Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:08:37 -0400 From: "Ben Kaduk" <minimarmot@gmail.com> To: "John Birrell" <jb@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/cddl Makefile.inc src/cddl/lib/libavl Makefile src/cddl/lib/libnvpair Makefile src/cddl/lib/libumem Makefile src/cddl/lib/libuutil Makefile src/cddl/lib/libzfs Makefile src/cddl/lib/libzpool Makefile src/cddl/sbin/zfs Makefile ... Message-ID: <47d0403c0803272008u127e61f0u1296d99e6f9d220c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200803272321.m2RNLQGT083530@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200803272321.m2RNLQGT083530@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/27/08, John Birrell <jb@freebsd.org> wrote: > jb 2008-03-27 23:21:25 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > Log: > The sources covered by Sun's CDDL have been repo copied below the > src/cddl and src/sys/cddl directories per the core@ decision following > the license review. > > This change modifies the affected Makefiles to reference the sources > in their new location. I somehow got the impression that it was traditional to make a forced commit to the files that were repo-copied, to note in their histories when that transition took place. Did I get this impression in error? Thanks, Ben Kaduk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47d0403c0803272008u127e61f0u1296d99e6f9d220c>