Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 3 May 2004 01:14:23 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Pete Fritchman <petef@absolutbsd.org>, freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] small speedups in Mk/bsd.port.mk
Message-ID:  <20040503081423.GA99522@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040503080953.GA12341@isis.wad.cz>
References:  <20040502050806.C12FB177CB@sirius.firepipe.net> <20040502070355.GA345@isis.wad.cz> <20040503065209.GA92943@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040503080953.GA12341@isis.wad.cz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 10:09:53AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> # kris@obsecurity.org / 2004-05-02 23:52:09 -0700:
> > On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 09:03:55AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> >=20
> > >     Hrmph, right, dot is just one of regexp metacharacters.
> > >     This version uses plain string comparisons in DISTINFO_SIZE_AWK a=
nd
> > >     DISTINFO_CKSUM_AWK.
> > >=20
> > >     Thanks again for testing! This would have taken weeks if I submit=
ted
> > >     the patch right away.
> >=20
> > But that's why you should always test patches thoroughly before
> > submitting them, right? ;-)
>=20
>     Yes, and I didn't mean to imply anything except that dealing with
>     portmgr@ is slow business.
>    =20
>     As I said, my box has cooling problems, e. g. it couldn't finish two
>     consecutive builds of mod_php4 yesterday. Plus, testing can't prove
>     absence of bugs, and I of course tested all changes, but missed some
>     things, like the fact that there are more RE metacharacters than
>     just the dot. That's what public testing is good for, right? :)
>=20
>     BTW any progress with ports/40699? Average response time from
>     portmgr@ 7 months, and it's been suspended ("the patch doesn't apply
>     anymore"; no wonder two years after it's been submitted :) for more
>     than month despite three new versions of the patch?

We'll be able to look at it once 4.10 is out the door.

Kris

--5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAlf9eWry0BWjoQKURArWwAJ9fC7bxlr9PaZH2L01Sj8ZcahPD0QCg0Pg7
X+4eHub+VoRd7f9L/8+qvY8=
=klT6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040503081423.GA99522>