Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:28:42 +0100
From:      Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: i386 vs amd64
Message-ID:  <50B657DA.8050700@netfence.it>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1211281045570.66068@wonkity.com>
References:  <20121128123623.4A29.AA011270@yahoo.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1211281045570.66068@wonkity.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On 11/28/12 18:49, Warren Block wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, mike miskulin wrote:
>
>> About to build a replacement system for an older i386 setup.   A few
>> years ago I had tried the amd64 port on it and found it was frustrating
>> as things that just worked on i386 did not on amd64. IIRC ports were
>> large annoyance too.
>>
>> Now I have a new system with 8GB, etc,etc and wonder if I am best off to
>> stick with i386 and PAE or is the amd64 version finally on a par or
>> close enough that I would not likely have many issues like in the past?
>>
>> Thanks for your thoughts/(recent) experiences.
>
> Do you use emulators/wine?  If not, switch to amd64.  In fact, even if
> you do, switch to amd64 to use that 8G of memory.  Building 32-bit Wine
> on amd64 is a hassle, but packages are available and I think there is a
> 64-bit port on the way.

I heard valgrind is another... in case you are a developer.

  bye
	av.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50B657DA.8050700>