usermod * change uid of that latter uid to the one stored */ =20 if(strcmp(a_name->val,"root") =3D=3D 0) errx(EX_DATAERR, "can't change uid of `root' account"); if(strcmp(arg->val, "root") =3D=3D 0) warnx("WARNING: account `%s' will have a uid of 0 (superuser access!)", pwd->pw_name); if(!(pwd =3D GETPWNAM(arg->val))) /* -u */ errx(EX_DATAERR, "User %s does not exist", arg->val); int alias_uid =3D pwd->pw_uid;=20 if(!(pwd =3D GETPWNAM(a_name->val))) /*usermod */ errx(EX_DATAERR, "User %s does not exist", a_name->val); pwd->pw_uid =3D (uid_t) alias_uid; warnx("User %s's uid changed to %d", pwd->pw_name, pwd->pw_uid); edited =3D 1; } As I stil do not know why the latter variant of my code worked and the former does not, I would still appreciate any comment or explanation which = would help me understanding GETPWNAM and getpwnam. Thanks and cheers, --=20 Christopher J. Ruwe TZ GMT + 2 --Sig_/1rLdDmL7vN6lqRD_ouhCIdb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOos2MAAoJEJTIKW/o3iwUYOUQALnWqq2URFPsb1lZ2+iEN0vs k4Azt7/lPHUlXuU8mLm5eOR1rHrCujsTpSUm0N3aGR4z++6gGHX7GTEZyL+Shqvn mFXBIAA9ClsTOX1GfZcHVXC2PgPAbXfs4dnLmlhDxrfkvWeFDFaM4QCxeJCBcFjP 11Lgw6lHvCS7G0/x6CIWsJrE3FKAWkBLB1HTK7esBlKBc4VjaA+QCMtN0o90MsPR j8VmY10OAFaItKkzinxay/BEEuOYO5h14wv5ljL7R63uXUUpX04XWusy7DhoActl gOibI4MkH6O/YgjgGkaxmf1lnOWC6PFqcb2kY2O0Q1mIIoU8a7eUpP41Ll7TGros MxuRNQ7LYG+DYX4rBMIpPHRzOhkxp9ddNXzJfZqRReCgIOrgIJO2GN7vuYnfmPmU dZm5TSgclOjxiSyEe/lRFji26WTTGMd00Kj7Xc7EfN3My4WSDhQawDIvWjDAryJa xWtPFlhXnlteL2XdEPzeD77PvXd4p04EZWpGObMmFngzis39gBp2Y2BvyOWpkWug vHVrS2uh8VHPyN1m/zErRu81MNVMVFAhJBj87Vz/Dog0KZIrfotKZ9cmVYDcFhRh SpmZIhl+MJjhyqJ1h2Q/fbkcz8aiGHmpUTmw4mhdMBUb93nEyYCb1iFAdaNRcUgp f8xOalnXSewlkzrw/V7R =OiE0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/1rLdDmL7vN6lqRD_ouhCIdb-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 14:08:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719241065677 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:08:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6928FC15 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:08:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2612AE79F2; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:08:54 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=QuiMVzNWpn4W 1cEmXYDGKZARe1k=; b=GXcu1s1Y/K6zSLn3tiPDteCcKnkYhQwP9iAMTfMVJJzQ CLFOWYkpqRfRS7OnrQ2dCN37FoHLJxgvywSm67is3OR8PgVk0Nq6gyNI7zWMp2P4 hvkunpPp+4br+5vxTCF0foXbff0PwH6/R8kWGP/6W4u5OhQSohKYgdO4rjTqY4g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=Hsoz5O /0YjMN7OTr8uIkxhxC28csupUapvmXqfUGL9ado4Z1jPn9g3lFZr2MxMnl7c+YqP O2e72Amt72Bvk44MF1fcp9CiHZ42uLdGxa8enG2FSM/Ia0AmO22+Yy9fcrOZSxY1 0/ezNTElAKD9EBV+lFJc8ekWnAB7rurEbF8H4= Received: from [192.168.1.68] (188-220-36-32.zone11.bethere.co.uk [188.220.36.32]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2ECCE7546; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:08:53 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4EA2CE72.5030202@cran.org.uk> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:08:50 +0100 From: Bruce Cran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Admin ValhallaProjectet References: <000001cc90c0$a0c16050$e24420f0$@org> In-Reply-To: <000001cc90c0$a0c16050$e24420f0$@org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Breakin attempt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:08:55 -0000 On 22/10/2011 14:43, Admin ValhallaProjectet wrote: > Apparently, I'm under some kind of attack, for the last 3 days. > > Lots of attempts to ssh in as root from many different IP addresses. > > No bruteforce attempts. > > > > Appreciate all ideas of how to proceed with this mather. > Keep calm and carry on? I suspect that these sorts of attacks are fairly normal if you're running ssh on the standard port. I used to have lots of 'break-in attempts' before I moved the ssh server to a different port. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 14:12:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAEE91065674 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:12:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A042F8FC0C for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:12:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-104-16.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.104.16]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DACE3D26C; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:12:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p9MECgaQ002582; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:12:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:12:42 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Bruce Cran Message-Id: <20111022161242.11803f76.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4EA2CE72.5030202@cran.org.uk> References: <000001cc90c0$a0c16050$e24420f0$@org> <4EA2CE72.5030202@cran.org.uk> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Breakin attempt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:12:45 -0000 On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:08:50 +0100, Bruce Cran wrote: > I suspect that these sorts of attacks are fairly normal if you're > running ssh on the standard port. I used to have lots of 'break-in > attempts' before I moved the ssh server to a different port. Is there _any_ reason why moving from port 22 to something different is _not_ a solution? Reason why I'm asking: Moving SSH away from its default port seems to be a relatively good solution as break-in attempts concentrate on default ports. So in case a sysadmin decides to move SSH to a "hidden" location, what could be an argument against this decision? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 14:37:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83EDF1065670 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:37:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A22E8FC19 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:37:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D8CBE79F2; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:37:56 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=mail; bh= HO3S/rGiWmBPTHtXr5C7mDAboy0=; b=PLGOKvGcSkNM8o58tIW1yacJ3fFe0dO3 tg0Lm6E4aAMfoxabZ1IkdmPA55D8UVHhSDCp1U3N4Fd+nPlD3F3q/JoLdskzqtCt fNZDG+uIlLYMCFdrsYvC+Rnnjocj26XIZL3aifusr6TBU6KZPDsb3hiRKtOWmDdx EEEVJKEN75M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= mail; b=aB4s6ctWVTiVAtpGousEfSOmxG8Ej7PjEEPiSwIPiQIcTFwHTmurxX/M EzCHxt03TjuIB9uqfFwMIkzEH7bxsxDLsXge9Yc9EdH63N3oGbuoTeEa94hTsVZc OzBoNyUuznfp7xRykQ8yZr3fgmiXUQ1nFiYvUjxMWqp15zz0Rto= Received: from [192.168.1.64] (188-220-36-32.zone11.bethere.co.uk [188.220.36.32]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2CC36E7546; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:37:56 +0100 (BST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Bruce Cran In-Reply-To: <20111022161242.11803f76.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:37:55 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <85D6B8A7-9AF6-4188-BC58-F8CBF5ED9E91@cran.org.uk> References: <000001cc90c0$a0c16050$e24420f0$@org> <4EA2CE72.5030202@cran.org.uk> <20111022161242.11803f76.freebsd@edvax.de> To: Polytropon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Breakin attempt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:37:57 -0000 On 22 Oct 2011, at 15:12, Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:08:50 +0100, Bruce Cran wrote: >> I suspect that these sorts of attacks are fairly normal if you're=20 >> running ssh on the standard port. I used to have lots of 'break-in=20 >> attempts' before I moved the ssh server to a different port. >=20 > Is there _any_ reason why moving from port 22 to something > different is _not_ a solution? If you run some sort of shell server, or where many people need to login = using ssh, you'll have a bit of a support problem telling people to = select the non-default port. Also, some might consider it security = through obscurity, which is often said to be a bad thing. --=20 Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 14:51:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C261065673 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:51:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A28E8FC0A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-104-16.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.104.16]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F333D1D8; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:51:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p9MEpKsN002871; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:51:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:51:20 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Bruce Cran Message-Id: <20111022165120.c000b368.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <85D6B8A7-9AF6-4188-BC58-F8CBF5ED9E91@cran.org.uk> References: <000001cc90c0$a0c16050$e24420f0$@org> <4EA2CE72.5030202@cran.org.uk> <20111022161242.11803f76.freebsd@edvax.de> <85D6B8A7-9AF6-4188-BC58-F8CBF5ED9E91@cran.org.uk> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Breakin attempt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:51:21 -0000 On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:37:55 +0100, Bruce Cran wrote: > > On 22 Oct 2011, at 15:12, Polytropon wrote: > > > On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:08:50 +0100, Bruce Cran wrote: > >> I suspect that these sorts of attacks are fairly normal if you're > >> running ssh on the standard port. I used to have lots of 'break-in > >> attempts' before I moved the ssh server to a different port. > > > > Is there _any_ reason why moving from port 22 to something > > different is _not_ a solution? > > If you run some sort of shell server, or where many people > need to login using ssh, you'll have a bit of a support > problem telling people to select the non-default port. No problem here, as login systems are preconfigured and come with "hardcoded" settings. No "user-serviceable" parts inside. :-) > Also, some might consider it security through obscurity, > which is often said to be a bad thing. Okay, that's a pragmatic reason I do understand. But: There are no basic _technical_ reasons NOT to move the SSH system to a nonstandard port, right? I'm aware that a portscan might reveal the "hidden" SSH port, but this solution at least terminates the break-in activity on the default port (which seems to be the main target in most cases). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 14:52:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4671D1065674 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:52:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@thorshammare.org) Received: from smtprelay-b11.telenor.se (smtprelay-b11.telenor.se [62.127.194.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C10BE8FC14 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:52:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from iph1.telenor.se (iph1.telenor.se [195.54.127.132]) by smtprelay-b11.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C0ACA0D for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:52:55 +0200 (CEST) X-SENDER-IP: [83.227.225.121] X-LISTENER: [smtp.bredband.net] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvAMAKXXok5T4+F5PGdsb2JhbABDmV+BbI1VGQEBAQE3MoFuAQEBAQIBAQEBBSAmCBgLBQgDAhYBATAHGQ4BBQQIAwcDEQEBBAgHBAEKEgSHXwIGshaDNoUKBIdWihiTeA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,391,1315173600"; d="scan'208";a="500250393" Received: from ua-83-227-225-121.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO odin.thorshammare.org) ([83.227.225.121]) by iph1.telenor.se with ESMTP; 22 Oct 2011 16:52:55 +0200 Received: from Obah (obah [192.168.1.10]) by odin.thorshammare.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9MEqpG3027286; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:52:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fbsd@thorshammare.org) From: "Hasse Hansson" To: "'Matthias Apitz'" References: <000001cc90c0$a0c16050$e24420f0$@org> <20111022135852.GA3310@tinyCurrent> In-Reply-To: <20111022135852.GA3310@tinyCurrent> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:52:43 +0200 Message-ID: <000701cc90ca$43c354d0$cb49fe70$@org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcyQwsf5VwUXud4ISDuBo5VkBnSovAABmFwg Content-Language: sv X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at odin.thorshammare.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on odin.thorshammare.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: SV: Breakin attempt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:52:57 -0000 -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] P=E5 vegne af Matthias = Apitz Sendt: den 22 oktober 2011 15:59 Til: Admin ValhallaProjectet Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Emne: Re: Breakin attempt El d=C3=ADa Saturday, October 22, 2011 a las 03:43:44PM +0200, Admin ValhallaProjectet escribi=C3=B3: > Hello all >=20 > =20 >=20 > FreeBSD odin.thorshammare.org 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Sat = Oct 22 > 10:14:48 CEST 2011 hasse@odin.thorshammare.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ODIN > i386 >=20 > Firewall PF.=20 >=20 > Blocking China and some other related countries in that region.=20 This 'rule' is interesting. What are 'other related countries in that region' exactly or as regular expression? United States? :-) > Disabled ssh root logins Disable PAM, i.e. set ChallengeResponseAuthentication to 'no'. HIH matthias --=20 Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ Thank you for your answer. Well, I meant The Far East region. Without going in to details, that's = where I've received most of my spam and hack attacks from this far. Will start with changing port and see how far that will take me. Best regards Hasse.=20 _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 14:54:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3D91065693 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:54:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DECBB8FC15 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RHcyE-0008Rz-3G for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:54:46 +0200 Received: from pool-173-79-99-96.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.99.96]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:54:46 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-99-96.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:54:46 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:54:49 -0400 Lines: 52 Message-ID: References: <000001cc90c0$a0c16050$e24420f0$@org> <4EA2CE72.5030202@cran.org.uk> <20111022161242.11803f76.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-99-96.washdc.fios.verizon.net Subject: Re: Breakin attempt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:54:49 -0000 Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:08:50 +0100, Bruce Cran wrote: >> I suspect that these sorts of attacks are fairly normal if you're >> running ssh on the standard port. I used to have lots of 'break-in >> attempts' before I moved the ssh server to a different port. > > Is there _any_ reason why moving from port 22 to something > different is _not_ a solution? > > Reason why I'm asking: Moving SSH away from its default port > seems to be a relatively good solution as break-in attempts > concentrate on default ports. So in case a sysadmin decides > to move SSH to a "hidden" location, what could be an argument > against this decision? > One such relatively minor argument might be the use by external entities for the ability to connect in a standardized way. Such a client may need to connect but has no way of knowing in advance what port to use. The only readily available means for them to locate you might be DNS, with them only knowing you by hostname. I tend to discount this as they would still need some form of auth, whether a user account/password combination or a certificate. In either case, this needs to be configured in advance - so there's no reason a port number couldn't be included when communicating how to login to the third party. There is also some remote possibility that the third party has some internal (albeit brain-dead) policy of mandating the use of some software that cannot be configured to use a port other than 22. I would consider such a software to be inherently 'broken by design', and not a good enough reason for me to 'break' my system just to make them happy. After all, aren't they the ones who want to connect to me and shouldn't the responsibility be on them to do it in accordance with what I have configured? I restrict any SSH access to my systems to certificate only, with password turned off. Only a trusted few will have these certificates, and these people will know what port to use because I told them. Just changing the port to some high number non well-known will not entirely stop a port scan if said scan is walking up every single port one after another. But simply changing it to something like 42347 works wonders for knocking down about 90% of script-kiddies. I just don't see SSH as the best tool for giving anonymous remote-access to the general public of the IntarWebZ in general. If access is not anonymous there must be some admin config done previous to the access. Providing anonymous access via SSH sort of defeats the purpose for using SSH in the first place. :-) Just my $.02 - Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 14:56:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27171065688 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:56:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay06.ispgateway.de (smtprelay06.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 540AD8FC16 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [78.34.185.7] (helo=fabiankeil.de) by smtprelay06.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1RHcp4-0007Zy-3Y; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:45:18 +0200 Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:45:08 +0200 From: Fabian Keil To: "Christopher J. Ruwe" Message-ID: <20111022164508.0dcca5aa@fabiankeil.de> In-Reply-To: <20111022160453.35dac1f3@dijkstra> References: <20111021185333.7c197a2a@dijkstra> <20111022160453.35dac1f3@dijkstra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/clBAzwN7k+pWFspR8vJncnk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Df-Sender: Nzc1MDY3 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: trying to learn systems programming, fear I have not understood and thus messed up X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:56:58 -0000 --Sig_/clBAzwN7k+pWFspR8vJncnk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Christopher J. Ruwe" wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:53:33 +0200 > "Christopher J. Ruwe" wrote: >=20 > > [...] > >=20 > > I have tried to follow the suggestion from the comment by modifiying > > the else-statement thus: > >=20 > > } else { > > struct passwd *trgpwd; > > if (!(trgpwd =3D GETPWNAM(arg->val))) > > errx(EX_DATAERR, "User %s does not exist", arg->val); > > =20 > > if (strcmp(a_name->val,"root") =3D=3D 0) > > errx(EX_DATAERR, "can't change uid of `root' account"); > > if (strcmp(trgpwd->pw_name, "root") =3D=3D 0) > > warnx("WARNING: account `%s' will have a uid of 0 (superuser > > access!)", pwd->pw_name); > >=20 > > pwd->pw_uid =3D (uid_t) (trgpwd->pw_uid); =20 > > edited =3D 1; > > }=20 > >=20 > > What happens is not what I intended. I invoke as "sudo ./pw usermod > > testuser1 -u testuser2". I can get testuser2's pwd-entry by GETPWNAM > > allright, but when I assign the pw_uid, so as to make testuser2's uid > > the same as testuser1's and imgaining to retain all other values, ./pw > > reports "pw: user 'testuser2' disappeared during update" and the > > testuser2's /etc/passwd entry is replaced by testuser1's. > >=20 > > I fear I have not understood GETPWNAM correctly, as it seems to > > replace the struct pwd as some sort of sideeffect. I could manually > > set all pwd-members to the correct ones (those of testuser2), but I > > fear that I have messed something up beforehand. > >=20 > > I am grateful for any suggestions and/or correction.=20 >=20 > It seems I have indeed not understood GETPWNAM correctly. I have worked > out a method which works by calling GETPWNAM twice: >=20 > else { > /* > * operation as follows: > * a_name->val is passed as usermod > * arg->val is passed as -u > * > * first check if we do someting stupid, i.e., want > * to set root uid to some other users uid or > * to set some user accout's uid to root uid. > * then get pwd to that of uname passed as -u . > * store uid from that pwdent. > * get pwd to that of uname passed as usermod > * change uid of that latter uid to the one stored > */ > =20 > if(strcmp(a_name->val,"root") =3D=3D 0) > errx(EX_DATAERR, "can't change uid of `root' account"); >=20 > if(strcmp(arg->val, "root") =3D=3D 0) > warnx("WARNING: account `%s' will have a uid of 0 (superuser > access!)", pwd->pw_name); >=20 > if(!(pwd =3D GETPWNAM(arg->val))) /* -u */ > errx(EX_DATAERR, "User %s does not exist", arg->val); > int alias_uid =3D pwd->pw_uid;=20 >=20 > if(!(pwd =3D GETPWNAM(a_name->val))) /*usermod */ > errx(EX_DATAERR, "User %s does not exist", a_name->val); >=20 > pwd->pw_uid =3D (uid_t) alias_uid; > warnx("User %s's uid changed to %d", pwd->pw_name, pwd->pw_uid); > edited =3D 1; > } >=20 > As I stil do not know why the latter variant of my code worked and the > former does not, I would still appreciate any comment or explanation > which would help me understanding GETPWNAM and getpwnam. I'm not familiar with the code you're working with, but according to the man page getpwnam() isn't thread safe so you probably shouldn't mess with the returned pointer in the first place and only treat the one returned by the last call as valid. Did you try using getpwnam_r() instead? Fabian --Sig_/clBAzwN7k+pWFspR8vJncnk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk6i1wQACgkQBYqIVf93VJ3jSgCeKDcUdfe6BHfGGlguNJbazKc5 7+EAn1zSVJRSKblZTD9SLZSH0x2pytTN =MiUO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/clBAzwN7k+pWFspR8vJncnk-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 15:08:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791AF106567A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:08:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39AA48FC1A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:08:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1RHdBW-0008FB-VX>; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:08:31 +0200 Received: from e178012083.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.12.83] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1RHdBW-00005V-SW>; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:08:30 +0200 Message-ID: <4EA2DC6E.7050506@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:08:30 +0200 From: "Hartmann, O." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111019 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.12.83 Cc: Subject: Groupware like OX for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:08:32 -0000 I'd like to know whether the "power to serve" OS FreeBSD is also capable of hosting a groupware like OX. I want to build a grupware server and found OX really nice. Our lab's administration is using OX. I can't find equivalent software for FreeBSD, but I may lack in the right termini and so I do not find something suitable in the ports. Does anyone has suggestions? Regards, Oliver P.S. I doubt that OX is ever working for FreeBSD as a native application? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 15:10:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B931065673 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:10:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A2A8FC1F for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:10:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-104-16.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.104.16]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF563D449; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:10:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p9MFANRs002920; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:10:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:10:23 +0200 From: Polytropon To: nightrecon@hotmail.com Message-Id: <20111022171023.b3ff11c5.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <000001cc90c0$a0c16050$e24420f0$@org> <4EA2CE72.5030202@cran.org.uk> <20111022161242.11803f76.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Breakin attempt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:10:25 -0000 Thanks for your statement. On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:54:49 -0400, Michael Powell wrote: > One such relatively minor argument might be the use by external entities for > the ability to connect in a standardized way. Such a client may need to > connect but has no way of knowing in advance what port to use. The only > readily available means for them to locate you might be DNS, with them only > knowing you by hostname. This might be debatable in case of "public services", but is not a problem in a somewhat "contract-driven" service where terms of use exist, as well as instructions on how to use the service. That's why I said this argument would go to the pragmatic (or organisatoric) section, not to the technical one. :-) > I tend to discount this as they would still need some form of auth, whether > a user account/password combination or a certificate. In either case, this > needs to be configured in advance - so there's no reason a port number > couldn't be included when communicating how to login to the third party. Fully agree. > There is also some remote possibility that the third party has some internal > (albeit brain-dead) policy of mandating the use of some software that cannot > be configured to use a port other than 22. I would consider such a software > to be inherently 'broken by design', and not a good enough reason for me to > 'break' my system just to make them happy. After all, aren't they the ones > who want to connect to me and shouldn't the responsibility be on them to do > it in accordance with what I have configured? That would have been my next idea: The "problem" that "suddenly appears" when someone tries to connect to the system with a program _not_ supplied with the contract, trying :22 and complaining "it no workin!" -- that's not a problem at all: "You are not supposed to use that program or try to login that way. Please refer to the documentation on how to properly do it." It's comparable to someone trying to connect to a web server with a MUA. :-) > I restrict any SSH access to my systems to certificate only, with password > turned off. Only a trusted few will have these certificates, and these people > will know what port to use because I told them. Usable approach, although I try to educate about strong (!) passwords and strong password rules. I see certificates as the next stage of security _added_ to username/password. > Just changing the port to > some high number non well-known will not entirely stop a port scan if said > scan is walking up every single port one after another. Yes, I didn't assume the approach would _not_ show up in a portscan. :-) Still a portscan is the minority in wide-area attacks. > But simply changing > it to something like 42347 works wonders for knocking down about 90% of > script-kiddies. I thought so. The main attacks address the _default_ port, and those are mostly static, i. e. they don't try other ports or search for them. > I just don't see SSH as the best tool for giving anonymous remote-access to > the general public of the IntarWebZ in general. Oh, I was _not_ asking about anonymous access, that's what the WebTuberZ'n'Stuff'Load is for. :-) > If access is not anonymous > there must be some admin config done previous to the access. The only valid choice here. > Providing > anonymous access via SSH sort of defeats the purpose for using SSH in the > first place. :-) The words "anonymous access" and "secure shell" do contradict. My EUR 0.02. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 15:11:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C7D106566B for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:11:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@thorshammare.org) Received: from smtprelay-b12.telenor.se (smtprelay-b12.telenor.se [62.127.194.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF978FC1F for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from iph4.telenor.se (iph4.telenor.se [195.54.127.135]) by smtprelay-b12.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011E91403A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:10:57 +0200 (CEST) X-SENDER-IP: [83.227.225.121] X-LISTENER: [smtp.bredband.net] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AltDAKPcok5T4+F5PGdsb2JhbABDm0uNVRkBAQEBNzKBbgEBAQEDAQEBBSAmCBgLDQMCFgIJGA8HGQ4BBQQIAwcDEQEBBAEHBwQBChACBIdhBrI9hTGDDwSHVooYk3g X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,391,1315173600"; d="scan'208";a="1992102089" Received: from ua-83-227-225-121.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO odin.thorshammare.org) ([83.227.225.121]) by iph4.telenor.se with ESMTP; 22 Oct 2011 17:10:57 +0200 Received: from Obah (obah [192.168.1.10]) by odin.thorshammare.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9MFAsjr027351; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:10:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fbsd@thorshammare.org) From: "Hasse Hansson" To: "'Polytropon'" , "'Bruce Cran'" , "'Michael Powell'" References: <000001cc90c0$a0c16050$e24420f0$@org> <4EA2CE72.5030202@cran.org.uk> <20111022161242.11803f76.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20111022161242.11803f76.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:10:44 +0200 Message-ID: <000f01cc90cc$c8c0abe0$5a4203a0$@org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcyQxLWA17wzeE2/RjC80/VE0A1/agABZtng Content-Language: sv X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at odin.thorshammare.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on odin.thorshammare.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: SV: Breakin attempt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:11:00 -0000 -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] P=E5 vegne af Polytropon Sendt: den 22 oktober 2011 16:13 Til: Bruce Cran Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Emne: Re: Breakin attempt On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:08:50 +0100, Bruce Cran wrote: > I suspect that these sorts of attacks are fairly normal if you're=20 > running ssh on the standard port. I used to have lots of 'break-in=20 > attempts' before I moved the ssh server to a different port. Is there _any_ reason why moving from port 22 to something different is _not_ a solution? Reason why I'm asking: Moving SSH away from its default port seems to be a relatively good solution as break-in attempts concentrate on default ports. So in case a sysadmin decides to move SSH to a "hidden" location, what could be an argument against this decision? --=20 Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... Thank you all Polytropon, Matthias, Bruce and Michael for your answers. No, no reason at all to not change from port 22, and I will follow that advice. And my plan is to move away from password based ssh logins in the = future. I've been running this server for educational purposes for several = years, But this is first time I've had a "Break in attempt" going on for this = long time. It don't bother me more than cluttering up my logfiles, but I got = curious if this Attempt was originating from one person. All the Best to you all Hasse _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 15:16:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EFAD106564A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:16:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52DEF8FC0A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:16:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-104-16.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.104.16]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A623D454; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:16:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p9MFGbPo002960; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:16:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:16:37 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "Hasse Hansson" Message-Id: <20111022171637.4ef367ee.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <000f01cc90cc$c8c0abe0$5a4203a0$@org> References: <000001cc90c0$a0c16050$e24420f0$@org> <4EA2CE72.5030202@cran.org.uk> <20111022161242.11803f76.freebsd@edvax.de> <000f01cc90cc$c8c0abe0$5a4203a0$@org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SV: Breakin attempt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:16:39 -0000 On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:10:44 +0200, Hasse Hansson wrote: > It don't bother me more than cluttering up my logfiles, but I got curious if > this > Attempt was originating from one person. That's problematic... in many cases, attackers do "hijack" home PCs or corporate networks to do their "dirty work" without the actual users noticing. In such a case, you could conclude that the attacks has been originated by one person, but carried out by several ones (or, to be precise, by their PCs). Attackers explore networks and turn them into tools they use theirselves, or they sell them to others who then use them (e. g. for further exploration, SSH attacks, spamming, illegal data storage and so on). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 15:23:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D1F1065673 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:23:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443388FC14 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:23:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id p9MFNNjZ019344 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:23:23 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:23:23 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201110221523.p9MFNNjZ019344@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20111022161242.11803f76.freebsd@edvax.de> Subject: Re: Breakin attempt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:23:39 -0000 > Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:12:42 +0200 > From: Polytropon > Subject: Re: Breakin attempt > > On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:08:50 +0100, Bruce Cran wrote: > > I suspect that these sorts of attacks are fairly normal if you're > > running ssh on the standard port. I used to have lots of 'break-in > > attempts' before I moved the ssh server to a different port. > > Is there _any_ reason why moving from port 22 to something > different is _not_ a solution? > > Reason why I'm asking: Moving SSH away from its default port > seems to be a relatively good solution as break-in attempts > concentrate on default ports. So in case a sysadmin decides > to move SSH to a "hidden" location, what could be an argument > against this decision? Arguements aginst doing so are generally based on the "'security by obscurity' is not security" concept. That argument _is_ 'technically accurate'. Moving sshd to a non-standard port does _not_ do anything to make the system any more secure. Of course, as long as one understands that that _is_ the case, and is doing it for 'some other' defensible reason -- such as to eliminate logfile 'noise' from script-kiddie 'doorknob rattlers' -- doing so *is* perfectly reasonable. *I* do it on _my_ machines, expressly for the reason stated in the prior paragraph. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 15:25:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A6210656D5 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:25:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howie@thingy.com) Received: from post1.inband.network-i.net (tobago.network-i.net [212.21.96.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16CBC8FC16 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:25:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18497 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2011 14:52:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.1.1.188?) (212.21.99.52) by post2.inband.network-i.net with SMTP; 22 Oct 2011 14:52:31 -0000 Message-ID: <4EA2DA0C.1080600@thingy.com> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:58:20 +0100 From: Howard Jones User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <000001cc90c0$a0c16050$e24420f0$@org> <4EA2CE72.5030202@cran.org.uk> <20111022161242.11803f76.freebsd@edvax.de> <85D6B8A7-9AF6-4188-BC58-F8CBF5ED9E91@cran.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <85D6B8A7-9AF6-4188-BC58-F8CBF5ED9E91@cran.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Breakin attempt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:25:03 -0000 On 22/10/2011 15:37, Bruce Cran wrote: > If you run some sort of shell server, or where many people need to > login using ssh, you'll have a bit of a support problem telling people > to select the non-default port. Also, some might consider it security > through obscurity, which is often said to be a bad thing. Security through obscurity is only really a bad thing if it's your ONLY security. It doesn't hurt to make things harder for someone in addition to your other measures (strong passwords, large keys, limited network ranges etc).... Howie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 16:29:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17DC1065690 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:29:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from oproxy1-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy1.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8176B8FC14 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:29:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22034 invoked by uid 0); 22 Oct 2011 16:29:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by oproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 22 Oct 2011 16:29:33 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apotheon.com; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=Kfo6IuA7mcKVlT3DrFnV5ethzgZNO75S+YJAKOdj0DA=; b=ldQHvYJnlEFlsMPn6z6IHKkA8hrNWYEcKrxxm/Zj6sf+Qt2EoNiIVNWkzATQIgCxqeaFn+9ClDSti+L8g98TliqsB1N6eLJKrNQTZScwHd6wkNTsXB6j7Qf/d1q6AKyc; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RHeRw-0001sr-3Q for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:29:33 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:27:56 -0600 Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:27:56 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111022162756.GA20964@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <000001cc90c0$a0c16050$e24420f0$@org> <4EA2CE72.5030202@cran.org.uk> <20111022161242.11803f76.freebsd@edvax.de> <85D6B8A7-9AF6-4188-BC58-F8CBF5ED9E91@cran.org.uk> <4EA2DA0C.1080600@thingy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EA2DA0C.1080600@thingy.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Breakin attempt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:29:34 -0000 --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 03:58:20PM +0100, Howard Jones wrote: > On 22/10/2011 15:37, Bruce Cran wrote: > > If you run some sort of shell server, or where many people need to > > login using ssh, you'll have a bit of a support problem telling people > > to select the non-default port. Also, some might consider it security > > through obscurity, which is often said to be a bad thing.=20 > Security through obscurity is only really a bad thing if it's your ONLY > security. It doesn't hurt to make things harder for someone in addition > to your other measures (strong passwords, large keys, limited network > ranges etc).... Actually, "security through obscurity" is always bad. The fact, however, is that something that could be used for security through obscurity is not automatically always a security through obscurity measure. Are you using a nonstandard port assignment for security, or just to make your logs cleaner? If you realize that moving SSH to a nonstandard port will not in any way protect you from a targeted attack, and only do so to clean up logs and reduce local SSH daemon activity from pointless low-hanging fruit attacks, while using other (better) techniques to actually properly secure the box, you aren't using employing a security through obscurity plan at all. "Security through obscurity" isn't the technique; it's the purpose to which a technique is directed. If what you're doing isn't intended as a security measure, it's "something other than security through obscurity", and you shouldn't beat yourself up over it. If you have no specific need to keep SSH on 22, definitely move a public-facing SSH server to a nonstandard port, for reasons unrelated to actual intrusion security. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk6i7wwACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKWrdgCg9BMDnDoUmET/ujNc3GGUTGIu IFEAoOM619xNTxU+/OszyhQHJoRtSu9Z =i4dU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 16:35:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67CB1065673 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:35:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from oproxy8-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy8.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 880B28FC08 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:35:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8982 invoked by uid 0); 22 Oct 2011 16:35:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by oproxy8.bluehost.com with SMTP; 22 Oct 2011 16:35:56 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apotheon.com; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=J6JfpbDmOiOttmbE3CldmE2Sh+BOuIOGqwjR0+GaGiE=; b=l/HhsSMBsMCFay+0tuS5hDA9oqN0Aiz2pkTkT25IYG3DYlcaBTHPTHTESTDqEJdYxlCx8l7i9u8tOgAo6ApQBw7tek+eMMTk60Ddiy7/HnQosIngSTKsxS7Hj0SZrY58; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RHeY7-0000Mk-52 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:35:56 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:34:19 -0600 Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:34:19 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111022163419.GB20964@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20111022161242.11803f76.freebsd@edvax.de> <201110221523.p9MFNNjZ019344@mail.r-bonomi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dc+cDN39EJAMEtIO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201110221523.p9MFNNjZ019344@mail.r-bonomi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: Breakin attempt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:35:56 -0000 --dc+cDN39EJAMEtIO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 10:23:23AM -0500, Robert Bonomi wrote: >=20 > Arguements aginst doing so are generally based on the "'security by > obscurity' is not security" concept. >=20 > That argument _is_ 'technically accurate'. >=20 > Moving sshd to a non-standard port does _not_ do anything to make the=20 > system any more secure. >=20 > Of course, as long as one understands that that _is_ the case, and > is doing it for 'some other' defensible reason -- such as to eliminate > logfile 'noise' from script-kiddie 'doorknob rattlers' -- doing so > *is* perfectly reasonable. >=20 > *I* do it on _my_ machines, expressly for the reason stated in the prior > paragraph. I should have finished reading the thread before sending my own reply on a different branch of the discussion. This is (stated differently) pretty much exactly the message I meant to convey. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --dc+cDN39EJAMEtIO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk6i8IsACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKVu2wCffAz4RsZEFlHMkPqG6u1zZgGl tkQAoKTX/7qlc9RviMOtlemPEFM2GDqU =nZpD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dc+cDN39EJAMEtIO-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 16:44:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE781065673 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:44:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander.kapshuk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD1B8FC08 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:44:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkbzu17 with SMTP id zu17so8012321bkb.13 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:44:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-forwarded-message-id:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=61wNYlrQO3gvRJTjIHWHmA8VA7WhSC5UDtrOJVu34gg=; b=biYJXXaCtURxq8eZZAMi52K3zSsWvnpDE35jVNsS0A2745clNmvdnxHocJHjnMrvsP Zeyx9cWS+DA60ejmPUXac2AY4OyNjoB9zkEQtM13HHH31p+8fkVVHWY8fDetE/5kDAYw RoR9DjejYFmgCB104KhGi+xeyRvWc53Li+Fs4= Received: by 10.223.5.201 with SMTP id 9mr33170253faw.5.1319299998720; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:13:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (93-127-96-97.static.vega-ua.net. [93.127.96.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q11sm29768759fad.20.2011.10.22.09.13.17 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:13:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4EA2EB9C.8070904@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 19:13:16 +0300 From: Alexander Kapshuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111014 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4EA2BFD9.6040200@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4EA2BFD9.6040200@gmail.com> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <4EA2BFD9.6040200@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Fwd: re: thefish-0.6.6_5 is marked as broken: does not build [FreeBSD9.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:44:42 -0000 howdy, when attempting to build x11/gnome2-power-tools from ports on my FreeBSD9.0 desktop, the package failed to build spitting out the error message below: gnome2-power-tools-2.32.1_2 depends on executable: thefish - not found ===> Verifying install for thefish in /usr/ports/sysutils/thefish ===> thefish-0.6.6_5 is marked as broken: does not build. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/thefish. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/gnome2-power-tools :; uname -a FreeBSD localhost 9.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3 #0: Sat Sep 24 20:46:57 UTC 2011 root@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 is there a fix for this? thanks. Alexander Kapshuk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 16:51:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9FF106566B for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:51:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=0269ed33c5=johnl@iecc.com) Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [64.57.183.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30438FC08 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18952 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2011 16:25:10 -0000 Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 22 Oct 2011 16:25:10 -0000 Date: 22 Oct 2011 16:24:48 -0000 Message-ID: <20111022162448.5020.qmail@joyce.lan> From: "John Levine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Updating emacs fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:51:52 -0000 For at least several weeks, attempts to rebuild emacs from ports fails with an odd linker error saying it can't find symbols in the termcap library. I poked around a little, the makefile does include the appropriate library and adding it again at the end of the line in the makefile didn't help. This is on 8.2, building it with no nonstandard options I'm aware of. Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 16:54:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7183D1065675 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:54:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cjr@cruwe.de) Received: from cruwe.de (cruwe.de [188.40.164.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C390D8FC15 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:54:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cruwe.de (unknown [127.0.0.4]) by cruwe.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9033C2964E for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:54:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by cruwe.de (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 670932964C; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:54:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.cruwe.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from dijkstra (p57BDFBB0.dip.t-dialin.net [87.189.251.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cruwe.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04EC429647; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:54:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 18:54:15 +0200 From: "Christopher J. Ruwe" To: Fabian Keil Message-ID: <20111022185415.25c76aa1@dijkstra> In-Reply-To: <20111022164508.0dcca5aa@fabiankeil.de> References: <20111021185333.7c197a2a@dijkstra> <20111022160453.35dac1f3@dijkstra> <20111022164508.0dcca5aa@fabiankeil.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/i_Peww_JkuUJ+X7Usz89t1h"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV on mail.cruwe.de using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: trying to learn systems programming, fear I have not understood and thus messed up X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:54:28 -0000 --Sig_/i_Peww_JkuUJ+X7Usz89t1h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:45:08 +0200 Fabian Keil wrote: > "Christopher J. Ruwe" wrote: >=20 > > On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:53:33 +0200 > > "Christopher J. Ruwe" wrote: > >=20 > > > [...] > > >=20 > > > I have tried to follow the suggestion from the comment by > > > modifiying the else-statement thus: > > >=20 > > > } else { > > > struct passwd *trgpwd; > > > if (!(trgpwd =3D GETPWNAM(arg->val))) > > > errx(EX_DATAERR, "User %s does not exist", arg->val); > > > =20 > > > if (strcmp(a_name->val,"root") =3D=3D 0) > > > errx(EX_DATAERR, "can't change uid of `root' account"); > > > if (strcmp(trgpwd->pw_name, "root") =3D=3D 0) > > > warnx("WARNING: account `%s' will have a uid of 0 (superuser > > > access!)", pwd->pw_name); > > >=20 > > > pwd->pw_uid =3D (uid_t) (trgpwd->pw_uid); =20 > > > edited =3D 1; > > > }=20 > > >=20 > > > What happens is not what I intended. I invoke as "sudo ./pw > > > usermod testuser1 -u testuser2". I can get testuser2's pwd-entry > > > by GETPWNAM allright, but when I assign the pw_uid, so as to make > > > testuser2's uid the same as testuser1's and imgaining to retain > > > all other values, ./pw reports "pw: user 'testuser2' disappeared > > > during update" and the testuser2's /etc/passwd entry is replaced > > > by testuser1's. > > >=20 > > > I fear I have not understood GETPWNAM correctly, as it seems to > > > replace the struct pwd as some sort of sideeffect. I could > > > manually set all pwd-members to the correct ones (those of > > > testuser2), but I fear that I have messed something up beforehand. > > >=20 > > > I am grateful for any suggestions and/or correction.=20 > >=20 > > It seems I have indeed not understood GETPWNAM correctly. I have > > worked out a method which works by calling GETPWNAM twice: > >=20 > > else { > > /* > > * operation as follows: > > * a_name->val is passed as usermod > > * arg->val is passed as -u > > * > > * first check if we do someting stupid, i.e., want > > * to set root uid to some other users uid or > > * to set some user accout's uid to root uid. > > * then get pwd to that of uname passed as -u . > > * store uid from that pwdent. > > * get pwd to that of uname passed as usermod > > * change uid of that latter uid to the one stored > > */ > > =20 > > if(strcmp(a_name->val,"root") =3D=3D 0) > > errx(EX_DATAERR, "can't change uid of `root' account"); > >=20 > > if(strcmp(arg->val, "root") =3D=3D 0) > > warnx("WARNING: account `%s' will have a uid of 0 (superuser > > access!)", pwd->pw_name); > >=20 > > if(!(pwd =3D GETPWNAM(arg->val))) /* -u */ > > errx(EX_DATAERR, "User %s does not exist", arg->val); > > int alias_uid =3D pwd->pw_uid;=20 > >=20 > > if(!(pwd =3D GETPWNAM(a_name->val))) /*usermod */ > > errx(EX_DATAERR, "User %s does not exist", a_name->val); > >=20 > > pwd->pw_uid =3D (uid_t) alias_uid; > > warnx("User %s's uid changed to %d", pwd->pw_name, > > pwd->pw_uid); edited =3D 1; > > } > >=20 > > As I stil do not know why the latter variant of my code worked and > > the former does not, I would still appreciate any comment or > > explanation which would help me understanding GETPWNAM and getpwnam. >=20 > I'm not familiar with the code you're working with, > but according to the man page getpwnam() isn't thread > safe so you probably shouldn't mess with the returned > pointer in the first place and only treat the one > returned by the last call as valid. >=20 > Did you try using getpwnam_r() instead? >=20 > Fabian You are quite right, GETPWNAM() is a macro to getpwnam(), which is not thread safe. GETPWNAM() is called throughout the code of pw and pw itself is not threaded, so it should not matter whether the functions called are thread-safe or not. I am not completely sure on my last statement though. Do you have other experience regarding this topic? Anyways, thanks and cheers, --=20 Christopher J. Ruwe TZ GMT + 2 --Sig_/i_Peww_JkuUJ+X7Usz89t1h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOovU9AAoJEJTIKW/o3iwULK0P/0yxEiCqiXb8Tr+APOvJ7sIB uR3JowxukyY2k8HaIjzQ5FEEieFjrH8/egcBPA5EPz9cTVO1aZieVXljb7s51TVb uE7+vRifybYJrTL2NPiLP8xCdEc5S93isOjKcViSWW0anFgO2+QSnKDBhRe1trP9 MMEPidCQ1WrKy3JCHJ+10Wk8MwttuE04n+dET+66lqXRcXPyvRzuVTBIufFrXVIF 9+Nx1z/bi3BG228mCYfkidS7kFWNM7tNVDXIwqekU8PWYPoCVMaOWclHSfRYEqcK 0yITYITV7EYIQxG4wjAcNrqHsNgaH5CsK7HpyzKP6CE3gG5zSqMoHWV5L6QdwG7f AOTcYxAvpBd5IzMmiHXDfRvIP6XDms5SHpM4e+DItWnSc/1bF4bzw1wt25dv9hKI BIFX9+wGPDDUXXa3hs8Ijns0oWijJyTd7ZjvOuq/Bz+wuTzKIlYAKaCOCJLcGBDO W1Z2azIMt7Ef/Yn73GC02lLbCneVS55rSsg6v3QCH6wMrMe6a1CN1KDJLUkmKjFx ixHDqY1TvIrrnDjYZBjZo3LBwI5z57HuLkBNZklXq3YgzTnLpp/RAuNw9LZyAssj OXVWlQl2STcWhKvHyScJssWDI9HKhc4ZDRYNjoh7yqIILDuZP0fV64gMrJWesJYQ H5EhEIk/q13zRFdsPv7y =Np8/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/i_Peww_JkuUJ+X7Usz89t1h-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 16:54:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DEDD10656B6 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:54:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dalescott@shaw.ca) Received: from idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca (idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012E48FC16 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pd3ml3so-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.141.149]) by pd4mo1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 22 Oct 2011 10:26:06 -0600 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=svA9syYi2VW8WjUw5Fmdp5V1toRmC2VQL6MasMQUDjw= c=1 sm=1 a=GbmakCcTSMMA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=skKjmG/OZnBOBO9jaVyiwQ==:17 a=5mcg790sAAAA:8 a=hDRs69GfbWEzr8HYdrUA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Received: from unknown (HELO HPdv9000) ([70.73.53.231]) by pd3ml3so-dmz.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 22 Oct 2011 10:26:05 -0600 From: "Dale Scott" To: "'Hartmann, O.'" , References: <4EA2DC6E.7050506@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <4EA2DC6E.7050506@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:26:10 -0600 Message-ID: <006401cc90d7$4f4f30a0$eded91e0$@shaw.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-index: AQKMQLVR9I0Ookjf8iPmaTgA6vNXpZQJKuhg Content-language: en-us Cc: Subject: RE: Groupware like OX for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:54:31 -0000 > I'd like to know whether the "power to serve" OS FreeBSD is also capable of > hosting a groupware like OX. I want to build a grupware server and found OX > really nice. Our lab's administration is using OX. Googling "open-xchange freebsd" turns up a few circa-2005 tutorials and quite a bit of discussion. Dale --- Transparency with Trust http://www.dalescott.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 16:55:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D33106566B for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:55:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C168FC1A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:55:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so6962991wwi.31 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:55:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HyhGizZdEYMAcyAb28ikVRigOMS2ceAo7IhCMjWUCPQ=; b=FolDYuznmvBtQaqVu/efWoEiDFlVIhzmTplpP3abEb3nUhHxKb/4dymGiq/z0JR63P wqbTWutvXuwAV+OqW2yobyZWyidthvvRtZ+4tbDPKSWSe226TLitaBWx32+y9CefLSkG AA9eCnMgtWlN3SINdx76cKiaybTTVl8m0j/mY= Received: by 10.227.120.205 with SMTP id e13mr6934203wbr.98.1319302502790; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:55:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ei16sm28479338wbb.21.2011.10.22.09.55.00 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:54:56 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111022175456.0e7afccc@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Configuring IPFW X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:55:04 -0000 On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:56:12 -0400 Carmel wrote: > I am attempting to set up a firewall using IPFW with a stateful > behavior. > > While I have investigated how to set up these rules, I have run into > conflicting opinions as to whether to all or deny "established" > behavior. > > EXAMPLE: (preceded by a "checkstate" rule) > > allow tcp from any to any established > > > Some documentation states that it should be denied and others say it > should be allowed. Neither has given me a convincing reason to follow > either scenario or any real documentation either for that fact. Normally if the rules are stateless you would allow established tcp packets, but would deny them with stateful rules. In the latter case, established traffic would be passed by the check-state From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 16:56:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545C31065758 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:56:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98DD8FC1A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:56:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so6963794wwi.31 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:56:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.14.29 with SMTP id c29mr1051234wec.13.1319302575942; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.81.193 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:56:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20111022161242.11803f76.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <000001cc90c0$a0c16050$e24420f0$@org> <4EA2CE72.5030202@cran.org.uk> <20111022161242.11803f76.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:56:15 -0700 Message-ID: From: Michael Sierchio To: Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Bruce Cran , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Breakin attempt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:56:17 -0000 On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Polytropon wrote: > Is there _any_ reason why moving from port 22 to something > different is _not_ a solution? > > Reason why I'm asking: Moving SSH away from its default port > seems to be a relatively good solution as break-in attempts > concentrate on default ports. So in case a sysadmin decides > to move SSH to a "hidden" location, what could be an argument > against this decision? Moving SSH to another port doesn't add appreciably to security, but it reduces the noise in the logs. ;-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 17:09:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0336106564A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:09:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmfepo203.cox.net (eastrmfepo203.cox.net [68.230.241.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ECB78FC08 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:09:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo209.cox.net ([68.230.241.224]) by eastrmfepo203.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20111022170903.JTPG3769.eastrmfepo203.cox.net@eastrmimpo209.cox.net>; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:09:03 -0400 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([98.164.86.236]) by eastrmimpo209.cox.net with bizsmtp id nt921h00B55wwzE02t933P; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:09:03 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020209.4EA2F8AF.0050,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=+K7zL980dhMm8KTqw6h5K0Lu41yfO7y+LPnYGiWxd/o= c=1 sm=1 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=uAbGmPAyUfLL1M3oYAsfuA==:17 a=69EAbJreAAAA:8 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=2qP8ZJ7foOG8AdM8kNkA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=EfJqPEOeqlMA:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=uAbGmPAyUfLL1M3oYAsfuA==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9MH92jn021433; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:09:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:08:56 -0500 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20111022120856.3eb392e3@cox.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: carmel_ny@hotmail.com Subject: Re: Configuring IPFW X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:09:09 -0000 On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:56:12 -0400 Carmel wrote: > I am attempting to set up a firewall using IPFW with a stateful > behavior. > > While I have investigated how to set up these rules, I have run into > conflicting opinions as to whether to all or deny "established" > behavior. > > EXAMPLE: (preceded by a "checkstate" rule) > > allow tcp from any to any established > > > Some documentation states that it should be denied and others say it > should be allowed. Neither has given me a convincing reason to follow > either scenario or any real documentation either for that fact. > > If possible, could someone with some real firewall knowledge and > familiarity with IPFW please give me some advice. > > Thanks! > Well, assuming that you're only allowing the connections you actually want to be be established to be setup in the first place, then the logical thing is to then allow any already established connections. All of your tcp "allow" rules should include the setup keyword, as well as keep-state. This way, only connections that are doing a first-time setup will be allowed, and their state will be remembered, for later checking using the check-state keyword. In other words, create setup/keep-state rules for all tcp connections you want to allow, and deny the rest. Just be sure the check-state and established rules precede the deny rules. Similarly, for udp rules, be sure to include the keep-state (but not setup) keyword. Hope this makes sense. :-) -- Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 17:09:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4FF51065673 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:09:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F1B8FC1D for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:09:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi40 with SMTP id 40so6367750wyi.13 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:09:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.42.136 with SMTP id s8mr2638621wbe.28.1319303392342; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:09:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.81.193 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:09:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20111022175456.0e7afccc@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <20111022175456.0e7afccc@gumby.homeunix.com> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:09:52 -0700 Message-ID: From: Michael Sierchio To: RW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Configuring IPFW X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:09:54 -0000 On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 9:54 AM, RW wrote: > Normally if the rules are stateless you would allow established tcp > packets, but would deny them with stateful rules. In the latter case, > established traffic would be passed by the check-state You need to pay attention to direction as well. Suppose you wanted to permit outbound TCP connections using stateful rules. If em0 is the outside interface of your firewall If you're using stateful rules, you would do something like this: ipfw add 1000 check-state ipfw add 2500 allow tcp from any to any out xmit em0 setup keep-state ipfw add 2550 deny tcp from any to any The check-state rule checks for established dynamic flows, 2500 permits outbound TCP with SYN,!ACK (the first part of the 3-way handshake), and 2550 denies all TCP traffic that is not permitted. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 17:11:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D962E106564A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:11:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A73E68FC18 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.52]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0DDCA70304 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:11:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 22021 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2011 17:11:34 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 7678, pid: 19980, t: 0.1553s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:13513 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 22 Oct 2011 17:11:34 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165142E0D9; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:11:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id DBAA83983C; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:11:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Polytropon References: <000001cc90c0$a0c16050$e24420f0$@org> <4EA2CE72.5030202@cran.org.uk> <20111022161242.11803f76.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:11:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20111022161242.11803f76.freebsd@edvax.de> (Polytropon's message of "Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:12:42 +0200") Message-ID: <444nz17xz4.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Breakin attempt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:11:36 -0000 Polytropon writes: > On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:08:50 +0100, Bruce Cran wrote: >> I suspect that these sorts of attacks are fairly normal if you're >> running ssh on the standard port. I used to have lots of 'break-in >> attempts' before I moved the ssh server to a different port. > > Is there _any_ reason why moving from port 22 to something > different is _not_ a solution? > > Reason why I'm asking: Moving SSH away from its default port > seems to be a relatively good solution as break-in attempts > concentrate on default ports. So in case a sysadmin decides > to move SSH to a "hidden" location, what could be an argument > against this decision? Connecting from behind other people's paranoid firewalls gets difficult on other ports. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 17:14:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C601065678 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:14:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78DC18FC0A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9MHEKhG013421 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 18:14:20 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.1 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p9MHEKhG013421 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1319303660; bh=A3Zuzj9HY2JpFruy74/+u4pkaJu4DR2DtAjjUxXjUxs=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc; b=yoziQ3Lg07CAvY58njGkCSwgM2WByFPWra7KQZB0Dz2tv/Awk1g14o//JZnq5TyKZ pxRkQXDK2hDycH70caG/EsqEIA0Ncg5/MJMG0490Q471G8tCjMNDdXTXlMoPmR/zBU KCIVhb3uNimwZ7yFrD2GE6iw0fzsl2D9oz9VAfxU= Message-ID: <4EA2F9E3.3050903@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 18:14:11 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20111022162448.5020.qmail@joyce.lan> In-Reply-To: <20111022162448.5020.qmail@joyce.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig962358629D3F5396247779AE" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: Updating emacs fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:14:24 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig962358629D3F5396247779AE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 22/10/2011 17:24, John Levine wrote: > For at least several weeks, attempts to rebuild emacs from ports fails > with an odd linker error saying it can't find symbols in the termcap > library. I poked around a little, the makefile does include the > appropriate library and adding it again at the end of the line in > the makefile didn't help. >=20 > This is on 8.2, building it with no nonstandard options I'm aware of. No errors are on record for building editors/emacs according to pointyhat/portsmon: http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=3Deditors&portname=3D= emacs&wildcard=3D Therefore I diagnose something specific to your system is broken. Unfortunately your report is too lacking in detail to be able to say anything useful that might help you to fix the problem. We'd need to see= * Your choice of options for the port (ie. 'make showconfig' output) * A complete build log showing the problem occurring. (ie 'make clean build' output) * The config.log from $WRKSRC showing what autoconf did. That should give a fighting chance of being able to work out what's wrong= =2E Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig962358629D3F5396247779AE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6i+esACgkQ8Mjk52CukIz4CwCfTYEYNYTu+FmchOrq5ZAdjyzd CeYAn176AcwiBy7KZ/uNORRa08IXVWfy =YwJo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig962358629D3F5396247779AE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 17:14:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B163106567C for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:14:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E9C8FC21 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:14:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.49]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4828A70346 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:14:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 24812 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2011 17:14:52 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 25491, pid: 17511, t: 0.1590s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 22 Oct 2011 17:14:52 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13ED62E0DA; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:14:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3BB293983C; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:14:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <000001cc90c0$a0c16050$e24420f0$@org> <4EA2CE72.5030202@cran.org.uk> <20111022161242.11803f76.freebsd@edvax.de> <444nz17xz4.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:14:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <444nz17xz4.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> (Lowell Gilbert's message of "Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:11:27 -0400") Message-ID: <44zkgt6j95.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Polytropon Subject: Re: Breakin attempt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:14:54 -0000 Lowell Gilbert writes: > Polytropon writes: > >> On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:08:50 +0100, Bruce Cran wrote: >>> I suspect that these sorts of attacks are fairly normal if you're >>> running ssh on the standard port. I used to have lots of 'break-in >>> attempts' before I moved the ssh server to a different port. >> >> Is there _any_ reason why moving from port 22 to something >> different is _not_ a solution? >> >> Reason why I'm asking: Moving SSH away from its default port >> seems to be a relatively good solution as break-in attempts >> concentrate on default ports. So in case a sysadmin decides >> to move SSH to a "hidden" location, what could be an argument >> against this decision? > > Connecting from behind other people's paranoid firewalls gets difficult > on other ports. And, yes, I realize this isn't a problem for most people, but I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one who runs into it, either. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 17:17:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE441065670 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:17:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D1DE8FC12 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:17:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwn22 with SMTP id 22so2066691wwn.1 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:17:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.159.81 with SMTP id r59mr1041642wek.28.1319303869039; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:17:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.81.193 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:17:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20111022120856.3eb392e3@cox.net> References: <20111022120856.3eb392e3@cox.net> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:17:49 -0700 Message-ID: From: Michael Sierchio To: "Conrad J. Sabatier" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: carmel_ny@hotmail.com, FreeBSD Subject: Re: Configuring IPFW X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:17:51 -0000 On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > Similarly, for udp rules, be sure to include the keep-state (but not > setup) keyword. > RIght - if you're just protecting a single host, for example, your ruleset might be something like ipfw add 1000 allow ip from any to any via lo0 ipfw add 1100 check-state ipfw add 1200 allow tcp from me to any setup keep-state ipfw add 1300 allow udp from me to any keep-state # stateful rules for ICMP sometimes work, and sometimes don't - traceroute for example ipfw add 1400 allow icmp from me to any ipfw add 1500 allow icmp from any to me icmptypes 0,3,8,11 # if you don't want to permit inbound echo requests, then use the next one instead # ipfw add 1500 allow icmp from any to me icmptypes 0,3,11 ipfw add 1600 deny ip from any to any There are sysctl variables you may want to look at: sysctl net.inet.ip.fw These are described in the man page, and some of these affect the behavior of dynamic rule sets. You generally don't need to worry about them for outbound connections, but they are critical for inbound connections - it's trivial to DOS a firewall with dynamic rules. Regards, M From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 17:19:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E8EE106566B for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:19:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pulley@dabus.com) Received: from aegir.dabus.com (aegir.dabus.com [173.14.229.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574F98FC1C for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:19:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aegir.dabus.com (localhost.dabus.com [127.0.0.1]) by aegir.dabus.com (Processor) with ESMTP id 783305F301 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:56:33 -0600 (MDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; b=onwojwyaDlKseZYouau6/Ien1wiKPIW6C4SDxWhk4NvOYe1iV2SSJxDIMZ2pkhXtgVhzj88tHK42dea9RkSGpqtSKK1AgTGaLvV9nG3aUPjdwRSnZ8ZziE2M79f/76bR21hoSt4arobCgTmUL/aDRINs4DoIs56xheIslSx2rGI=; c=nofws; d=dabus.com; q=dns; s=aegir1 Received: from [192.168.10.25] (unknown [192.168.10.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aegir.dabus.com (Dabus) with ESMTPSA id F15CE5F2CD for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:56:31 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:56:31 -0600 From: Eric S Pulley To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <544D62C65A99325660F7D6D3@alcor.dabus.com> In-Reply-To: <000001cc90c0$a0c16050$e24420f0$@org> References: <000001cc90c0$a0c16050$e24420f0$@org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: Breakin attempt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:19:41 -0000 Actually this looks like fairly normal white noise you can expect on a public facing ssh server. There are a lot of bots out there, looking for another box to own. If you're running PF put in something like the following. block in quick log from {} . . . pass in log on $ext_if proto tcp to ($ext_if) port { ssh } \ flags S/SA modulate state \ (max-src-conn-rate 3/60, overload flush global) And remember that that you need to wait a minute if you (for some reason) make more than x (3 in this case) connections from the same source in a minutes time. Tune as needed. The disable root logins and only use keys if you can, strong PWs if you can't and you should be good. --On Saturday, October 22, 2011 03:43:44 PM +0200 Admin ValhallaProjectet wrote: > Hello all > > > > FreeBSD odin.thorshammare.org 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Sat Oct 22 > 10:14:48 CEST 2011 > hasse@odin.thorshammare.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ODIN i386 > > Firewall PF. > > Blocking China and some other related countries in that region. > Disabled ssh root logins > > > > Apparently, I'm under some kind of attack, for the last 3 days. > > Lots of attempts to ssh in as root from many different IP addresses. > > No bruteforce attempts. > > This just puzzles me. Using all these resources ? To achieve what ? > > Below is a one hour snip from my auth.log > > Nothing unusual in pflog > > Appreciate all ideas of how to proceed with this mather. > > > > Best regards Hasse > > > > Oct 22 12:00:19 odin sshd[14359]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from server.fabian.cz > > Oct 22 12:01:08 odin sshd[14365]: Address 87.105.187.194 maps to > client-arsmedica-2.wroclaw.dialog.net.pl, but this does not map back to > the address - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! > > Oct 22 12:01:09 odin sshd[14365]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 87.105.187.194 > > Oct 22 12:02:59 odin sshd[14422]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 87.229.7.163 > > Oct 22 12:03:36 odin sshd[14865]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 201.25.53.34 > > Oct 22 12:03:53 odin sshd[15571]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 109.237.210.147 > > Oct 22 12:05:18 odin sshd[18357]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 12.222.202.34 > > Oct 22 12:05:36 odin sshd[18375]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from mx.aysor.am > > Oct 22 12:05:53 odin sshd[18537]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 190.129.11.76 > > Oct 22 12:07:06 odin sshd[19429]: Address 80.188.13.214 maps to > www.profitaxi.cz, but this does not map back to the address - POSSIBLE > BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! > > Oct 22 12:07:06 odin sshd[19429]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 80.188.13.214 > > Oct 22 12:07:27 odin sshd[19542]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 85.185.180.48 > > Oct 22 12:08:05 odin sshd[19591]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 208.125.137.121 > > Oct 22 12:09:45 odin sshd[19629]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 83.14.240.10 > > Oct 22 12:10:53 odin sshd[19699]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 200.160.121.246 > > Oct 22 12:10:59 odin sshd[19702]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 151.1.183.216 > > Oct 22 12:11:38 odin sshd[19787]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from crm.nepinc.com > > Oct 22 12:12:16 odin sshd[19830]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 189.16.12.146 > > Oct 22 12:12:45 odin sshd[19843]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from narro.uaaan.mx > > Oct 22 12:14:14 odin sshd[19913]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 217.128.151.181 > > Oct 22 12:14:56 odin sshd[19925]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for > panda.zsuvoz.cz [195.178.81.116] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! > > Oct 22 12:14:56 odin sshd[19925]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 195.178.81.116 > > Oct 22 12:16:14 odin sshd[19995]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 87.193.246.26 > > Oct 22 12:16:23 odin sshd[20008]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 219.94.144.230 > > Oct 22 12:16:39 odin sshd[20026]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 82.130.143.216 > > Oct 22 12:17:41 odin sshd[20073]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 87.193.246.26 > > Oct 22 12:17:52 odin sshd[20102]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 82.130.143.216 > > Oct 22 12:21:16 odin sshd[20268]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 203.141.158.120 > > Oct 22 12:21:34 odin sshd[20286]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 208.125.137.121 > > Oct 22 12:22:05 odin sshd[20326]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for > 86-100-134-185-ip.balticum.lt [86.100.134.185] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN > ATTEMPT! > > Oct 22 12:22:05 odin sshd[20326]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 86.100.134.185 > > Oct 22 12:22:22 odin sshd[20339]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 201.232.69.113 > > Oct 22 12:23:35 odin sshd[20428]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 87.229.7.163 > > Oct 22 12:23:58 odin sshd[20486]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 65.161.248.26 > > Oct 22 12:24:39 odin sshd[20605]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 210.238.91.147 > > Oct 22 12:25:08 odin sshd[21400]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 12.222.202.34 > > Oct 22 12:26:08 odin sshd[23744]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from zodiaq3d.info > > Oct 22 12:26:56 odin sshd[23747]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from mx.cbc-group.kz > > Oct 22 12:30:26 odin sshd[23752]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 190.152.145.53 > > Oct 22 12:30:54 odin sshd[23757]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 80.24.95.85 > > Oct 22 12:30:59 odin sshd[23759]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 200.183.172.2 > > Oct 22 12:31:13 odin sshd[23755]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from starless.com.pl > > Oct 22 12:31:38 odin sshd[23764]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 61.19.252.236 > > Oct 22 12:32:21 odin sshd[23767]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 109.237.210.147 > > Oct 22 12:32:29 odin sshd[23770]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 65.82.69.5 > > Oct 22 12:33:36 odin sshd[23785]: Address 161.200.90.2 maps to > dsprl.eng.chula.ac.th, but this does not map back to the address - > POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! > > Oct 22 12:33:37 odin sshd[23785]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 161.200.90.2 > > Oct 22 12:34:48 odin sshd[23788]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 83.139.194.70 > > Oct 22 12:35:46 odin sshd[23793]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 61.19.45.119 > > Oct 22 12:36:20 odin sshd[23796]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for > nat-div.azores.gov.pt [83.240.154.46] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! > > Oct 22 12:36:21 odin sshd[23796]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 83.240.154.46 > > Oct 22 12:36:56 odin sshd[23799]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 109.237.210.147 > > Oct 22 12:37:06 odin sshd[23802]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from supermodels.com > > Oct 22 12:38:45 odin sshd[23805]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 193.77.58.207 > > Oct 22 12:39:04 odin sshd[23808]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 80.26.69.233 > > Oct 22 12:40:53 odin sshd[23813]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from www.iitkgp.ac.in > > Oct 22 12:43:47 odin sshd[24680]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 213.195.75.188 > > Oct 22 12:44:20 odin sshd[24697]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 99.13.226.154 > > Oct 22 12:45:05 odin sshd[24730]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from bk19.com > > Oct 22 12:45:52 odin sshd[24738]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 91.191.170.146 > > Oct 22 12:46:01 odin sshd[24735]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 81.56.57.50 > > Oct 22 12:46:15 odin sshd[24743]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 217.128.151.181 > > Oct 22 12:46:27 odin sshd[24746]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for > z-atman-ett.net.pl [193.111.37.122] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! > > Oct 22 12:46:28 odin sshd[24746]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 193.111.37.122 > > Oct 22 12:47:33 odin sshd[24749]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 202.28.37.63 > > Oct 22 12:48:34 odin sshd[24752]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 189.19.13.239 > > Oct 22 12:49:38 odin sshd[24755]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 82.228.250.163 > > Oct 22 12:49:46 odin sshd[24758]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for > customer-201-134-39-146.uninet-ide.com.mx [201.134.39.146] failed - > POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT! > > Oct 22 12:49:46 odin sshd[24758]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 201.134.39.146 > > Oct 22 12:49:57 odin sshd[24761]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for > 138-65-162-69.reverse.lstn.net [69.162.65.138] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN > ATTEMPT! > > Oct 22 12:49:57 odin sshd[24761]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 69.162.65.138 > > Oct 22 12:50:15 odin sshd[24770]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 217.128.151.181 > > Oct 22 12:53:04 odin sshd[24774]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for > 86-100-134-185-ip.balticum.lt [86.100.134.185] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN > ATTEMPT! > > Oct 22 12:53:04 odin sshd[24774]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 86.100.134.185 > > Oct 22 12:53:28 odin sshd[24781]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 12.222.202.34 > > Oct 22 12:53:31 odin sshd[24784]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 109.237.210.147 > > Oct 22 12:55:19 odin sshd[24801]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 87.193.246.26 > > Oct 22 12:55:51 odin sshd[24804]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 219.94.144.230 > > Oct 22 12:56:24 odin sshd[24807]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 213.192.8.22 > > Oct 22 12:56:28 odin sshd[24810]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from server.fabian.cz > > Oct 22 12:57:07 odin sshd[24813]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 62.213.201.100 > > Oct 22 12:57:26 odin sshd[24816]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 83.18.24.58 > > Oct 22 12:58:03 odin sshd[24822]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 99.13.226.154 > > Oct 22 12:58:38 odin sshd[24825]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from crm.nepinc.com > > Oct 22 13:00:06 odin sshd[24846]: error: PAM: authentication error for > root from 85.22.60.6 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 17:33:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC674106564A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:33:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CFEC8FC14 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id p9MHXBwF020188 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:33:11 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:33:11 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201110221733.p9MHXBwF020188@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20111022120856.3eb392e3@cox.net> Subject: Re: Configuring IPFW X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:33:26 -0000 > Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:08:56 -0500 > To: FreeBSD > Subject: Re: Configuring IPFW > > On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:56:12 -0400 > Carmel wrote: > > > I am attempting to set up a firewall using IPFW with a stateful > > behavior. > > > > While I have investigated how to set up these rules, I have run into > > conflicting opinions as to whether to all or deny "established" > > behavior. > > > > EXAMPLE: (preceded by a "checkstate" rule) > > > > allow tcp from any to any established > > > > > > Some documentation states that it should be denied and others say it > > should be allowed. Neither has given me a convincing reason to follow > > either scenario or any real documentation either for that fact. > > > > If possible, could someone with some real firewall knowledge and > > familiarity with IPFW please give me some advice. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Well, assuming that you're only allowing the connections you actually > want to be be established to be setup in the first place, then the > logical thing is to then allow any already established connections. This, of course, ignores the possibility that a 'bad guy' might send an initial packet _without_ the 'SYN' flag set. > All of your tcp "allow" rules should include the setup keyword, as well > as keep-state. This way, only connections that are doing a first-time > setup will be allowed, and their state will be remembered, for later > checking using the check-state keyword. Now *THAT*, done _properly_, closes the aforementioned hole. :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 17:39:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6078E106566B for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:39:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from mail.mroute.net (lax-gw09.mailroute.net [199.89.0.109]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F408FC1A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:39:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lax-gw09.mroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198A01385D4; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:39:15 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from red.stonehenge.com (red.stonehenge.com [208.79.95.2]) by lax-gw09.mroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48AD8138492; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:39:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: by red.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 70E263761; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:39:13 -0700 (PDT) From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <000001cc90c0$a0c16050$e24420f0$@org> <4EA2CE72.5030202@cran.org.uk> <20111022161242.11803f76.freebsd@edvax.de> <444nz17xz4.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.18.14.14; tzolkin = 7 Ix; haab = 2 Zac Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:39:13 -0700 In-Reply-To: <444nz17xz4.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> (Lowell Gilbert's message of "Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:11:27 -0400") Message-ID: <8662jh6i4e.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Polytropon Subject: Re: Breakin attempt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:39:16 -0000 >>>>> "Lowell" == Lowell Gilbert writes: Lowell> Connecting from behind other people's paranoid firewalls gets difficult Lowell> on other ports. That's why mine's on 443. Doubly useful when I want to connect to it from behind an outbound web proxy. :) -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 17:51:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68CA106566C for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:51:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (smtprelay04.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7228FC12 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [87.78.63.222] (helo=fabiankeil.de) by smtprelay04.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1RHfjG-0005qL-7j; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 19:51:30 +0200 Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 19:49:29 +0200 From: Fabian Keil To: "Christopher J. Ruwe" Message-ID: <20111022194929.434452ec@fabiankeil.de> In-Reply-To: <20111022185415.25c76aa1@dijkstra> References: <20111021185333.7c197a2a@dijkstra> <20111022160453.35dac1f3@dijkstra> <20111022164508.0dcca5aa@fabiankeil.de> <20111022185415.25c76aa1@dijkstra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/DXxJGEUjKUd1p0n3jJl2hW7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Df-Sender: Nzc1MDY3 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: trying to learn systems programming, fear I have not understood and thus messed up X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:51:32 -0000 --Sig_/DXxJGEUjKUd1p0n3jJl2hW7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Christopher J. Ruwe" wrote: > On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:45:08 +0200 > Fabian Keil wrote: >=20 > > "Christopher J. Ruwe" wrote: > >=20 > > > On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:53:33 +0200 > > > "Christopher J. Ruwe" wrote: > > > As I stil do not know why the latter variant of my code worked and > > > the former does not, I would still appreciate any comment or > > > explanation which would help me understanding GETPWNAM and getpwnam. > >=20 > > I'm not familiar with the code you're working with, > > but according to the man page getpwnam() isn't thread > > safe so you probably shouldn't mess with the returned > > pointer in the first place and only treat the one > > returned by the last call as valid. > >=20 > > Did you try using getpwnam_r() instead? > You are quite right, GETPWNAM() is a macro to getpwnam(), which is not > thread safe. GETPWNAM() is called throughout the code of pw and pw > itself is not threaded, so it should not matter whether the functions > called are thread-safe or not. I am not completely sure on my last > statement though. Do you have other experience regarding this topic? My point is that if getpwnam() isn't thread safe because separate calls are using the same static buffer to return their result (which I didn't verify), and you do something like: pwd =3D GETPWNAM(...) [...] trgpwd =3D GETPWNAM(...) pwd->pw_uid =3D (uid_t) (trgpwd->pw_uid); the second getpwnam() call is going to reuse the memory pointed to by pwd. While I assume your intention was to only change pwd->pw_uid, the second getpwnam() call already had the side effect of overwriting all the other members as well. This would happen in a single-threaded application as well. Fabian --Sig_/DXxJGEUjKUd1p0n3jJl2hW7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk6jAi0ACgkQBYqIVf93VJ1OygCgsEpm+nGFV2SD6L/KMsxekYAa OfMAn25GgK2I6J66cXUR4yBR4cTHlOSu =hYPn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/DXxJGEUjKUd1p0n3jJl2hW7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 19:18:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0B5106566B for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 19:18:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from mail.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88DD8FC08 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 19:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gamma.lan.locolomo.org (gamma.lan.locolomo.org [192.168.0.33]) by mail.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24BD01C0841 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 21:18:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4EA31702.7080406@locolomo.org> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 21:18:26 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <000001cc90c0$a0c16050$e24420f0$@org> <4EA2CE72.5030202@cran.org.uk> <20111022161242.11803f76.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20111022161242.11803f76.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Breakin attempt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 19:18:27 -0000 On 22/10/2011 16:12, Polytropon wrote: > Is there _any_ reason why moving from port 22 to something > different is _not_ a solution? Yes > Reason why I'm asking: Moving SSH away from its default port > seems to be a relatively good solution as break-in attempts > concentrate on default ports. So in case a sysadmin decides > to move SSH to a "hidden" location, what could be an argument > against this decision? Moving to a non standard port does not provide you any additional real security. The random scannings and occasional attacks will disappear from your logs but these are not interesting, they fail because you already hardened your server. Those who are determined to break into your server will also find your ssh running on a non-standard port. On the other hand, those legitimate users who rely on ssh to connect remotely to their account may not be able to because the firewall on the network only allows access to standard ports for whatever reason, and running ssh on port, say, 24 is a non-standard port. It is actually common to block access to most ports and allow access only through a proxy, and then open for those particular services that will not run through a proxy. Hence, if you want to be sure to be able to connect remotely, your best bet is to run your services on standard ports. In summary, nothing is won moving ssh to a nonstandard port except for potential problems. BR, Erik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 19:49:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0CF31065673 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 19:49:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from marvin.chruetertee.ch (marvin.chruetertee.ch [217.150.245.55]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C4DC8FC0A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 19:49:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.38] (123-108.79-83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.79.108.123]) (authenticated bits=0) by marvin.chruetertee.ch (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9MJSgbl031622 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 22 Oct 2011 19:28:47 GMT (envelope-from beat@FreeBSD.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beat_G=E4tzi?= In-Reply-To: <20111022005442.GA68656@whisperer.chthonixia.net> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 21:28:40 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <97324B18-C763-4D11-AB7B-30B0DE98E601@FreeBSD.org> References: <20111022005442.GA68656@whisperer.chthonixia.net> To: freebsd-announce@chthonic.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Upgrading libxul, dependency on Firefox 3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 19:49:47 -0000 On Oct 22, 2011, at 2:54 AM, Joe Altman wrote: > Greetings... >=20 > I was running portupgrade on libxul and noticed it depends on Firefox > 3.x. I cancelled the upgrade, because I thought FF3.x was insecure and > therefore deprecated while FF7 was recommended and secure. >=20 > My questions: >=20 > 1) is the dependency libxul has for FF3 a security problem? libxul doesn't depend on FF3. We just use the FF3.6 source tarball to build xulrunner (libxul) as upstream no longer provides tarballs for the latest xulrunner 1.9.2.x releases. Nevertheless FF3.6 is still supported upstream and security problems get fixed regularly during the normal Mozilla release cycle. > 2) is the dependency on FF3 a bug in libxul? If it is a bug, who > should receive a report: gecko@ or the Mozilla project? There is no FF3 dependency in libxul. HTH, Beat > FYI: I'm pretty sure it was portsclean -D (and not me) that deleted > FF3...yet libxul tried to pull it in during the portupgrade. >=20 > Best regards, >=20 > Joe > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 20:06:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E5A106564A; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 20:06:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-announce@chthonic.com) Received: from www5.pairlite.com (www5.pairlite.com [64.130.10.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76CE68FC12; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 20:06:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whisperer.chthonixia.net (cpe-66-65-69-148.nyc.res.rr.com [66.65.69.148]) by www5.pairlite.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D5F9E2E2BD; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:06:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:10:16 -0400 From: Joe Altman To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20111022201016.GA41340@whisperer.chthonixia.net> References: <20111022005442.GA68656@whisperer.chthonixia.net> <97324B18-C763-4D11-AB7B-30B0DE98E601@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <97324B18-C763-4D11-AB7B-30B0DE98E601@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Subject: Re: Upgrading libxul, dependency on Firefox 3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 20:06:23 -0000 On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 09:28:40PM +0200, Beat G?tzi wrote: > On Oct 22, 2011, at 2:54 AM, Joe Altman wrote: > > Greetings... > > > > I was running portupgrade on libxul and noticed it depends on Firefox > > 3.x. I cancelled the upgrade, because I thought FF3.x was insecure and > > therefore deprecated while FF7 was recommended and secure. > > > > My questions: > > > > 1) is the dependency libxul has for FF3 a security problem? > > libxul doesn't depend on FF3. Got it. Thanks, and best regards, Joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 22:56:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC58D106567D for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 22:56:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (asmtp1.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3B88FC08 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 22:56:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9MMuCVc029792; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 23:56:12 +0100 Received: from orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (host-92-22-130-66.as13285.net [92.22.130.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9MMuBca029785; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 23:56:11 +0100 Received: by orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6610B33C1F; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 23:56:11 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 23:56:11 +0100 From: Frank Shute To: "Christopher J. Ruwe" Message-ID: <20111022225611.GA36172@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <20111021185333.7c197a2a@dijkstra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111021185333.7c197a2a@dijkstra> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE amd64 X-Organisation: 'shute.org.uk' Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: trying to learn systems programming, fear I have not understood and thus messed up X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 22:56:15 -0000 --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 06:53:33PM +0200, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote: > > To improve on my C and to learn something about systems programming, I > have begun to pick out "bite-size bits" from the bin-PRs. Currently, I > am dispairing about bin/149972, which is about 1) adding error handling > to pw being invoced "pw -u " and 2) trying to get a uid from > the (incorrectly) passed username. Currently, I cannot accomplish want > I wanted to do, so I turn here for hints or help. >=20 [snip] Christopher, you're probably best off posting to hackers@ for programming problems pertaining to FreeBSD. Regards, --=20 Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk6jSgoACgkQHduKvUAgeK43EwCgvhB2yuwmrY3F9T5EOwk06SfA tWoAnia6ywew2iJuNLaoG9G95pG42zth =//pV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 23:03:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290A9106566B for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 23:03:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063F78FC0A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 23:03:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82FB5BDC34 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:03:27 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20111022125209.9ba97a1f.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:03:27 -0700 Message-ID: <29197.1319324607@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: Help needed: sound/audio only semi-working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 23:03:28 -0000 In message <20111022125209.9ba97a1f.freebsd@edvax.de>, Polytropon wrote: >On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:29:25 -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >> The really strange thing is that after I followed all the directions here: >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/sound-setup.html >> >> This command: >> >> cat /dev/random > /dev/dsp >> >> *does* produce quite a bit of white noise sound. However when I perform >> the other officially recommended basic audio functionality test: >> >> cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0 play 1 >> >> with one of my favorite old audo CDs in the drive (AND with that special >> little wire running from the back of the drive to my motherboard) all that >> happens is that the CD/DVD drive apparently _does_ start to read some stuff. >.. >> as evidenced by the blinking access light in the front of the drive... but I >> still get no sound out, and YouTube videos still aren't giving me any audio >> even though the video seems to be playing perfectly. > >Does the Handbook mention to check your mixer settings? No, but I _did_ look at that anyway, because something I read while resarching this problem indicated that I should. And those (mixer) settings are all OK. Anyway... NEVERMIND! I fiddled a few things some more last night... nothing that really should have made any difference at all... and I re-booted and today, now, the sound _is_ playing when I watch YouTube videos in Firefox. I really don't understand why because I really didn't change anything. I did install mplayer and cdparanoia, and then I used the latter to suck some .wav files off of one of my old CDs and then used mplayer to play them (which worked OK) but I don't see how any of that should have had any effect on the audio coming out of the flash plugin for Firefox. Oh well! It works now, and mplayer can play .wav and .mp3 files too. So mostly everything is working now, and I am happy. But playing a CD using cdcontrol still is not working. That's OK. I can easily live without that. I was only using it for testing purposes anyway. Still, it is a shame it doesn't just work. >The problem regarding audio CDs seems to be quite "modern". I assume by that you mean quite "recent". Yes? >I also cannot play them anymore (but I don't have that >special wire installed at the moment). Audio is VIA HDA. I do believe that the little wire is manditory. So that explains why it doesn't work for you. But I have the little grey wire installed, so I don't know why it doesn't work for me. >> So how can it be that this works just fine: >> >> cat /dev/random > /dev/dsp >> >> even while this: >> >> cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0 play 1 >> >> causes the disk to spin up and read, but otherwise produces utter silence? > >CD audio subsystem has been "modernized". :-) I wouldn't know about that. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 23:14:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49651106566C for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 23:14:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA048FC08 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 23:14:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-104-16.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.104.16]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED5D1E63D; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 01:14:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p9MNEZoV004198; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 01:14:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 01:14:35 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Message-Id: <20111023011435.66d4cefd.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <29197.1319324607@tristatelogic.com> References: <20111022125209.9ba97a1f.freebsd@edvax.de> <29197.1319324607@tristatelogic.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help needed: sound/audio only semi-working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 23:14:38 -0000 On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:03:27 -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > I did > install mplayer and cdparanoia, and then I used the latter to suck some .wav > files off of one of my old CDs and then used mplayer to play them (which > worked OK) but I don't see how any of that should have had any effect on > the audio coming out of the flash plugin for Firefox. Oh well! It works > now, and mplayer can play .wav and .mp3 files too. So mostly everything is > working now, and I am happy. Both the "Flash" plugin and mplayer use the mixer's pcm channel for output (unlike CD audio). Maybe you'll find that mplayer is able to play *.mp3, but isn't the optimal program to do so - in this case have a look at xmms which can play both *.mp3 and *.ogg (a popular format when you want to make your CDs' content available on your system). And xmms also is able to play CD audio. > But playing a CD using cdcontrol still is not working. That's OK. I can > easily live without that. I was only using it for testing purposes anyway. > Still, it is a shame it doesn't just work. Doesn't work _anymore_. :-) > >The problem regarding audio CDs seems to be quite "modern". > > I assume by that you mean quite "recent". Yes? No, "modern" (note the quotes) indicates disimprovement, reduction and removal of functionality that has been taken as granted for many years. :-) > >I also cannot play them anymore (but I don't have that > >special wire installed at the moment). Audio is VIA HDA. > > I do believe that the little wire is manditory. In this specific case, it is. In my old PC, I had one to connect the ATAPI drive to the sound card (a CMI based PCI card, no onboard stuff). This _did_ work perfectly using "cdcontrol play " and the mixer's CD channel. > So that explains why it > doesn't work for you. But I have the little grey wire installed, so I don't > know why it doesn't work for me. I'll install that wire tomorrow, just to check - I just hope my cheap (and nearly crappy) mainboard does have support for it. I can't use external wiring (to the sound "card's" line-in connector) as the drive doesn't have a front connector anymore. See "modern". :-) OS is 8.2-STABLE/x86 of late August. > >> So how can it be that this works just fine: > >> > >> cat /dev/random > /dev/dsp > >> > >> even while this: > >> > >> cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0 play 1 > >> > >> causes the disk to spin up and read, but otherwise produces utter silence? > > > >CD audio subsystem has been "modernized". :-) > > I wouldn't know about that. As far as I could understand, the track files /dev/acdXtYY will be gone in the upcoming 9.0, as well as the acd device files in favour of cd (the optional, but very nice ATAPICAM interface used by recording programs). Basically, I do appreciate merging acd and cd (so "one device file per device" becomes true), but if the price is that CD audio doesn't work anymore... we'll see. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...