Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 14:03:26 -0500 (CDT) From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/gzip Makefile ports/archivers/ucl Makefile ports/archivers/lzop Makefile ports/archivers/cabextract Makefile ports/archivers/dact Makefile ports/archivers/star Makefile Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0504111403100.10456-100000@pancho> In-Reply-To: <20050411184433.GA69339@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: > The first issue here is timing. As reminded in my original email > there are not supposed to be any sweeping commits during the ports > slush. The second issue is the amount of breakage that happened here > due to untested changes and apparent lack of visual review of the diff > prior to committing. I believe that most of that will be caught by a > simple review of the diff, which you've probably completed already. > I'll be happy for you to commit the rest of the changes after the > slush ends, but for now we need to go back to a relatively clean > slate. I support this. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.44.0504111403100.10456-100000>