Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 8 Aug 2002 21:46:52 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <dev-null@NUXI.com>
To:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc:        Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG>, Andrew Kolchoogin <andrew@snark.rinet.ru>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Comments on Release Building for -current
Message-ID:  <20020809044652.GA12216@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020804195905.O1075-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
References:  <20020803123249.B70372@espresso.q9media.com> <20020804195905.O1075-100000@gamplex.bde.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 08:01:10PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > > sorry, but some time ago I read here that gcc -O2 breaks our printf() in
> > > libc. I haven't find any assembler code in /usr/src/lib/libc/stdio/vfprintf.c,
...
> > If someone could find the small segment of code where the optimizer
> > screws up, and write a small program to demonstrate the problem, we
> > would have a good chance of it getting fixed.
> 
> Er, someone (Dan Lukes) has already done this.  See PR 40209.

It looks like this PR is against the system GCC 3.1.  As such it isn't a
very interesting bug report.  Someone needs to test to see if this bug
exists when using the gcc31 (gcc 3.1.1 release) port.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020809044652.GA12216>