Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 9 May 2007 06:52:37 -0300
From:      AT Matik <asstec@matik.com.br>
To:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Cc:        Kirk Davis <Kirk.Davis@epsb.ca>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Subject:   Re: Policy Routing natd+ipfw
Message-ID:  <200705090652.37906.asstec@matik.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <463FBE30.90009@elischer.org>
References:  <33910a2c0705041812s2aaf0b62t785e16abc0decee6@mail.gmail.com> <DB9A31C316524A4A83E54A2C0D20655702216E5A@Exchange24.EDU.epsb.ca> <463FBE30.90009@elischer.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Monday 07 May 2007 21:02:56 Julian Elischer wrote:
> Kirk Davis wrote:
> > Julian Elischer wrote:
> >> in -current you can implement a routing table via FWD and tables.
> >> in  6.x you need to specify the next hop. and an more explicit rule.
> >
> >    Is there any information floating around on how to do this in current
> > using the FWD rules and tables? Any pointer on where to look.
>
> man ipfw on -current
>
> basically you can implement alternate routing tables..
>
> ipfw table 1 add 0.0.0.0/0 4.5.6.7 # default route for table 1
> ipfw table 1 add 2.3.4.0/24 5.4.3.2 # but not for packets to 2.3.4.x
> ipfw table 2 add 0.0.0.0/0 7.6.5.4 #default route for table 2
> ipfw table 2 add 2.3.4.0/24 6.5.4.3 # but differnet route for packets to
> 2.3.4.x
>


certainly this still are not routing tables but simplified forward table 
configurations right?

what we still need is kind of route2 implementation like Linux does 

Joao









A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik  https://datacenter.matik.com.br



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200705090652.37906.asstec>