From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 22 08:55:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE6FF08; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 08:55:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-da0-f43.google.com (mail-da0-f43.google.com [209.85.210.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB978FC13; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 08:55:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-da0-f43.google.com with SMTP id u36so2467637dak.30 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 00:55:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=7oplZgFm+p8upJ/IP7Qx8ny3Db8PRPbCLFjSMamBdkQ=; b=X0VtYFRiVT5k/6B6/RTgBnK5wauYCRovWA/85361GwcZS6reruVcRThAeC3hohC0Nz f5bhN+Sefr8PwNsR2TWGHXKzvHCN83GqtV0TAp0q+7UfT1aFjBezZZgK7KDqtCm4RLlV mN1W81WcWAAVSMLKZg9jhwQgEevAT/cs+Zv3kq0ZoRYUW+vaQ7E455zKP4aGs3VnQ9uk fa697z+JyR02hMtwa5hPVIOAiqiBgUtpYV9196PFAdJ8BU9K7eG3UK+DzwSi/rONzPD5 ++IfXiKRq0OPe6JYqu58CE/sD6lW0R8gjMupmzt/uVU4jb65P/Z+PJkpanHjZv39/X6S DMfg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.134.232 with SMTP id pn8mr46829620pbb.47.1356166509687; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 00:55:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.218.134 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 00:55:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 09:55:09 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: java/openjdk6 fails to build.. From: David Demelier To: Eitan Adler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: java@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Ronald Klop X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 08:55:10 -0000 Okay, thanks I remove it, i may avoid some compilation problems :) 2012/12/22 Eitan Adler > On 21 December 2012 19:16, David Demelier > wrote: > > Yes, I wanted to answser, but the man says that MAKE_JOBS are disabled by > > default, I tried to build with MAKE_JOBS=1 and it works, the problem did > > appear when MAKE_JOBS=6 was set. Can you reproduce the issue? > > I want to mark this MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and remove the current hack > Any objection from java@ ? > > > I had MAKE_JOBS=6 in my /etc/make.conf instead of MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER though > > Exactly. MAKE_JOBS is not user-settable. MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER is. IMHO > MAKE_JOBS should start with an _. > > > -- > Eitan Adler > -- Demelier David