From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Mar 2 12:16:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from jedi.burnit.net (jedi.burnit.net [151.198.231.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B3A14D63 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 12:16:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wharton@burnit.net) Received: from localhost (wharton@localhost) by jedi.burnit.net (8.9.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA17655; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:19:45 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:19:45 -0500 (EST) From: "Daniel J. Wharton" To: VanHoutJ@hurlburt.af.mil Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FTPD query In-Reply-To: <89A9DA446D81D2118163022048400E8325F634@exwncc001.hurlburt.af.mil> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am wondering what version of NT you are running. So, tell me. Anyway, I have an NT server, and their is an option in there to switch, but as far as that standard ftpd goes, I am not sure. You should check out the ncftpd (I am talking about the ncftp server and not the client). I believe you will find that option in there somewhere. DAN WHARTON ----------------------------------------- System Administrator THE BURNIT NETWORK - www.burnit.net Director of Network Operations BIG SECRET - www.bigsecret.org ----------------------------------------- On Tue, 2 Mar 1999 VanHoutJ@hurlburt.af.mil wrote: > Not really a FreeBSD specific question, but I figure someone has had to deal > with this before - and I hate to think NT (yuk) can accomplish something, > (even something convoluted) that UNIX can't. > > Here's the situation. We have a mainframe here that sends data via FTP to > our FTP server (FreeBSD) for base dissemination. The caveat is this; it > outputs the data in DOS pathname construction, (i.e. data\filepath\filename) > which our ftp server views as a single long filename. Our NT admin claims > that NT can be set to either, so naturally I assumed that there must be some > way to enable a UNIX FTP server to accept or alter DOS based pathnames. > Please don't tell me NT can do this (however moronic it is) and UNIX can't. > > > BTW, I already asked if the mainframe could be re-programmed. Apparently > it's too old and no one wants to mess with it. > > > Thanks in advance folks. > > -John > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message