Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 11:25:09 -0700 From: Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> To: Olivier Smedts <olivier@gid0.org> Cc: FreeBSD current mailing list <current@freebsd.org>, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> Subject: Re: problems with em(4) since update to driver 7.2.2 Message-ID: <BANLkTikRamXUF3p3k8-wZHLVZTqQEO8zBw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTik36Yqtj%2B4H9Zd388ORBFEt3z1u=w@mail.gmail.com> References: <BANLkTinrfZbO%2BMUDDuzsoaN1y-=_O8LgNA@mail.gmail.com> <4D94A354.9080903@sentex.net> <AANLkTik_XPsVWL-KqHkPic1KQ0SdCSk6u_9ykRefi3VE@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=K5ASG9TWLAh5r%2Bzo9Wy1stMf9WA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikPPzxZ6XRAaqrvdeXBp=Ydvz7hNg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=rhZ0dyO6Zq13jY6-NKVE8n24YyQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DC07013.9070707@gmx.net> <BANLkTi=DmQsVvJOaoxMr5GPOLkjs7sdTxQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DC078BD.9080908@gmx.net> <BANLkTin1ykoo80%2B9iWe%2Bg5ib1DXw%2B05BgQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=STPT13-50dxMRgjLP_pyxL9Utyw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikX8gs7Ln2KLZkA=MyieeCR%2BzKXzQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikj-wSOFWQX9Y_yN54Q_jk-=vD3LA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTin0ANtbWGv4CTr%2BO5xEL58hVRDefg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikzpjxe%2BcMYiTRak0B0tnkhrW%2BBow@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikUJOD%2BtzYoiHCoWHrD36PxLQgN7A@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTin2j3QzO0pwVHe9Nm-L8otEf9pcbg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinmKH40yx5Mgu9zgQ2qEF2O-n6HMQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikehcbxm0MQtb0SQ0giSfhmkHw99A@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikkbpW6_jE5QznGjAt4Zcpee0RagQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimVc2Chq9iKrRVCBfqg6WPmt_O=6w@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimXU3eRTPtUDfxX2FwsJ=uHs3xS3A@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTik36Yqtj%2B4H9Zd388ORBFEt3z1u=w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Not sure, I wondered if those seeing this had some special sequence of actions they took for granted that is different than what we do in house... In any case, the init really is ultimately a correctness thing, so let's just call it good :) Jack On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Olivier Smedts <olivier@gid0.org> wrote: > 2011/5/5 Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>: > > Anyway, I see the problematic code path, its only when > > you skip the while loop altogether. I'm surprised the compiler > > did not complain about this, its usually so anal. > > Could it be related to the compiler (clang) or some optimization flags ? > > -- > Olivier Smedts _ > ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) > e-mail: olivier@gid0.org - against HTML email & vCards X > www: http://www.gid0.org - against proprietary attachments / \ > > "Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde : > ceux qui comprennent le binaire, > et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas." >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTikRamXUF3p3k8-wZHLVZTqQEO8zBw>