From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 8 04:32:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510A016A4CE; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 04:32:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBFA743D5C; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 04:32:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4]) by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i584W1tD015956; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 00:32:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 00:32:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com To: Sean McNeil In-Reply-To: <1086663455.1258.79.camel@server.mcneil.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: weak implementation of threads has problems - kse fix attached X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 04:32:05 -0000 On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Sean McNeil wrote: > > Up front, I'd like to make a few apologies: > > 1) I am sorry for the length of this email. > 2) Although some very valid opinions have been expressed, I respectfully > have to disagree. This email will hopefully strengthen my position. Please stop spamming multiple lists. No, I don't want to litter all our thread libraries with strong references. As I've said before, build your shared libraries correctly so they don't bring in the threads library. -- Dan Eischen