From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 20 14:16:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D089106566B for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:16:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (adsl-63-193-123-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.123.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43208FC16 for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:16:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m6KDkRpf031340; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 06:46:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@bunrab.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id m6KDkRtV031339; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 06:46:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 06:46:27 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: Ashish Shukla ???????????? ??????????????? Message-ID: <20080720134627.GK13924@bunrab.catwhisker.org> References: <873am4bu7a.fsf@chateau.d.lf> <20080720124951.GJ13924@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <87prp8acyf.fsf@chateau.d.lf> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YnMEyEaIoW4wzvEg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87prp8acyf.fsf@chateau.d.lf> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List Subject: Re: How to post good follow-ups to bug-followup@ ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:16:55 -0000 --YnMEyEaIoW4wzvEg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 07:13:04PM +0530, Ashish Shukla ???????????? ??????= ????????? wrote: > ... > > So either encoding them so they do get properly decoded, or ensuring > > that they remain as-is (no MIME encoding or claims of same) should do > > the trick. I think I'd be more inclined toward the latter approach, if > > possible. >=20 > You mean, no quoted-printable attachments, but using 7bit > Content-Transfer-Encoding instead, hmm...? I suspect that Fabian Keil's suggestion that the Web interface might have trouble with signed messages may well be on the mark. Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org I submit that "conspiracy" would be an appropriate collective noun for cats. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --YnMEyEaIoW4wzvEg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiDQbIACgkQmprOCmdXAD3MBgCeIbexbJh3LHSX4FxVDnTmdCuy hJsAn1pspujsQqzndU2Z9yISvVc++o6O =VWp0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YnMEyEaIoW4wzvEg--