From owner-freebsd-current Thu Aug 8 21:46:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E95A37B400; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 21:46:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.92.13.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA2F43E75; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 21:46:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g794ksIK012239; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 21:46:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g794kqXP012238; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 21:46:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 21:46:52 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Bruce Evans Cc: Mike Barcroft , Andrew Kolchoogin , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Comments on Release Building for -current Message-ID: <20020809044652.GA12216@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Mail-Followup-To: David O'Brien , Bruce Evans , Mike Barcroft , Andrew Kolchoogin , current@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020803123249.B70372@espresso.q9media.com> <20020804195905.O1075-100000@gamplex.bde.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020804195905.O1075-100000@gamplex.bde.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 08:01:10PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > sorry, but some time ago I read here that gcc -O2 breaks our printf() in > > > libc. I haven't find any assembler code in /usr/src/lib/libc/stdio/vfprintf.c, ... > > If someone could find the small segment of code where the optimizer > > screws up, and write a small program to demonstrate the problem, we > > would have a good chance of it getting fixed. > > Er, someone (Dan Lukes) has already done this. See PR 40209. It looks like this PR is against the system GCC 3.1. As such it isn't a very interesting bug report. Someone needs to test to see if this bug exists when using the gcc31 (gcc 3.1.1 release) port. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message