Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 11:50:15 +0800 From: Martin Wilke <miwi.fbsd@gmail.com> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: "svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org" <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>, Danilo Egea Gondolfo <danilo@freebsd.org>, "svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org" <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r344402 - head/math/primegen Message-ID: <CAFY%2ByEnFDeqi17hkhegF5Ha9q4VDPVgozh4iyX%2BNxF-rr31xZA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20140305033615.GB91204@FreeBSD.org> References: <201402151509.s1FF9VUc063590@svn.freebsd.org> <20140305025848.GA91204@FreeBSD.org> <CAFY%2ByEmWH7B3ZgC6Q1ZHvQaUEvRKhypVe2%2Bn9q4=FEF89O05dg@mail.gmail.com> <20140305033615.GB91204@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I do agree with you. But in the end it is still the maintainer where have to take care of it, or at least that person where find a problem and wants to fix it. Thats why I think it should be still maintainer/committer choice. In the end nobody care about the output as long everything build/package is fine. On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 11:21:20AM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote: > > No, there is no such rule to enable/disable it. > > If it's not documented in the PH yet, then it should. I'll add it to my > TODO list. > > > It is still maintainer/committer choice. > > I think I've given reasons clear and valid enough to strongly prefer vocal > installations. Pessimizing debugging, leaving users unaware of what's > going > on is bad, and we should not encourage it. > > In fact, most of the times muted commands are there not by choice, but due > to lack of initial thought of implications of doind so. > > ./danfe >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFY%2ByEnFDeqi17hkhegF5Ha9q4VDPVgozh4iyX%2BNxF-rr31xZA>