From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 23 21:57:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED553106564A; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 21:57:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gkontos.mail@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6FDC8FC0A; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 21:57:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iadj38 with SMTP id j38so17974972iad.13 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 13:57:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=XhtHzezHnm9BECx3CGdFoUzocldIyc1pubhxq1veFW0=; b=YDGsOLyf557dqU/Ba6uuYVEHpdN0yfzv6b9jS/tNJH7U7xYtA9gXmxxoirqqWOFU0V 6U5guIBym4XxS/uI25dL/WsGYsIG3WZOBob6spq4Dr69gBKMgS+ovsMHb0LYc9V2FQxq cVFo9pedmvCFBbHjL42Sas0+V6g6F575n9Zu8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.155.166 with SMTP id vx6mr15843892igb.16.1324677432878; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 13:57:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.15.7 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 13:57:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4EF4A75C.2040609@my.gd> <4EF4B2D6.5090206@sentex.net> <4EF4B982.3070207@missouri.edu> <4EF4C08A.3080609@sentex.net> <4EF4CB2E.4030109@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20111223204838.GA43740@in-addr.com> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 23:57:12 +0200 Message-ID: From: George Kontostanos To: Shawn Webb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 21:57:14 -0000 On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Shawn Webb wrote: > As others have mentioned, you don't _have_ to patch this weekend. All > of the vulnerabilities have been [semi-]public knowledge for at least > a week. What's the harm in waiting till next week? Just pretend like > the patches came in on Tuesday. > > I, for one, am grateful that FreeBSD has provided patches. It allows > people who do have the time/ability to patch this weekend to do just > that. If you don't want to, then don't. Simple as that. > > Thanks, > > Shawn > I wish it was that simple. It is very different to be aware of a possible vulnerability from getting an official security advisory. Unfortunately sometimes, the decision to patch or not to patch, comes from people who decide based upon bureaucracy. I am certainly thankful to the FreeBSD security team for identifying and providing patches. However, when you start receiving emails about security advisories every 5 minutes, you tend to wonder when will they stop :) Regards and happy holidays George